黄土丘陵区不同植被对根际土壤微生物特性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.007

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 577-583.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.007

黄土丘陵区不同植被对根际土壤微生物特性的影响

薛萐^1,2, 刘国彬^1,2, 张超^1,2

1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌712100;
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌712100

收稿日期:2011-02-18 修回日期:2011-04-15 出版日期:2011-08-15 发布日期:2011-08-15
通讯作者: 刘国彬,E-mail:gbliu@ms.iswc.ac.Cn
作者简介:薛萐(1978- ),男,陕西西安人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事生态恢复与土壤微生物生态研究,E-mail:xuesha100@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(40801094);国家“973”项目(2007CB407205);中国科学院西部行动计划(KZCX2-XB2-05)资助

Effects of Different Vegetation on Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties in the Hilly-Gully Region of Loess Plateau

XUE Sha^1,2, LIU Guo-bin^1,2, ZHANG Chao^1,2

1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2011-02-18 Revised:2011-04-15 Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解黄土高原植被恢复对根际土壤微生物特性的影响,以黄土丘陵区墩山小流域的6种植被为研究对象,分析了不同植被根际、非根际土壤有机碳、微生物量C、微生物量N、基础呼吸以及酶活性的变化趋势。结果表明:6种植被中,柠条(Caragana korshinskii)、阿尔泰狗娃花(Heteropappus altaicus)和茵陈蒿(Artemisia capillaris)根际土壤有机碳高于非根际;沙打旺(Astragalus adsurgens)、柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum)、阿尔泰狗娃花和茵陈蒿根际pH值均低于非根际;除沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides)外,其他植被的根际微生物量N高于非根际;沙棘、阿尔泰狗娃花和茵陈蒿根际土壤微生物量C高于非根际;6种植被的根际基础呼吸和过氧化物酶显著高于非根际(P<0.05),多酚氧化酶两者无显著差异,蔗糖酶、脲酶、碱性磷酸酶及过氧化氢酶变化趋势不同。根际与非根际土壤有机碳、微生物量C、微生物量N、蔗糖酶、脲酶和过氧化氢酶之间呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),过氧化物酶与基础呼吸呈显著正相关(P<0.05),与多酚氧化酶呈极显著负相关(P<0.01)。无论是根际土壤还是非根际土壤,天然草地(阿尔泰狗娃花和茵陈蒿)的有机碳、微生物量C、微生物量N、蔗糖酶、脲酶、过氧化氢酶及过氧化物酶总体高于人工灌木(柠条和沙棘)和人工草地(沙打旺和茵陈蒿)。

关键词: 不同植被, 根际, 非根际, 微生物量, 土壤酶

Abstract: In order to explore the effect of revegetation on rhizosphere soil microbial properties in Loess Plateau,the changes of organic carbon (C),microbial biomass C,microbial biomass N,basal respiration and enzymes activities in both rhizosphere and bulk soil of six vegetation types at the Dunshan watershed of Hilly-Gully Region were investigated.Results showed organic C in the rhizosphere soil of Caragana korshinskii,Heteropappus altaicus and Artemisia capillaris was higher than that in bulk soil.The pH in the rhizosphere soil of Astragalus adsurgens,Panicum virgatum,Heteropappus altaicus and Artemisia capillaris was lower than that in bulk soil.With an exception of Hippophae rhamnoides,microbial biomass N in rhizosphere soil of five vegetation types was higher than that in bulk soil.Microbial biomass C in the rhizosphere of Hippophae rhamnoides,Heteropappus altaicus and Artemisia capillaris was higher compared with in bulk soil.All plants showed higher basal respiration and peroxidase in the rhizosphere soil than that in bulk soil.Saccharase,urease,alkaline phophatase and catalase had different change tendency in rhizosphere and bulk soil.Rhizosphere did not have significant effect on polyphenol oxidase.There were positively correlation between soil organic C,microbial biomass C,microbial biomass N,saccharase,urease and catalase.Peroxidase was positively correlated with basal respiration but negatively with polyphenol oxidase.Furthermore,natural grassland (Heteropappus altaicus,Artemisia capillaris) showed higher organic C,microbial biomass N,saccharase,urease,catalase and polyphenol oxidase in the both rhizosphere and bulk soil than artificial shrubland (Caragana korshinskii,Hippophae rhamnoides) and artificial grassland (Astragalus adsurgens,Panicum virgatum).

