不同基质对新建果岭土壤微生物、酶活性及草坪性状的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.020

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 338-345.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.020

不同基质对新建果岭土壤微生物、酶活性及草坪性状的影响

王小琼, 舒常庆, 王洪顺, 尹少华

华中农业大学园艺林学学院园艺植物生物学教育部重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2012-09-12 修回日期:2012-11-20 出版日期:2013-04-15 发布日期:2013-04-23
通讯作者: 尹少华,yinshaohua@mail.hzau.edu.cn
作者简介:王小琼(1986-),女,湖北宜昌人,硕士研究生,主要从事草坪管理研究,E-mail:mubi86485@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(52204-09104);国家质检公益项目(200810494-2)资助

Influence of Newly Established Golf Green Rootzone Mixtures on Soil Microbial, Enzyme Activities and Bermudagrass Performances

WANG Xiao-qiong, SHU Chang-qing, WANG Hong-shun, YIN Shao-hua

College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University; Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430070, China

Received:2012-09-12 Revised:2012-11-20 Online:2013-04-15 Published:2013-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以中粗沙、极细沙和粉粘粒、泥炭为配材,采用极端顶点配方试验设计,参照美国高尔夫协会(USGA)规范建立高尔夫果岭试验小区,对6种不同配方土壤的微生物数量(细菌、真菌、放线菌)、酶活性、狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)草坪性状及其相关关系进行研究,以了解不同基质对新建果岭土壤微生物、酶活性及草坪性状的影响。结果表明:新建狗牙根果岭成坪后微生物数量、酶活性均较植草前显著增加;含泥炭的基质中微生物数量和酶活性水平、地上地下生物量、草坪质量显著高于全沙基质(P<0.05)。中粗沙、泥炭的含量及pH值与微生物数量、酶活性和草坪性状关系密切。各种土壤微生物数量和酶活性的增加能促进新建高尔夫果岭草坪的地上、地下0～5 cm、10～20 cm及地下生物总量和草坪表观质量的增加,而对地下5～10 cm生物量的影响较小。土壤微生物和酶的共同作用能促进高尔夫果岭草坪健康生长。

关键词: 基质配方, 微生物, 酶活性, 草坪性状, 相关关系

Abstract: Eperimental plots were established using United States Golf Association specifications. An extreme vertex design was used with medium-coarse, very fine silt and clay, peat as mixing ingredients. Soil microbes (bacteria, fungi and actinomyces), enzyme activities, bermudagrass performances and mutual relationships were studied on six different newly established golf green rootzones mixtures. Results were as follows: the number of soil microbes and enzyme activities in newly established bermudagrass rootzone increased dramatically after planting, but were still obviously lower than the average level for natural soil. Microbial quantity, enzyme activity, biomass and visual turf quality in mixtures with peat were significantly higher than in pure sandy mixtures. There was a close relationship between pH value, the content of medium-coarse peat, microbial quantity, enzyme activities, and turfgrass performances. Increases of soil microorganisms and enzyme activities could promote the aboveground biomass, the total underground biomass, the underground biomass in 0～5 cm, 10～20 cm soil layers and the visual turf quality of turfgrass, but couldn't promote the underground biomass in 5～10 cm soil layers. The interaction between soil microbial and enzyme activities could improve turfgrass growth healthily.

Key words: Golf green rootzone mixtures, Microbial, Enzyme activity, Turfgrass performance, Relationships

中图分类号:

S154
S688.4

王小琼, 舒常庆, 王洪顺, 尹少华. 不同基质对新建果岭土壤微生物、酶活性及草坪性状的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 338-345.

WANG Xiao-qiong, SHU Chang-qing, WANG Hong-shun, YIN Shao-hua. Influence of Newly Established Golf Green Rootzone Mixtures on Soil Microbial, Enzyme Activities and Bermudagrass Performances[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 338-345.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I2/338

