豆科牧草水浸提液的酚酸物质含量及化感潜力

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.001

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 401-406.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.001

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

豆科牧草水浸提液的酚酸物质含量及化感潜力

邬彩霞, 李志华, 沈益新

南京农业大学动物科技学院, 南京, 210095

收稿日期:2007-04-04 修回日期:2007-05-08 出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
通讯作者: 沈益新,E-mail:yxsh en@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:邬彩霞(1978- ),女,汉,内蒙古人,博士研究生,研究方向为牧草栽培与利用
基金资助:
江苏省自然基金(BK2005092)

Quantification and Allelopathy Potential of Phenolic Acids in Aqueous Extracts of Legumes

WU Cai-xia, LI Zhi-hua, SHEN Yi-xin

College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received:2007-04-04 Revised:2007-05-08 Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 酚酸是豆科牧草水浸提液中一类重要的化感物质。试验采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定了紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.cv.Alfaking)、毛苕子(Vicia rillosa Roth.)、黄花草木樨(Melilotus of ficinalis Desr.)、白三叶(Trifolium repens L.cv.Haifa)、红三叶(Trifolium pretense L.)和杂三叶(Trifolium hybridum L.)地上部分水浸提液中对羟基苯甲酸、绿原酸、咖啡酸、香豆酸、阿魏酸、原儿茶酸、丁香酸、香草酸和肉桂酸9种酚酸的含量,并检测了这6种豆科牧草水浸提液处理以及不同浓度的酚酸纯品溶液处理对多花黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum Lam.cv.Tetragold)幼苗根生长的影响。结果表明:豆科牧草水浸提液处理能显著地抑制多花黑麦草幼苗根生长,抑制率达59.6%～97.7%;所测9种酚酸在供试豆科牧草水浸提液中普遍存在;酚酸类物质的化感作用强弱因种类而有显著差异,但均随浓度升高而加强;豆科牧草水浸提液中酚酸类物质的化感潜力存在相互作用。

关键词: 豆科牧草, 水浸提液, 酚酸含量, 化感作用

Abstract: Phenolic acid is one of the allelochemicals. Phenolic acids, namely p-hydroxybenzoic, chlorogenic,caffeic, ferulic, p-coumaric, protocatechuic,syringic,vanillic and cinnamonic acids, in aqueous extracts of over ground part of alfalfa(Medicago sativa L. cv. Alfaking), hairy vetch(Vicia rillosa Roth.), yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis Desr. ), white clover(Trifolium repens L. cv. Haifa), red clover(Trifolium pretense L.), and alsike clover(Trifolium hybridum L.)had been quantified by high performance liquid chromatography. And the inhibition rate of root growth of Italian ryegrass(Lolium multiflorum Lam. cv. Tetragold)treated by the aqueous extracts and phenolic acid solutions were tested. The result showed that root growth of Italian ryegrass seedling was inhibited significantly by application of the aqueous extracts with inhibition rates of 59.6%～97.7%. Nine tested phenolic acids were all detected in the aqueous extracts of the 6 tested legumes. Althought the allelopathic effect of the phenolic acids on root growth of Italian ryegrass seedlings was significantly different, but the inhibition rate of the root growth was stronger with the phenolic acid solutions concentration increasing. Allelopathic interactions existed among phenolic acids in the aqueous extracts of legume herbages.

Key words: Legume herbages, Aqueous extracts, Phenolic acids content, Allelopathy

中图分类号:

S812

邬彩霞, 李志华, 沈益新. 豆科牧草水浸提液的酚酸物质含量及化感潜力[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 401-406.

WU Cai-xia, LI Zhi-hua, SHEN Yi-xin. Quantification and Allelopathy Potential of Phenolic Acids in Aqueous Extracts of Legumes[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 401-406.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.001

