Research Progress in the Biological Basis of Legume Pod Dehiscence

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.004

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 927-935.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.004

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress in the Biological Basis of Legume Pod Dehiscence

LUO Dong, WANG Yan-rong, LIU Zhi-peng

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, China

Received:2014-08-06 Revised:2014-12-20 Online:2015-10-15 Published:2015-12-01

豆科植物裂荚生物学基础的研究进展

罗栋, 王彦荣, 刘志鹏

草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃兰州 730020

通讯作者: 刘志鹏
作者简介:罗栋(1991-),男,陕西安康人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草类作物育种与生物技术,E-mail:luod13@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)"牧草、乡土草抗逆优质高产的生物学基础"(2014CB138704);国家自然科学基金面上项目"紫花苜蓿种子发育分子机理的研究"(31272492)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

Pod dehiscence is a very important reproductive trait during the evolution of legume. However, this trait also can lead to seed dispersal before harvest, which causes heavy losses on legume seed production. In order to improve the seed yield, loss of pod dehiscence becomes one of the key agronomical traits targeted by human breeding selection. The study advances of morphology, physiology and molecular biology on pod dehiscence traits of legume were elaborated in this paper. Moreover, the existing problems and developmental tendency were also prospected.

Key words: Legume, Pod dehiscence, Dehiscence zone, Dehiscence genes

摘要：

裂荚是豆科植物在进化过程中产生的一种繁殖特性,但裂荚会导致种子在收获前大量脱落,给种子生产造成严重的损失。为了提高种子产量,豆科植物的抗裂荚性状成为人们重要的育种目标之一。文章主要从形态学、生理学和分子生物学3个角度对豆科植物裂荚进行综述,并对目前存在的问题及今后的研究趋势进行了展望。

关键词: 豆科植物, 裂荚, 裂荚区, 裂荚基因

CLC Number:

S330.3

LUO Dong, WANG Yan-rong, LIU Zhi-peng. Research Progress in the Biological Basis of Legume Pod Dehiscence[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 927-935.

罗栋, 王彦荣, 刘志鹏. 豆科植物裂荚生物学基础的研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 927-935.

