不同添加剂对红三叶青贮品质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2008.05.018

›› 2008, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 522-525,529.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2008.05.018

不同添加剂对红三叶青贮品质的影响

陶莲¹, 玉柱¹, 陈燕¹, 云鹏²

1. 中国农业大学草地研究所, 北京, 100193;
2. 北京市畜牧兽医总站, 北京, 100029

收稿日期:2007-12-19 修回日期:2008-04-15 出版日期:2008-10-15 发布日期:2008-10-15
通讯作者: 玉柱,E-mail:yuzhu3@sohu.com
作者简介:陶莲(1984- ),女,达斡尔族,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草加工贮藏,E-mail:taolian@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
十一五国家科技支撑项目(2006BAD16B03-04);十一五国家科技支撑项目(2006BAD16B08);北京市畜牧兽医总站与中国农业大学合作项目;农业部“948”项目(2006-G38)资助

Effect of Additives on the Silage Quality of Red Clover

TAO Lian¹, YU Zhu¹, CHEN Yan¹, YUN Peng ²

1. Institute of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Beijing General Station of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2007-12-19 Revised:2008-04-15 Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究探讨了不同添加剂对红三叶(Trifolium pretense L.)青贮饲料发酵品质与化学成分的影响。实验处理分别是对照组、青宝Ⅱ号添加组、青宝Ⅱ号+纤维素酶添加组、甲酸添加组和糖蜜添加组。青贮45 d后打开取样,测定其发酵品质与化学成分。结果表明,与对照相比,添加剂处理可显著降低红三叶青贮饲料的pH值和非蛋白氮含量;青宝Ⅱ号、青宝Ⅱ号+纤维素酶处理可显著提高青贮饲料乳酸含量,青宝Ⅱ号+纤维素辅酶处理青贮饲料可溶性碳水化合物含量显著低于对照组;甲酸处理青贮饲料的可溶性碳水化合物含量显著高于对照组,乳酸含量和氨态氮含量显著低于对照组。通过利用添加剂可以改善红三叶青贮饲料的发酵品质和化学成分。

关键词: 红三叶, 青贮, 添加剂, 发酵品质, 可溶性碳水化合物

Abstract: The effects of different additives,including FAST-SILE,cellulase,molasses,and formic acid,on the fermentation quality and chemical composition of red clover silages after ensiling for 45 days were investigated.The results show that the pH and content of non-protein nitrogen in all the treatments were markedly lower than the control.The lactic acid contents of FAST-SILE and FAST-SILE-cellulase treatments were significantly higher than the control,and the content of the soluble carbohydrates in the treatment of FAST-SILE-cellulase was markedly decreased.The content of water soluble carbohydrates of the treatment of formic acid was significantly increased,and the contents of ammonia nitrogen and lactic acid in formic acid treatment were significantly decreased.In summary,the additives improved the fermentation quality and the chemical composition of red clover silages.

Key words: Red clover, Silage, Additives, Fermentation quality, Soluble carbohydrate

中图分类号:

S816.7

陶莲, 玉柱, 陈燕, 云鹏. 不同添加剂对红三叶青贮品质的影响[J]. , 2008, 16(5): 522-525,529.

TAO Lian, YU Zhu, CHEN Yan, YUN Peng . Effect of Additives on the Silage Quality of Red Clover[J]. , 2008, 16(5): 522-525,529.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2008.05.018

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2008/V16/I5/522

参考文献

[1] 张文淑.红=三叶[J].农村养殖技术,2002,15:27
[2] 杨淑玺.青贮饲料的制作技术[J].农村经济与科技,2004,15(6):48
[3] 王晶.红三叶与紫花苜蓿蛋白质利用率的比较[J].草业科学,2005,23(1):52-54 (下转529页)
[4] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,Duke S H.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J].Crop Science,1999,39:1873-1880
[5] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社.2002:49-73
[6] Zhu Y,Nishino N,Kishida Y,Uchida S.Ensiling characteristics and ruminal degradation of italian ryegrass and lucerne silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J].Science,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[7] 许庆方.贮藏期和添加绿汁发酵液对袋装苜蓿青贮的影响[J].草业科学,2006,14(2):129-133
[8] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1999,23-25
[9] 刘建新,杨振海,叶均安,史占全,吴跃明.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准[J].饲料工业,1999,20(4):3-5
[10] Gordon F J.Improving the feeding va] ue of silage through biological control[A].Proceedings of the All-Tech European Lecture Tour[,C].Birmingham,Alhech UK,1992,2-17
[11] 时建忠.青贮接种菌的研究[J].中国饲料,2003,(5):15-17
[12] 彭海兰.不同青贮添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质的影响[D] :[学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2003
[13] Sclmer-Olsen I.Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clove mixtures[J].Grass and Forage Science,1994,49(3):305-315
[15] 孙娟娟,玉柱,薛艳林,等.添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):238-242
[16] 薛艳林,白春牛,玉柱.等.添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮饲料品质的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(4):339-343
[14] Jacobs J L,McAllan A B.Enzymes as silage additives for Silage quality,digestion,digestibility and performance in grow ing cattle[J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-68
[17] Jaakkola S,Huhtanen P.The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes or formic acid on fermentation quality and on digestion of grass silage by cattle[J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):75-80
[18] Sheperd A C,Kung L.Effect of an enzyme additive on composition of corn silage ensiled at various stages of maturity[J].Dairy Science.1996,79:1767-1773
[19] De Figueiredo M,Marais J P.The effect of bacterial inoculants on Kikuyu silage quality[J].Journal of the Agricultural science,1994,122(11):53-60
[20] 玉柱,韩建国,胡跃高等.绿汁发酵液对豆科牧草青贮发酵品质的影响[A].觋代草业学进展-中国国际草业发展大会论文集[C].2002.159-162
[21] Phillip L E.Effects treating lucerne with an inoculum of lactic acid bacteria or formic acid upon chemical changes during fermentation,and upon the nutritive value of the silage for Iambs[J].Grass and Forage Science,1990,(45):337-344
[22] Chamberlain D G.The rate of addition of formic acid to grass at ensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the rnmen and intestine of sheep[J].Grass and Forage Science,1982,(37):159-164
[23] Hristov A N,Sander S G.Proteolysis and rumen degradability of protein in alfalfa preserved as silage,wilted silage or hay[J].Animal Feed Science Technology,1998,72:175-181

不同添加剂对红三叶青贮品质的影响

Effect of Additives on the Silage Quality of Red Clover

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[5]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[6]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[8]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[9]	李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 佘智慧, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[11]	郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[12]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[13]	王斌, 董秀, 李满有, 杨雨琦, 兰剑. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[14]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[15]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.