4种苜蓿属植物幼苗的抗旱性研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.012

›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 205-211.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.012

4种苜蓿属植物幼苗的抗旱性研究

王赫¹, 刘利², 周道玮³

1. 辽宁省环境科学研究院, 辽宁, 沈阳, 110031;
2. 东北师范大学草地科学研究所, 吉林, 长春, 130024;
3. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 吉林, 长春, 130012

收稿日期:2008-06-18 修回日期:2009-12-15 出版日期:2010-04-15 发布日期:2010-04-15
通讯作者: 周道玮,E-mail:zhoudaowei@neigae.ac.cn
作者简介:王赫(1980- ),辽宁锦州人,博士,研究方向为牧草种质资源的抗逆选育,E-mail:he.wangworld@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(G2007CB106801)资助

Study on drought resistance of 4 Medicago L.varieties

WANG He¹, LIU Li², ZHOU Dao-wei ³

1. Liaoning Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110031, China;
2. Institute of Grassland Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130024, China;
3. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecolgy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130012

Received:2008-06-18 Revised:2009-12-15 Online:2010-04-15 Published:2010-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究了4种苜蓿属(Medicago)植物:2个俄罗斯的黄花苜蓿品种(M. falcata L. cv. Daviluya;M. falcata L. cv. Culuskaya)和采自我国内蒙古锡林郭勒盟的野生黄花苜蓿(M. falcata L.),公农I号紫花苜蓿(M. sativa L. cv. GongNongⅠ)的幼苗在3个土壤水分梯度下(对照(CK)、中度干旱(M)、重度干旱(S))对干旱胁迫的响应,比较其抗旱性,为我国优良苜蓿品种的选育奠定基础。结果表明:随着胁迫强度的增加,幼苗的株高、根长、分枝、根颈直径、叶面积和生物量显著下降,相对叶面积、茎叶比显著升高;叶片脯氨酸含量和电解质外渗率显著升高,光合作用显著下降。将胁迫指数用SPSS进行聚类分析显示:GongNongⅠ和Daviluya各自为一类,Culuskaya和野生黄花苜蓿聚为一类。对抗旱指标进行综合评价可知:Culuskaya抗旱能力较强,适宜在干旱、半干旱地区种植。

关键词: 苜蓿属, 干旱胁迫, 生理, 抗旱性

Abstract: Seedlings of 2 cultivars of Medicago falcata from Russia(Daviluya and Culuskaya),1 wild seedlings of M.falcata and a cultivar of Medicago sativa(GongnongⅠ) of China were grown in one of three soil water contents(CK,16%;M,9%;S,6%) to compare their drought resistance under soil water stress.With the increment of drought stress,plant height,root length,crown buds,root crown diameter,leaf area and biomass significantly decreased.Relative leaf area and stem/ leaf ratio significantly increased.Proline content in leaf and electrolyte permeation significantly increased and photosynthesis decreased significantly.C1uster analysis for drought index using SPSS software showed that GongNongⅠ and Daviluya was one group respectively,Culuskaya and wild M.falcata was another group.Considering the aspects of drought resistance data,Culuskaya displayed superior characteristics under drought stress which was suitable for growing in dry and semidry regions.

Key words: Medicago L., Drought stress, Physiology, Drought resistance

中图分类号:

S541
Q945.78

王赫, 刘利, 周道玮. 4种苜蓿属植物幼苗的抗旱性研究[J]. , 2010, 18(2): 205-211.

WANG He, LIU Li, ZHOU Dao-wei . Study on drought resistance of 4 Medicago L.varieties[J]. , 2010, 18(2): 205-211.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2010/V18/I2/205

