不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.005

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1063-1070.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.005

不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响

冯斌^1,2, 杨晓霞^1,2, 刘文亭^1,2, 董全民^1,2, 张春平^1,2, 刘玉祯^1,2, 孙彩彩^1,2, 李彩弟^1,2, 时光^1,2, 杨增增^1,2, 张小芳^1,2, 魏琳娜^2,3

1. 青海大学畜牧兽医科学院, 青海省畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海大学青海省高寒草地适应性管理重点实验室, 青海西宁 810016;
3. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2021-08-18 修回日期:2021-12-13 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-06-06
通讯作者: 董全民,E-mail:qmdong@qhu.edu.cn
作者简介:冯斌(1993-),男,汉族,甘肃武威人,博士研究生,主要从事草地生态与环境保护研究,E-mail:1051259550@qq.com
基金资助:
青海省科技厅创新平台建设专项(2020-ZJ-T07);国家自然基金项目(31772655);国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U20A2007)资助

Effects of Different Livestock Assembly on the Stoichiometry of Alpine Grassland Functional Groups

FENG Bin^1,2, YANG Xiao-xia^1,2, LIU Wen-ting^1,2, DONG Quan-min^1,2, ZHANG Chun-ping^1,2, LIU Yu-zhen^1,2, SUN Cai-cai^1,2, LI Cai-di^1,2, SHI Guang^1,2, Yang Zeng-zeng^1,2, ZHANG Xiao-fang^1,2, WEI Lin-na^2,3

1. Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University/Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Science, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Adaptive Management on Alpine Grassland, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
3. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2021-08-18 Revised:2021-12-13 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于青藏高原东北部高寒草甸化草原设置的控制放牧试验，测定牦牛单牧(YG)、藏羊单牧(SG)、牦牛藏羊1∶6混牧(MG1∶6)、牦牛藏羊1∶4混牧(MG1∶4)、牦牛藏羊1∶2混牧(MG1∶2)和禁牧对照(NG)下禾本科、莎草科、豆科和杂类草的C，N，P含量并计算分析其计量特征。结果表明：各放牧处理增加了禾本科和莎草科的N含量，降低了杂类草的C含量，此外仅YG处理增加了莎草科的P含量；各放牧处理降低了禾本科和莎草科牧草的C∶N，除YG降低了莎草科的C∶P和N∶P以外，其他放牧处理增加了C∶P和N∶P；不同放牧方式下各功能群C∶N，C∶P，N∶P与N，P具有显著的负相关性(P<0.05)。依据中度放牧干扰下植物超补偿性生长的机制和植被生长速率假说，YG促进了莎草科物种的生长，同时也表明N、P在促进植被更新方面起到了重要的作用，是高寒草地植被生长重要的限制性元素。

关键词: 中度放牧, 高寒草地, 功能群, 生态化学计量特征, 放牧方式

Abstract: The stability of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecosystem is of great significance to global climate regulation and the maintenance of biodiversity. The response of contents and stoichiometry of carbon (C),nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) of plant functional groups to different livestock assembly under moderate grazing is important to reveal the utilization,distribution and balance of C,N and P among plant functional groups under grazing management. The experiment treatments included:only yak grazing (YG),only Tibetan sheep grazing (SG),yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed as 1:6 (MG1:6),yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed as 1:4 (MG1:4),yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed as 1:2 (MG1:2) and no grazing for control (NG). The element contents and their stoichiometry of four plant functional groups (Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Fabaceae and forb) were measured through a manipulated grazing experiment on an alpine grassland. The results showed that:All grazing treatments increased the N content of Poaceae and Cyperaceae,but decreased the C content of forb. Besides,YG increased the P content of Cyperaceae. All grazing treatments decreased C:N of Poaceae and Cyperaceae. YG decreased whereas the other grazing treatments increased C:P and N:P of Cyperaceae. It showed a significantly negative correlation among C:N,C:P,N:P and the contents of N,P for each functional group under all treatments (P<0.05). YG promotes the growth of Cyperaceae,meanwhile it shows that N and P play an important role in promoting vegetation regeneration and may restrict plant growth in alpine grassland based on the mechanism of super-compensatory growth of plant under moderate grazing and growth-rate hypothesis.

Key words: Moderate grazing, Alpine grassland, Functional group, Ecological stoichiometry, Livestock assembly

中图分类号:

S812

冯斌, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 董全民, 张春平, 刘玉祯, 孙彩彩, 李彩弟, 时光, 杨增增, 张小芳, 魏琳娜. 不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070.

