不同刈割强度对晋北赖草草地生态系统CO2交换的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.016

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 3159-3166.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.016

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

不同刈割强度对晋北赖草草地生态系统CO₂交换的影响

杨鹤明¹, 王海南¹, 王常慧^1,2,3, 董宽虎^1,2,3, 刁华杰^1,2,3, 张晓琳^1,2,3

1. 山西农业大学草业学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 山西右玉黄土高原草地生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 山西右玉 037200;
3. 草地生态保护与乡土草种质创新山西省重点实验室, 山西太谷 030801

收稿日期:2024-01-04 修回日期:2024-03-04 发布日期:2024-11-04
通讯作者: 张晓琳,E-mail:alleenzhang@126.com
作者简介:杨鹤明(1998-)，男，汉族，吉林桦甸人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地生态与管理研究，E-mail：yang18503483599@163.com
基金资助:
山西省基础研究计划项目(No.202303021221092);山西农业大学高层次人才专项(2021XG008)和山西省重点实验室项目(202104010910017)资助

Effects of Different Mowing Intensities on Ecosystem CO₂ Exchange of Leymus secalinus Grassland in Jinbei

YANG He-ming¹, WANG Hai-nan¹, WANG Chang-hui^1,2,3, DONG Kuan-hu^1,2,3, DIAO Hua-jie^1,2,3, ZHANG Xiao-lin^1,2,3

1. College of Grassland Science, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. Youyu Loess Plateau Grassland Ecosystem Research Station of Shanxi Province, Youyu, Shanxi Province 037200, China;
3. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecological Protection and Native Grass Germplasm Innovation, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

Received:2024-01-04 Revised:2024-03-04 Published:2024-11-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 刈割是草地的主要利用方式，合理的刈割强度对维持草地生态系统碳平衡具有重要意义。本研究以山西省右玉县赖草(Leymus secalinus)草地生态系统为研究对象，动态监测2021年生长季不刈割、轻度刈割、中度刈割和重度刈割对草地生态系统净碳交换(Net ecosystem carbon exchange，NEE)、生态系统呼吸(Ecosystem respiration，ER)和生态系统总初级生产力(Gross ecosystem productivity，GEP)的影响，探究草地生态系统CO₂交换对不同刈割强度的响应。实验结果显示，刈割显著影响GEP，主要是由于GEP在中度刈割处理下较不刈割和重度刈割分别提高了21.4%和21.5%，NEE在中度刈割处理下较轻度刈割和重度刈割分别显著降低了54.4%和53.6%，但刈割对ER影响不显著。在不同刈割强度下，土壤温度和土壤无机氮含量是影响生态系统CO₂交换的重要因子。本研究结果表明中度刈割可以促进碳吸收而重度刈割会导致生态系统由碳汇转变为碳源，因此中度刈割为晋北赖草草地最适刈割强度。

关键词: 生态系统呼吸, 生态系统总初级生产力, 赖草草地, 刈割, 生态系统净碳交换, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: Mowing is the main utilization method of grassland,and reasonable mowing intensity is important for maintaining ecosystem carbon balance in grassland. This study took the Leymus secalinus grassland ecosystem in Youyu,Shanxi Province as the research object to explore the response of grassland ecosystem CO₂ exchange to different mowing intensities. We dynamically monitored the effects of no mowing,light mowing,moderate mowing,and heavy mowing on the net carbon exchange,ecosystem respiration,and gross ecosystem productivity during the growing season in 2021. The experimental results showed that mowing significantly affected the gross ecosystem productivity. Compared with no mowing, moderate mowing and heavy mowing increased it by 21.4% and 21.5%,respectively. In addition,net ecosystem carbon exchange under moderate mowing significantly reduced than light mowing by 54.4% and heavy mowing by 53.6%,respectively. But the effect of mowing on ecosystem respiration was not significant. Soil temperature and soil inorganic nitrogen content were important factors affecting ecosystem CO₂ exchange under different mowing intensities. This study indicated that moderate mowing could promote carbon absorption,while heavy mowing could lead to the transformation of ecosystems from carbon sinks to carbon sources. Therefore,moderate mowing was the most suitable mowing intensity for the Leymus secalinus grassland ecosystem of Jinbei.

Key words: Ecosystem respiration, Gross ecosystem productivity, Leymus secalinus grassland, Mowing, Net ecosystem carbon exchange, Soil physicochemical properties

中图分类号:

S812

杨鹤明, 王海南, 王常慧, 董宽虎, 刁华杰, 张晓琳. 不同刈割强度对晋北赖草草地生态系统CO₂交换的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3159-3166.