Key words: Rhizosphere, Bulk soil, Microbial biomass, Soil enzymes

中图分类号:

S154.36

薛萐, 刘国彬, 张超. 黄土丘陵区不同植被对根际土壤微生物特性的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 577-583.

XUE Sha, LIU Guo-bin, ZHANG Chao. Effects of Different Vegetation on Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties in the Hilly-Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 577-583.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2011/V19/I4/577

参考文献

[1] Steenwerth K L,Jackson L E,Calderon F J,et al.Soil microbial community composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2002,34(11):1599-1611
[2] Dick R P.Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health[A].In:Pankhurst C E,Doube B M,Gupta V V S R,Eds.Biological indicators of soil health[C].CAB International,Wallingford,1997.121-156
[3] 张学利,杨树军,张百习.我国林木根际土壤研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(6):461-465
[4] 杨玉盛,何宗明,邹双全,等.格氏栲天然林与人工林根际土壤微生物及其生化特性的研究[J].生态学报,1998,18(2):20-23
[5] Annelies S,Ridder-Duine D E,George A,et al.Rhizosphere bacterial community composition in natural stands of Carex arenaria (sand sedge) is determined by bulk soil community composition[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2005,37:349-357
[6] Sinha S,Masto R E,Ram LC,et al.Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2009,41:1824-1832
[7] 王群,尹飞,郝四平,等.下层土壤容重对玉米根际土壤微生物数量及微生物量碳、氮的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(6):3096-3104
[8] 刘登义,沈章军,严密,等.铜陵铜矿区凤丹根际和非根际土壤酶活性[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(7):1315-1320
[9] 薛萐,李占斌,李鹏,等.不同植被恢复模式对黄土丘陵区土壤抗蚀性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(增刊1):69-72
[10] 胡婵娟,刘国华,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型人工林土壤CO₂释放规律及其影响因子[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4700-4708
[11] 温仲明,焦峰,刘宝元.黄土高原森林草原区退耕地植被自然恢复与土壤养分变化[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2025-2029
[12] 安韶山,张扬,郑粉莉.黄土丘陵区土壤团聚体分形特征及其对植被恢复的响应[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(2):66-70
[13] 张成娥,陈小利.黄土丘陵区不同撂荒年限自然恢复的退化草地土壤养分及酶活性特征[J].草地学报,1997,5(3):195-200
[14] Jia G M,Cao J,Wang C Y,et al.Microbial biomass and nutrients in soil at the different stages of secondary forest succession in Ziwuling,northwest China[J].Forest Ecology Management,2005,217:117-125.
[15] 安韶山,黄懿梅,郑粉莉.黄土丘陵区草地土壤脲酶活性特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):233-237
[16] 王兵,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(3):282-287
[17] Vance E D,Brookes P C,Jenkinson D.An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass carbon[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1987,19:703-707
[18] Jenkinson D S,Powlson D S.The etfects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soils-a method for measuring soil biomass [J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1976,8:167-177
[19] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986
[20] Marschner,Romheld,Zhang F S,et al.Mobilization of mineral nutrients in the rhizosphere[J].Soil Science,1990,(2):158-163
[21] 詹媛媛,薛梓瑜,任伟,等.干旱荒漠区不同灌木根际与非根际土壤氮素的含量特征[J].生态学报,2009,29(1):59-66
[22] 厉婉华.栓皮栎,杉木和火炬松根际与非根际土壤氮素及pH值差异的研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1996,20(2):49-52
[23] Jenkinson D S,Ladd J N.Microbial biomass in soil:Measurement and turnover[A].In:Paul E A,Ladd J N,Marcel Dekker.Soil biochemistry[C].New York,1981.415-417
[24] 杨刚,何寻阳,王克林,等.不同植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮及土壤呼吸的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(1):189-191
[25] 周国英,陈小艳,李倩茹,等.油茶林土壤微生物生态分布及土壤酶活性的研究[J].经济林研究,2001,19(1):9-12
[26] 吉艳芝,冯万忠,陈立新,等.落叶松混交林根际与非根际土壤养分、微生物和酶活性特征[J].生态环境,2008,17(1):339-343
[27] 郑华,欧阳志云,王效科,等.不同森林恢复类型对土壤微生物群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(11):2019-2024
[28] Finzi A C,Breemen N,Canbarn C D.Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests:Species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen[J].Ecological Application,1998,8:440-446
[29] 陈闳竣,李传涵.杉木根际与非根际土壤酶活性比较[J].林业科学,1994,30(2):170-175
[30] 张学利,杨树军,张百习,等.不同林龄樟子松根际与非根际土壤的对比[J].福建林学院学报,2005,25(1):80-85
[31] Buee M,De Boer W,Martin F,et al.The rhizosphere zoo:an overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms,including phages,bacteria,archaea,and fungi,and of some of their structuring factors[J].Plant and Soil,2009,321:189-212
[32] Koranda M,Sohnecker J,Kaiser C,et al.Microbial processes and community composition in the rhizosphere of European beech-The in fuence of plant C exudates[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2010,doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.022
[33] 李国辉,陈庆芳,黄懿酶,等.黄土高原典型植物根际对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷和基础呼吸的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):0976-0983
[34] 张超,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区不同林龄人工刺槐林土壤酶演变特征[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):23-29
[35] 谭芳林,林捷,张水松.沿海沙地湿地松林地土壤养分含量及酶活性研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(1):170-173