参考文献

[1] 武维华.植物生理学[M]. 北京:科学出版社.2003:35-112.
[2] 耿华珠,吴永敷,曹致中.中国苜蓿[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社.1995:1-25.
[3] 春亮,闫志坚,路艳峰.中国苜蓿植物资源概述[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2009,28(5):6-9.
[4] Irwin J A G,Lloyd D L,and Lowe K F.Lucerne biology and genetic improvement-an analysis of past activities and future goals in Australian[J]. Australian Journal Agricultural Research,2001,(52):699-712.
[5] Hafid R E,Smith D H.Root and shoot growth,water use and water use efficiency of spring durum wheat under early-season drought[J]. Agronomie,1998,18:181-195.
[6] Li F M,Song Q H.Effects of pre-sowing irrigation and phosphorus application on water use and yield of spring wheat under semi-arid conditions[J]. Agriculture Water Management,2001,49:173-183.
[7] Deblonde P M K,Ledent J F.Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number,stem height,leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2001,14:31-41.
[8] 朱铁霞,高凯,卢长青,姚锦秋,安春光.干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(1):48-50.
[9] Roma O.Comparative field study of Quercus ilex and Phillyrea latifolia:photosynthetic response to experimental drought conditions[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2003,50:137-148.
[10] Hugo A P.Drought tolerance in relation to protection against oxidative stress in clones of Coffea canephora subjected to long-term drought[J]. Plant Science,2004,167:1307-1314.
[11] 李明,王根轩.干旱胁迫对干草幼苗保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J]. 生态学报,2002,22(4):503-507.
[12] 韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,杨秀娟.紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)对干旱胁迫的光合生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(2):5229-5237.
[13] 余玲,王彦荣,Garnett T,Auricht G,韩德梁.紫花苜蓿不同品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 草业学报,2006,15(3):75-85.
[14] Liu F,Stützel H.Biomass partitioning,specific leaf area,and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth(Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2004,102:15-27.
[15] 徐炳成,山仑.苜蓿和沙打旺苗期需水及其根冠比[J]. 草地学报,2003,11(1):78-82.
[16] Liu H Sh.Deficiency of water can enhance root respiration rate of drought-sensitive but not drought-tolerant spring wheat[J]. Agriculture Water Management,2004,64:41-48.
[17] Lucero D W.Effects of deficit and plant interaction on morphological growth parameters and yield of white clover and ryegrass[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,1999,11:167-177.
[18] Kage H,Kochler M.Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress conditions:measurement and simulation[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2004,20:379-394.
[19] Bai W,Li L H.Effect of irrigation methods and quota root water uptake and biomass of alfalfa in the Wulanbuhe sandy region of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2003,62(2):139-148.
[20] O'Toole J C,De Datta S K.Drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice[M]. In:Progress in Rainfed Lowland Rice,International Rice Research Institute,Makati City,Philippines.1986,145-158.
[21] Schulze E D.Whole-plant responses to drought[J]. Australia Journal of Plant Physiology,1986,13:127-141.
[22] Cabuslay G S,Ito O.Physiological evaluation of responses of rice to water deficit[J]. Plant Science,2002,163:815-827.
[23] 汤章程.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的积累及其的意义[J]. 植物生理学通讯,1984,(1):15-21.
[24] Frick H,Golt C.Sensitivity of Lemnra minor growth to osmotic potential and relative tolerance of its callus[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,1995,146:718-724.
[25] Sunclaresan S,Sudhakaran,P K.Water stress-induced alterations in the proline metabolism of drought-susceptible and tolerant cassava cultivars[J]. Physiology Plant,1995,94(4):635-642.
[26] 韩瑞宏,卢欣石.苗期紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫的适应机制[J]. 草地学报,2006,14(4):393-394.
[27] 韩德梁,王彦荣.紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(6):7-13.
[28] 程伟燕,张卫国,哈斯其木格.特莱克紫花苜蓿的形态解剖学观察[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报,2003,6:251-254.
[29] Tjus S E,Moller H V.Photosystem is an early target of photoinhibition in barely illuminated at chilling temperatures[J]. Plant Physiology,1998,116:755-764.
[30] 徐秀梅,杨万仁,刘东宁.干旱区20个紫花苜蓿品种抗旱性研究[J]. 种子,2004,23(11):21-24.
[31] 韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,杨秀娟.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报,2006,14(2):142-146

4种苜蓿属植物幼苗的抗旱性研究

Study on drought resistance of 4 Medicago L.varieties

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[2]	杜建雄, 任尉香, 袁涓文, 黄慧琼, 刘杰, 肖玉. 汞胁迫对4个草坪草、牧草品种幼苗生长和生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1712-1718.
[3]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[4]	李红, 李波, 方志坚, 杨曌, 张超, 冯成龙, 金姗姗, 王思琦, 石婉莹. 冻融和冻融+苏打盐碱复合胁迫下苜蓿幼苗的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[5]	杨婉秋, 敬洁, 朱灵, 高永恒. 川西北高寒草甸植物根际促生菌筛选及其特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1174-1182.
[6]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[7]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[8]	刘芳, 黄莉娟, 王普昶, 赵丽丽. 巴哈雀稗苗期对不同浓度磷胁迫的生理适应机制[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 684-693.
[9]	李波, 李晨阳, 李红, 杨曌. 短期低温胁迫对‘龙牧807’苜蓿幼苗生理代谢的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 515-521.
[10]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[11]	尹玉林, 马文馨, 李亚娟, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘肃省中部地区猫尾草新品系的抗寒性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.
[12]	李倩, 李长慧, 孙启忠, 王有良. 门源县越冬成功的3种紫花苜蓿抗寒性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 631-634.
[13]	陈斌, 薛晴, 李子葳, 杨宇佳, 杨小梅, 薄杉, 李强, 何淼. 光强对4种鸭跖草科植物叶片生理特性和超微结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 281-292.
[14]	万婷, 段钧译, 李蒙, 陈智勇. 南荻MlNAC2基因差异表达与耐盐生理响应的相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2685-2693.
[15]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.