放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.018

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 149-155.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.018

放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响

张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 王青, 刘佳乐, 杨娜, 苏德荣, 平晓燕

北京林业大学草业与草原学院, 草地资源与生态研究中心, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-07-21 修回日期:2020-09-09 发布日期:2021-01-08
通讯作者: 平晓燕
作者简介:张紫薇(1997-),女,河北保定人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地资源与生态研究,Email:randol9285@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31700388）；北京林业大学自由探索项目（2019ZY10）资助

Effects of Grazing Intensity on Biomass Allocation Patterns of Six Plant Species in a Typical Grassland

ZHANG Zi-wei, GAO Bin, LIN Chang-cun, WANG Qing, LIU Jia-le, YANG Na, SU De-rong, PING Xiao-yan

Research Center for Grassland Ecology and Resources, School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-07-21 Revised:2020-09-09 Published:2021-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究选取河北坝上地区为研究区域，以不同放牧强度样地的群落优势种或亚优势种（马蔺（Iris lactea）、线叶蒿（Artemisia subulata）、糙隐子草（Cleistogenes squarrosa）、二裂委陵菜（Potentilla bifurca）、华北米蒿（A.giraldii）和羊草（Leymus chinensis））为研究对象，分析放牧强度对6个物种生物量分配格局的影响。结果表明：随放牧强度的增加，6个物种的单株总生物量和单株地上生物量均显著降低，单株地下生物量随放牧强度呈现不同的规律；与对照相比，重度放牧显著提高了糙隐子草的单株地下生物量，中度放牧则显著提高了二裂委陵菜的单株地下生物量；根冠比随放牧强度显著增加，且不同物种之间也呈现显著差异；羊草在群落中的重要值与根冠比呈显著负相关，其他5个物种的根冠比与其重要值呈显著正相关。本研究证实物种会通过调整其生物量分配格局来适应放牧干扰，研究结果有助于深入理解放牧退化草原群落物种组成的形成机制。

关键词: 放牧强度, 生物量分配格局, 典型草原, 羊草

Abstract: This study focused on biomass allocation patterns of six plant species (Iris lactea,Artemisia subulata,Cleistogenes squarrosa,Potentilla bifurca,A. giraldii and Leymus chinensis) in response to grazing intensity in a typical grassland of Bashang region in Hebei Province. Six plant species were dominant or subdominant species of communities. The results showed that total biomass and aboveground biomass of six plant species significantly decreased with increasing grazing intensity，while belowground biomass showed different tendencies among six plant species. Compared with the control (without grazing),the belowground biomass of C. squarrosa significantly increased under heavy grazing density,and the belowground biomass of P. bifurca significantly increased under moderate grazing density. The root:shoot ratio (R/S ratio) increased significantly with increasing grazing intensity. Moreover,R/S ratio was significantly different among six plant species. The belowground biomass of individual plant varied largely among six plant species. There was significant negative correlation between important value and R/S ratio for L. chinensis,but the correlations were significant positive for the other five plant species. Our results confirmed that plant species adjusted their biomass allocation patterns in response to grazing disturbance,and our results were beneficial for understanding the formation mechanism of plant community composition in degraded grazing grassland.

Key words: Grazing intensity, Biomass allocation pattern, Typical grassland, Leymus chinensis

中图分类号:

张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 王青, 刘佳乐, 杨娜, 苏德荣, 平晓燕. 放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 149-155.