References

[1] 孙东凤,康玉凡. 大豆炸荚性研究进展[J]. 大豆科学,2012,30(6):1030-1034
[2] 刘玉英,王颖,穆春生,等. 广布野豌豆裂荚影响因素与裂荚日动态研究[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(3):251-254
[3] 王翔,陈晓博,李爱丽,等. 植物器官脱落分子生物学研究进展[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(3):381-387
[4] 罗汝叶,巩鹏涛. 植物落粒性状研究进展[J]. 豆科基因组学与遗传学:网络版,2011,2(1):1-13
[5] Caviness C E. Heritability of pod dehiscence and its association with some agronomic characters in soybeans[J]. Crop Science,1969,9(2):207-209
[6] Luo R,Gong P,Zhao D,et al. QTL mapping and analysis of traits related to pod dehiscence in soybean[J]. Legume Genomics and Genetics,2012,3(3):14-20
[7] Mos M. Anatomic structure of birdsfoot trefoil(Lotus corniculatus) pod[J]. Zeszyty Problermowe Postepov,1987,240:200-213
[8] Tsuchiya T. Physiological and genetic analysis of pod shattering in soybean[J]. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly,1987,21(3):166-175
[9] Suzuki M,Fujino K,Funatsuki H. A major soybean QTL, qPDH1, controls pod dehiscence without marked morphological change[J]. Plant Production Science,2009,12(2):217-223
[10] Summers J E,Bruce D M,Vancanneyt G,et al. Pod shatter resistance in the resynthesized Brassica napus line DK142[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science,2003,140(1):43-52
[11] Dong Y,Yang X,Liu J,et al. Pod shattering resistance associated with domestication is mediated by a NAC gene in soybean[J]. Nature Communications,2014,5:3352
[12] Tiwari S P,Bhatia V S. Characters of pod anatomy associated with resistance to pod-shattering in soybean[J]. Annals of Botany,1995,76(5):483-485
[13] Welsh-Maddux M M,Spaeth S C,Muehlbauer F J. Morphology of the slashed pod trait in lentil[J]. Economic Botany,1994,48(1):29-34
[14] Pate J S. Legume fruits-the structure:function equation[C]//Stirton C H, Zarucchi J L ed(s). Advances in legume biology. Saint Louis:Missouri botanic Gardens Press,1989:399-415
[15] Butler A. Investigations of pod characters in the Vivieae[J]. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany,2002,11(1/2):127-132
[16] Yang J B,Somers D A,Wright R L,et al. Seed pod dehiscence in birdsfoot trefoil,Lotus conimbricensis, and their interspecific somatic hybrid[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1990,70(1):279-284
[17] Repkova J,Hofbauer J. Seed pod shattering in the genus Lotus and its overcoming[J]. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding,2009,45(2):39-44
[18] Child R D,summers J E,Babij J,et al. Increased resistance to pod shatter is associated with changes in the vascular structure in pods of a resynthesized Brassica napus line[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2003,54(389):1919-1930
[19] Christiansen L C,Dal Degan F,Ulvskov P,et al. Examination of the dehiscence zone in soybean pods and isolation of a dehiscence-related endopolygalacturonase gene[J]. Plant Cell and Environment,2002,25(4):479-490
[20] Grant W F. Seed pod shattering in the genus Lotus(Fabaceae):A synthesis of diverse evidence[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1996,76(3):447-456
[21] Rajani S,Sundaresan V. The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence[J]. Current Biology,2001,11(24):1914-1922
[22] 唐桂香,秦叶波,宋文坚,等. 拟南芥角果发育和开裂的调控机制及在油菜育种中的应用[J]. 细胞生物学杂志,2008,29(6):864-868
[23] Agrawal A P,Basarkar P W,Salimath P M,et al. Role of cell wall-degrading enzymes in pod-shattering process of soybean, Glycine max(L.) Merrill[J]. Current Science,2002,82(1):58-60
[24] Petersen M,Sander L,Child R,et al. Isolation and characterisation of a pod dehiscence zone-specific polygalacturonase from Brassica napus[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,1996,31(3):517-527
[25] Ross-Ibarra J,Morrell P L,Gaut B S. Plant domestication,a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2007,104(S1):8641-8648
[26] Bailey M A, Mian M,Carter T E,et al. Pod dehiscence of soybean:Identification of quantitative trait loci[J]. Journal of Heredity,1997,88(2):152-154
[27] Funatsuki H,Ishimoto M,Tsuji H,et al. Simple sequence repeat markers linked to a major QTL controlling pod shattering in soybean[J]. Plant Breeding,2006,125(2):195-197
[28] Weeden N F,Brauner S,Przyborowski J A. Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence in pea(Pisum sativum L.)[J]. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters,2002,7(2B):657-664
[29] Weeden N F. Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum:Is there a common genetic basis to the 'domestication syndrome' for legumes?[J]. Annals of Botany,2007,100(5):1017-1025
