内蒙古草地净初级生产力时空变化及其对干旱的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.019

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 156-165.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.019

内蒙古草地净初级生产力时空变化及其对干旱的响应

康振山^1,2, 张莎¹, 白雲¹, Malak Henchiri¹, 张佳华^1,2

1. 青岛大学计算机科学技术学院遥感与数字地球研究中心, 山东青岛 266071;
2. 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院, 北京 100094

收稿日期:2020-07-02 修回日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2021-01-08
通讯作者: 张佳华
作者简介:康振山(1993-),山东济南人,男,汉族,硕士研究生,主要从事遥感草地研究,Email:2279575305@qq.com
基金资助:
山东省基础研究计划（2018GNC110025）；国家自然科学基金（41871253）资助

Spatio-temporal Changes of Grassland Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in Inner Mongolia and its Response to Drought

KANG Zhen-shan^1,2, ZHANG Sha¹, BAI Yun¹, HENCHIRI Malak¹, ZHANG Jia-hua^1,2

1. School of Computer Sciences and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266071, China;
2. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2020-07-02 Revised:2020-08-28 Published:2021-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究内蒙古草地生长季净初级生产力（Net primary productivity，NPP）的变化及其与干旱的关系，本文通过趋势变化和相关性计算对2001-2015年内蒙古草地NPP和标准化降水蒸散指数（Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index，SPEI）的时空变化进行研究。结果表明：内蒙古草地生长季NPP平均增长率为2.20 g C·m^-2·a^-1，其中草甸草原为3.73 g C·m^-2·a^-1，典型草原为1.69 g C·m^-2·a^-1，荒漠草原为0.30 g C·m^-2·a^-1。NPP均值整体上自西南向东北逐渐增加，其中草甸草原最高，其次为典型草原，荒漠草原最低，年均NPP分别为387.90 g C·m^-2·a^-1，291.26 g C·m^-2·a^-1，133.70 g C·m^-2·a^-1。NPP整体上与SPEI-1相关性最强，其中，草甸草原与SPEI-1最强相关性最强，典型草原、荒漠草原与SPEI-3相关性最强。干旱对荒漠草原的影响最大，对典型草原的影响次之，对草甸草原的影响最小。

关键词: BEPS模型, 草地NPP, SPEI, 时空变化, 干旱响应

Abstract: In order to explore the relationship between net primary productivity (NPP) change and drought in grassland growing season in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,this paper studies the interannual and spatial change characteristics of NPP and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2001 to 2015 based on the change rate analysis,correlation analysis and one-way linear regression analysis of SPEI and NPP simulated by Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS) model. At the same time,using SPEI data of different scales and grassland growth season NPP data simulated by BEPS model,the response analysis of grassland growth season NPP to drought in Inner Mongolia was realized.The results showed that the average growth rate of NPP was 2.20 g C·m^-2·a^-1 from 2001 to 2015,among which the average growth rate of NPP in meadow steppe was 3.73 g C·m^-2·a^-1,the fastest growth rate;the average growth rate of NPP in typical steppe was 1.69 g C·m^-2·a^-1,the second growth rate;the average growth rate of NPP in desert steppe was 0.30 g C·m^-2·a^-1,the slowest growth rate. In the aspect of spatial change,NPP increased gradually from southwest to northeast. Among them,meadow steppe was the highest,with an average annual unit area of 387.90 g C·m^-2·a^-1;typical steppe was the second,with an average of 291.26 g C·m^-2·a^-1;desert steppe was the lowest,with an average of 133.70 g C·m^-2·a^-1. The correlation between NPP and SPEI showed that NPP during grassland growth season had the strongest correlation with SPEI at one month scale. Meadow steppe had the strongest correlation with SPEI at one month scale,and typical steppe,desert steppe had the strongest correlation with SPEI in three months scale. The study also showed that NPP of grassland in Inner Mongolia had a strong response to short-term surface water anomalies and drought changes on a seasonal scale,while it had a poor response to medium and long-term drought changes,especially on the annual scale. The results of NPP response to SPEI showed that drought had the greatest impact on desert steppe,followed by typical steppe,and the least impact on meadow steppe.

Key words: BEPS, Grassland NPP, SPEI, Spatio-temporal change, Drought response

中图分类号:

TP79

康振山, 张莎, 白雲, Malak Henchiri, 张佳华. 内蒙古草地净初级生产力时空变化及其对干旱的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 156-165.

KANG Zhen-shan, ZHANG Sha, BAI Yun, HENCHIRI Malak, ZHANG Jia-hua. Spatio-temporal Changes of Grassland Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in Inner Mongolia and its Response to Drought[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 156-165.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.019

