利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.024

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 678-681.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.024

利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨

王敏玲¹, 孙海霞², 钟荣珍¹, 周道玮¹

1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 吉林长春130012;
2. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 黑龙江哈尔滨150081

收稿日期:2010-07-29 修回日期:2011-03-11 出版日期:2011-08-15 发布日期:2011-08-15
通讯作者: 周道玮,E-mail:zhoudaowei@neigae.ac.cn
作者简介:王敏玲(1982- ),女,黑龙江省绥化市人,硕士,主要从事农业生态方向研究,E-mail:wangml@neigae.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(30970493)资助

Discussion on Silage Quality Evaluation Using In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility

WANG Min-ling¹, SUN Hai-xia², ZHONG Rong-zhen¹, ZHOU Dao-wei¹

1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province 130012, China;
2. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Haerbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China

Received:2010-07-29 Revised:2011-03-11 Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 饲草青贮后会产生易挥发的发酵产物,在烘干时使干物质损失,从而低估了消化率。采用纤维素酶-胃蛋白酶两级离体消化法测定玉米(Zea mays L.)、羊草(Leymus chinensis Tzvel.)、苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的青贮料与其原料的消化率,并进行校正。结果表明:青贮饲料体外干物质消化率的实测值与校正值差异显著,校正后青贮饲料体外干物质体外消化率显著提高,相比之下,玉米青贮饲料提高的幅度更大,9月7日、9月17日收获的玉米分别提高了6.72%和5.63%。7月18日收获的羊草、9月7日收获的玉米、9月24日收获的苜蓿青贮饲料体外干物质消化率的实测值与原料相比均显著降低,但校正后都显著高于原料。8月19日收获的羊草和9月17日收获的玉米青贮饲料体外干物质消化率校正后虽比实测值显著提高,分别提高了2.00%和5.63%,但与原料相比还是显著下降,但降低幅度变小。7月18日收获的羊草和9月24日收获的苜蓿青贮饲料体外干物质校正消化率和原料差异不显著。

关键词: 青贮饲料, 品质评价, 校正

Abstract: The digestibility of silage could be underestimated due to fermentation product volatility.Digestibility of both silage and its crude materials such as corn (Zea mays L.),guineagrass (Leymus chinensis Tzvel.) and lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) using the pepsin-cellulase two-step in vitro technique was studied comparably here.Results indicated that there is significant deference between measured and adjusted IVDMD value of silage.Adjusted IVDMD values of silage are higher than measured ones.The adjusted IVDMD value of corn silage harvested in 7 Sep.and 17 Sep.increased 6.72% and 5.63% compared with measured ones,respectively.The measured IVDMD value of guineagrass silage harvested in 18 July,corn silage harvested in 7 Sep.and lucerne silage harvested in 24 Sep.decreased compared with that of crude materials.But the adjusted values of these silages all were higher than that of crude materials.Although the adjusted IVDMD value of guineagrass silage in 19 August and corn silage in 17 Sep.increased 2.00% and 5.63% compared with measured values,respectively,these values are still lower than that of crude materials.There is no significant deference between adjusted IVDMD value of guineagrass silage in 18 July as well as lucerne silage in 24 Sep.and that of their crude materials.

Key words: Silage, Evaluate, Correction

中图分类号:

王敏玲, 孙海霞, 钟荣珍, 周道玮. 利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 678-681.

WANG Min-ling, SUN Hai-xia, ZHONG Rong-zhen, ZHOU Dao-wei. Discussion on Silage Quality Evaluation Using In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 678-681.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2011/V19/I4/678