[30] Boersma J G,Pallotta M,Li C,et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map using MFLP and identification of molecular markers linked to domestication genes in narrow-leafed lupin(Lupinus angustifolius L.)[J]. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters,2005,10(2):331-344
[31] Nelson M N,Phan H T,Ellwood S R,et al. The first gene-based map of Lupinus angustifolius L.-Location of domestication genes and conserved synteny with Medicago truncatula[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2006,113(2):225-238
[32] Koinange E M,Singh S P,Gepts P. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean[J]. Crop Science,1996,36(4):1037-1045
[33] Mohammed M S,Russom Z,Abdul S D. Inheritance of hairiness and pod shattering, heritability and correlation studies in crosses between cultivated cowpea(Vigna unguiculata(L.) Walp.) and its wild(var. pubescens) relative[J]. Euphytica,2010,171(3):397-407
[34] Abd El-Moneim A M. Selection for non-shattering common vetch, Vicia sativa L.[J]. Plant Breeding,1993,110(2):168-171
[35] Ladizinsky G. Seed dispersal in relation to the domestication of Middle East legumes[J]. Economic Botany,1979,33(3):284-289
[36] Isemura T,Kaga A,Konishi S,et al. Genome dissection of traits related to domestication in azuki bean(Vigna angularis) and comparison with other warm-season legumes[J]. Annals of Botany,2007,100(5):1053-1071
[37] Liu B,Fujita T,Yan Z,et al. QTL mapping of domestication-related traits in soybean(Glycine max)[J]. Annals of Botany,2007,100(5):1027-1038
[38] Kang S,Kwak M,Kim H,et al. Population-specific QTLs and their different epistatic interactions for pod dehiscence in soybean[Glycine max(L.) Merr.][J]. Euphytica,2009,166(1):15-24
[39] Funatsuki H,Hajika M,Hagihara S,et al. Confirmation of the location and the effects of a major QTL controlling pod dehiscence, qPDH1, in soybean[J]. Breeding Science,2008,58(1):63-69
[40] Yamada T,Funatsuki H,Hagihara S,et al. A major QTL, qPDH1, is commonly involved in shattering resistance of soybean cultivars[J]. Breeding Science,2009,59(4):435-440
[41] Suzuki M,Fujino K,Nakamoto Y,et al. Fine mapping and development of DNA markers for the qPDH1 locus associated with pod dehiscence in soybean[J]. Molecular Breeding,2010,25(3):407-418
[42] Gao M,Zhu H. Fine mapping of a major quantitative trait locus that regulates pod shattering in soybean[J]. Molecular Breeding,2013,32(2):485-491
[43] Ehlting J U R,Mattheus N,Aeschliman D S,et al. Global transcript profiling of primary stems from Arabidopsis thaliana identifies candidate genes for missing links in lignin biosynthesis and transcriptional regulators of fiber differentiation[J]. The Plant Journal,2005,42(5):618-640
[44] Blixt S. Mutation genetics in Pisum[J]. Agricultural and Horticultural Genetics,1972,30:1-293
[45] Muehlbauer F J. Registration of 'Alaska 81' and 'Umatilla' dry pea[J]. Crop Science,1987,27(5):1089-1090
[46] Gladstones J S. Selection for economic characters in Lupinus angustifolius and L. digitatus[J]. Animal Production Science,1967,7(27):360-366
[47] Boersma J G,Buirchell B J,Sivasithamparam K,et al. Development of two sequence-specific PCR markers linked to the le gene that reduces pod shattering in narrow-leafed lupin(Lupinus angustifolius L.)[J]. Genetics and Molecular Biology,2007,30(3):623-629
[48] Boersma J G,Nelson M N,Sivasithamparam K,et al. Development of sequence-specific PCR markers linked to the Tardus gene that reduces pod shattering in narrow-leafed lupin(Lupinus angustifolius L.)[J]. Molecular Breeding,2009,23(2):259-267
[49] Li X,Renshaw D,Yang H,et al. Development of a co-dominant DNA marker tightly linked to gene tardus conferring reduced pod shattering in narrow-leafed lupin(Lupinus angustifolius L.)[J]. Euphytica,2010,176(1):49-58
[50] Phillips R L,Keim W F. Seed pod dehiscence in Lotus and interspecific hybridization involving L. corniculatus L.[J]. Crop Science,1968,8(1):18-21
[51] Ladizinsky G. The genetics of several morphological traits in the lentil[J]. Journal of Heredity,1979,70(2):135-137
[52] Aliboh V O,Kehinde O B,Fawole I. Inheritance of leaf mark, pod dehiscence and dry pod colour in crosses between wild and cultivated cowpeas[J]. African Crop Science Journal,1996,4(3):283-288
[53] Fourquin C E,Del C C,Victoria F C,et al. A change in SHATTERPROOF protein lies at the origin of a fruit morphological novelty and a new strategy for seed dispersal in Medicago genus[J]. Plant Physiology,2013,162(2):907-917