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I1/156

参考文献

[1] 张佳华,张国平,王培娟. 植被与生态遥感[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:139-190
[2] 邱文君. 干旱对西南地区植被净初级生产力的影响研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2013:5-6
[3] 刚成诚,王钊齐,杨悦,等. 近百年全球草地生态系统净初级生产力时空动态对气候变化的响应[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(11):1-14
[4] 陈辰,王靖,潘学标,等. 气候变化对内蒙古草地生产力影响的模拟研究[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(5):850-860
[5] 苏力德,杨劼,万志强,等. 内蒙古地区草地类型分布格局变化及气候原因分析[J]. 中国农业气象,2015,36(2):139-148
[6] 穆少杰,朱超,周可新,等. 内蒙古草地退化防治对策及碳增汇途径研究[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(2):217-225
[7] 许志信,李永强. 草地退化对水土流失的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2003,017(001):65-68
[8] Liu Y,Wang Q,Zhang Z,et al. Grassland dynamics in responses to climate variation and human activities in China from 2000 to 2013[J]. The ence of the Total Environment,2019,690:27-39
[9] Gao Q,Li Y,Wan Y,et al. Dynamics of alpine grassland NPP and its response to climate change in Northern Tibet[J]. Climatic Change,2009,97(3-4):515
[10] Liu Y Y,Yang Y,Wang Q,et al. Assessing the Dynamics of Grassland Net Primary Productivity in Response to Climate Change at the Global Scale[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2019,29(5):725-740
[11] Yu C L,Liu D. Response in productivity of natural vegetation to drought in northeast China based on MODIS[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(11):3978-3990
[12] Gang C,Zhou W,Wang Z,et al. Comparative Assessment of Grassland NPP Dynamics in Response to Climate Change in China,North America,Europe and Australia from 1981 to 2010[J]. Journal of Agronomy & Crop ence,2015,201(1):57-68
[13] 张美玲,陈全功,闫培洁. 中国天然草地净初级生产力时空分布[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(5):1124-1131
[14] 杨思遥,孟丹,李小娟,等. 华北地区2001-2014年植被变化对SPEI气象干旱指数多尺度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(3):1028-1039
[15] 张清雨,吴绍洪,赵东升,等. 内蒙古草地生长季植被变化对气候因子的响应[J]. 自然资源学报,2013,28(5):754-764
[16] 杨晗,周伟,石佩琪,等. 内蒙古草地NPP时空变化格局及其与水热因子耦合关系[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(2):238-244
[17] 张莎,张佳华,白雲,等. 基于MODIS-EVI及物候差异免阈值提取黄淮海平原冬小麦面积[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(11):150-158
[18] 王爱玲,朱文泉,李京,等. 内蒙古生态系统服务价值遥感测量[J]. 地理科学,2007,27(3):325-330
[19] 王修信,孙涛,朱启疆,等. 利用BEPS模型估算城区植被净初级生产力的时空变化[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(11):1-5
[20] 张文华,贾志斌,卓义,等. 锡林郭勒草地产草量空间动态变化及影响因素分析[J]. 地球环境学报,2016,7(2):163-172
[21] 贺金生,方精云,朴世龙,等. 中国草地植被生物量及其空间分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报,2004,28(4):491-498
[22] 穆少杰,李建龙,杨红飞,等. 内蒙古草地生态系统近10年NPP时空变化及其与气候的关系[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(3):6-15
[23] 戴尔阜,黄宇,吴卓,等. 内蒙古草地生态系统碳源/汇时空格局及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 地理学报,2016,071(001):21-34
[24] 周广胜,张峰,王玉辉. 基于CASA模型的内蒙古典型草原植被净初级生产力动态模拟[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(4):786-797
[25] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,龙中华,等. 基于GIS和RS的区域陆地植被NPP估算-以中国内蒙古为例[J]. 遥感学报,2005,009(003):300-307
[26] 周扬,李宁,吉中会,等. 基于SPI指数的1981-2010年内蒙古地区干旱时空分布特征[J]. 自然资源学报,2013,28(10):1694-1706
[27] 毕力格. 基于MODIS数据的内蒙古干旱监测[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2009:43-44
[28] 道日娜,包玉海. 基于生态分区的1980-2015年内蒙古干旱动态[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(3):165-171

内蒙古草地净初级生产力时空变化及其对干旱的响应

Spatio-temporal Changes of Grassland Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in Inner Mongolia and its Response to Drought

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈国茜, 祝存兄, 李素雲, 周秉荣, 李甫, 曹晓云, 周华坤. 三江源地区土壤水分的地理分区遥感模型构建及时空变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 199-207.
[2]	宋奇, 高琪, 马自强, 王楠, 王明玥, 彭杰. 1990—2019年阿拉尔垦区植被覆盖时空变化特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1014-1024.
[3]	何国兴, 柳小妮, 张德罡, 杜月红, 李强, 刘志刚, 关文昊, 杨军银, 韩天虎, 孙斌, 潘冬荣. 甘肃省草地NPP时空变化及对气候因子的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 788-797.
[4]	何国兴, 柳小妮, 张德罡, 李强, 蒲小鹏, 刘志刚, 关文昊, 杨军银, 韩天虎, 孙斌, 潘冬荣. 甘肃省高寒草甸植被覆盖度反演及其时空变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 593-602.
[5]	张晓克, 孟宏志. 1998-2018年藏北申扎县植被NDVI时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2513-2522.
[6]	张思源, 聂莹, 张海燕, 李永利, 韩燕东, 刘晓煌, 王兵. 基于地理探测器的内蒙古植被NDVI时空变化与驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1460-1472.
[7]	余飞燕, 王坤悦, 叶鑫, 董洪君, 黄凯, 罗志力, 郝建锋. 金马河温江段河岸带不同生境草本群落物种多样性和生物量变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 793-800.
[8]	任正超, 朱华忠, 史华, 柳小妮. 中国潜在自然植被NPP时空分布格局变化及其对气候和地形的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 474-485.
[9]	王涛, 沈渭寿, 欧阳琰, 林乃峰. 1982—2010年西藏草地生长季NDVI时空变化特征[J]. , 2014, 22(1): 46-51.
[10]	赵哈林, 刘任涛, 赵学勇, 张铜会. 沙漠化对科尔沁沙质草地大型土壤节肢动物群落时空变化的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 394-400,405.