木聚糖酶在青贮及反刍动物日粮中的应用

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.034

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 331-339.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.034

木聚糖酶在青贮及反刍动物日粮中的应用

刘伟¹, 于凤民², 马千鹏³, 特古斯巴雅尔³, 张晓华³, 张兴军³, 谭艺沅⁴, 贾玉山¹

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院/农业农村部饲草栽培、加工与高效利用重点实验室/草地资源教育部重点实验室, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
2. 巴林左旗农牧局, 内蒙古赤峰 024000;
3. 巴林左旗林业和草原局, 内蒙古赤峰 024000;
4. 巴林左旗工信和科技局, 内蒙古赤峰 024000

收稿日期:2023-06-16 修回日期:2023-11-11 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-30
通讯作者: 贾玉山,E-mail:jys_nm@sina.com
作者简介:刘伟(1996-),男,汉族,内蒙古通辽人,博士研究生,主要从事饲草加工与贮藏方面研究,E-mail:liuwei0416996@126.com
基金资助:
“国家乳业技术创新中心创建”重点项目（2021-国家乳创中心-1）；内蒙古自治区科技计划项目（2021GG0109）；财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系资助

Application of Xylanase in Silage and Ruminant Diet

LIU Wei¹, YU Feng-min², MA Qian-peng³, TE Gu-si-ba-ya-er³, ZHANG Xiao-hua³, ZAHNG Xing-jun³, TAN Yi-yuan⁴, JIA Yu-shan¹

1. Colleg of Grassland Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010019, China;
2. Bahrain Left Banner Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024000, China;
3. Bahrain Left Banner Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024000, China;
4. Bahrain Left Banner Bureau of Industry, Information and Technology, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024000, China

Received:2023-06-16 Revised:2023-11-11 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 青贮饲料与反刍动物日粮中木质纤维素占比高，直接进行利用会造成能量流失。酶制剂在青贮或日粮中应用广泛，通过酶制剂预处理可提高饲料的利用效率。木聚糖酶与其它酶制剂混合添加可有效降解青贮中的纤维含量，增加可代谢糖含量，有利于微生物生长，促进青贮发酵，进而提高青贮饲料的利用效率。在反刍动物日粮中，木聚糖酶可以辅助瘤胃微生物分解饲料中的纤维成分，改善瘤胃发酵环境，使反刍动物获得更多的能量来供其生长和代谢，进而提升反刍动物的生产性能。本文介绍了木聚糖与木聚糖酶，通过综述木聚糖酶在青贮及反刍动物日粮中应用，阐释了木聚糖酶在青贮与反刍动物日粮中的添加量、利用效果，为后续木聚糖酶的利用提供理论参照。

关键词: 木聚糖, 木聚糖酶, 青贮, 反刍动物, 日粮

Abstract: The proportion of lignocellulose in silage and ruminant diets is relatively high, and direct utilization can cause energy loss. Enzyme preparations are widely used in silage or diets, and pretreatment with enzyme preparations can improve the efficiency of feed utilization. Mixing xylanase with other enzyme preparations can effectively degrade the fiber content in silage, increase the fermentable sugar content, facilitate microbial growth, promote silage fermentation, and thereby improve the utilization efficiency of silage feed. In the diet of ruminants, xylanase can assist rumen microorganisms in breaking down fiber components in feed, improve the rumen fermentation environment, and enable ruminants to obtain more energy for their growth and metabolism, thereby improving their production performance. This article mainly introduced xylan and xylanase. By reviewing the application of xylanase in silage and ruminant diets, the addition amount and utilization effect of xylanase in silage and ruminant diets were explained, providing theoretical reference for the subsequent utilization of xylanase.

Key words: Xylan, Xylanase, Silage, Ruminants, Diet

中图分类号:

S816.5+3

刘伟, 于凤民, 马千鹏, 特古斯巴雅尔, 张晓华, 张兴军, 谭艺沅, 贾玉山. 木聚糖酶在青贮及反刍动物日粮中的应用[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 331-339.

