关中地区紫花苜蓿，小麦及玉米根际土壤理化性质研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.027

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1246-1252.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.027

关中地区紫花苜蓿，小麦及玉米根际土壤理化性质研究

昝看卓¹, 刘丛¹, 张燕燕¹, 阿山江·伊米尼江¹, 白婕¹, 龙明秀¹, 王可珍², 屈洋², 何树斌¹

1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 宝鸡市农业科学研究院, 陕西岐山 722400

收稿日期:2021-09-13 修回日期:2022-01-04 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-06-06
通讯作者: 何树斌,E-mail:heshubin@nwsuaf.edu.com
作者简介:昝看卓(1997-),女,蒙古族,青海门源人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草生理生态研究,E-mail:zkz1128@nwafu.edu.com
基金资助:
陕西省重点研发项目(2019ZDLNY05-03);国家自然科学基金面上项目(32071878)资助

Study on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Alfalfa,Wheat and Maize Rhizosphere in Guanzhong Area

ZAN Kan-zhuo¹, LIU Cong¹, ZHANG Yan-yan¹, Ashanjiang·Yiminijiang¹, BAI Jie¹, LONG Ming-xiu¹, WANG Ke-zhen², QU Yang², HE Shu-bin¹

1. College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Baoji Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Qishan, Shaanxi Province 722400, China

Received:2021-09-13 Revised:2022-01-04 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为进一步明确关中地区基于牧草种植和传统农作物生产对土壤理化性质的影响，本试验测定了单播紫花苜蓿(A)、玉米(M)、小麦(W)及套种紫花苜蓿和玉米(AM)四年后土壤碳氮含量、稳定性同位素、微生物生物量及酶活性。结果表明：紫花苜蓿根际土壤全氮(TN)、同位素氮(δ¹⁵N)、微生物生物量碳氮(MBC、MBN)及蔗糖酶(SUC)、脲酶(UR)和中性磷酸酶(NP)均显著高于小麦和玉米。此外，AM的根际土壤全碳(TC)，TN和MBC显著高于单播作物。土壤TC和TN分别与δ¹⁵N,MBC和NP等呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)，且冗余分析中土壤C,N及微生物生物量分别解释了酶活性变化的50.86%和69.81%。因此，关中地区基于豆科牧草紫花苜蓿的种植模式能够实现C,N资源的高效利用与土壤的可持续生产。本研究从土壤理化性质的角度为关中地区落实“粮改饲”等政策，实现农业资源的高效利用提供理论依据。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 小麦, 玉米, 套种, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: To further clarify the effects of forage planting and traditional crop production on soil physical and chemical properties in Guanzhong area,this experiment determined the soil carbon and nitrogen content,stable isotope,microbial biomass and enzyme activity after four years of monoculture of alfalfa (A),maize (M),wheat (W) and interplanting alfalfa and maize (AM). The results showed that total nitrogen (TN),isotope nitrogen (δ¹⁵N),microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC,MBN),invertase (SUC),urease (UR) and neutral phosphatase (NP) in rhizosphere soil of alfalfa were significantly higher than those of wheat and maize. In addition,the rhizosphere soil total carbon (TC),TN and MBC of AM were significantly higher than those of monoculture. Soil TC and TN were significantly positively correlated with δ¹⁵N,MBC and NP,respectively (P<0.01),and the redundancy analysis of soil C,N and microbial biomass explained 50.86% and 69.81% of the changes in enzyme activity,respectively. Therefore,the planting modes of legume forage alfalfa in Guanzhong area can fulfill the efficient utilization of C and N resources and the sustainable production of soil. From the perspective of soil physical and chemical properties,this study provides a theoretical basis for the implementation of the "grain to feed" policy in Guanzhong area and the efficient utilization of agricultural resources.

Key words: Alfalfa, Wheat, Maize, Interplanting, Soil physicochemical properties

中图分类号:

S153

昝看卓, 刘丛, 张燕燕, 阿山江·伊米尼江, 白婕, 龙明秀, 王可珍, 屈洋, 何树斌. 关中地区紫花苜蓿，小麦及玉米根际土壤理化性质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1246-1252.