ZHANG Zi-wei, GAO Bin, LIN Chang-cun, WANG Qing, LIU Jia-le, YANG Na, SU De-rong, PING Xiao-yan. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Biomass Allocation Patterns of Six Plant Species in a Typical Grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 149-155.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.018

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I1/149

参考文献

[1] Byrnes R C,Eastburn D J,Tate K W,et al. A global meta-analysis of grazing impacts on soil health indicators[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2018,47(4):758-765
[2] Canals R M,San emeterio L,Duran M,et al. Plant-herbivory feedbacks and selective allocation of a toxic metal are behind the stability of degraded covers dominated by Brachypodium pinnatum in acidic soils[J]. Plant and Soil,2017,415(1-2):373-386
[3] Dai L,Guo X,Ke X,et al. Moderate grazing promotes the root biomass in Kobresia meadow on the northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2019,9(16):395-406
[4] Guo Y,Liu L P,Zheng L L,et al. Long-term grazing affects relationships between nitrogen form uptake and biomass of alpine meadow plants[J]. Plant Ecology,2017,218(9):1035-1045
[5] Deng L,Zhang Z N,Shangguan Z P. Long-term fencing effects on plant diversity and soil properties in China[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2014(137):7-15
[6] Veen G F,De vries S,Bakker E S,et al. Grazing-induced changes in plant-soil feedback alter plant biomass allocation[J]. Oikos,2014,123(7):800-806
[7] 陈林. 荒漠草原猪毛蒿的生态适应对策[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2009:5-7
[8] Mokany K,Raison R J,Prokushkin A S. Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes[J]. Global Change Biology,2006,12(1):84-96
[9] Dovrat G,Meron E,Shachak M,et al. Plant size is related to biomass partitioning and stress resistance in water-limited annual plant communities[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2019(165):1-9
[10] Patty L,Halloy S R P,Hiltbrunner E,et al. Biomass allocation in herbaceous plants under grazing impact in the high semi-arid Andes[J]. Flora,2010,205(10):695-703
[11] Hu F L,Liu B,Liu Z M,et al. Effects of grazing on plant species diversity and carbon partitioning in semiarid rangelands of northeastern China[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany,2015,84(1):209-221
[12] Niu B,Zeng C,Zhang X,et al. High below-ground productivity allocation of alpine grasslands on the northern Tibet[J]. Plants-Basel,2019,8(12):535
[13] Li L,Weiner J,Wang Y,et al. Yield-density relationships of above-and belowground organs in Allium cepa var. aggregatum populations[J]. Plant Ecology,2016,217(7):913-922
[14] Ma H M,Zheng C C,Gao Y Z,et al. Moderate clipping stimulates over-compensatory growth of Leymus chinensis under saline-alkali stress through high allocation of biomass and nitrogen to shoots[J]. Plant Growth Regulation,2020,92:95-106
[15] 平晓燕,周广胜,孙敬松. 植物光合产物分配及其影响因子研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):104-115
[16] 陈佐忠,汪诗平. 中国典型草原生态系统[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000:1-5
[17] 安钰,安慧. 宁夏荒漠草原优势植物生长及生物量分配对放牧干扰的响应[J]. 西北植物学报,2015,35(2):373-378
[18] 荀其蕾,安沙舟,孙宗玖,等. 不同放牧压力下伊犁绢蒿构件生物量分配的变化[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(2):258-263
[19] Zeng C,Wu J,Zhang X. Effects of grazing on above-vs. below-ground biomass allocation of Alpine grasslands on the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plos One,2015,10(8):e0135173
[20] 许宏斌,辛晓平,宝音陶格涛,等. 放牧对呼伦贝尔羊草草甸草原生物量分布的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(3):768-774
[21] Gong X Y,Fanselow N,Dittert K,et al. Response of primary production and biomass allocation to nitrogen and water supplementation along a grazing intensity gradient in semiarid grassland[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2015(63):27-35
[22] Liu W. Individual reproductive strategy of Stipa breviflora under different grazing pressures[J]. Grassland Science,2020,66:174-182
[23] 张洪生,邵新庆,刘贵河,等. 围封、浅耕翻改良技术对退化羊草草地植被恢复的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(3):339-344
[24] Li W,Huang H Z,Zhang Z N,et al. Effects of grazing on the soil properties and C and N storage in relation to biomass allocation in an alpine meadow[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2011,11(4):27-39
[25] 张璐. 不同利用方式对内蒙古典型草原优势种功能性状及功能多样性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:11-18
[26] 邢小青,张璐,宝音陶格涛,等. 放牧对糙隐子草地上个体功能性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(6):116-122
[27] Wilson C H,Strickland M S,Hutchings J A,et al. Grazing enhances belowground carbon allocation,microbial biomass,and soil carbon in a subtropical grassland[J]. Global Change Biology,2018,24(7):2997-3009
[28] Pucheta E,Bonamici I,Cabido M,et al. Below-ground biomass and productivity of a grazed site and a neighbouring ungrazed exclosure in a grassland in central Argentina[J]. Austral Ecology,2004(29):201-208
[29] Gao Y Z,Giese M,Lin S,et al. Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity[J]. Plant and Soil,2008,307(1-2):41-50
[30] 位晓婷,刘月华,钟梦莹,等. 羊草个体性状对不同放牧模式响应的研究[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(5):949-953
[31] Hui D,Jackson R B. Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems:a synthesis of field data[J]. New Phytologist,2006,169(1):85-93
[32] Wang L,Niu K,Yang Y,et al. Patterns of above- and belowground biomass allocation in China's grasslands:Evidence from individual-level observations[J]. Science China-Life Sciences,2010,53(7):851-857
[33] 祁永. 放牧对草原群落特征及种群繁殖特性的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2005:45-51
[34] 汪诗平,李永宏,王艳芬,等. 不同放牧率对内蒙古冷蒿草原植物多样性的影响[J]. 植物学报,2001,43(1):89-96

