Effect of Different Mixed Sowing Patterns on Yield and Nutritional Value of Grass in Sowing Year

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.035

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 340-348.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.035

Effect of Different Mixed Sowing Patterns on Yield and Nutritional Value of Grass in Sowing Year

SUN Ling-li, MENG Xiang, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, LIU Wei, YANG Long, CUI He-ting, ZHAO Yue, CHU Hao-qing

College of Grassland Sciences of Xinjiang Agricultural University/Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology/Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology for Western Arid Desert Rengion, Ministry of Education, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2023-06-11 Revised:2023-08-15 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-30

不同混播模式对播种当年牧草产量和营养价值的影响

孙伶俐, 孟翔, 谢开云, 颜安, 刘伟, 杨龙, 崔荷婷, 赵越, 褚皓清

1. 新疆农业大学草业学院/新疆草地资源与生态重点实验室/西部干旱荒漠区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

通讯作者: 谢开云,E-mail:xkycah@163.com;颜安,E-mail:yanan@xjau.edu.cn
作者简介:孙伶俐(1996-),女,汉族,新疆昌吉人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地管理与牧草生产研究,E-mail:1525710724@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发项目（2022B02003）；新疆“三农”骨干人才培养项目（2022SNGGGCC019）资助

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the effects of different mixed sowing patterns on forage yield and nutritional value, 11 mixed sowing patterns were studied in this experiment by controlling the mixed sowing proportion and the mixed forage species, namely, 4 mixed sowing patterns of legume forage:mixed sowing ratios of Medicago varia + Onobrychis viciaefolia +Lotus corniculatus were 1:1:1, 1:1:2, 1:2:1, 2:1:1 (Z1H1B1, Z1H1B2, Z1H2B1, Z2H1B1), 4 mixed sowing patterns of gramineous forage:mixed sowing ratios of Elymus dahuricus + Bromus inermis + Agropyron cristatum were 1:1:1, 1:1:2, 1:2:1, 2:1:1 (W1P1B1, W1P1B2, W1P2B1, W2P1B1), and 3 mixed sowing patterns of legume and gramineous:mixed sowing ratios of Medicago varia + Onobrychis viciaefolia +Lotus corniculatus + Elymus dahuricus + Bromus inermis + Agropyron cristatum were 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 (L25G75, L50G50, L75G25). The results showed that the plant height, density and dry matter yield of the six forage mixed sowing patterns were lower than those of the three leguminous forage mixed sowing patterns and the three gramineous forage mixed sowing patterns(P<0.05), but the crude protein content and relative feeding value of the forage were lower than those of the three leguminous forage mixed sowing patterns(P<0.05), and higher than those of the three gramineous forage mixed sowing patterns(P<0.05). The results showed that 1:1 mixed sowing ratio was more conducive to the accumulation of total dry matter in six mixed sowing patterns.

Key words: Mixed sowing patterns, Forage yield, Nutritive value, Legume forage, Gramineous forage

摘要： 为探究不同混播模式对牧草产量和营养价值的影响，本试验通过设置11种混播模式，即4个豆科牧草混播模式[杂花苜蓿（Medicago varia）+红豆草（Onobrychis viciaefolia）+百脉根（Lotus corniculatus）混播比例为1：1：1，1：1：2，1：2：1，2：1：1（Z1H1B1，Z1H1B2，Z1H2B1，Z2H1B1）]，4个禾本科牧草混播模式[披碱草（Elymus dahuricus）+无芒雀麦（Bromus inermis）+扁穗冰草（Agropyron cristatum）混播比例为：1：1：1，1：1：2，1：2：1，2：1：1（W1P1B1，W1P1B2，W1P2B1，W2P1B1）]和3个豆科禾本科牧草混播混播模式[杂花苜蓿+红豆草+百脉根+披碱草+无芒雀麦+扁穗冰草豆禾比为1：3，1：1，3：1（L25G75，L50G50，L75G25）]，分析研究不同混播模式对牧草产量和营养价值的影响。结果表明：6种牧草混播模式下各牧草株高、密度、干物质产量均显著低于3种豆科牧草混播模式和3种禾本科牧草混播模式（P<0.05），且牧草粗蛋白含量和相对饲喂价值均显著低于3种豆科牧草混播模式（P<0.05），但高于3种禾本科牧草混播模式（P<0.05）；在6种牧草混播模式中混播比例为1：1时更有利于混播草地牧草干物质总量积累。

关键词: 混播模式, 牧草产量, 营养价值, 豆科牧草, 禾本科牧草

CLC Number:

S812.4

SUN Ling-li, MENG Xiang, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, LIU Wei, YANG Long, CUI He-ting, ZHAO Yue, CHU Hao-qing. Effect of Different Mixed Sowing Patterns on Yield and Nutritional Value of Grass in Sowing Year[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 340-348.

