Trade-off Relationship of Typical Vegetation Ecosystem Functions in Loess Hilly Areas

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.028

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1234-1242.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.028

Trade-off Relationship of Typical Vegetation Ecosystem Functions in Loess Hilly Areas

ZHANG Fei¹, ZHENG Cheng¹, YUAN Liu-huan¹, LIN Zi-qi¹, YAO Hong-bin¹, WEN Zhong-ming^1,2

1. College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2023-11-22 Revised:2024-01-29 Published:2024-05-07

黄土丘陵区典型植被生态系统功能的权衡关系

张飞¹, 郑诚¹, 袁浏欢¹, 林子琦¹, 姚宏斌¹, 温仲明^1,2

1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨陵 712100;
2. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨陵 712100

通讯作者: 温仲明,E-mail:zmwen@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:张飞(1999-)，男，汉族，陕西榆林人，硕士研究生，主要从事植被恢复及草地生态学研究，E-mail：zhangf1020@nwafu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41671289；41977077)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the trade-off relationship of the ecosystem functions on the Loess Plateau,we focused on the shrub,natural grassland,abandoned grassland,and tree communities after vegetation restoration to investigate the differences and trade-off relationships among four ecosystem function indicators of biomass production,soil moisture content,soil nutrient content,and species diversity,based on the root mean square deviation (RMSD). The results showed that significant differences of ecosystem function indicators were observed among the four vegetation communities. The highest trade-off was obtained between biomass and the other ecosystem function indicators in all the communities,with RMSD ranging from 0.27 to 0.53. The ecosystem function indicators of the tree community were seriously imbalanced,suggesting that biomass reduction be preferred for a balanced development of all the indicators. A moderate imbalance of ecosystem function indicators was observed in the shrub and natural grassland communities,which are the two vegetation types more suitable for vegetation restoration in this area,and soil nutrient content and soil moisture content need to be improved for the shrub and natural grassland communities respectively. The least imbalance degree was found in the abandoned grassland,in spite of low values of ecosystem function indicators,which needs to improve species diversity and biomass. Our results provide basis for vegetation restoration and sustainable development on the Loess Plateau.

Key words: Loess hilly, Vegetation restoration, Vegetation type, Ecosystem function, Trade-off

摘要： 为探究黄土高原植被恢复形成各群落生态系统功能权衡关系，本研究以植被恢复形成的灌木、自然草地、撂荒草地及乔木群落为对象，采用均方根偏差法(Root mean square deviation，RMSD)研究了生物量生产、土壤含水量、土壤养分含量、物种多样性4种生态系统功能差异及其权衡关系。结果表明：各植被类型间生态系统功能差异显著；各植被类型最高权衡均出现在生物量与其他生态系统功能间，RMSD在0.27~0.53间变化；乔木群落生态系统功能严重失衡，需要降低生物量促进各功能协调发展；灌木群落和自然草地群落生态系统功能中度失衡，是较为适合该区域的植被恢复的类型，两种群落分别需要改善土壤养分含量和土壤含水量；撂荒草地失衡程度最轻但生态系统功能低下，需要提升物种多样性及生物量。研究结果为黄土高原植被恢复调控与可持续发展提供依据。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 植被恢复, 植被类型, 生态系统功能, 权衡关系

CLC Number:

S284

ZHANG Fei, ZHENG Cheng, YUAN Liu-huan, LIN Zi-qi, YAO Hong-bin, WEN Zhong-ming. Trade-off Relationship of Typical Vegetation Ecosystem Functions in Loess Hilly Areas[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1234-1242.

