Effects of Water and Fertilizer Cooperation on Production Performance and Quality of Legume-Grass Mixed Pasture in North China Plain

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.024

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3547-3553.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.024

Effects of Water and Fertilizer Cooperation on Production Performance and Quality of Legume-Grass Mixed Pasture in North China Plain

WU Qiong¹, YAO Ze-ying¹, WEI Xiao-ting², LU Xin-ming⁴, WU Rui-xin³, YOU Yong-liang³, HU Meng-ai¹, SHI Li-na¹, SHI Yu-chuan¹, LI Yuan³, ZHAO Hai-ming³, HAN Jia-yi¹, SHAO Xin-qing¹

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Chinese Academy of Forestry, Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Beijing 100091, China;
3. Dryland Farming Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Hebei Key Laboratory of Crops Drought Resistance, Hengshui, Hebei Province 053000, China;
4. Tianshui Fruit Research Institute, Tianshui, Gansu Province 741002, China

Received:2024-05-06 Revised:2024-06-30 Published:2024-11-29

水肥协作对华北平原豆禾混播牧草生产性能和品质的影响

吴琼¹, 姚泽英¹, 位晓婷², 逯新明⁴, 武瑞鑫³, 游永亮³, 胡蒙爱¹, 石丽娜¹, 石雨川¹, 李源³, 赵海明³, 韩伽怡¹, 邵新庆¹

1. 中国农业大学草业科学与技术学院, 北京 100193;
2. 中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所, 北京 100091;
3. 河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所河北省农作物抗旱研究重点实验室, 河北衡水 053000;
4. 天水市果树研究所, 甘肃天水 741002

通讯作者: 邵新庆,E-mail:shaoxinqing@163.com;位晓婷,E-mail:weixiaoting6@163.com
作者简介:吴琼(2001-),女,汉族,河北邢台人,硕士研究生,主要从事粮草轮作生产力提升与土壤改良效应研究,E-mail:wuqiong200126@163.com
基金资助:
优质饲草和种子丰产栽培与高效利用技术(2022YFD1300804)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of water reduction and fertilizer reduction on the performance and quality of mixed sowing grass in North China Plain,and to screen suitable water and fertilizer treatment in this area. In this study,the forage established by mixed sowing of Triticale + Vicia villosa and Avena sativa + Vicia sativa was taken as the test object. Two gradients were set for irrigation and fertilization,respectively. The performance and nutritional quality of forage mixed with water and fertilizer were compared and evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The results showed that the dry matter yield of both modes was the highest under 1500 m³·hm^-2+94 kg·hm^-2(W₂N₁) treatment,and the dry matter yield and the content of medium acid detergent fiber were lower under 750 m³·hm^-2+188 kg·hm^-2 (W₁N₂) treatment,but the soluble sugar content was higher. The results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation showed that both models performed well under the treatment of 750 m³·hm^-2 +188 kg·hm^-2 (W₁N₂),and the membership degree was above 0.6. In conclusion,in the North China Plain,the optimum water and fertilizer treatment for mixed forage cultivation for dry matter yield is 1500 m³·hm^-2 +94 kg·hm^-2 (W₂N₁). In order to pursue comprehensive performance (dry matter yield +forage quality),750 m³·hm^-2+188 kg·hm^-2(W₁N₂) was suitable for water and fertilizer treatment.

Key words: Water and fertilizer cooperation, Mixed sowing of beans and grains, Production performance, Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, Nutritional quality