孙伶俐, 孟翔, 谢开云, 颜安, 刘伟, 杨龙, 崔荷婷, 赵越, 褚皓清. 不同混播模式对播种当年牧草产量和营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 340-348.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.035

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I1/340

References

[1] 徐柱. 面向21世纪的中国草地资源[J]. 中国草地, 1998(5):1-8
[2] 方精云, 潘庆民, 高树琴, 等. "以小保大"原理:用小面积人工草地建设换取大面积天然草地的保护与修复[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(10):1913-1916
[3] 石岳, 马殷雷, 马文红, 等. 中国草地的产草量和牧草品质:格局及其与环境因子之间的关系[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(3):226-239
[4] 陈宝书. 牧草饲料作物栽培学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2015:140-141
[5] 赵艳兰. 豆禾混播组合与比例对草地生产力及土壤微生物群落的影响[D]. 成都:四川农业大学, 2022:1-2
[6] 冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 等. 高寒地区燕麦与豌豆不同混播组合和比例对饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2):487-494
[7] PAPADOPOULOS Y A, MCELROY M S, FILLMORE S A E, et al. Sward complexity and grass species composition affect the performance of grass-white clover pasture mixtures[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2012, 92(6):1199-1205
[8] 刘启宇, 云岚, 陈逸凡, 等. 苜蓿——禾草混播草地牧草产量及种间竞争关系的动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3):181-191
[9] 冯冰, 刘志英, 宝音陶格涛, 等. 不同刈割频次对旱作混播人工草地群落特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(3):10-18
[10] 王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 等. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4):99-110
[11] 李昂, 吴应珍, 台喜生, 等. 甘肃沿黄灌区种植豆禾混播牧草对土壤盐分和养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4):664-670
[12] 张辉辉, 师尚礼, 武蓓, 等. 苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2):159-170
[13] 祁亚淑, 朱林, 许兴. 宁夏绿洲禾豆牧草混播组合及其比例效应[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(9):1463-1472
[14] 王丹, 王俊杰, 李凌浩, 等. 旱作条件下苜蓿与冰草不同混播方式的产草量及种间竞争关系[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(5):27-31
[15] 张仁平, 于磊, 鲁为华. 混播比例和刈割期对混播草地产量及品质影响的研究[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(5):139-143
[16] 谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 等. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4):29-40
[17] 李满有, 杨彦军, 王斌, 等. 干旱地区滴灌条件下燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播模式研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(12):51-57, 66
[18] 包兴国, 杨文玉, 曹卫东, 等. 豆科与禾本科绿肥饲草作物混播增肥及改土效果研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(1):43-47
[19] 刘青青, 赫苗花, 王晓丽, 等. 不同坡向下高寒矿区混播草地的恢复效果评估[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9):2834-2842
[20] 张哲, 杨姝, 杜桂娟, 等. 遮阴对三种豆科牧草光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(5):212-219
[21] 张永亮, 范富, 高凯, 等. 苜蓿、无芒雀麦单播与混播对土壤有机质和速效养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1):22-26
[22] 苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 等. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2):473-481
[23] NYFELER D, HUGUENIN-ELIE O, SUTER M, et al. Grass-legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-ymbiotic sources[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 140(1):155-163
[24] HOOPER D U, DUKES J S. Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment[J]. Ecology Letters, 2004, 7(2):95-105
[25] BORK E W, GABRUCK D T, MCLEOD E M, et al. Five years forage dynamics arising from four legume-grass seed mixes[J]. Agronomy Journal,2017, 109:2789-2799
[26] 王平, 周道玮, 张宝田. 禾-豆混播草地种间竞争与共存[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2560-2567
[27] 郑伟, 朱进忠, 加娜尔古丽, 等. 不同混播方式对豆禾混播草地生产性能的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(5):45-52
[28] OSIPOVA V V, PAVLOV N E, PETROVA M I, et al. Cultivation technology and its effect on productivity, botanical composition and nutritive value of herbage mixtures intended for grazing[J]. Foundation for Environmental Protection and Research, 2018, 311(1):1-18
[29] MALEZIEUX E, CROZAT Y, DUPRAZ C, et al. Mixing plant species in cropping systems:concepts, tools and models. A review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 29(1):43-62
[30] OATIBIA G R, AMENGUAL G, BOYERO L, et al. Aridity exacerbates grazing-induced rangeland degradation:a population approach for dominant grasses[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 57(10):1999-2009
[31] BI X, LI B, ZHANG L X, et al. Response of grassland productivity to climate change and anthropogenic activities in arid regions of Central Asia[J]. Peer J, 2020, 8(6):9797
[32] 李强, 黄迎新, 钟荣珍, 等. 豆-禾混播草地中紫花苜蓿比例对其固氮效率的影响及潜在生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(13):2647-2656
[33] XU W, ZHU M Y, ZHANG Z H, et al. Experimentally simulating warmer and wetter climate additively improves rangeland quality on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55(3):1486-1497
[34] 何玮, 张新全, 杨春华. 刈割次数、施肥量及混播比例对牛鞭草和白三叶混播草地牧草品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2006, 23(4):39-42
[35] KYRIAZOPOULOS A P, ABRAHAM E M, PARISSI Z M, et al. Forage production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata and Trifolium subterraneum mixtures under different shading treatments[J]. Grass & Forage Science, 2013, 68(1):72-82
[36] 王龙然, 王伟, 蒲小剑, 等. 柴达木盆地19个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能和饲用品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(10):3136-3144
[37] 冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 等. 三江源区小黑麦与豆科饲草混播最佳组合及比例研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(2):232-241
[38] 张翊碧, 何静, 韩永芬. 混播草种及其比例对黔草4号鸭茅草地产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(9):34-35, 120
[39] 裴彩霞, 董宽虎, 范华. 不同刈割期和干燥方法对牧草营养成分含量的影响[J]. 中国草地, 2002(1):33-38
[40] 候伟峰, 其格其, 何刘柱,等. 兴安盟8种乡土豆科牧草营养成分比较研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(12):135-138

