干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.008

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1552-1562.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.008

干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响

刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 马祥, 梁国玲

青海省青藏高原优良牧草种质资源利用重点实验室, 青海大学畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2020-04-27 修回日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-12-02
通讯作者: 刘文辉
作者简介:刘凯强(1992-),男,甘肃宁县人,博士,主要从事牧草种质资源抗逆性研究。E-mail:lkqgsqy@126.com
基金资助:
青海省科技厅重点实验室发展专项“青海省青藏高原优良牧草种质资源利用重点实验室”（2020-ZJ-Y03）；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS）；青海省“高端创新人才计划”资助

Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’

LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling

Key Laboratory of Superior Forage Germplasm in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Qinghai university Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2020-04-27 Revised:2020-06-16 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究干旱胁迫后燕麦（Avena sativa）生长及水分利用的响应变化，本研究选择‘青燕1号’（Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No.1’）进行干旱胁迫处理，研究水分亏缺对燕麦生长发育的影响。结果显示：燕麦株高、茎粗和叶面积随着胁迫程度和次数增加下降明显；干旱胁迫抑制了根、茎、叶和穗鲜重的增加，各处理以苗期-拔节期、孕穗-抽穗期、开花-乳熟期持续性中度和重度干旱降幅最大；干旱胁迫后光合性能变化明显，蒸腾速率下降幅度达4.11~10.35 mmol·m^-2·s^-1，净光合速率降幅达3.10~16.59 μmol·m^-2·s^-1，气孔导度降幅达0.03~0.34 mol·m^-2·s^-1；干旱胁迫后燕麦水分利用效率（water use efficiency，WUE）以苗期-拔节期、开花-乳熟期轻度干旱处理最高（4.95），各器官稳定碳同位素分辨率（△¹³C）有增有减，其中△¹³C_sp与WUE呈极显著负相关，△¹³C_le和△¹³C_st与WUE呈显著负相关。整体水平来看，干旱胁迫程度和次数对燕麦形态特征、器官鲜重及光合性能的影响大小表现为：中度和重度胁迫、胁迫3次影响最大。

关键词: 燕麦, 干旱胁迫, 器官生长, 水分利用效率

Abstract: In order to clarify the response of growth and water use efficiency of oats to drought stress,the study was conducted for Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’ to understanding the effect of water deficit on oats growth and development. It found that plant height,stem thick and leaf area decreased obviously with increasing stress degree and time. Water deficit inhibited the increase of fresh weight of root,stem,leaf and spikelet,and the largest decrease occurred at the seedling-jointing stage,booting-heading stage,and flowering-milking stage under persistent moderate and severe drought. Drought stress affected the photosynthetic performance significantly. The transpiration rate decreased by 4.11~10.35 mmol·m^-2·s^-1,photosynthetic rate decreased by 3.10~16.59 μmol·m^-2·s^-1 and stomatal conductance decreased by 0.03~0.34 mol·m^-2·s^-1. After drought stress,water use efficiency(WUE) was the highest(4.95) at seedling-jointing stage and flowering-milking stage with the mild drought;the stable carbon isotope of each organ increased and decreased. Though correlation analysis,it found that △¹³C_sp was negatively correlated with WUE,and △¹³Cle and △¹³Cst were negatively correlated with WUE. In terms of the overall level,effects of different drought degrees and times on morphological characteristics,fresh organ weight and photosynthetic performance were as follows:three times of drought and moderate and severe stress had the greatest impact.

Key words: Oat, Drought stress, Organ growth, Water use efficiency

中图分类号:

S152.6

刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 马祥, 梁国玲. 干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.

LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling. Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I6/1552