FENG Bin, YANG Xiao-xia, LIU Wen-ting, DONG Quan-min, ZHANG Chun-ping, LIU Yu-zhen, SUN Cai-cai, LI Cai-di, SHI Guang, Yang Zeng-zeng, ZHANG Xiao-fang, WEI Lin-na. Effects of Different Livestock Assembly on the Stoichiometry of Alpine Grassland Functional Groups[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I5/1063

参考文献

[1] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].地理学报,2012,67(01):3-12
[2] REICH P B,OLEKSYN J,TILMAN G D. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(30):11001-11006
[3] TESSIER J T,RAYNAL D J. Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2003,40(3):523-534
[4] WANG W J,WANG H M,ZU Y G. Temporal changes in SOM,N,P,K,and their stoichiometric ratios during reforestation in China and interactions with soil depths:Importance of deep-layer soil and management implications[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2014(325):8-17
[5] 方瑛,安韶山,马任甜.云雾山不同恢复方式下草地植物与土壤的化学计量学特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(01):80-88
[6] 孙力,贡璐,朱美玲,等.塔里木盆地北缘荒漠典型植物叶片化学计量特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(05):1208-1214
[7] ELSER J J,STERNER R W,GOROKHOVA E,et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters,2010,3(6):540-550
[8] YAN W M,ZHONG Y Q W,ZHENG S X,et al. Linking plant leaf nutrients/stoichiometry to water use efficiency on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016(87):124-131
[9] 海旭莹,董凌勃,汪晓珍,等.黄土高原退耕还草地C,N,P生态化学计量特征对植物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):8570-8581
[10] LEBAUER D S,TRESEDER K K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed[J]. Ecology,2008,89(2):371-379
[11] 雒明伟,毛亮,李倩倩,等.青藏高原筑路取土迹地恢复植物群落与土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(23):7832-7841
[12] ELSER J. Biological stoichiometry:a chemical bridge between ecosystem ecology and evolutionary biology[J]. The American Naturalist,2006(168):25-35
[13] 田地,严正兵,方精云.植物生态化学计量特征及其主要假说[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(07):682-713
[14] LAMBERS H,ALBORNOZ F,KOTULA L,et al. How belowground interactions contribute to the coexistence of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal species in severely phosphorus-impoverished hyperdiverse ecosystems[J]. Plant and Soil,2018(424):11-33
[15] LAMBERS H,BRUNDRETT M C,RAVEN J A,et al. Plant mineral nutrition in ancient landscapes:high plant species diversity on infertile soils is linked to functional diversity for nutritional strategies[J]. Plant and Soil,2011(348):7-27
[16] 王鹏,牟溥,李云斌.植物根系养分捕获塑性与根竞争[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(11):1184-1196
[17] OSONE Y,TATENO M. Nitrogen absorption by roots as a cause of interspecific variations in leaf nitrogen concentration and photosynthetic capacity[J]. Functional Ecology,2005(19):460-470
[18] 戚德辉,温仲明,王红霞,等.黄土丘陵区不同功能群植物碳氮磷生态化学计量特征及其对微地形的响应[J].生态学报,2016,36(20):6420-6430
[19] 徐媛,鲍雅静,李政海,等.蒙辽农牧交错区草地植物碳氮化学计量特征[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(04):101-109
[20] 刘旻霞,朱柯嘉.青藏高原东缘高寒草甸不同功能群植物氮磷化学计量特征研究[J].中国草地学报,2013,35(02):52-58
[21] BAI Y F,WU J G,CLARK C M,et al. Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,49(6):1204-1215
[22] 郝广,闫勇智,李阳,等.不同刈割频次对呼伦贝尔羊草草原土壤碳氮变化的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(02):195-199
[23] ABBASI M K,ADAMS W A. Estimation of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in grassland soil associated with urea-N using 15 N and nitrification inhibitor[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,31(1):38-44
[24] 刘卓艺,王晓光,魏海伟,等.氮素补给对呼伦贝尔草甸草原退化草地牧草产量和品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(09):2992-2998
[25] 张艳芬,杨晓霞,董全民,等.牦牛和藏羊混合放牧对放牧家畜采食量和植物补偿性生长的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(06):1607-1614
[26] 冯斌,杨晓霞,董全民,等.高寒草地主要物种对放牧方式的响应[J].草业科学,2021,38(03):531-543
[27] YANG X X,DONG Q M,Chu H,et al. Different responses of soil element contents and their stoichiometry (C:N:P) to yak grazing and Tibetan sheep grazing in an alpine grassland on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau'[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2019,285(8):106628
[28] 王雪晴,阮文渊,易可可.植物体内磷素状况测定方法的研究进展[J].植物生理学报,2016,52(09):1327-1332
[29] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008(08):3937-3947
[30] 韩建国,毛培胜,董宽虎,等.草地学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008:84-86
[31] 汪诗平,王艳芬.不同放牧率下糙隐子草种群补偿性生长的研究[J].植物学报,2001,43(04):413-418
[32] 王新宇,高英志.禾本科/豆科间作促进豆科共生固氮机理研究进展[J].科学通报,2020,65(2-3):142-149
[33] 谢开云,王玉祥,万江春,等.混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素[J].草业学报,2020,29(03):157-170
[34] 张永亮,于铁峰,郝凤.豆禾混播牧草碳氮磷钾生态化学计量特征对施肥与混播比例的响应[J].草地学报,2020,28(05):1386-1394
[35] 黄菊莹,赖荣生,余海龙,等. N添加对宁夏荒漠草原植物和土壤C:N:P生态化学计量特征的影响[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(11):2850-2856
[36] 黄小波,刘万德,苏建荣,等.云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林152种木本植物叶片C,N,P化学计量特征[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(03):567-575
[37] 刘文亭,卫智军,吕世杰,等.中国草原生态化学计量学研究进展[J].草地学报,2015,23(05):914-926
[38] 陈云,李玉强,王旭洋,等.中国典型生态脆弱区生态化学计量学研究进展[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):4213-4225
[39] 丁小慧,宫立,王东波,等.放牧对呼伦贝尔草地植物和土壤生态化学计量学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(15):4722-4730
[40] 翟夏杰,黄顶,王堃.围封与放牧对典型草原植被和土壤的影响[J].中国草地学报,2015,37(06):73-78
[41] 付娟娟,益西措姆,陈浩,等.青藏高原高山嵩草草甸优势植物营养成分对放牧的响应[J].草业科学,2013,30(04):560-565
[42] 马文静.羊草和冷蒿的氮磷养分利用策略研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2019,26-27
[43] 马晶晶,王恩多.蛋白质合成中的核糖核酸蛋白质复合物[J].生命科学,2010,22(02):103-108
[44] 杨晓霞,任飞,周华坤,等.青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落生物量对氮、磷添加的响应[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(02):159-166
[45] 张永亮,于铁峰,郝凤.豆禾混播牧草碳氮磷钾生态化学计量特征对施肥与混播比例的响应[J].草地学报,2020,28(05):1386-1394

