甜高粱叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.008

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 3636-3650.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.008

甜高粱叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析

洪森荣^1,2,3,4, 林顺来¹, 李盈萍¹, 李芸芸¹, 李和月¹, 张庆宝¹

1. 上饶师范学院生命科学学院, 江西上饶 334001;
2. 上饶农业技术创新研究院, 江西上饶 334001;
3. 上饶市药食同源植物资源保护与利用重点实验室, 江西上饶 334001;
4. 上饶市薯芋类作物种质保存与利用重点实验室, 江西上饶 334001

收稿日期:2023-07-03 修回日期:2023-08-10 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2024-01-03
作者简介:洪森荣(1974-)，男，汉族，江西永新人，硕士，教授，主要从事植物生物技术研究工作，E-mail：hongsenrong@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助目(31960079)；江西省科技厅重点研发计划一般项目(20202BBG73010)；江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ201704；GJJ211729)；江西省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(JXARS-13-赣东站)；上饶市科技局平台载体建设项目(2020J001)；上饶师范学院2023年大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202310416013)资助

Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence Characteristics and Its Code Usage Bias of Sorghum bicolor

HONG Sen-rong^1,2,3,4, LIN Shun-lai¹, LI Ying-ping¹, LI Yun-yun¹, LI He-yue¹, ZHANG Qing-bao¹

1. College of Life Sciences, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province 334001, China;
2. Shangrao Agricultural Technology Innovation Research Institute, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province 334001, China;
3. Key Laboratory of protection and utilization of medicinal and edible plant resources in Shangrao City, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province 334001, China;
4. Key Laboratory of germplasm conservation and utilization of potato and taro crops in Shangrao City, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province 334001, China

Received:2023-07-03 Revised:2023-08-10 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用高通量测序技术对甜高粱叶绿体基因组进行测序，对组装和注释后的叶绿体基因组进行结构、基因组成及密码子偏好性分析。结果表明，甜高粱(Sorghum bicolor)叶绿体基因组长度为140 644 bp，编码86个CDS基因、38个tRNA基因和8个rRNA基因，检测到31个SSR位点和42个Long repeat序列。甜高粱及其14个近缘种的叶绿体基因组变化不大，IR区边界未发生明显的收缩与扩张。甜高粱叶绿体基因组密码子偏好以A，U结尾，其密码子使用偏性很大程度上受自然选择的影响，而受突变压力的影响小。甜高粱叶绿体基因组的最优密码子14个(ACU，UAG，CCU，CUA，GCU，AGU，GAU，UUA，CGU，GAA，GUU，UCA，CAU，UGU)。甜高粱与高粱Sorghum bicolor MT333845(产地：韩国，栽培种Donganme)、MT333848(产地：韩国，栽培种Sodam Chal)、MT459453(产地：韩国，栽培种ATx623)亲缘关系较近。研究结果将为完善高粱属植物分子育种技术和探究高粱属植物系统发育提供参考。

关键词: 甜高粱, 叶绿体基因组, 序列特征, 密码子偏好性, 最优密码子, 系统发育分析

Abstract: The chloroplast genome of Sorghum bicolor was sequenced by high-throughput sequencing technology,and its structure,gene composition and codon preference of the assembled and annotated chloroplast genome were analyzed in this study. The results showed that the chloroplast genome length of S. bicolor was 140 644 bp,encoding 86 CDS genes,38 tRNA genes,and 8 rRNA genes. 31 SSR loci and 42 long repeat sequences were detected. The chloroplast genome of S. bicolor and its 14 related species showed little change,and the IR region boundary had no significant contraction or expansion. The codon preference of Sorghum bicolor chloroplast genome ended with A and U,and the codon usage bias was largely affected by natural selection,but was less affected by mutation pressure. There were 14 optimal codons (ACU,UAG,CCU,CUA,GCU,AGU,GAU,UUA,CGU,GAA,GUU,UCA,CAU,UGU) in the chloroplast genome of S. bicolor. S. bicolor had close genetic relationship with S. bicolor MT333845 (origin:Korea,cultivated species Donganme),S. bicolor MT333848 (origin:Korea,cultivated species Sodam Chal),and S. bicolor MT459453 (origin:Korea,cultivated species ATx623). The research results would provide reference for improving molecular breeding techniques and exploring the phylogenetic development of Sorghum plants.

Key words: Sweet sorghum, Chloroplast genome, Sequence characteristics, Codon bias, Optimal codons, Phylogenetic analysis

中图分类号:

S344+.13

洪森荣, 林顺来, 李盈萍, 李芸芸, 李和月, 张庆宝. 甜高粱叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3636-3650.