Effect of Different Mixed Sowing Patterns on Yield and Nutritional Value of Grass in Sowing Year

不同混播模式对播种当年牧草产量和营养价值的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HE Lin-xin, HUANG Rong, TIAN Wang-jun, JIN Zhen-hai, ZHAO Liang, CHEN Hai-yan, ZHANG Zhen-fen. Effects of Erwinia sp. DE2 on the Growth of three Leguminous Forage Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2642-2652.
[2]	ZHOU Tao, LU Rui, LIU Ning-fang, XU Qian, HU Long-xing. Analysis and Evaluation of Forage Yield and Quality on Amaranthus cruentus Germplasm from Different Origins [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2369-2376.
[3]	LIU Dong-xia, LIU Hui, MENG Shuai, DU Jun-ying, REN Xiao-yun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Productivity and Weed Community Dynamics of Mixed Artificial Grasslands in Agro-pastoral Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2086-2095.
[4]	BAO Gen-sheng, ZHANG Peng, MA Xiang, JIA Zhi-feng, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xing-yun. Effect of Nitrogen Addition on Forage and Seed Yields of Intercropping System of Avena sativa and Pisum sativum in Alpine Regions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2210-2219.
[5]	HUA Xian-ze, LIU Ying, MA Yu-shou, WANG Yan-long. Yield and Growth Characteristics Response to Row Spacing and Sowing Rate in Poa pratensis L. 'Qinghai' [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2220-2231.
[6]	WANG Yun-tao, SUN Zhen, WANG Qi-qi, XIE Ji-hong, YU Lin-qing, XUE Chun-feng, LIU Sheng-hao, ZHONG Gang, GONG Yan-chun, SHEN Jie. Different Amounts of (NH₄)₂HPO₄ on Winter Survival,Yield and Nutritive Value of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1902-1910.
[7]	GUO Rui, JIN Xing-na, CHANG Dan-dan, DU Wen-hua. QTL Analyses of Forage Yield-related Traits Using the Recombinant Inbred Line Populations of Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 710-718.
[8]	CHEN Mei-rong, NIE Xiao-wei, ZHANG Xue-min, WANG Zong-song, SONG Zhao-you, A Wang, WANG Qi, WANG Shi-ping, LI Yao-ming, SIQUE Duo-ji, ZHANG Lin, YAN Jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, SHI Pei-li, JIANG Li-li. Study on Screening the Suitable Forage Grass for Artificial Grass Establishment in Nagqu, Xizang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 2897-2904.
[9]	HOU Qing-qing, CHENG Hua-qiang, ZHU Min, YANG Xuan, XIA Fang-shan. Parameter Sensitivity Analysis on Submodules of APSIM to Two Forages in Northern Shanxi Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3114-3122.
[10]	ZHANG Hui-hui, SHI Shang-li, WU Bei, LI Zi-li, LI Xiao-long, WU Fang, KANG Wen-juan, CHEN Xin-dong. Physiological Characteristics of Alfalfa Mixed with Perennial Gramineous Forages with Different Life Forms [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2144-2157.
[11]	ZHOU Rui, SONG Mei-ling, WANG Yu-qin, WANG Hong-sheng, MA Ge-Liang, KONG Hai-su. Effects of Ligularia virgaurea Control on Plant Community of Grassland under Different Grazing Modes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1819-1828.
[12]	DU Jun-ying, LI Xing-yang, YANG Li, SONG Lian-zhao, ZHOU Zhi-ming, LI Jun, XUE Zhu-lin, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Changes of Grassland Productivity in the Third Year of Mixed Sowing in Bashang Area of Northwest of Hebei [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1855-1861.
[13]	YANG Yan-yan, SUN Yu, WU Chun-hui, LI Yun-qi, WU Rui-xin, WANG Ming-ya, LI Qiu-feng. Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 931-935.
[14]	ZHANG Hai-juan, LU Guang-xin, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, ZHOU Xue-li, DOU Sheng-yun, YAO Shi-ting, YAN Hui-lin, MA Kun, ZHAO Yang-an, QI Yan-hui, GOU Heng-rui. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth of Six Gramineous Forages of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 1013-1020.
[15]	WANG Li, WANG Chuan-jie, PAN Min, CHENG Zhi-qiang, WEI Yuan-hao, HUA He-liang, YIN Zhi-tong, ZHAO Guo-qi, HUANG Qian-qian. Study on Silage Fermentation Quality and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Four Silage Maize Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 568-574.