苜蓿、玉米根系提水作用与耐旱性的关系——植物根系提水作用机理研究Ⅱ

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.06.002

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 515-518,530.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.06.002

苜蓿、玉米根系提水作用与耐旱性的关系——植物根系提水作用机理研究Ⅱ

李唯¹, 胡自治², 倪郁³, 李尚忠⁴, 倪胜利⁴

1. 甘肃农业大学生命科学技术学院, 兰州, 7300703;
2. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 兰州, 730070;
3. 西南农业大学农学院, 重庆, 400716;
4. 甘肃省农业科学院旱农研究所, 兰州, 730070

收稿日期:2007-01-25 修回日期:2007-09-14 出版日期:2007-12-15 发布日期:2007-12-15
通讯作者: 韩建国,E-mail:grasslab@public3.bta.net.cn
作者简介:李唯(1955- ),男,甘肃省成县人,教授,主要从事作物生态生理研究,E-mail:liwei@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
甘肃省人事厅“333创新人才工程”专项资助(035-036080)

The Relationship of Hydraulic Lift in Alfalfa and Maize and Their Drought Resistance Study on Mechanism of Hydraulic Lift in Root System of Plant(Ⅱ)

LI Wei¹, HU Zi-zhi², NI Yu³, LI Shang-zhong⁴, NI Sheng-li⁴

1. College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
3. College of Agronomy, Southwest Agricultural University, Chongqing 400716, China;
4. Institute of Arid-land Farming, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2007-01-25 Revised:2007-09-14 Online:2007-12-15 Published:2007-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示植物根系提水作用与抗旱性的关系,选用抗旱性较强的苜蓿和2个旱作型玉米杂交种为材料,利用中子水分仪在大田条件下研究了其蒸腾速率和根系特性与根系提水作用大小及其抗旱性强弱的关系。结果表明:3种供试材料的蒸腾速率与其单位叶面积气孔数和气孔开度呈明显正相关,相关系数(r)分别为0.958 7和0.999 9,而与单株每夜的表观根系提水量(Q_m)则呈弱负相关,r仅为-0.490 0,表明较低的蒸腾速率促进根系提水作用。2种玉米根系特性测定相比,耐旱性较强的豫玉22玉米无论是上层干燥土壤中根系的体积、鲜重、干重和根数,还是下层湿润土壤中根系的体积和干重都明显大于中单二号,但每夜单株的Q_m却仅为后者的63.34%,表明在一定条件下,较为发达的根系和相对较低的根系提水作用,是植物具有较强耐旱性的一个重要原因。

关键词: 苜蓿, 玉米, 根系提水作用, 抗旱性, 相关分析

Abstract: A drought-resistant alfalfa variety and two high-yield maize varieties with different drought-resistance ability were investigated using Neutron probe on the relationship between transpiration/hydraulic lift and the capacity of drought resistance and between the characteristics of root system and hydraulic lift and the capacity of drought resistance.The results indicate that the transpiration rate had distinct positive correlation with the number and opening degree of stoma on the unit leaf area,correlation coefficients were 0.958 7 and 0.999 9,respectively.However,the transpiration rate was weakly and negatively correlated to the apparent lifted quantity each night each plant(Q_m) and the correlation coefficient was only-0.490 0.It showed that the low transpiration rate could improve the hydraulic lift in root.The comparison between root system characteristics of two maize varieties showed that Yuyu No.22 had bigger the root volume,wet weight,dry weight,and the number of root in the shallow or deep soil than Zhongdan No.2,but had only 63.34% of Zhongdan No.2 in the amount of actual water hydraulic lift in root one night per plant.Those results indicated the strong root and the low hydraulic lift in root was one of the reasons for strongerdrought-resistance.

Key words: Alfalfa, Maize, Hydraulic lift, Drought resistance, Correlated analysis

中图分类号:

S311

李唯, 胡自治, 倪郁, 李尚忠, 倪胜利. 苜蓿、玉米根系提水作用与耐旱性的关系——植物根系提水作用机理研究Ⅱ[J]. , 2007, 15(6): 515-518,530.