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2007/V15/I5/401

参考文献

[1] 邬彩霞,沈益新,李志华.豆科牧草对多花黑麦草化感作用的种间差异[J].中国草地,2005,27 (6):39-43
[2] 李志华.紫花苜蓿化感效应的研究[D] :[学位论文].南京:南京农业大学,2005:31-35,57-71,83-93
[3] 郭晓霞,沈益新.几种豆科牧草地上部水浸提液对稗草种子和幼苗的化感效应[J].草地学报,2006,14 (4):356-359
[4] Inderjit KM.Plant phenolics in allelopathy[J].Bot Rev,1996,62:186-202
[5] Baziramakenga R,Leroux1 G D,Simard R R.Effect of benzoic and cinnamic acids on membrane permeability of soybean roots[J].Chem Ecol.,1995,21(8):1271-1285
[6] Chou C H,Leu L L.Allelopathy substance and activities of Delonix regia Raf(M)[J].Chem.Ecol.1992,(18):353-367
[7] Borivoj Klejdus,Vlastimil Kuban.High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Seed Exudates of Festuca arundinacea and F.pretense[J].Phytochem.Anal.,2000,11:375-379
[8] Wu H W,Haig T,Pratley J,Lemerle D,An M.Allelo-chemical in wheat (Triticum aestivum):Variation of phenolic acids in shoot tissues[J].Chem Ecol.,2000,27(1):125-135
[9] Ohno T,Doolan K L.Effects of red clover decomposition on phytotoxicity to wild mustard seedling growth[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2001,16:187-192
[10] 何华勤,梁义元,贾小丽,等.酚酸类物质的抑草效应分析[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2342-2346
[11] Patterson DT.Effects of allelopathic chemical on growth and physical responses of soybean (Glycine max L.)[J].Weed Science,1981,29(1):53-58
[12] Einhellig F A.Interactive effects of allelochemicals and en-vironmental stress[A].In:Chou C H,Waller G R,eds.Phyto-chemical Ecology:Allelochemicals,Mycotoxins,and Insect Pheromones and Allomones[C].Academia Sinica Monograph Series No.9.Taibei:Institute of Botany.1989,101-106
[13] 宋亮,潘开文,王进闯,等.酚酸类物质对苜蓿种子萌发及抗氧化物酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(10):3393-3403
[14] Blum U.Allelopathic interaction involving phenolic acids[J].Nematol,1996,28:259-267
[15] Blum U.Effects of microbial utilization of phenolics acids and their phenolic acids breakdown products on allelopathic interaction[J].Chem.Ecol.,1998,24:685-708
[16] Einhellig F A.Allelopathy:Current status and future goal[A].In:Inderjit Dakshini KMM,Einhellig FA,eds.Allelopathy:Oroganisms,Processes,and Applications[C].American Chemi-cal Society Symposium Series,ACS.Washington,DC.1995,58:1-24
[17] Olofsdotter M,Rebulanan M,Artemio M,Dalil W,Navarezl D,Olk1 DC.Why phenolic acids are unlikely primary alle-lochemicals in rice[J].Chem.Ecol.,2002,28(1):229-242
[18] 林文雄,何华勤,郭玉春,等.水稻化感作用及其生理生化特性的研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):871-875
[19] 孔垂华,徐效华,陈建军,等.胜红蓟化感作用研究Ⅸ.主要化感物质在土壤中的转化[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1185-1195

豆科牧草水浸提液的酚酸物质含量及化感潜力

Quantification and Allelopathy Potential of Phenolic Acids in Aqueous Extracts of Legumes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	左郎, 王树森, 马迎梅, 温苏雅勒图, 白刚, 郁鑫明. 火炬树浸提液对两种草坪草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1927-1933.
[2]	马银山, 常妍, 王含睿, 贾云凤, 李文英, 漆瑞强. 天仙子种子浸提液对黑麦草种子萌发和幼苗生长的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1697-1703.
[3]	张金花, 何静, 张小彦, 张树衡, 张恒, 李彦湘. 除草剂胁迫下3种牧草浸提液对受体植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1719-1728.
[4]	李善魁, 孟焕文, 李宇晨, 张海青, 白雪, 张宇宽, 周洪友, 王千军, 张笑宇. 圆柏对几种农田杂草及作物的化感潜力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1769-1778.
[5]	谢开云, 孟翔, 徐珍珍, 张力文, 万江春, 颜安, 李陈建. 新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1835-1842.
[6]	苏贝贝, 张英, 道日娜. 4种豆科植物根际土壤真菌群落特征与土壤理化因子间相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2670-2677.
[7]	严琳玲, 张瑜, 董荣书, 郇恒福, 刘国道, 刘一明. 基于植物学性状分析山蚂蝗属种质的遗传多样性[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 640-651.
[8]	胡婧, 李德颖, 朱慧森, 董宽虎, 马承泽. 草地早熟禾叶和根茎浸提液对3种花卉植物种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 178-184.
[9]	雷威肖, 李伟, 郭梁, 程积民, 张义, 郑周敏, 赵妮. 铁杆蒿枯落物对四种豆科牧草的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 818-825.
[10]	王宁, 陈浩, 董莹莹, 袁美丽. 土壤水分对入侵植物节节麦表型可塑性和化感作用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 402-408.
[11]	范愈新, 颜仕龙, 蔡波, 朱朝华, 袁洋, 敖苏. 苦瓜秸秆水浸提液对3种杂草的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1002-1006.
[12]	张德, 龙会英. 4个豆科牧草在干热河谷生态芒果园的应用研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 612-617.
[13]	李晶晶, 丁立人, 李志华. 白三叶水浸提液对无芒稗种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 82-91.
[14]	丁春发, 魏小红. 野生麻花秦艽中龙胆苦苷和黄酮对牧草的化感作用及抗氧化性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 92-99.
[15]	吴榕, 郑国华, 郝玉兰. 白三叶化感作用相关基因CHS的克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 100-106.