不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响

Effects of Different Livestock Assembly on the Stoichiometry of Alpine Grassland Functional Groups

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏洪烨, 张中华, 佘延娣, 马丽, 毛旭锋, 贾顺斌, 马真, 周华坤, 黄小涛. 不同管理措施对青海湖流域高寒草地土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1071-1076.
[2]	邵梓桐, 秦彧. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草地碳循环的影响研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1086-1094.
[3]	孙建财, 杨沙, 武玉坤, 李孟玉, 赵国丁, 肖国涛, 邓得婷, 史惠兰. 高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1273-1279.
[4]	王淼, 张宇, 张楚, 陈思思, 王旭, 陈金强, 李瑞强, 曹娟, 辛晓平, 周忠义, 闫瑞瑞. 放牧强度对草甸草原植物群落主要功能群碳氮磷贮量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 125-133.
[5]	李强, 何国兴, 刘志刚, 关文昊, 乔欢欢, 张德罡, 韩天虎, 孙斌, 潘冬荣, 柳小妮. 东祁连山高寒草甸植被特征和生物多样性对生境的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 169-177.
[6]	郭丽珠, 吕进英, 王堃, 范希峰, 黄顶, 武菊英. 不同草地利用方式对河北坝上天然草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 245-252.
[7]	杨冲, 王文颖, 刘攀, 周华坤, 索南吉, 刘艳方, 关晋宏. 三江源区不同高寒草地植物矿物元素含量特征及分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 52-61.
[8]	秦海蓉, 陈长成, 胡月明, 王立亚, 肖武, 赵之重, 胡永强, 赵理, 马秉云, 霍俊领, 王福成. 青海省高寒草地土壤侵蚀强度及其空间分布特点[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 104-112.
[9]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[10]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[11]	赵树栋, 李建宏. 高原早熟禾根际促生菌分离筛选及特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1885-1891.
[12]	高宏元, 侯蒙京, 葛静, 包旭莹, 李元春, 刘洁, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚, 贺金生, 钱大文. 基于随机森林的高寒草地地上生物量高光谱估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[13]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[14]	李兰平, 张慧敏, 李宏林, 梁德飞, 武学霞, 李希来. 不同功能群及先锋种在高寒人工草地建植初期的作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1513-1521.
[15]	钱前, 张秀娟, 王军邦, 叶辉, 李英年, 张志军. 2005-2017年青海三江源区草地家畜承载力时空格局研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1311-1317.