张飞, 郑诚, 袁浏欢, 林子琦, 姚宏斌, 温仲明. 黄土丘陵区典型植被生态系统功能的权衡关系[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1234-1242.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I4/1234

References

[1] YANG X H,ZHANG X P,LV D，et al. Remote sensing estimation of the soil erosion cover-management factor for China’s Loess Plateau [J]. Land Degradation & Development,2020,31(15):1942-1955
[2] LI J J,PENG S Z,LI Z. Detecting and attributing vegetation changes on China’s Loess Plateau [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2017,247:260-270
[3] WANG X H,WANG B T,XU X Y，et al. Spatial and temporal variations in surface soil moisture and vegetation cover in the Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,95:320-330
[4] ZHAO J,FENG X M,DENG L，et al. Quantifying the effects of vegetation restorations on the soil erosion export and nutrient loss on the Loess Plateau[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,11
[5] ZHANG S L,YANG D W,YANG Y T，et al. Excessive afforestation and soil drying on china’s Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences,2018,123(3):923-935
[6] CAO S X,ZHANG J Z,CHEN L，et al. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China,and lessons for other developing countries [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2016,183:843-849
[7] 孟婷婷,王欢元,刘金宝,等. 黄土丘陵区退耕还林草对深层土壤水分动态的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2021,40(12):78-84
[8] 赵跃中,穆兴民,严宝文,等. 延河流域植被恢复对径流泥沙的影响[J]. 泥沙研究,2014(4):67-73
[9] 马婧怡,贾宁凤,程曼. 黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤水分变化特征[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(10):3471-3481
[10] 侯庆春,黄旭,韩仕峰,等. 关于黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究Ⅲ:小老树的成因及其改造途径[J]. 水土保持学报,1991(4):80-86
[11] 李玉新,赵忠,陈金泉. 不同林龄人工沙棘林结构与林下物种多样性研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2010,30(4):776-785
[12] 唐翠平,李小婷,袁思安,等. 中国沙棘人工林早衰成因及相应对策[J]. 国际沙棘研究与开发,2013,11(4):4-9
[13] FU B J,ZHANG L W,XU Z H，et al. Ecosystem services in changing land use [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2015,15(4):833-843
[14] 包玉斌. 陕北黄土高原退耕还林还草工程产水效应[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2021,32(6):49-56,64
[15] 杨丽霞,陈少锋,安娟娟,等. 陕北黄土丘陵区不同植被类型群落多样性与土壤有机质、全氮关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(2):291-298
[16] 张海东,汝海丽,焦峰. 黄土丘陵区典型植被类型草本层生态学特性与环境解释[J]. 水土保持研究,2015,22(5):100-105
[17] 徐明,张健,刘国彬,等. 植被类型和降雨量对沟谷地土壤水分和温度空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3):499-507
[18] 李静,蔚晓燕,唐明. 黄土高原纸坊沟流域不同植物对土壤微生物生物量和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2013,33(2):387-393
[19] 巩杰,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等. 黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(1):93-96
[20] 肖列,刘国彬,薛萐,等. 黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤水分及地上生物量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2016,36(04):204-209,215
[21] BRADFORD J B,D’AMATO A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2012,10(4):210-216
[22] 郭茹茹,杨磊,李宗善,等. 黄土高原半干旱区苜蓿草地撂荒过程生态功能的权衡分析[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(9):1698-1709
[23] 杨阳,窦艳星,王云强,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(20):8152-8168
[24] LU N,FU B J,JIN T T,et al. Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology,2014,29(10):1697-1708
[25] YANG Y T,FAN Y M,BASANG C M J，et al. Different biomass production and soil water patterns between natural and artificial vegetation along an environmental gradient on the Loess Plateau [J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,814:152839
[26] SU B Q,SU Z X,SHANGGUAN Z P. Trade-off analyses of plant biomass and soil moisture relations on the Loess Plateau [J]. Catena,2021,197:104946