YANG He-ming, WANG Hai-nan, WANG Chang-hui, DONG Kuan-hu, DIAO Hua-jie, ZHANG Xiao-lin. Effects of Different Mowing Intensities on Ecosystem CO₂ Exchange of Leymus secalinus Grassland in Jinbei[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3159-3166.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I10/3159

参考文献

[1] CORINNE L Q,ANDREW R M,CANADELL J G,et al. Global carbon budget[J]. Earth System Science Data,2016,8(1):605-649
[2] POEPLAU C,DON A,VESTERDAL L,et al. Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone-carbon response functions as a model approach[J]. Global Change Biology,2011,17(7):2415-2427
[3] 牛慧敏,何雨欣,卞嘉琛,等.养分添加和浅耕翻对晋北赖草草地土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(11):3436-3443
[4] RAYMENT M B,JARVIS P G. Temporal and spatial variation of soil CO₂ efflux in a Canadian boreal forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32(1):35-45
[5] ADAMS J M,FAURE H,FAURE-DENARD L,et al. Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the Last Glacial Maximum to the present[J]. Nature,1990,348(6303):711-714
[6] WEI L,LIU J,SU J S,et al. Effect of clipping on soil respiration components in temperate grassland of Loess Plateau[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2016(75):157-167
[7] 郑佳华,张峰,赵天启,等.氮,磷,钾施配对大针茅割草地地上生物量的影响[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(5):64-71
[8] BREMER D J,HAM J M,OWENSBY C E,et al. Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie[J]. Journal of Environment Quality,1998,27(6):1539-1548
[9] ZITER C,MACDOUGALL A S. Nutrients and defoliation increase soil carbon inputs in grassland[J]. Ecology,2013,94(1):106-116
[10] 李旭亮,杨礼箫,田伟,等. 中国北方农牧交错带土地利用/覆盖变化研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3487-3495
[11] BROOKES P C,KRAGT J F,POWLSON D S,et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen:The effects of fumigation time and temperature[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1985,17(6):831-835
[12] VANCE E D,BROOKES P C,JENKINSON D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1987,19(6):703-707
[13] 邢鹏飞,李刚,陈晓鹏,等. 放牧对晋北农牧交错带赖草草地生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(10):1-11
[14] 王梅,付秀琴,石福孙,等. 刈割对南方草地植物补偿性生长的影响——以渝东北部岐山草场为例[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2014,20(3):474-483
[15] CIAIS P,REICHSTEIN M,VIOVY N,et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003[J]. Nature,2005,437(7058):529-533
[16] BELSKY A J,CARSON W P,JENSEN C L,et al. Overcompensation by plants:Herbivore optimization or red herring[J]. Evolutionary Ecology,1993,7(1):109-121
[17] 吴力博,古松,赵亮,等. 三江源地区人工草地的生态系统CO₂净交换、总初级生产力及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(7):770-780
[18] LA PIERRE J,SMITH M D. Functional trait expression of grassland species shift with short-and long-term nutrient additions[J]. Plant Ecology,2015,216(2):307-318
[19] NIU S,WU M,HAN Y,et al. Nitrogen effects on net ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe[J]. Global Change Biology,2010,16(1):144-155
[20] SHAO C,CHEN J,LI L. Grazing alters the biophysical regulation of carbon fluxes in a desert steppe[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2013,8(2):12-25
[21] 马文婧,李英年,张法伟,等. 青海湖北岸草甸草原CO₂通量年际动态及其驱动机制[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(3):1102-1112
[22] HAN Y,ZHANG Z,WANG C,et al. Effects of mowing and nitrogen addition on soil respiration in three patches in an oldfield grassland in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2012,5(2):219-228
[23] LI S G,ASANUMA J,EUGSTER W,et al. Net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange over grazed steppe in central Mongolia[J]. Global Change Biology,2005,11(11):1941-1955
[24] PEICHL M,CARTON O,KIELY G. Management and climate effects on carbon dioxide and energy exchanges in a maritime grassland[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2012,158(158):132-146
[25] JIA X X,SHAO M A,WEI X R. Responses of soil respiration to N addition,burning and clipping in temperate semiarid grassland in northern China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2012,166-167:32-40
[26] 孙宇,张峰,郑佳华,等. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(8):1859-1864
[27] 李昕珂,杨鹤明,王常慧,等. 晋北赖草草地生态系统碳通量对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(3):819-826
[28] POLLEY H W,FRANK A B,SANABRIA J,et al. Interannual variability in carbon dioxide fluxes and flux-climate relationships on grazed and ungrazed northern mixed-grass prairie[J]. Global Change Biology,2008,14(7):1620-1632
[29] 李峰,李琪,薛红喜,等. 温度对克氏针茅草原生态系统生长季碳通量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2012,31(7):1453-1459
[30] 陈敏玲,张兵伟,任婷婷,等. 内蒙古半干旱草原土壤水分对降水格局变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2016,40(7):658-668
[31] 李成龙,周广胜,周梦子,等. 1971—2020年盘锦芦苇湿地净生态系统生产力及其影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报,2023,34(5):1331-1340
[32] 张燕江,邱莉萍,高海龙,等. 黄土高原半干旱区典型草地生态系统CO₂交换对刈割的响应[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(1):336-344(责任编辑付宸)第32卷第10期 Vol.32 No. 10草地学报 ACTAAGRESTIASINICA 2024年 10月