LIU Wei, YU Feng-min, MA Qian-peng, TE Gu-si-ba-ya-er, ZHANG Xiao-hua, ZAHNG Xing-jun, TAN Yi-yuan, JIA Yu-shan. Application of Xylanase in Silage and Ruminant Diet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 331-339.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.034

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I1/331

参考文献

[1] BAJPAI P. Xylanolytic Enzymes[M]. Kidlington:Academic Press, 2022:149-211
[2] WANG Y L, WANG W K, WU Q C, et al. The release and catabolism of ferulic acid in plant cell wall by rumen microbes:a review[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2022, 9:335-344
[3] 丁浩, 吴永杰, 邵涛. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021,29(11):2600-2608
[4] RYTIOJA J, HILDEN K, YUZON J, et al. Plant-polysaccharide-degrading enzymes from basidiomycetes[J]. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2014, 78(4):614-49
[5] BAJPAI P. Xylanolytic Enzymes[M]. Kidlington:Academic Press, 2022:1-12
[6] POLIZELI M L, RIZZATTI A C, MONTI R, et al. Xylanases from fungi:properties and industrial applications[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2005, 67(5):577-91
[7] 郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5):1113-1117
[8] BOWMAN G R, BEAUCHEMIN K A, SHELFORD J A. The proportion of the diet to which fibrolytic enzymes are added affects nutrient digestion by lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(12):3420-3429
[9] BEAUCHEMIN K A, COLOMBATTO D, MORGAVI D P, et al. Mode of action of exogenous cell wall degrading enzymes for ruminants[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 84(1):13-22
[10] BUREENOK S, LANGSOUMECHAI S, PITIWITTAYAKUL N, et al. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality andin vitrodigestibility of Napier grass silage[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 18(1):1438-1444
[11] DESTA S T, YUAN X, LI J, et al. Ensiling characteristics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass ensiled with additives[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 221:447-454
[12] SALEM A Z M, BUENDÍA-RODRÍGUEZ G, ELGHANDOUR M M M, et al. Effects of cellulase and xylanase enzymes mixed with increasing doses of Salix babylonica extract on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of a mixture of corn silage with concentrate[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(1):131-139
[13] HARRIS P J, STONE B A. Chemistry and molecular organization of plant cell walls[M]. Oxford, United Kingdom:Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009:61-93
[14] EMILIE A, RENNIE E A, SCHELLER H V. Xylan biosynthesis[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2014, 26:100-107
[15] VOGEL J. Unique aspects of the grass cell wall[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2008, 11(3):301-307
[16] MUHAMMAD S, NOORA B, PHILIPPE M, et al. Cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes from yeasts:properties and industrial applications[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(12):3783
[17] SHARMA M, KUMAR A. Xylanases:an overview[J]. British Biotechnology Journal, 2013, 3(1):40-45
[18] IANNACCONE F, ALBORINO V, DINI I, et al. In vitro application of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes from trichoderma spp. to improve feed utilization by ruminants[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(5):573-573
[19] 吴爽, 周玉香, 贾柔, 等. 饲用酶制剂在反刍动物生产中的应用概况[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(7):3005-3011
[20] KAEWPILA C, THIP-UTEN S, CHERDTHONG A, et al. Impact of Cellulase and Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculant to Modify Ensiling Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Sweet Corn Stover and Cassava Pulp Silage[J]. Agriculture, 2021, 11(1):1-12
[21] WANG Y, MCALLISTER T A, RODE L M, et al. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec) [J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2001, 85(3):325-332
[22] JIN L, DUNIERE L, LYNCH J P, et al. Impact of ferulic acid esterase producing lactobacilli and fibrolytic enzymes on conservation characteristics, aerobic stability and fiber degradability of barley silage[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 207:62-74
[23] THOMAS M E, FOSTER J L, MCCUISTION K C, et al. Nutritive value, fermentation characteristics, and in situ disappearance kinetics of sorghum silage treated with inoculants[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(11):7120-7131
[24] DEL VALLE T A, ANTONIO G, ZENATTI T F, et al. Effects of xylanase on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of sugarcane silage[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2019, 156(9):1123-1129
[25] EUN J S, BEAUCHEMIN K A. Assessment of the potential of feed enzyme additives to enhance utilization of corn silage fibre by ruminants[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 88(1):97-106
[26] TANG S X, TAYO G O, TAN Z L, et al. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 86(5):1164-1172
[27] CAMPANA M, DE MORAIS J P G, CAPUCHO E, et al. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fermentation losses and reduce fiber content of sorghum silage[J]. Annals of Animal Science, 2023, 23(1):165-172
[28] WANG S, ZHAO J, DONG Z, et al. Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 309:123371
[29] PAPADIMITRIOU K, ALEGRIA A, BRON P A, et al. Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria[J]. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2016, 80(3):837-90
[30] DEHGHANI M R, WEISBJERG M R, HVELPLUND T, et al. Effect of enzyme addition to forage at ensiling on silage chemical composition and NDF degradation characteristics[J]. Livestock Science, 2012, 150(1-3):51-58
[31] LIU Q, ZONG C, DONG Z, et al. Effects of cellulolytic lactic acid bacteria on the lignocellulose degradation, sugar profile and lactic acid fermentation of high-moisture alfalfa ensiled in low-temperature seasons[J]. Cellulose, 2020, 27(14):7955-7965