ZAN Kan-zhuo, LIU Cong, ZHANG Yan-yan, Ashanjiang·Yiminijiang, BAI Jie, LONG Ming-xiu, WANG Ke-zhen, QU Yang, HE Shu-bin. Study on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Alfalfa,Wheat and Maize Rhizosphere in Guanzhong Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1246-1252.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I5/1246

参考文献

[1] HAZRA K K,NATH C P,SINGH U,et al. Diversification of maize-wheat cropping system with legumes and integrated nutrient management increases soil aggregation and carbon sequestration[J]. Geoderma,2019,353:308-319
[2] WANG X L,JIA Y,LI XG,et al. Effects of land use on soil total and light fraction organic,and microbial biomass C and N in a semi-arid ecosystem of northwest China[J]. Geoderma,2009,153(1-2):285-290
[3] SU Y Z. Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration following the conversion of cropland to alfalfa forage land in northwest China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2007,92(1-2):181-189
[4] 邢会琴,肖占文,闫吉智,等.玉米连作对土壤微生物和土壤主要养分的影响[J].草业科学,2011,28(10):1777-1780
[5] 张丽琼,郝明德,臧逸飞,等.苜蓿和小麦长期连作对土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(11):3191-3196
[6] CHAPAGAIN T,RISEMAN A. Nitrogen and carbon transformations,water use efficiency and ecosystem productivity in monocultures and wheat-bean intercropping systems[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2015,101(1):107-121
[7] NIU Y,LUO Z,CAI L,et al. Continuous monoculture of alfalfa and annual crops influence soil organic matter and microbial communities in the rainfed loess plateau of China[J]. Agronomy,2020,10(7):1054
[8] ZHANG G,YANG Z,DONG S. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system[J]. Field Crops Research,2011,124(1):66-73
[9] BEDOUSSAC L,JUSTES E. The efficiency of a durum wheat-winter pea intercrop to improve yield and wheat grain protein concentration depends on N availability during early growth[J]. Plant and Soil,2010,330(1-2):19-35
[10] LATATI M,BARGAZ A,BELARBI B,et al. The intercropping common bean with maize improves the rhizobial efficiency,resource use and grain yield under low phosphorus availability[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2016,72:80-90
[11] CHEN P,SONG C,LIU X M,et al. Yield advantage and nitrogen fate in an additive maize-soybean relay intercropping system[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,657:987-999
[12] 中华人民共和国农业农村部.关于2021年农业农村部重大引领性技术遴选结果的公示公告[EB/OL]. http://moa.gov.cn/govpublic/KJJYS/202107/t20210721_6372397.htm,2021-07-21
[13] 屈洋,宋慧,刘洋,等.谷子新品种(系)主要农艺性状及茎杆特性的遗传多样性分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(3):51-58
[14] 闫茹,冯薇,王玺婧.呼伦贝尔沙地不同固沙植物土壤真菌群落组成及多样性[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(01):60-68
[15] 俞慎,李振高.熏蒸提取法测定土壤微生物量研究进展[J].土壤学进展,1994,22(6):42-50
[16] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986:260-360
[17] FORNARA D A,TILMAN D. Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation[J]. Journal of Ecology,2008,96(2):314-322
[18] RASMUSSEN J,GYLFADóTTIR T,DHALAMA N R,et al. Temporal fate of ¹⁵N and ¹⁴C leaf-fed to red and white clover in pure stand or mixture with grass-Implications for estimation of legume derived N in soil and companion species[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,133:60-71
[19] RAO I M,AYARZA M A,THOMAS,R J.The use of carbon isotope ratios to evaluate legume contribution to soil enhancement in tropical pastures[J]. Plant and Soil,1994,162(2):177-182
[20] CHEN J,HEILING M,RESCH C,et al. Does maize and legume crop residue mulch matter in soil organic carbon sequestration?[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2018,265:123-131
[21] BALESDENT J,GIRARDIN C,MARIOTTI A. Site-related δ¹³C of tree leaves and soil organic matter in a temperate forest[J]. Ecology,1993,74(6):1713-1721
[22] O'LEARY M H,OSMOND C B. Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis[J]. Bioscience,1988,38(5):328-336
[23] BARTHèS B,AZONTONDE A,BLANCHART E,et al. Effect of a legume cover crop (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) on soil carbon in an Ultisol under maize cultivation in southern Benin[J]. Soil Use and Management,2004,20(2):231-239
[24] EHLERINGER J R,BUCHMANN N,FLANAGAN L B. Carbon isotope ratios in belowground carbon cycle processes[J]. Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):412-422
[25] 林关辉.稳定同位素生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013:35-50
[26] MA J Y,SUN W,LIU X N,et al. Variation in the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope composition of plants and soil along a precipitation gradient in northern China[J]. Plos One,2011,7(12):e51894
[27] MAHIEU S,ESCARRé J,BRUNEL B,et al. Soil nitrogen balance resulting from N fixation and rhizodeposition by the symbiotic association Anthyllis vulneraria/Mesorhizobium metallidurans grown in highly polluted Zn,Pb and Cd mine tailings[J]. Plant and soil,2014,375(1):175-188
[28] PERI P L,LADD B,PEPPER D A,et al. Carbon (δ¹³C) and nitrogen (δ¹⁵N) stable isotope composition in plant and soil in southern patagonia's native forests[J]. Global Change Biology,2015,18(1):311-321
[29] LIU Y,MA L Y,LU Y C,et al. Comprehensive analysis of degradation and accumulation of ametryn in soils and in wheat,maize,ryegrass and alfalfa plants[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2017,140:264-270
[30] WANG L,PANG X,LI N,et al. Effects of vegetation type,fine and coarse roots on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in eastern Tibetan plateau[J]. CATENA,2020,194:104694
[31] DONG W H,ZHANG S,RAO X,et al. Newly-reclaimed alfalfa forage land improved soil properties comparison to farmland in wheat-maize cropping systems at the margins of oases[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016,94:57-64
[32] ZHANG G,ZHANG C,YANG Z,et al. Root distribution and N acquisition in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,2013,5(9):128
[33] LATATI M,BLAVET D,ALKAMA N,et al. The intercropping cowpea-maize improves soil phosphorus availability and maize yields in an alkaline soil[J]. Plant and Soil,2014,385(1-2):1-11
[34] MOORE J M,KLOSE S,TABATABAI M A. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,31(3):200-210