[27] WANG J,ZHAO W W,XU Z X,et al. Plant functional traits explain long-term differences in ecosystem services between artificial forests and natural grasslands [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2023,345:118853
[28] 叶璇,康帅直,赵永华,等. 陕北黄土高原植被恢复与生态系统服务的时空关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(10):2760-2768
[29] 何佳瑛,蒋晓辉,雷宇昕. 黄土高原生态工程对关键生态系统服务时空变化的影响——以延河流域为例[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(12):4823-4834
[30] 王一佩.半湿润黄土区刺槐人工林生产力和土壤微生物群落对降雨减少的响应[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020:7-8
[31] 王伟峰,段玉玺,李少博,等. 毛乌素沙地3种典型灌木生物量分配与土壤含水量特征[J]. 西部林业科学,2018,47(3):45-49
[32] 马克平,刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性,1994(4):231-239
[33] 郭彩云.内蒙古大青山不同植被类型生态系统服务权衡与协同[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2023:14
[34] SUN J,MA B B,LU X Y. Grazing enhances soil nutrient effects:Trade-offs between aboveground and belowground biomass in alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2018,29(2):337-348
[35] 许小明,张晓萍,何亮,等. 黄土丘陵区不同恢复植被类型的固碳特征[J]. 环境科学,2022,43(11):5263-5273
[36] 杨永东,张建生,蔡国军,等. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型土壤水分动态变化[J]. 水土保持研究,2008(4):149-151,156
[37] 张轩华,黄亚楠,李志. 陕北黄土区深剖面土壤水的多因子联合作用及主控因素[J]. 水土保持研究,2023,30(3):173-180,187
[38] HUANG T M,PANG Z H,LIU J L，et al. Groundwater recharge mechanism in an integrated tableland of the Loess Plateau,northern China:insights from environmental tracers [J]. Hydrogeology Journal,2017,25(7):2049-2065
[39] 黄泽.黄土高原不同土地利用类型的土壤水分亏缺及补偿潜力研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023:68-71
[40] 薛少博,李鹏,于坤霞,等. 2002-2020年黄土高原土壤水变化及其相关性分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2021,35(5):221-226
[41] MIAO R,MA J,LIU Y,et al. Variability of aboveground litter inputs alters soil carbon and nitrogen in a coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest of central china[J]. Forests,2019,10(2):188
[42] 郭继勋,祝廷成. 羊草草原枯枝落叶分解的研究——枯枝落叶分解与生态环境的关系[J]. 生态学报,1993(3):214-220
[43] 王红霞,温仲明,高国雄,等. 黄土丘陵区刺槐人工林与乡土植物叶片和细根功能性状比较研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2016,23(1):1-7
[44] 胡广德,周继强,达军山,等. 金塔沙地不同人工林下草本植物多样性与土壤性质的关系[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1834-1841
[45] LIU C C,LI Y,YAN P,et al. How to improve the predictions of plant functional traits on ecosystem functioning?[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:622260
[46] 魏嘉琪,郑诚,崔梦莹,等. 黄土丘陵区生物多样性与生态系统功能响应关系的分析[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(5):1490-1500
[47] 刘冲,野起瑞,李江文,等. 黄土丘陵区撂荒年限和坡向对灌丛生物量及丰富度的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(9):2826-2833
[48] 杜峰,梁宗锁,徐学选,等. 陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒草地群落生物量及植被土壤养分效应[J]. 生态学报,2007(5):1673-1683
[49] 师阳阳,陈云明,张光辉,等. 不同退耕年限撂荒地植物多样性及生物量分析[J]. 水土保持研究,2012,19(6):36-40,44
[50] 黄晶,刘克思,豆鹏鹏,等. 农牧交错区不同撂荒年限对农田土壤的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024，32(3)：667-683
[51] 戴全厚,刘国彬,薛萐,等. 侵蚀环境退耕撂荒地植物种群演变动态研究[J]. 西北农业学报,2008(4):320-328
[52] 刘丙霞,任健,邵明安,等. 黄土高原北部人工灌草植被土壤干燥化过程研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(11):3795-3803
[53] 谭学进,穆兴民,高鹏,等. 黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2019,39(02):713-722
[54] 侯庆春,黄旭,韩仕峰,等. 黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究——Ⅱ土壤水分和养分状况及其与小老树生长的关系[J]. 水土保持学报,1991(2):75-83
[55] 王力,邵明安,李裕元. 陕北黄土高原人工刺槐林生长与土壤干化的关系研究[J]. 林业科学,2004(1):84-91
[56] 朱燕,翟博超,孙美美,等. 黄土丘陵区不同密度刺槐和油松人工林土壤理化性质与化学计量特征[J]. 水土保持研究,2023,30(6):160-167
[57] 刘雨,高光耀,王棣,等. 不同疏伐强度下黄土丘陵区刺槐林的水分利用特征[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(7):2845-2855