HONG Sen-rong, LIN Shun-lai, LI Ying-ping, LI Yun-yun, LI He-yue, ZHANG Qing-bao. Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence Characteristics and Its Code Usage Bias of Sorghum bicolor[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3636-3650.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I12/3636

参考文献

[1] 高丽娜,杨斌,金志琴,等.基于穗粒重的甜高粱耐旱性全基因组关联分析[J].塔里木大学学报,2023,35(1):39-44
[2] TAO Y,SUN Q Z,LI F,et al. Comparative analysis of ensiling characteristics and protein degradation of alfalfa silage prepared with corn or sweet sorghum in semiarid region of Inner Mongolia[J]. Animal Science Journal,2020,91(1):e13321
[3] ZHANG S J,CHAUDHRY A S,RAMDANI D,et al. Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an alternative to forage maize for silage making in Tarim Basin,China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(1):175-182
[4] XIE Q,XU Z H. Sustainable agriculture:from sweet sorghum planting and ensiling to ruminant feeding[J]. Molecular Plant,2019,12(5):603-606
[5] 张一为,王鸿英,王显国,等.天津地区饲用高粱属作物品种生长适应性比较[J].草原与草坪,2021,41(2):136-142
[6] 张一为,王鸿英,王显国,等.不同类型饲用高粱属作物营养价值比较[J].饲料研究,2020(10):101-104
[7] 陈超,张宇君,赵丽丽,等.高粱属牧草分子指纹图谱构建及遗传聚类分析[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(10):2191-2195
[8] 王芳,高秋,王杰,等.利用SSR标记分析高粱属种质资源的遗传多样性[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):125-133
[9] 黄卓然,吴晓敏,张慧君,等.四种禾本科作物叶绿体基因组碱基替换的侧翼序列特征[J].植物生理学报,2019,55(7):959-966
[10] 许卫东,阎隆飞,程振起.高粱叶绿体psbD基因的克隆及其高效表达[J].科学通报,1991(22):1741-1744
[11] KLEIN R R. Closing and finishing the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of sorghum male-sterile a1 cytoplasm using long span NGS read technology[J]. Plant & Animal Genome,2015(1):10-14
[12] LLORENTE B,SEGRETIN M E,GIANNINI E, et al. Homecoming:rewinding the reductive evolution of the chloroplast genome for increasing crop yields[J]. Nature Communications,2021,12(1):6734
[13] JING M,BAO H,MA Y,et al. The complete chloroplast genome of Poa pratensis (Poaceae),a high-quality forage[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences,2021,12(12):1755-1760
[14] PING J Y,FENG P P,LI J Y,et al. Molecular evolution and SSRs analysis based on the chloroplast genome of Callitropsis funebris[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2021,11(9):4786-4802
[15] DOYLE J J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue[J]. Phytochemical Bulletin,1987(19):11-15
[16] TILLICH M,LEHWARK P,PELLIZZER T,et al. GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes[J]. Nucleic acids research,2017,45(W1):W6-W11
[17] LOWE T M,EDDY S R. tRNAscan-SE:a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1997,25(5):955-964
[18] LOHSE M,DRECHSEL O,BOCK R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW):a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes[J]. Current Genetics,2007,52(5-6):267-274
[19] THIEL T,MICHALEK W,VARSHNEY R,et al. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics,2003,106(3):411-422
[20] KURTZ S,CHOUDHURI J V,OHLEBUSCH E,et al. REPuter:the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,2001,29(22):4633-4642
[21] AMIRYOUSEFI A,HYVÖNEN J,POCZAI P. IRscope:an online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes[J]. Bioinformatics,2018,34(17):3030-3031
[22] ROZAS J,FERRER-MATA A,SÁNCHEZ-DELBARRIO J C,et al. DnaSP 6:DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,2017,34(12):3299-3302
[23] KATOH K,STNDLEY D M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7:improvements in performance and usability[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,2013,30(4):772-780
[24] PRICE M N,DEHAL P S,ARKIN A P. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments[J]. Plos One,2010,5(3):e9490
[25] ZHU A D,GUO W H,GUPTA S,et al. Evolutionary dynamics of the plastid inverted repeat:the effects of expansion,contraction,and loss on substitution rates[J]. New Phytologist,2016,209(4):1747-1756
[26] SASKI C,LEE S B,FJELLHEIM S,et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Hordeum vulgare,Sorghum bicolor and Agrostis stolonifera,and comparative analyses with other grass genomes[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics,2007,115(4):571-590
[27] ŠMARDA P,BUREŠ P H L,LEITCH I J. et al. Ecological and evolutionary significance of genomic GC content diversity in monocots[J]. Processings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2014,111(39):E4096-E4102
[28] WU L W,NIE L P,XU Z C,et al. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of three Paeonia section Moutan Species (Paeoniaceae)[J]. Frontiers in Genetics,2020(11):980
[29] ZENG J M,CHEN X J,WU X F,et al. Genetic diversity analys is of genus Nicotiana based on SSR markers in chloroplast genome and mitochondria genome[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica,2016,22(4):89-97
[30] 卢政阳,于凤扬,肖月娥,等.北陵鸢尾叶绿体基因组及其特征分析[J].草地学报,2023,31(6):1656-1664
[31] 郝新艳,赵淑文,刘嘉伟,等.杂花苜蓿叶绿体基因组特征及系统发育分析[J].草地学报,2023,31(6):1665-1672
[32] ZHENG G,WEI L L,MA L,et al. Comparative analyses of chloroplast genomes from 13 Lagerstroemia (Lythraceae) species:identification of highly divergent regions and inference of phylogenetic relationships[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2020,102(6):659-676
[33] XIE J B,QIAN K C,SI J N,et al. Conserved noncoding sequences conserve biological networks and influence genome evolution[J]. Heredity,2018(120):437-451
[34] 刘慧,王梦醒,岳文杰,等.糜子叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性的分析[J].植物科学学报,2017,35(3):362-371
[35] LI G,ZHANG L,XUE P. Codon usage pattern and genetic diversity in chloroplast genomes of Panicum species[J]. Gene,2021(802):145866
[36] SUEOKA N. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution,1995,40(3):318-325
[37] CAMPBELL W H,GOWRI G. Codon usage in higher plants,green algae,and cyanobacteria[J]. Plant Physiology,1990,92(1):1-11
[38] 杨祥燕,蔡元保,谭秦亮,等.菠萝叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J].热带作物学报,2022,43(3):439-446
[39] YANG G F,SU K L,ZHAO Y R,et al. Analysis of codon usage in the chloroplast genome of Medicago truncatula[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(12):171-179
[40] 胡晓艳,许艳秋,韩有志,等.酸枣叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性分析[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(6):621-628
[41] 杨惠娟,刘国顺,张松涛,等.烟草叶绿体密码子的偏好性及聚类分析[J].中国烟草学报,2012,18(2):37-43
[42] 季凯凯,宋希强,陈春国,等.木兰科叶绿体基因组的密码子使用特征分析[J].中国烟草学报,2020,22(11):52-62
[43] 柏梁耀,努热曼古力·扎克尔,董宇,等.南疆阿拉尔地区5种饲用甜高粱农艺性状与营养成分分析[J].饲料研究,2023,46(4):126-130

