添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.008

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 238-242.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.008

添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响

孙娟娟¹, 玉柱¹, 薛艳林², 毛培胜¹, 白春生³, 许庆方⁴, 单战¹

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京, 100094;
2. 内蒙古农牧科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古, 呼和浩特, 010000;
3. 沈阳农业大学, 辽宁, 沈阳, 110161;
4. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西, 太谷, 030801

收稿日期:2006-09-30 修回日期:2006-12-01 出版日期:2007-06-15 发布日期:2007-06-15
通讯作者: 玉柱,E-mail:yuzhu3@sohu.com
作者简介:孙娟娟(1982- ),女,内蒙古商都人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草加工与贮藏、草产业化技术,E-mail:sjj8234@126.com
基金资助:
农业部“948”项目(2006-G38);农业结构调整重大技术专项项目(04-13-01A)

Effects of Different Additive Treatments on Fermentation Quality and in Vitro Digestibility of Leymus chinensis Silage

SUN Juan-juan¹, YU Zhu¹, XUE Yan-lin², MAO Pei-sheng¹, BAI Chun-sheng³, XU Qing-fang⁴, SHAN Zhan¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China;
2. Institute of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010000, China;
3. Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110161, China;
4. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

Received:2006-09-30 Revised:2006-12-01 Online:2007-06-15 Published:2007-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究乳酸菌制剂、纤维素酶和甲酸对羊草(Leymus chinensis)青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响。结果表明:添加乳酸菌制剂、纤维素酶、乳酸菌制剂+纤维素酶均显著降低了青贮饲料pH值,提高了乳酸含量(P<0.05);添加甲酸显著降低了青贮料pH值、乳酸和氨态氮含量(P<0.05);添加乳酸菌制剂或甲酸显著提高了干物质体外消化率(P<0.05),乳酸菌制剂与纤维素酶混合添加显著提高了干物质和粗蛋白质体外消化率(P<0.05)。

关键词: 羊草, 发酵品质, 体外消化率, 乳酸菌, 纤维素酶, 甲酸

Abstract: Studies were conducted to investigate the fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of Leymus chinensis silage treated with lactic acid bacteria,cellulase,and formic acid.The results indicate that the three treatments of adding lactic acid bacteria,or cellulase,or lactic acid bacteria plus cellulase to the silage,significantly(P<0.05) decreased its pH value and greatly increased the lactic acid content.Adding of formic acid greatly(P<0.05) reduced the silage pH value,lactic acid and ammonia nitrogen content.Lactic acid bacteria or formic acid treatments significantly(P<0.05) increased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter,while the treatment of adding lactic acid bacteria plus cellulase increased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter and crude protein.

Key words: Leymus chinensis, Fermentation quality, In vitro digestibility, Lactic acid bacteria, Cellulase, Formic acid

孙娟娟, 玉柱, 薛艳林, 毛培胜, 白春生, 许庆方, 单战. 添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J]. , 2007, 15(3): 238-242.

SUN Juan-juan, YU Zhu, XUE Yan-lin, MAO Pei-sheng, BAI Chun-sheng, XU Qing-fang, SHAN Zhan. Effects of Different Additive Treatments on Fermentation Quality and in Vitro Digestibility of Leymus chinensis Silage[J]. , 2007, 15(3): 238-242.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2007/V15/I3/238

参考文献

[1] 张玉芬,周道玮.羊草分化及育种研究进展[J].中国草地,2002.24(2):54-58
[2] 蔡义民,熊井清雄,廖芷.乳酸菌制剂对青贮饲料发酵品质的改善效果[J].中国农业科学,1995,28(2):73-82
[3] Davit G,Chamberlain J Q.The effects of the rate of addition of formic acid and sulphuric acid on the ensilage of perennial ryegrass in laboratory silos[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1987,38:217-228
[4] 杨恩忠,蒋瑞芬,陈容.牧草营养物质及消化动态的研究[J].中国草地,1987,(6):36-39
[5] 任莉,张力,芦志刚.绵羊常用蛋白质饲料在瘤胃降解的特征[J].饲料工业,1999,(10):37-38
[6] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002
[7] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,Duke S H.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J].Crop Science,1999,39:1873-1880
[8] Han K J,M Collins,E S Vanzant,et al.Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round baie silage[J].Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919
[9] Broderica,G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[H].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[10] 自给饲料品质评价研究会.粗饲料の品质评价かィドブック.社团法人日本草地畜产种子协会.2001,94
[11] Patterson H H,A dam S D C,Klopfenstein T J,et al.Supplementation to meet metabolizable protein requirements of primiparous beef heifers:Ⅱ.Pregnancy and economics[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(3):563-570
[12] Weiss W P.Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods.In:G C Fahey J,M Collins,D R M rtens,and L E Moser(ed.)Forage Quality,Evaluation,and Utilization[M].American Society of Agronomy,Crop Science Society of Ame-rica.Soil Science Society of America,Madison,W I.1994,644-681
[13] 刘建新,杨振海.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准[J].饲料工业,1999,20(3):4-7
[14] 蔡羲民,大桃定洋,熊井清雄.饲料作物·牧草に付着すゐ乳酸菌の分布とその乳酸发酵特性[J].日本草地学会志,1994,39:420-428
[15] 庄益芬,安宅一夫,张文昌.添加剂、收割期对猫尾草青贮细胞壁成分和体外消化率的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(3):436-439
[16] Jacobs J L,Mcallan A B.Enzymes as silage additives.1.Silage quality,digestion,digestibility and performance in growing cattle[J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46:63-73
[17] Weinberg Z G,Ashbell G,Azrieli A,et al.Ensiling peas,ryegrass and wheat with additives of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)and cell degrading enzymes[J].Grass and Forage Science,1993,48:70-78
[18] Dwayne R B,Richard E M,Joseph H H.Silage science and technology[M].Madison Wisconsin,USA.2003,305-360

添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响

Effects of Different Additive Treatments on Fermentation Quality and in Vitro Digestibility of Leymus chinensis Silage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[2]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[3]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[4]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[5]	郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[6]	李文晶, 王俊锋, 高晓荻, 石玉杰, 穆春生. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[7]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[8]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[9]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[10]	候文慧, 张玉霞, 王红静, 张庆昕, 侯美玲, 丛百明, 杜晓艳. 施氮水平对羊草叶片光合特性和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 531-536.
[11]	王丽学, 韩静, 陈龙宾, 余新越, 刘景喜, 马毅, 霍文娟. 不同乳酸菌组合对苜蓿青贮细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 388-395.
[12]	寇江涛, 程钰, 张海波, 郭冬生, 雷佳星, 孟佳琪, 刘鑫, 李乐. 不同酶制剂对水稻秸秆和白酒糟混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 396-401.
[13]	张天俊, 张永亮, 李威, 侯美玲, 于金鑫, 李鑫. 植物生长延缓剂对羊草非结构性碳水化合物含量及产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 407-411.
[14]	丁浩, 吴永杰, 邵涛, 赵杰, 代童童, 董东, 尹雪敬, 贾玉山, 李君风. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2600-2608.
[15]	张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 王青, 刘佳乐, 杨娜, 苏德荣, 平晓燕. 放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 149-155.