季节性围封对内蒙古典型草原植被恢复的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.004

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 812-818.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.004

季节性围封对内蒙古典型草原植被恢复的影响

单贵莲¹, 薛世明², 陈功¹, 匡崇义², 刘钟龄³, 初晓辉¹

1. 云南农业大学草业科学系, 云南昆明 650201;
2. 云南省草地动物科学研究院, 云南昆明 650212;
3. 内蒙古大学生命科学学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010021

收稿日期:2012-04-15 修回日期:2012-06-25 出版日期:2012-10-15 发布日期:2012-11-01
通讯作者: 初晓辉,E-mail:chuxiaohui@ynau.edu.cn
作者简介:单贵莲(1982-),女,云南沾益人,博士,讲师,研究方向为草地生态,E-mail:shanguilian8203@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究"973"项目"北方草地与农牧交错带生态系统适应性管理的科学基础" (2007CB106800)资助

Influence of Seasonal Exclosure on Vegetation Restoration in Typical Steppe, Inner Mongolia

SHAN Gui-lian¹, XUE Shi-ming², CHEN Gong¹, KUANG Chong-yi², Liu Zhong-lin³, CHU Xiao-hui¹

1. Pasture Science Department, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650201, China;
2. Yunnan Academy of Grassland and Animal Science, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650212, China;
3. College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021, China

Received:2012-04-15 Revised:2012-06-25 Online:2012-10-15 Published:2012-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对退化草地恢复与合理利用问题,选取生长季围封调制干草、其他时间轻度放牧利用的草地为研究对象,同时选取自由放牧草地为对照,开展季节性围封对典型草原植被恢复影响的研究。结果表明:重度退化草地采用生长季围封措施后植被恢复演替,草地生产力、盖度、密度和地下生物量显著增加(P<0.05),围封13年达最大,之后降低。围封后各物种的优势地位发生较大改变,经20年围封,草地由星毛委陵菜(Potentilla acaulis)+冷蒿(Artemisia frigida)+糙隐子草(Cleistogenes squarrosa)演替为羊草(Leymus chinensis)+克氏针茅(Stipa krylovii)+冷蒿+糙隐子草。就围封后物种多样性的变化来看,经7年围封,物种的丰富度、多样性、均匀度和生态优势度指数显著增加(P<0.05)。但由于各物种的竞争能力不同,经10~13年围封,群落成为具有单优或寡优势种的群落,物种丰富度、均匀度和多样性指数降低,生态优势度指数急剧增加。之后,随着围封年限继续延长至20年,群落逐步趋于稳定,形成多优或优势不明显的群落,群落的丰富度、均匀度及多样性指数增加,生态优势度指数降低。综上所述,生长季围封调制干草、其他时间轻度放牧利用的管理方式可保证退化草地在一定程度上得到恢复,综合考虑草地产草量、群落结构及物种多样性,认为13年是较适宜的围封年限,但围封后的适宜利用问题(如适宜的割草制度)有待进一步研究。

关键词: 典型草原, 季节性围封, 植被恢复, 群落结构, 物种多样性

Abstract: In order to discuss the restoration and reasonable utilization of degradation typical steppe, natural grasslands fenced in growing season for hay production then lightly grazed for the rest of the year were selected as research objects. Continuously grazed grasslands were selected as control. Vegetation restoration was investigated after seasonal exclosure. Results showed as follows: the biomass, coverage and density of vegetation in degraded typical steppe increased significantly after seasonal exclosure (P<0.05), and reached the highest values after 13 years exclosure then decreased due to hay production developed continuously for many years. Dominant species changed significantly after seasonal exclosure. The community structure was changed from Potentilla acaulis+Artemisia frigida+Cleistogenes squarrosa to Leymus chinensis+Stipa krylovii+Artemisia frigida+Cleistogenes squarrosa after 20 years exclosure. The species richness, evenness, diversity and dominance increased significantly after 7 years exclosure. But the community was mainly dominated by signal or minority species and the species richness, evenness and diversity decreased then the dominance increased remarkably after 10 to 13 years exclosure. Then the community stabilized gradually, the species richness, evenness and diversity increased and the dominance decreased with the exclosure period prolonged to 20 years. In conclusion, seasonal exclosure was a feasible management method in Chinese pastoral areas. Comprehensive analysis of community structure, yield and species diversity indicated that 13 years exclosure is a reasonable exclosure period. And some problems such as reasonable mowing systems needed further study.

Key words: Typical steppe, Seasonal exclosure, Vegetation restoration, Community structure, Species diversity

中图分类号:

单贵莲, 薛世明, 陈功, 匡崇义, 刘钟龄, 初晓辉. 季节性围封对内蒙古典型草原植被恢复的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 812-818.