放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响

Effects of Grazing Intensity on Biomass Allocation Patterns of Six Plant Species in a Typical Grassland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[2]	裴雯, 陈清, 张洛梓, 贾丽英. 放牧、水分和氮素对内蒙古草原土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[3]	李文晶, 王俊锋, 高晓荻, 石玉杰, 穆春生. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[4]	候文慧, 张玉霞, 王红静, 张庆昕, 侯美玲, 丛百明, 杜晓艳. 施氮水平对羊草叶片光合特性和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 531-536.
[5]	张天俊, 张永亮, 李威, 侯美玲, 于金鑫, 李鑫. 植物生长延缓剂对羊草非结构性碳水化合物含量及产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 407-411.
[6]	杨建强, 曹梦琪, 王袼, 胡姝娅, 王常慧. 内蒙古不同类型草地土壤氨氧化细菌和古菌的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2664-2669.
[7]	李雯, 马昕昕, 马宁, 赵允格, 乔羽, 王鹏, 孙会. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2547-2555.
[8]	李彤, 张宇, 赵晋灵, 闫瑞瑞, 辛晓平, 王旭, 陈金强, 吴冬秀, 李凌浩, 赵曼. 放牧对草甸草原土壤水热状况和地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2577-2582.
[9]	何源, 李星锐, 杨晓帆, 唐海萍. 内蒙古锡林郭勒盟典型草原固碳量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2274-2285.
[10]	王秀梅, 董建军. 基于广义线性模型估算内蒙古荒漠草原及典型草原地上生物量变化[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1711-1718.
[11]	李春艳, 王曦, 周胜花, 李希, 钟华, 董宽虎. 白羊草R2R3-MYB转录因子的挖掘及对干旱胁迫反应的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1784-1790.
[12]	方志红, 刘建宁, 张燕, 郭璞, 池惠武, 吴欣明, 贾会丽, 李莲芬, 王运琦, 石永红. 白羊草NAC转录因子家族生物信息学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1266-1274.
[13]	朱瑞芬, 刘杰淋, 王建丽, 韩微波, 申忠宝, 李达. 两种不同生境羊草根际土壤细菌群落多样性与环境因子的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 652-660.
[14]	许宏斌, 辛晓平, 宝音陶格涛, 闫瑞瑞, 王旭, 陈宝瑞, 金东艳, 姚静, 刘志英. 放牧对呼伦贝尔羊草草甸草原生物量分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 768-774.
[15]	任雨佳, 刘夏琳, 王惠玲, 刁华杰, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 北方农牧交错带赖草草地土壤氮矿化对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 328-337.