参考文献

[1] Frankenberger W T, Dick W A. Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1983,47(5):945-951
[2] Deacon L J, Pryce-Millera E J, Frankland J C, et al. Diversity and function of decomposer fungi from a grassland soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(1):7-20
[3] Giai C, Boerner R E J. Effects of ecological restoration on microbial activity, microbial functional diversity, and soil organic matter in mixed-oak forests of southern Ohio, USA [J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2007,35(2):281-290
[4] Dick R P, Rasmussen D, Turco R. Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrating biological indicators. [M]//Doran J W, Jones A J, eds. Handbook of methods for assessment of soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1996:247-272
[5] Hodges C F. The microbiology of nonpathogens and minor root pathogens in high-sand content greens[J]. Golf Course Manage,1990,58(11):60-75
[6] Elliott M L, Des Jardin E A. Effect of organic nitrogen fertilizers on microbial populations associated with bermudagrass putting greens[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1999,28(4):431-435
[7] Elliott M L, Des Jardin E A. Fumigation effects on bacterial populations in new golf course bermudagrass putting greens[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2001,33(12/13):1841-1849
[8] Mancino C F, Barakat M, Maricic A. Soil and thatch microbial populations in and 80% sand: 20% peat creeping bentgrass putting green[J]. HortScience,1993,28(3):189-191
[9] Bigelow C A, Bowman D C, Wollum A G. Characterization of soil microbial population dynamics in newly constructed sand-based rootzones[J]. Crop Science,2002,42(5):1611-1614
[10] Liu Y Y, Dell E, Yao H Y, et al. Microbial and soil properties in bentgrass putting greens: Impacts of nitrogen fertilization rates[J]. Geoderma,2011,162(1/2):215-221
[11] Lee I S, Kim O K. Dehydrogenase activity and physico-chemical characteristics of golf course soils in Kyonggi province[J]. Korean Journal of Ecology,1994,17(2):143-148
[12] 王长庭,龙瑞军,王根绪,等.高寒草甸群落地表植被特征与土壤理化性状、土壤微生物之间的相关性研究[J].草业学报,2010,19(6):25-34
[13] 尚占环,丁玲玲,龙瑞军,等.江河源区退化高寒草地土壤微生物与地上植被及土壤环境的关系[J].草业学报,2007,16(1):34-40
[14] 文都日乐,张静妮,李刚,等.放牧干扰对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(4):517-522
[15] Stromberger M E, Klose S, Ajwa H, et al. Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soils fumigated with methyl bromide alternatives[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(6):1987-1999
[16] Shi W, Dell E, Bowman D, et al. Soil enzyme activities and organic matter composition in a turfgrass chronosequence[J]. Plant and Soil,2006,288(1/2):285-296
[17] Yao H Y, Bowman D, Rufty T, et al. Interactions between N fertilization, grass clipping addition and pH in turf ecosystems: Implications for soil enzyme activities and organic matter decomposition[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2009,41(7):1425-1432
[18] 张晓波. 草地早熟禾根际促生菌(PGPR)特性及根际微生物区系研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2008:109-111
[19] Mancino C F, Torello W A. Enumeration of denitrifying microbial populations in turf[J]. Plant and Soil,1986,96(1):149-151
[20] Couch, H B. Diseases of turfgrass[M].3rd ed. Krieger Publishing Malahar, FL., 1995;59-64
[21] United States Golf Association Green Section Staff. Revising the USGA Recommendations for a Method of Putting Green Construction[S]. USGA, Far Hills,N.J.,2004
[22] 宋桂龙,韩烈保. 土壤配比对运动场草坪草生长的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(2):199-200
[23] 尹少华.不同配方高尔夫球场果岭物理性质及其对草坪生长的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(3):358-364
[24] 尹少华,卢欣石,韩烈保. 高尔夫果岭土壤配方与物理性质及匍匐剪股颖草坪性状相关关系的研究[J].草业科学,2009,26(6):152-158
[25] Murphy J A, Samarnayake H, Honig J A, et al. Creeping bentgrass establishment on sand-based rootzones varying in amendment[J].USGA Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online,2004,3(10):1-15
[26] Waltz F C, McCarty L B. Field evaluation of soil amendments used in rootzone mixes for golf course putting greens[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal,2005(10):1150-1158
[27] 洪伟,吴承祯.试验设计与分析:原理·操作·案例[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004:213-226
[28] 李振高,骆永明,滕应. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2008:398-399
[29] 周礼恺. 土壤酶学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1987:97-99
[30] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:146-195
[31] 孙力安,刘国彬,梁一民.不同直径土钻测定草地地下生物量方法探讨[J]. 中国草地,1994,16(2):32-35
[32] 胡林,边秀举,阳新玲.草坪科学与管理[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2001:129-133
[33] 胡中民,樊江文,钟华平,等.中国草地地下生物量研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(9):1095-1101
[34] 孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,等.长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性的影响及其调控土壤肥力的作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(4):406-410

不同基质对新建果岭土壤微生物、酶活性及草坪性状的影响

Influence of Newly Established Golf Green Rootzone Mixtures on Soil Microbial, Enzyme Activities and Bermudagrass Performances

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[2]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[3]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[4]	王文军, 刘磊, 朱碧锋, 王成之, 王含笑, 马云锡, 魏江文, 王森山. 芥子油苷对豌豆蚜生长、存活及保护酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1675-1681.
[5]	王宝强, 赵颖, 朱晓林, 王旺田, 魏小红. 盐碱胁迫对藜麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1689-1696.
[6]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[7]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[8]	林春英, 李希来, 孙海松, 孙华方, 马程彪, 韩辉邦, 张宇鹏, 李成一. 黄河源高寒湿地有机碳组分对不同退化程度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.
[9]	甄莉娜, 李侠, 李朕, 刘丽珍, 卫振华, 郭彤彤, 王润梅. 煤矸石山不同植被根际可培养微生物数量的动态变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1224-1233.
[10]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[11]	丁成翔, 刘禹. 光伏园区建设对青藏高原高寒荒漠草地土壤原核微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1061-1069.
[12]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[13]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[14]	吴建波, 王小丹. 藏北高寒草原土壤酶活性对氮添加的响应及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 555-562.
[15]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.