Research Progress in the Biological Basis of Legume Pod Dehiscence

豆科植物裂荚生物学基础的研究进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANAG Xin-yuan, YANG Tian-hui, WANG Wen-jun, LI Lan, LAN Jian, HOU Fu-jiang. Effects of Multiple Mowing on the Performance of Legume Forage in Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(4): 1163-1171.
[2]	WU Shi-wen, NAN Li-li, CHEN Xiao-shan, FU Jun-shi, ZHANG Ze-long, GUO Zhao. Effects of Different Alfalfa-Grass Mixed Sowing Methods on Hay Yield and Soil Nutrients [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(3): 975-983.
[3]	ZHONG Zhen-mei, LI Chun-yan, XING Shi-he, WENG Bo-qi. Seasonal Variation of Nitrogen Supply Level in Soil of Orchard and Its Response to Interplanting Green Manure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(8): 2514-2522.
[4]	SUN Ling-li, MENG Xiang, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, LIU Wei, YANG Long, CUI He-ting, ZHAO Yue, CHU Hao-qing. Effect of Different Mixed Sowing Patterns on Yield and Nutritional Value of Grass in Sowing Year [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 340-348.
[5]	HE Lin-xin, HUANG Rong, TIAN Wang-jun, JIN Zhen-hai, ZHAO Liang, CHEN Hai-yan, ZHANG Zhen-fen. Effects of Erwinia sp. DE2 on the Growth of three Leguminous Forage Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2642-2652.
[6]	GUO Chuan, ZHOU Ji-qiong, ZHANG Ying-jun. Host and Nutrient Mediated the Synergistic Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Rhizobium on Plant Growth [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 1931-1938.
[7]	LIU Dong-xia, LIU Hui, MENG Shuai, DU Jun-ying, REN Xiao-yun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Productivity and Weed Community Dynamics of Mixed Artificial Grasslands in Agro-pastoral Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2086-2095.
[8]	SUN Yuan-wei, LYU Long, WANG Qi, ZHAO Xiao-le, ZHANG Deng-kui, ZHOU Xu-jiao, CUI Xun-zhen. The Ecological Benefit Analysis on the Alfalfa/Legume Intercropping [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 884-892.
[9]	ZHANG Hao-wei, MA Xin-wei, Gao Ya-qing, SHI Wen-min, LU Li-juan, XI Jie-jun. A Novel Genetic Crossing Method for Medicago truncatula [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 914-922.
[10]	ZHONG Zhen-mei, YANG Qing, WENG Bo-qi, LI Chun-yan. Analysis of the Relationship between Fertilizer Application and Growth Performance of Two Chamaecrista spp in Hilly Area of Southern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3085-3093.
[11]	CHEN Yi-fan, YUN Lan, AI Qian, LI Nan, YAO Na, REN Xiao-min, SHI Feng-ling. Effect of Alfalfa-grass Mixed Pasture On the Remediation of Soil in Saline Area of Hailiutu [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3203-3211.
[12]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WEI Xiao-li, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effects of Sowing Method and Row Spacing on Production Performance and Interspecific Relationship of Oat/Forage Pea Mixed Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2483-2491.
[13]	DU Jun-ying, LI Xing-yang, YANG Li, SONG Lian-zhao, ZHOU Zhi-ming, LI Jun, XUE Zhu-lin, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Changes of Grassland Productivity in the Third Year of Mixed Sowing in Bashang Area of Northwest of Hebei [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1855-1861.
[14]	WANG Xin-you, CAO Wen-xia, SHI Shang-li, WANG Xiao-jun, CHEN Xin-dong, BAI Jie, LI Wen. Study on the Stability Utilization and Management of Legume-Grass Mixtures Community Based on Niche Theory [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 456-463.
[15]	WANG Hai-jin, ZENG Qing-fei, WEI Xing-di, WANG Jia-chu-han, WEI Xin, CHEN Chao. The Rhizobia of Wild Legume Forage in Guizhou Tailings Areas and Determination of Resistance [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3253-3262.