[32] XIONG H, ZHU Y, WEN Z, et al. Effects of Cellulase, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Sucrose on Fermentation Parameters, Chemical Composition, and Bacterial Community of Hybrid Pennisetum Silage[J]. Fermentation, 2022, 8(8):1251
[33] COLOMBATTO D, MORGAVI D P, FURTADO A F, et al. Screening of exogenous enzymes for ruminant diets:Relationship between biochemical characteristics and in vitro ruminal degradation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2003, 81:2628-2638
[34] NAIR J, YANG H E, REDMAN A A, et al. Effects of a mixture of lentilactobacillus hilgardii, lentilactobacillus buchneri, pediococcus pentosaceus and fibrolytic enzymes on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of growing beef cattle[J]. Translational Animal Science, 2022, 6(4):txac144
[35] BRUNA C A, JOÃO L P D, LUCIA M Z, et al. Effects of lignocellulolytic enzymes on the fermentation profile, chemical composition, and in situ ruminal disappearance of whole-plant corn silage[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2021, 99(11):skab295
[36] SINGH D, JOHNSON T A, TYAGI N, et al. Synergistic Effect of lab strains (lb. fermentum and pediococcus acidilactisci) with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on quality and fermentation characteristics of sugarcane tops silage[J]. Sugar Technology, 2022, 25(1):141-153
[37] KUPRYS-CARUK M, CHOINSKA R, DEKOWSKA A, et al. Silage quality and biogas production from spartina pectinatal fermented with a novel xylan-degrading strain of lactobacillus buchneri m b·00077[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1):13175
[38] PHAKACHOED N, SUKSOMBAT W, COLOMBATTO D, et al. Use of fibrolytic enzymes additives to enhance in vitro ruminal fermentation of corn silage[J]. Livestock Science, 2013, 157(1):100-112
[39] YANG J-C, GUEVARA-OQUENDO V H, REFAT B, et al. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme derived from trichoderma reesei on rumen degradation characteristics and degradability of low-tannin whole plant faba bean silage in dairy cows[J]. Dairy, 2022, 3(2):303-313
[40] YANG W Z, BEAUCHEMIN K A, RODE L M. A Comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2000, 83(11):2512-2520
[41] TAO R, ATEF S, YIZHAO S, et al. PSXII-23 effects of a recombinant fibrolytic enzyme on fiber digestion, ruminal fermentation, nitrogen balance and total tract digestibility of heifers fed a high forage diet[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 97:419-420
[42] ELGHANDOUR M M M Y, KHOLIF A E, MÁRQUEZ-MOLINA O, et al. Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixture on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios[J]. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 2015, 39:435-442
[43] SCHINGOETHE D J, STEGEMAN G A, TREACHER R J. Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1999, 82(5):996-1003
[44] SILVA T H, TAKIYA C S, VENDRAMINI T H A, et al. Effects of dietary fibrolytic enzymes on chewing time, ruminal fermentation, and performance of mid-lactating dairy cows[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 221:35-43
[45] NSEREKO V L, BEAUCHEMIN K A, MORGAVI D P, et al. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2002, 48(1):14-20
[46] 王国秀, 马东方, 黄永亮, 等. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶处理大麦秸秆和玉米秸秆的绵羊瘤胃降解特性[J]. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(3):1781-1790
[47] HRISTOV A N, MCALLISTER T A, CHENG K J. Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes:effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2000, 78(2):477-487
[48] FENG P, HUNT W C, PRITCHARD G, et al. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1996, 74(6):1349-1357
[49] ARRIOLA K G, ADESOGAN A T. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme application on the digestibility of corn silage, alfalfa hay, concentrates, and complete diets under simulated ruminal and preruminal conditions[J]. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 2013, 13(3):537-550
[50] BEAUCHEMIN K A, JONES S D M, RODE L M, et al. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1997, 77(4):645-653
[51] PJ V S, JB R, BA L. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Sciences, 1991, 74(10):3583-3597
[52] DIJKSTRA B J, TAMMINGA S. Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 74:617-634
[53] FORSBERG C W, CHENG K J. Biotechnology and Nutrition[M]. Butterworth Heinmann, Stoneham, UK:1992:89-95
[54] WANG Y, MCALLISTER T A. Rumen microbes, enzymes and feed digestion-a review[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2002, 15(11):1659-1677
[55] WANG Y, MCALLISTER T A, RODE L M, et al. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the rumen simulation technique[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2001, 85(3):325-332
[56] YANG W Z, BEAUCHEMIN K A, RODE L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1999, 82(2):391-403
[57] COLOMBATTO D, HERVÁS G, YANG W Z, et al. Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture, maintained at high and low pH[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 81(10):2617-2627
[58] YANG W Z, BEAUCHEMIN K A, RODE L M. A comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2000, 83(11):2512-2520
[59] YANG J, REFAT B, GUEVARA-OQUENDO V H, et al. Lactational performance, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows fed whole-plant faba bean silage-based diet with fibrolytic enzyme[J]. Animal, 2022, 16(9):100606
[60] KUNG L, COHEN M A, RODE L M, et al. The effect of fibrolytic enzymes sprayed onto forages and fed in a total mixed ratio to lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(9):2396-2402
[61] ROMERO J J, MACIAS E G, MA Z X, et al. Improving the performance of dairy cattle with a xylanase-rich exogenous enzyme preparation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(5):3486-3496