Trade-off Relationship of Typical Vegetation Ecosystem Functions in Loess Hilly Areas

黄土丘陵区典型植被生态系统功能的权衡关系

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	TIAN Hai-jing, HUANG Wen-guang, WANG Lin, FAN Yun-bao, ZHAO Huan, HUANG Wei, WANG Shun-xia, WANG Peng-jie. Evaluation on the Contribution of the Policy of Grazing Constraint and Grassland Conservation for 20 Years to Grassland Vegetation Restoration in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 37-45.
[2]	LIU Yu-zhen, ZHAO Xin-quan, DONG Quan-min, LIU Wen-ting, YANG Xiao-xia, YU Yang, ZHANG Chun-ping, CAO Quan. Research Progress on the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystem Structure and Function [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2253-2262.
[3]	LI Na, ZHAO Na, WANG Ya-lin, WEI Lin, ZHANG Qian, GUO Tong-qing, WANG Xun-gang, XU Shi-xiao. Variation of Organic and Inorganic Carbon in Topsoil and Physicochemical Factors under Different Artificial Grasslands in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2361-2368.
[4]	WU Meng-han, HOU Jian, ZHANG Yan-qin, FENG Hao-bo. Ratio of Dominant Soil and Water Conservation Plants in Catchment of Loess Hilly Region Based on CATS Model [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2455-2461.
[5]	KAN Hai-ming, XU Heng-kang, LU Jia-nan, SUN Xin-bo, WU Ju-ying. The Influence of Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation on the Growth Characteristics of Three Forage Species [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 1922-1930.
[6]	TANG Jing-lei, REN Zhi-guo, ZHANG Xue-yuan, ZHANG Yi-yao, WANG Zhong-wu, WANG Zhen, SUO Ming-chun, REN Hai-yan. Relationships between Species Diversity and Productivity of Different Functional Groups in a Typical Steppe in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 1939-1949.
[7]	WEI Jia-qi, ZHENG Cheng, CUI Meng-ying, SHEN Qiao-tian, JIN Xiang-qian, WEN Zhong-ming. Analysis on the Relationship between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Loess Hilly Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1490-1500.
[8]	QU Zhi-qiang, HAN Guo-dong, TIE Ying, LI Zhi-guo, ZHANG Zi-ting, BAI Lu, YANG Zi-qiong, SUN Xue-yan. Analysis of Restoration Effects in Loess Hilly Region of Horinger County Based on Remote Sensing [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 963-971.
[9]	XING Bin-bin, AN Hui, LIU Shu-xuan, YIN Xing-yuan, WEN Zhi-lin, GUO Jian-chao, LIU Xiao-ping, WANG Bo. Effects of rainfall Change on Plant Community Biomass and its Trade-off in Desert Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3103-3113.
[10]	XIA Shu-miao, WEI Heng-rui, ZHENG Wei, ZHANG Bao-jiang, DENG Gang, ZHANG Hai-dong. Effects of Different Grazing Methods on the Production and Ecological Functions of Mountain Meadows and their Trade-off Relationships [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 1972-1981.
[11]	ZHANG Qi, GUO Chen-wen, YAO Meng-meng, DONG Kuan-hu, WANG Chang-hui, REN Guo-hua. Effects of Grazing Intensities on Functional Traits of the Dominant Plant Leymus secalinus in Semi-arid Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2108-2117.
[12]	KAN Hai-ming, PANG Zhuo, CHEN Chao, ZOU Jun-liang, ZHANG Guo-fang, WU Ju-ying. Changes in Soil Microbial Communities Following the Vegetation Restoration of Degraded Sandy Grassland in Beijing [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1350-1358.
[13]	GAO Xiao-long, WANG You-qi, BAI Yi-ru, RUAN Xiao-han. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions in Typical Vegetations Communities of the Yuehai Urban Wetland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1441-1449.
[14]	ZHANG Bin, LI Shao-yu, GU Chen, ZHAO Meng-li, ZOU Jun-ming, DUAN Hong-mei, LIU Hao-jie, LI Jian-guo. Biomass Allocation of Four Dominant Plant Species in Inner Mongolia Desert Grasslands in Response to Different Grazing Intensities [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3355-3363.
[15]	CHANG Ming. Study on the Species Composition and Community Characteristics of Subalpine Meadow during Restoration after a Fire [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.