SHAN Gui-lian, XUE Shi-ming, CHEN Gong, KUANG Chong-yi, Liu Zhong-lin, CHU Xiao-hui. Influence of Seasonal Exclosure on Vegetation Restoration in Typical Steppe, Inner Mongolia[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 812-818.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I5/812

参考文献

[1] 杜青林.中国草业发展战略[M].北京,中国农业出版社,2006
[2] 贾晓妮,程积民,万惠娥.云雾山本氏针茅草地群落恢复演替过程中的物种多样性变化动态[J].草业学报,2008,17(4):12-18
[3] Hüseyin K F, Steven S S, Bilal S.The effect of long-term grazing exclosure on range plants in the central Anatolian region of Turkey[J].Environmental Management,2007,39(3):326-337
[4] 单贵莲,徐柱,宁发,等. 围封年限对典型草原群落结构及物种多样性的影响[J].草业学报,2008,17(6):1-8
[5] Alder P, Lauenroth W.Livestock exclusion increases the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation in Colorado shortgrass steppe[J].Applied Vegetation Science,2000,3(2):213-222
[6] 李媛媛,董世魁,李小艳,等.围栏封育对黄河源区退化高寒草地植被组成及生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):275-279
[7] Su Y Z, Li Y L, Zhao H L.Soil properties and their spatial pattern in a degraded sandy grassland under post-grazing restoration, Inner Mongolia, northern China[J].Biogeochemistry,2006,79(3):297-314
[8] 单贵莲,徐柱,宁发,等.围封年限对典型草原植被与土壤特征的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):3-10
[9] Su Yong-Zhong, Li Yu-Lin, Cui Jian-Yuan, et al.Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China[J].Catena,2005,59(3):267-278
[10] 单贵莲,陈功,宁发,等.典型草原恢复演替过程中土壤微生物及酶活性动态变化研究[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):292-297
[11] Katoh K, Takeuchi K, Jiang D, et al.Vegetation restoration by seasonal exclosure in the Kerqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia[J].Plant Ecology,1998,139(2):133-144
[12] 单贵莲,徐柱,宁发,等.围封年限对典型草原植被与土壤特征的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):3-10
[13] 任继周.草业科学研究方法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1998:16-28
[14] Marcelo S, Mario G, Avi P, et al.Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: a functional group approach[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,37(2):224-237
[15] Micchunas D G, Sala O E, Lauenroth W K.A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure[J].The American Naturalist,1988,132(1):11-23
[16] Agarwal M, Shukla A, Pal V N.Grazing of forested grassland and its conservation[J].Ecological Modelling,1993,69(1):57-62
[17] Bak1r O.Management systems for in-situ conservation of plants[M].Central Research Institute for Field Crops, Ankara, Turkey,1998:67-72
[18] Adler P B, Milchunas D G, Lauenroth W K, et al. Functional traits of graminoids in semiarid steppes: a test of grazing Histories[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,41(4):653-663
[19] Vickery P J.Grazing and net primary production of a temperate grassland[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1972,9(2):307-314
[20] Alice A, Martin O, Elsa L, et al. Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland[J].Plant Ecology,2005,179(1):83-91
[21] 刘钟龄,王炜,郝郭元,等.内蒙古草原退化与恢复演替机理的探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(1):84-91
[22] 张洪生,邵新庆,刘贵河,等.围封、浅耕翻改良技术对退化羊草草地植被恢复的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(3):339-344

季节性围封对内蒙古典型草原植被恢复的影响

Influence of Seasonal Exclosure on Vegetation Restoration in Typical Steppe, Inner Mongolia

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	吕婷, 刘玉萍, 亢俊铧, 刘涛, 梁瑞芳, 苏旭. 德令哈-哈拉湖沿线不同生境下群落的物种组成及其多样性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 146-155.
[3]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[4]	孙宇, 张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[5]	裴雯, 陈清, 张洛梓, 贾丽英. 放牧、水分和氮素对内蒙古草原土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[6]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[7]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[8]	丁成翔, 刘禹. 光伏园区建设对青藏高原高寒荒漠草地土壤原核微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1061-1069.
[9]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[10]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[11]	苏贝贝, 张英, 道日娜. 4种豆科栽培牧草根际土壤细菌群落分布特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[12]	王丽学, 韩静, 陈龙宾, 余新越, 刘景喜, 马毅, 霍文娟. 不同乳酸菌组合对苜蓿青贮细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 388-395.
[13]	杨建强, 曹梦琪, 王袼, 胡姝娅, 王常慧. 内蒙古不同类型草地土壤氨氧化细菌和古菌的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2664-2669.
[14]	王玉琴, 宋梅玲, 王宏生, 尹亚丽, 马玉寿. 添加氮素对退化高寒草地植被及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2742-2751.
[15]	姚蒙蒙, 郭琛文, 赫凤彩, 张琦, 任国华. 晋北盐碱草地土壤化学计量特征及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2800-2807.