参考文献

[1] Beáta B,Katalin J,Attila F. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals[J]. Plant Cell andEnvironment,2008,31(1):11-38
[2] Wedad A K,Mohammed E O,Mohammed N O,et al. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,2013,32(1):122-130
[3] Basia V,Arie A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress:achievements and limitations[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology,2005,16(2):123-132
[4] Shakeel A A,Umair A,Mohsin T,et al. Drought induced changes in growth,osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant metabolism of three maize hybrids[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2017,8(69):1-12
[5] 曲涛,南志标. 作物和牧草对干旱胁迫的响应及机理研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(2):126-135
[6] Liu E K,Mei X R,Yan C R,et al. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics,dry matter translocation and WUE in two winter wheat genotypes[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2016,167:75-85
[7] 陈锐. 水分调控对滴灌春小麦灌浆特性及产量的影响[D]. 石河子:石河子大学,2016:18-32
[8] Bjorn M,Charles G T,Robert K L. Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato[J]. Crop Science,1999,39(6):1775-1783
[9] Ray I M,Townsend M S,Muncy C M. Heritabilities and Interrelationships of Water-Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits in Irrigated Alfalfa[J]. Crop Science,1999,39(4):1088-1092
[10] Viktoriya A,Adel M,Eva B,et al. Carbon isotope composition,water use efficiency,and drought sensitivity are controlled by a common genomic segment in maize[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2019,132(1):53-63
[11] Liu Z,Ma F Y,Hu T X,et al. Using stable isotopes to quantify water uptake from different soil layers and water use efficiency of wheat under long-term tillage and straw return practices[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2020,229:105933
[12] Austin R B. Prospects for improving crop production in stressful environments[J]. Plants Under Stress,1989,39:235-248
[13] Pereira J S,Chaves M M. Plant water deficits in Mediterranean ecosystems[J]. Plant Responses to Water Deficits-From Cell to Community,1993,237-248
[14] Bottner P,Couteaux M M,Vallejo V R. Soil organic matter in Mediterranean-type ecosystems and global climatic changes:a case study-the soils of the Mediterranean Basin,in Global Change and Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems[J]. Springer,1995:306-325
[15] 崔雄雄,侯扶江,常生华,等. 高寒牧区两个燕麦品种的产量与品质比较[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(6):1489-1495
[16] 任永峰. 水分胁迫对燕麦生长发育与产量的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2009:34-36
[17] 胡跃高. 裸燕麦不同生育时期对干旱胁迫后复水的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报,2012,32(2):284-288
[18] 张娜. 不同抗旱性燕麦品种对水分胁迫的生理响应机制研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012:38-43
[19] 周澎. 土壤持续干旱条件下早开堇菜与草地早熟禾对土壤水分利用特征的比较研究[J]. 北方农业学报,2008(1):28-30
[20] 杜建雄. 干旱胁迫和复水对草地早熟禾3个品种生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2008,18(1):73-77
[21] 李连朝,王学臣. 水分亏缺对植物细胞壁的影响及其与细胞延伸生长的关系[J]. 植物生理学报,1996,32(5):321-327
[22] 单云鹏,陈新慧,万平,等. 小豆种质资源苗期抗旱性评价及抗旱资源筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(5):1151-1159
[23] Trillo N,Fernandez R J. Wheat plant hydraulic properties under prolonged experimental drought:stronger decline in root-system conductance than in leaf area[J]. Plant and Soil,2005,277(1-2):277-284
[24] 董宽虎. 不同白羊草居群对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(1):195-202
[25] Choluj D,Karwowska R,Jasinska M,et al. Growth and dry matter partitioning in sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) under moderate drought[J]. Plant Soil and Environemnt,2004,50(6):265-272
[26] 刘建新,王金成,王瑞娟,等. 干旱胁迫下一氧化氮对燕麦幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2015,37(2):41-45
[27] 张娜,赵宝平,张艳丽,等. 干旱胁迫下燕麦叶片抗氧化酶活性等生理特性变化及抗旱性比较[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(1):166-171
[28] 吴旭红,冯晶旻. 外源亚精胺对PEG胁迫下燕麦幼苗生长及部分生理特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2017,37(1):122-129
[29] Liu X J,Zhang H H,Wang J R,et al. Increased CO₂ concentrations increasing water use efficiency and improvement PSII function of mulberry seedling leaves under drought stress[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions,2019,14(1):213-223
[30] 陈根云,陈娟,许大全. 关于净光合速率和胞间CO₂浓度关系的思考. 植物生理学报,2010,46(1):64-66
[31] 黄占斌,山仑. 水分利用效率及其生理生态机理研究进展[J]. 生态农业研究,1998,6(4):19-23
[32] 郭贤仕,山仑. 前期干旱锻炼对谷子水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报,1994,20(3):352-356
[33] 孙宏勇,刘昌明,张永强,等. 不同时期干旱对冬小麦产量效应和耗水特性研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2003,22(2):13-16
[34] 张继波,薛晓萍,李楠,等. 水分胁迫对扬花期冬小麦光合特性和干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 干旱气象,2019,37(3):447-453
[35] Hao B Z,Xue Q W,Thomas H M,et al. Grain yield,evapotranspiration,and water-use efficiency of maize hybrids differing in drought tolerance[J]. Irrigation science,2019,37(1):25-34
[36] 王雅梅. 小麦非结构性碳水化合物累积分配和光合生理对水分胁迫的响应[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014:3-5
[37] Farouhar G D,Richards R A. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes[J]. Functional Plant Biology,1984,11(6):539-552
[38] 梁银丽,康绍忠,山仑. 水分和氮磷水平对小麦碳同位素分辨率和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2000,24(3):289-292

干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响

Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋词, 黄小涛, 石国玺, 周华坤, 王芳萍, 姚步青. 播期对青藏高原燕麦生长和饲草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 121-127.
[2]	吴海艳, 曲珍, 刘昭明, 拉巴顿珠, 同桑措姆, 曲尼, 尼玛卓嘎, 马玉寿. 基于主成分分析的燕麦品种生产性能的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[3]	朱海霞. 多孢木霉HZ-31菌株胁迫下野燕麦内参基因的选择[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1666-1674.
[4]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[5]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[6]	童永尚, 鱼小军, 徐长林, 汪鹏斌, 宋建超, 李珍, 李颖. 天祝高寒区播期对7个燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[7]	梁国玲, 刘文辉, 马祥. 590份皮燕麦种质资源穗部性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[8]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[9]	刘备, 宋玉梅, 孙铭, 毛培胜. 燕麦劣变种子吸胀过程中线粒体AsA-GSH循环的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[10]	贾志锋, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 刘凯强, 赵桂琴. 施氮量和播种量对燕麦光合特性、激素含量及种子产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 293-302.
[11]	张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳, 耿小丽. 燕麦种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性的鉴定评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[12]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[13]	李文, 魏廷虎, 阿保地, 永措巴占, 才仁塔次, 周玉海, 李文浩, 郭卫兴, 张雁平. 化肥减施配合有机肥对高寒区燕麦营养品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[14]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[15]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.