摘要： 为探明减水减肥对华北平原豆禾混播牧草生产性能和品质的影响，并筛选适宜该地区的水肥处理。本研究以小黑麦(Triticale)+毛苕子(Vicia villosa)(XM)和燕麦(Avena sativa)+箭筈豌豆(Vicia sativa)(YJ)混播建植的牧草为试验对象，设置2个灌水(W₁和W₂)和2个施肥(N₁和N₂)梯度，比较水肥协作下混播牧草生产性能和营养品质等指标，并利用模糊综合评价法进行评估。结果表明：两种模式干物质产量均在1500 m³·hm^-2+94 kg·hm^-2(W₂N₁)处理下最高；而750 m³·hm^-2+188 kg·hm^-2(W₁N₂)处理下干物质产量、中性洗涤纤维含量、酸性洗涤纤维含量较低，但可溶性糖含量较高。通过模糊综合评价表明，两种模式均在750 m³·hm^-2+188 kg·hm^-2(W₁N₂)处理下综合表现较好，隶属度在0.6以上。综上，在华北平原地区，混播牧草栽培以干物质产量为目的时，适宜水肥处理为1500 m³·hm^-2+94 kg·hm^-2(W₂N₁)；以追求综合性能(干物质产量+牧草品质)为目的时，适宜水肥处理为750 m³·hm^-2+188 kg·hm^-2(W₁N₂)。

关键词: 水肥协作, 豆禾混播, 生产性能, 模糊综合评价, 营养品质

CLC Number:

S542
S544

WU Qiong, YAO Ze-ying, WEI Xiao-ting, LU Xin-ming, WU Rui-xin, YOU Yong-liang, HU Meng-ai, SHI Li-na, SHI Yu-chuan, LI Yuan, ZHAO Hai-ming, HAN Jia-yi, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Cooperation on Production Performance and Quality of Legume-Grass Mixed Pasture in North China Plain[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3547-3553.

吴琼, 姚泽英, 位晓婷, 逯新明, 武瑞鑫, 游永亮, 胡蒙爱, 石丽娜, 石雨川, 李源, 赵海明, 韩伽怡, 邵新庆. 水肥协作对华北平原豆禾混播牧草生产性能和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3547-3553.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I11/3547