LI Wei, HU Zi-zhi, NI Yu, LI Shang-zhong, NI Sheng-li. The Relationship of Hydraulic Lift in Alfalfa and Maize and Their Drought Resistance Study on Mechanism of Hydraulic Lift in Root System of Plant(Ⅱ)[J]. , 2007, 15(6): 515-518,530.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.06.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2007/V15/I6/515

参考文献

[1] 李唯,倪郁,胡自治,等.植物根系提水作用研究述评[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(6):1056-1062.
[2] Breazeale J F.Maintenance of moisture-equilibrium And nutrition of plants at and below the wilting percentage[J].Ariz.Agric.Exip.Stn.Bull.,1930,29:137-177
[3] Borman F H.Moisture transfer between plants through intertwind roots systems[J].Plant Physiol,1957,32:48-55
[4] Baker J M,Van Bavel c H M.Measurement of mass flow of water in the stems of herbacious plant[J].Plant Cell Environ.,1987,10:777-782
[5] Caldwell M M,Richards J H.Hydraulic lift:water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deeproots[J].Oecologia,1989,79:1-5
[6] Dawson T E.Hydraulic lift and water use by plants:implications for water balance,performance and plant-plant interaction[J].Oecologia,1993,95:565-574
[7] Vetterlein D,Masrschner H,Hom R.Microtenaionmeter technique for in situ measurement of soil matric potential and root water extraction from a sandy soil matric potential and root water extraction from a sandy soil[J].Plant and Soil.1993,149(2),263-274
[8] 旭许旦,诸涵素.植物根部的水分倒流现象[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(4):241-245
[9] 樊小林,石卫国,曹新华,等.根系提水作用的土壤水分变异及养分有效性:谷子根系提水作用及根系吸收对土壤水分变异的影响[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):36-42
[10] 管秀娟,赵世伟.植物根水倒流的证据及意义[J].西北植物学报,1999,19(4):746-754
[11] Wan C G,Xu W W,Sosebee R E,et al.Hydraulic lift in drought-tolerant and susceplible maize Hybrids[J].Plant and Soil,2000,219:117-126
[12] Baker J M,Van Bavel C H M.Resistance of plant roots to water loss[J].Agron,1986,78:641-644
[13] Baker J M.Van Bavel C H M.Water transfer through cotton plants connecting soil regions of differing water potential[J].Agron.,1988,80:993-997
[14].Xu X,Bland W L.Resumption of water uptake by sorghumafter water stress[J].Agron.,1993.85:697-702
[15] 樊小林,李生秀.植物根系的提水作用[J].西北农业大学学报,1997,25(5):75-81
[16] 赵多长.玉米杂交种豫玉22引种实验结果[J].甘肃农业科技,2000(2):21-22
[17] 李可夫,李晓丽,庞占琴.玉米新品种豫玉22特征特性及高产栽培技术[J].甘肃农业科技,2001(12):9-10
[18] Caldwell M M.Water parasitism stemming from hydraulic lift:A quantitative test in the field[J].Israel Bot.,1990,39:395-402
[19] Dalton F N,Puss J A.Soil water content and salinity assessment for irrigation scheduling using time-domain reflectometry:Principles and applications[J].Acta Hortic.,1990,278,381-393
[20] Breazele E L,Megeorge W T.Exudation pressure in roots of tomato plants under humid conditions[J].Soil Sci.,1953,75:293-298
[21] Dirksen C,Raats P A.Water uptake and release by alfalfa roots[J].Agron.,1985,77:621-626
[22] Corak S T,Blevin D G,Pallardy S G.Water transfer in an alfalfa/maize association,survival of maize draught[J].Plant Physiol.,1987,84:582-586
[23] Willims K,Caldwell M M,Richards J H.The influence ofshade and clauds on soil water potential:the buffered behavior of hydraulic lift[J].Plant Soil,1993,157:83-95
[24] Wan C G,Sosebee R E,Mcmichacl BL.Does hydraulic lift exit in a shallow rooted species?A quantitative examination with a half shrub Gutierrexia sarothrae[J].Plant and Soil,1993,153:11-17
[25] Richards J H,Caldwell M M.Hydraulic lift:substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Aryemisla tridentata roots[J].Oecologia,1987,(73):486-489

苜蓿、玉米根系提水作用与耐旱性的关系——植物根系提水作用机理研究Ⅱ

The Relationship of Hydraulic Lift in Alfalfa and Maize and Their Drought Resistance Study on Mechanism of Hydraulic Lift in Root System of Plant(Ⅱ)

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[3]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[4]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[5]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[6]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[7]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[8]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[9]	李红, 李波, 方志坚, 杨曌, 张超, 冯成龙, 金姗姗, 王思琦, 石婉莹. 冻融和冻融+苏打盐碱复合胁迫下苜蓿幼苗的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[10]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[11]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[12]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[13]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[14]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[15]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.