不同刈割强度对晋北赖草草地生态系统CO₂交换的影响

Effects of Different Mowing Intensities on Ecosystem CO₂ Exchange of Leymus secalinus Grassland in Jinbei

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	白瑞, 关皓, 李海萍, 王笑寒, 汪辉, 陈仕勇. 初次刈割时间和乳酸菌剂对再生燕麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2982-2989.
[2]	徐文印, 马昀峤, 柴瑜, 段成伟, 把熠晨, 张静, 李希来. 商品有机肥对不同坡向退化高寒草甸土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2638-2647.
[3]	岳竞之, 孙迷平, 陈丽, 张庆社, 牛小沛, 张月玲, 杜文华, 肖兴中, 蔡友敏. 刈割方式对豫西北地区小黑麦草产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2297-2304.
[4]	韦银珠, 李家红, 孙雪铜, 刘杰淋, 肖汇川, 李浩天, 付楚涵, 宋雪, 张强, 秦立刚. 松嫩盐碱退化草地土壤理化性质及离子变化规律分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1702-1709.
[5]	丁子健, 刘文, 李天泽, 白龙, 孙彪, 秦嗣军, 李佳欢. 乡土草草地建植对辽西北连作农田土壤的改良效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1572-1582.
[6]	谭华, 靳旭妹, 蔡明明, 陈慧敏, 陈嘉轩, 龙明秀. 生草对关中地区有机猕猴桃园土壤理化性质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 667-676.
[7]	黄晶, 刘克思, 豆鹏鹏, 高茜, 刘程, 苗正洲, 任卓然, 王堃. 农牧交错区不同撂荒年限对农田土壤的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 677-683.
[8]	铁晓龙, 张英, 马林雄, 道日娜, 汪焱, 雷生妍. 三江源区燕麦根际PGPR菌株功能多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 693-702.
[9]	牧仁, 朱亮, 王丹阳, 安景源, 刘雅婧, 李新乐. 乌兰布和沙漠不同演替阶段白刺灌丛沙堆土壤养分和粒径的变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 818-826.
[10]	丁子健, 蒋师丞, 任百慧, 白龙, 秦嗣军, 李佳欢. 土地利用方式对低山丘陵区土壤理化性质及微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 426-435.
[11]	韩菲, 苏原, 杨倩雯, 王袼, 常婕, 赵芳草, 刁华杰, 董宽虎, 王常慧. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤净氮矿化速率对氮磷添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2759-2768.
[12]	门璐, 何奕成, 李婷婷, 黎鹏宇, 胡健, 周青平. 高寒草甸植物叶绿素对氮添加梯度的非线性响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1622-1631.
[13]	王明涛, 雷变霞, 赵玉红, 王向涛, 包赛很那, 马素洁, 苗彦军. 垂穗披碱草人工草地建植和管理措施对土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1728-1734.
[14]	胡广德, 周继强, 达军山, 雷隆举, 赵长兴, 李超男, 周自强, 刘金荣. 金塔沙地不同人工林下草本植物多样性与土壤性质的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1834-1841.
[15]	南铭, 李晶, 王昶, 李永生, 向达兵, 景芳, 刘彦明. 甘肃中部春播燕麦不同刈割期产量和品质比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1878-1885.