References

[1] 周长春,张清涛. 水资源危机的内涵及黄淮海平原水资源分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究,2004(1):79-80
[2] 王大鹏,吴文良,顾松东,等. 华北高产粮区基于种植制度调整和水氮优化的节水效应[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(2):1-8
[3] 倪玉雪,李萌,宋建燕,等. 冬小麦需肥规律及化肥减量增效技术[J]. 现代农村科技,2021(12):54-55
[4] 潘家荣,巨晓棠,刘学军,等. 水氮优化条件下在华北平原冬小麦/夏玉米轮作中化肥氮的去向[J]. 核农学报,2009,23(2):334-340,307
[5] 蔡媛媛,王瑞琪,王丽丽,等. 华北平原不同施氮量与施肥模式对作物产量与氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2020,37(4):503-510
[6] 黄峰,杜太生,王素芬,等. 华北地区农业水资源现状和未来保障研究[J]. 中国工程科学,2019,21(5):28-37
[7] 张光辉,费宇红,刘春华,等. 华北平原灌溉用水强度与地下水承载力适应性状况[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(1):1-10
[8] 洪绂曾. 谈谈饲料作物和牧草与种植业结构调整的问题[J]. 作物杂志,2000(2):1-4
[9] 潘国艳,欧阳竹,李鹏. 华北平原主要优质牧草的种植模式与产业发展方向[J]. 资源科学,2007,29(2):15-20
[10] 徐春燕,张倩,贠一鸣,等. 有机肥替代化学氮肥对冬小麦-夏玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J/OL]. https://doi.org/10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20240603.002,2024-06-04/2024-07-04
[11] 翟思龙,张云虹,张永吉,等. 油菜秸秆还田条件下氮肥运筹对水稻产量和土壤可利用氮的影响[J/OL].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5498.S.20240525.1043.002.html,2024-05-28/2024-07-04
[12] 王东. 黄淮流域冬小麦按需补灌方法及其应用[J]. 水土保持学报,2017,31(6):220-228
[13] 王慧军,张喜英. 华北平原地下水压采区冬小麦种植综合效应探讨[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(5):724-733
[14] 孙蕊,董心亮,赵长龙,等. 气候×基因型×水分管理对河北平原冬小麦产量和WUE的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(2):200-210
[15] 李争艳,徐智明. 豆科牧草在肉羊生产中的应用[J]. 北方牧业,2023(21):15
[16] 窦梓镱,郑伟华,田燕燕,等. 一年生豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合比较[J]. 草业科学,2023,40(10):2639-2650
[17] 张永亮,高凯,于铁峰,等. 禾草种类与混播比例对苜蓿-禾草混播系统生产力及种间关系的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2020,42(2):47-57
[18] 张江辉,刘洪波,白云岗,等. 极端干旱区滴灌葡萄水肥耦合效应研究[J]. 土壤学报,2018,55(4):804-814
[19] 孙伶俐,孟翔,谢开云,等. 不同混播模式对播种当年牧草产量和营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(1):340-348
[20] KHUDYAKOVA K K,KOSOLAPOVA V G. Determining the structural carbohydrates and lignin levels in forage using the Van Soest and Kizel Methods[J]. Russian Agricultural Sciences,2022,48:400-404
[21] 何亚灵,韦潇,曾泰儒,等. 氮肥水平对豆禾混播草地产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2022,40(5):721-727,745
[22] 冯琴,王斌,王腾飞,等. 不同播种量毛苕子与燕麦混播对草地生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(12):3439-3446
[23] 熊乙,许庆方,玉柱,等. 不同苜蓿干草营养成分及饲用价值评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(5):1262-1266
[24] 马彦麟,齐广平,汪精海,等. 西北荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿产量和营养品质对水肥调控的响应[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2018,53(6):171-179,186
[25] 岳正山. 内蒙古地区黑麦草规模化生产效益分析[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2022:52-38
[26] 周燕飞,高雪芹,田静,等. 宁夏干旱风沙区羊草水肥效应研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(11):13-22
[27] 戚秋慧,盛修武,姜恕. 灌水施肥对羊草(Aneurolepidium chinense)草原群落光合速率的影响[J]. 植物研究,1990(3):99-105
[28] 李源. 水肥耦合对垄作沟灌小麦-玉米土壤水氮分布及产量的影响[J]. 农业与技术,2023,43(21):18-26
[29] 苗晓茸,孙艳梅,于磊,等. 氮磷互作对不同茬次滴灌苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(9):55-66
[30] 王运涛,杨志敏,刘建成,等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1311-1318
[31] 陈小凤,李杨瑞,叶燕萍. 3种禾本科牧草饲用品质的季节动态分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2011,24(3):1173-1177
[32] 毕盛楠. 施肥补播对退化苜蓿草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2019:48-40
[33] 胡冬雪,王建丽,潘多锋,等. 施氮肥对羊草栽培草地生产性能及品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2017,39(1):35-41
[34] 白春生,佟明昊,赵萌萌,等. 施氮量和留茬高度对高丹草青贮发酵品质及饲用价值的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1421-1426
[35] 徐鑫磊,宋彦涛,赵京东,等. 施肥和刈割对呼伦贝尔草甸草原牧草品质的影响及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(7):1-10
[36] 李文晶,王俊锋,高晓荻,等. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(4):743-748
[37] 杨金虎,李立军,张艳丽,等. 燕麦箭筈豌豆间作及施肥对科尔沁沙地饲草产量和品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(6):179-189
[38] 史志强,裴亚斌,徐强,等. 甘南高寒牧区甘农2号小黑麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(9):1771-1781
[39] 罗海玲,龚明霞,周芸伊,等. 利用隶属函数法对山药种质资源品质和产量进行综合评价[J]. 西南农业学报,2018,31(5):911-916

Effects of Water and Fertilizer Cooperation on Production Performance and Quality of Legume-Grass Mixed Pasture in North China Plain