黄土丘陵区不同植被对根际土壤微生物特性的影响

Effects of Different Vegetation on Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties in the Hilly-Gully Region of Loess Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵树栋, 李建宏. 高原早熟禾根际促生菌分离筛选及特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1885-1891.
[2]	王谭国艳, 马志远, 李沛洋, 郭俊宏, 张嘉懿, 蒋胜竞. 短期增温对青藏高原高寒草甸不同植物根际丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.
[3]	张新飞, 佘木子, 李晗玉, 敬松, 姜惠娜, 高浩, 朱延晓, 付娟娟. 琥珀酸黄杆菌促生机理及其对多年生黑麦草生长和抗逆性的生理调控作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1704-1711.
[4]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[5]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[6]	周洋洋, 景媛媛, 徐长林, 鱼小军. 覆膜种植对高寒区土壤水热、养分和苜蓿越冬的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1843-1852.
[7]	张万通, 李超群, 于露, 邵新庆. 植物根际促生菌菌肥在高寒草甸替代化肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.
[8]	杨婉秋, 敬洁, 朱灵, 高永恒. 川西北高寒草甸植物根际促生菌筛选及其特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1174-1182.
[9]	于铁峰, 郝凤, 张永亮, 高凯. 沙地豆禾混播草地土壤酶与土壤养分对混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[10]	吴建波, 王小丹. 藏北高寒草原土壤酶活性对氮添加的响应及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 555-562.
[11]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[12]	宿敬龙, 祁娟, 刘艳君, 杨航, 李明. 不同氮素水平及施氮方式对老芒麦根际土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 259-269.
[13]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[14]	喻岚晖, 王杰, 廖李容, 张超, 刘国彬. 青藏高原退化草甸土壤微生物量、酶化学计量学特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1702-1710.
[15]	孙韵雅, 陈佳, 王悦, 程济南, 韩庆庆, 赵祺, 李惠茹, 李慧萍, 何傲蕾, 缑晶毅, 吴永娜, 牛舒琪, 索升州, 李静, 张金林. 根际促生菌促生机理及其增强植物抗逆性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1203-1215.