甜高粱叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析

Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence Characteristics and Its Code Usage Bias of Sorghum bicolor

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢政阳, 于凤扬, 肖月娥, 石钰, 毕晓颖. 北陵鸢尾叶绿体基因组及其特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1656-1664.
[2]	郝新艳, 赵淑文, 刘嘉伟, 石蕊, 王晓龙, 李迎, 王晓宇, 米福贵. 杂花苜蓿叶绿体基因组特征及系统发育分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1665-1672.
[3]	郭冉昊, 赵淑文, 米福贵, 候伟峰, 赵力兴. 直立型半野生大豆叶绿体基因组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3334-3342.
[4]	黄娟, 周瑜, 张亚勤, 李泽碧, 王秋月, 奚江, 吴修林. 甜高粱苗期镉耐性和富集能力综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(10): 3040-3049.
[5]	祁鹤兴, 王海春, 芦光新, 李宗仁, 田丰, 贺晨邦, 徐成体, 邹海涛, 雷生妍, 李红芳, 唐海鹏. 青贮玉米蠕形菌的分离鉴定及其致病性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 40-49.
[6]	倪旺, 梁丹妮, 时兴伟, 王斌, 王腾飞, 李满有, 冯琴, 兰剑. 灌溉次数和施氮量对甜高粱生产性能及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 294-301.
[7]	孙哲, 李澳旋, 杜晓蓉, 宋芸, 乔永刚. 房山紫堇叶绿体基因组特征及其系统进化关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 1982-1989.
[8]	马桂花, 段晓明, 徐文华, 周渊涛, 马海霞, 马伟丽, 祁鹤兴. 蒙古黄芪根腐病病原鉴定及防治药剂室内筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1122-1130.
[9]	孙志轩, 敖平星, 毕玉芬, 赵雁. 德钦’紫花苜蓿叶绿体基因组序列及特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 320-328.
[10]	苏杭, 翟建荣, 邓苛莉, 栗扬, 杨建峰, 綦才, 郭彦军. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对甜高粱和青贮玉米幼苗耐涝性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3140-3147.
[11]	汪雪, 刘晓静, 赵雅姣, 王静. 不同根系交互强度下紫花苜蓿/甜高粱体内氮营养动态特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 76-83.
[12]	董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 聂聪, 杨建, 张建波, 苟文龙, 马啸. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[13]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[14]	安明珠, 韩博, 姜华, 段新慧, 文亦芾, 周凯. 鸭茅物种起源与系统发育分析研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2637-2644.
[15]	田春育, 武自念, 李贤松, 李志勇. 扁蓿豆叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2678-2684.