参考文献

[1] 任继周.草业科学研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.160-173
[2] Tilley J M,Terry R A.A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops[J].Journal of the British Grassland Society,1963,18:104-111
[3] Jones D I H,Hayward M V.A cellulose digestion technique for predicting the dry matter digedtibility of grasses[J].Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture,1973,24:1419-1426
[4] Mc Queen R E,Van Soest P J.Fungal cellulase and hemicellulase prediction of forage digestibility[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1975,58:1482-1491
[5] 周道玮.顶级刍秣:成功的青贮[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008
[6] 闫峻,王文杰,高玉鹏,等.自动凯氏定氮仪快速测定青贮饲料中的氨态氮[J].粮食与饲料工业,2009,4:47-48
[7] De Boever J L,Cottyn B G,Wainman F X,et al.The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility,metabolizable and net energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants[J].Animal Feed Science & Technology,1986,14:203-214
[8] 卢德勋.现代反刍动物营养研究方法和技术[M].北京:农业出版社,1991.56-61
[9] 许庆方,玉柱,李志强,等.苜蓿、玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性研究[J].草地学报,2007,15(6):519-524
[10] Pitt R E.Silage and hay preservation,northeast regional agricultural engineering service[M].New York:NRAES and Ithaca,1990.53
[11] Pordesimo L O,Hames B R,Sokhansanj S,et al.Variation in corn stover composition and energy content with crop maturity[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2005,28:366-374
[12] Browne E M,Juniper D T,Bryant M J,et al.Apparent digestibility and nitrogen utilization of diets based on maize silage harvested at three stages of maturity and fed to steers[J].Grass and Forage Science,2005,60:274-282
[13] Woolford M K.The microbiology of silage,in:the silage fermentation[M].New York:Marcel Dekker,1984.1-10
[14] 于秀芳,刘海燕,于维.玉米秸秆及青贮饲料的细胞壁成分体外消化性能比较[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,35(5):155-156
[15] 张佩华,王加启,贺建华,等.青贮对饲料稻秸秆DM和NDF瘤胃降解特性的影响[J].草业科学,2008,25(6):80-84
[16] 范华,裴彩霞,董宽虎.不同保存方法对秸秆营养价值的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(11):24-28

利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨

Discussion on Silage Quality Evaluation Using In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	商振达, 谭占坤, 李家奎, 卓嘎, 王宏辉, 谢国平, 刘锁珠. 种植时间对西藏地区青贮玉米发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 488-496.
[2]	梁国玲, 秦燕, 魏小星, 刘迎春, 刘勇, 刘文辉. 青藏高原高寒区I-D燕麦品系饲草生产性能及品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 917-927.
[3]	郑毅, 唐鸿宇, 李天宇, 蔡茂, 陈豪, 张嘉保, 王鹏. 青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置的设计与验证[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 238-243.
[4]	王旭哲, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 青贮饲料中真菌、真菌毒素及其检测方法的研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 509-517.
[5]	陈明霞, 刘秦华, 张建国. 耐低温乳酸菌的筛选鉴定及其对黑麦草青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 409-415.
[6]	崔棹茗, 郭刚, 原现军, 李君风, 杨晓丹, 丁良, 余成群, 邵涛. 青稞秸秆青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 607-615.
[7]	韩丹蕊, 孙启忠. 呼伦贝尔草原牧草青贮饲料硝酸盐与亚硝酸盐含量研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1360-1364.
[8]	张庆, 玉柱, 田吉鹏. 羊草晾晒过程中淋雨后进行青贮的研究[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 196-201.
[9]	韩立英, 周禾, 玉柱. 青贮饲料中脂肪酸研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(6): 990-994.
[10]	吴兆海, 梁超, 王永新, 高文俊, 玉柱, 孙启忠, 白春生, 许庆方. 晾晒和添加剂对白羊草青贮的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 768-771.
[11]	杨冬梅, 陶双伦, 梁静, 李俊年. 添加单宁酸对青贮葛藤茎叶品质的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 784-787.
[12]	许庆方, 崔志文, 魏化敬, 玉柱, 张翔, 刘豪, 蒙淑芳. 不同添加剂对小黑麦青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. , 2009, 17(4): 480-484.
[13]	范传广, 刘秦华, 张建国, 黎学青, 张向前, 唐湘如. 六个水稻品种饲用价值及青贮特性研究[J]. , 2009, 17(4): 495-499.
[14]	许庆方, 玉柱, 李志强, 韩建国, 聂志东, 孙娟娟, 单战. 苜蓿、玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性研究[J]. , 2007, 15(6): 519-524.