木聚糖酶在青贮及反刍动物日粮中的应用

Application of Xylanase in Silage and Ruminant Diet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨丹, 吴硕, 陈丹丹, 张庆. 黄梁木精油活性成分测定及其对全株玉米青贮有氧稳定的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2860-2867.
[2]	严旭, 吴子周, 左艳春, 王红林, 王强锋, 李杨, 寇晶, 杜周和. 玉米植株不同部位的青贮特征及其品质提升策略[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2275-2286.
[3]	佘智慧, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 交错区青贮玉米品种(品系)筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2409-2416.
[4]	党佳皓, 龙仕和, 李雪枫, 潘俊歆, 王坚. ‘热研4号’王草青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2537-2544.
[5]	刘逸超, 孙鹏波, 张佳伟, 李冬梅, 马宏伟, 井志伟, 王瑞峰, 贾玉山. 发酵抑制剂对羊草青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2564-2570.
[6]	吴艾丽, 肖宇, 邵涛, 宗成, 黄仲永, 吴金鑫, 刘秦华, 荣辉. 青贮发酵产物—角鲨烯抑制β-胡萝卜素损失的机理探究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 1988-1995.
[7]	黄佩珊, 张超, 陈丹丹, 张庆. 辣木叶提取物对柱花草和象草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2194-2202.
[8]	闫星全, 贾玉山, 格根图, 王志军, 赵牧其尔, 刘静怡, 珠娜, 孙鹏波. 原料含水量及添加剂种类对青贮苜蓿品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1861-1866.
[9]	甘丽, 李海萍, 汪辉, 陈有军, 陈仕勇, 蒋永梅, 张珈敏, 梁骥, 关皓, 周青平. 生育期和混播比例对四川冬闲田燕麦/箭筈豌豆混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1867-1877.
[10]	徐均钊, 王琦, 胡宗福, 吴白乙拉, 牛化欣. 不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.
[11]	安江波, 刘明健, 刘伟, 白宝超, 井志伟, 王瑞峰, 王志军, 格根图, 贾玉山. 青贮过程中亚硝酸盐转化途径及影响因素研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 943-951.
[12]	冯启贤, 张磊, 李妍, 凌文卿, 李珏, 周燚, 阳伏林, 周晶. 甲酸处理对苜蓿青贮品质及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1264-1272.
[13]	柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮. 添加不同乳酸菌对燕麦低温青贮发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 923-928.
[14]	巩海强, 柴继宽, 陈三冬, 尹国丽, 邓秀霞. 抑制黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 587-595.
[15]	田丽梅, 陈菲, 林炎丽, 倪奎奎, 杨富裕. 近红外光谱检测燕麦饲草青贮营养品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3841-3850.