水肥协作对华北平原豆禾混播牧草生产性能和品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DONG Zhi-xiao, XIONG Yi, XIONG Yan-li, ZHAO Jun-ming, ZHANG Jian-bo, PENG Jing-han, CHEN Shu-ming, MIN wei, YU QING-qing, MA Xiao. Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Eleven Forage Sorghum Varieties in Liangshan Prefecture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(9): 2934-2942.
[2]	ZHU Hao, ZHANG Hui-hui, ZHANG Xue-zhou, LIANG Wei-wei, ASIYA Manlike, GUAN Ting-xian, WANG Xue-min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance of 15 Introduced Forage Oat Varieties in Changji,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2151-2157.
[3]	CHAI Yu-xin, JIA Shu-an, ZHANG Tian, LI Xiao, CHEN Yong-cheng, HUANG Rong-zheng, ZHANG Fan-fan. Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on Silage Quality of Urtica cannabina and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Sheep [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2283-2289.
[4]	YUE Jing-zhi, SUN Mi-ping, CHEN Li, ZHANG Qing-she, NIU Xiao-pei, ZHANG Yue-ling, DU Wen-hua, XIAO Xing-zhong, CAI You-min. Effects of Mowing Methods on Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Triticale in Northwest Henan Province,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2297-2304.
[5]	WANG Long-ran, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, WEI Xi-jie, FU Yun-jie, XU Cheng-ti. Comparison of Feeding Quality and Production Performance of Different Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) Varieties in the Arid Zone of Eastern Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(6): 1936-1943.
[6]	YE Yu-nong, YU Shu-yan, WANG Xing, SONG Wen-xue, WANG Jing, HU Peng-fei, WANG Tong-rui, GAO Xue-qin, FU Bing-zhe. Effect of Irrigation Methods and Phosphorus on the Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1592-1600.
[7]	BAO Wen-long, REN Jia-hui, ZHANG Teng-wei, ZHAO Jin-mei, WANG Zhao-lan, WANG Feng-wu, TANG Jia-gao, YIN Guo-mei, HAN Yun-peng, SUN Juan-juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176.
[8]	HUANG Jing, ZHAO Na, GUO Wan-zheng, JIN Feng, CHEN Fang, ZHU Wei, FAN Qi-wen, DU En-cun, TAO Wen-jing, HUANG Shao-wen, WEI Jin-tao. Effects of Fermented Mulberry Branch and Leaf Meal on Production Performance, Egg Quality and Intestinal Tissue Morphology of Laying Hens [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1259-1266.
[9]	HE Peng-liang, JIE Hong-dong, ZHU Ning-jing, LUO Zi-xuan, XU Yan, XIE Zhi-yu, XING Hu-cheng, JIE Yu-cheng. Comparison of Silage Maize Production Performance in the Eastern and Western Regions of Hunan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 977-984.
[10]	NAN Ding-han, GE Gen-tu, WANG Zhi-jun, ZHAO Mu-qi-er, YAN Xing-quan, ZHU Na. Study on Optimal Modeling Method for Nutritional Quality of Multi-Flowered Ryegrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 610-619.
[11]	WANG Yu, LI Qi-zheng, MA Xiao-dong, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, LAN Jian, ZHANG Yu. Effects of Different Sowing and Cutting Periods Study on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Triticosecale Wittmack in Rain-fed Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 637-645.
[12]	SANG Rui-juan, DONG Chun-yang, ZHANG Xiao-xia, LIU Yi-dan, SUN Hao, LIU Bo-shuai, MA Sen, LI De-feng. Selection and Evaluation of Silage Maize Varieties in Northern Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3472-3479.
[13]	WANG Ming, SHI Shang-li, CHENG Xi, WEI Bing-huan, YANG Bo-xiang, ZHOU Ting-ting, KANG Wen-juan, LIU Lin-bo. Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of ‘Qingshui’ Male Sterile Sterile Line and Male Parent Varieties of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3480-3489.
[14]	YU Ai-ping, JIANG Ang-chen, ZHANG Hao-hao, CHEN Ai-ping. Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Qroductivity of 14 Bromus inermis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3205-3214.
[15]	ZHAO Ya-jiao, LIU Xiao-jing, LIN Fang. Effects of Different Intercropping Systems with Forage Combinations on Their Nutrition and Feeding Quality in Lanzhou Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3241-3251.