关中地区紫花苜蓿，小麦及玉米根际土壤理化性质研究

Study on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Alfalfa,Wheat and Maize Rhizosphere in Guanzhong Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毛培, 申书恒, 蒲军, 娄可可, 周强, 王增裕, 孙娟, 刘志鹏. 基于SCoT标记分析紫花苜蓿遗传多样性的取样数量[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1110-1121.
[2]	魏江文, 刘磊, 王森山, 陈丽霞, 蒋明君, 王庚浩, 徐亨昊. “抗”“感”苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜适应性及体内酶活的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1171-1177.
[3]	孙延亮, 刘选帅, 李生仪, 赵俊威, 马春晖, 张前兵. 新疆石河子地区不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿生产性能的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1227-1236.
[4]	张海铉, 霍文婕, 陈雷, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 许庆方, 郭刚. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质及小肠可吸收氨基酸的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1302-1309.
[5]	李鑫, 刘艳琪, 付婧萍, 班丽萍. 鲜食玉米生产中的亚洲玉米螟防控技术进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 825-834.
[6]	王静, 刘晓静, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同紫花苜蓿品种的氮效率比较及差异机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 889-900.
[7]	刘东霞, 杨莉, 宋连昭, 杨志敏, 王芳, 刘贵河. 三种镰孢菌对不同苜蓿品种致病性的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 909-918.
[8]	昝看卓, 阿山江·伊米尼江, 刘丛, 谭凯, 白婕, 何树斌, 王可珍, 屈洋, 龙明秀. 不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质及化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 957-965.
[9]	王黎, 王传杰, 潘旻, 程志强, 魏元浩, 华鹤良, 印志同, 赵国琦, 黄倩倩. 4个青贮玉米品种的青贮发酵品质及瘤胃降解特性的比较[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 568-574.
[10]	马坤, 芦光新, 邓晔, 颜珲璘, 王英成, 赵阳安, 张海娟, 周学丽, 窦声云. 有机肥对垂穗披碱草根际微生物及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 594-602.
[11]	王芳, 李伟, 刘鑫, 李文辰, 赵金波, 张智慧, 杨曌. 紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.
[12]	杨迎月, 毛桂莲, 麻冬梅, 张峰举, 许兴. 四种牧草种子在不同浓度NaCl或NaHCO₃胁迫下的萌发特性[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 637-645.
[13]	付东青, 贾春英, 张力, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 石河子地区青贮玉米农艺性状和发酵品质动态分析及评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 682-691.
[14]	赵小雪, 郭凤根, 罗富成. 添加纤维素酶与藜麦麸皮及小麦麸皮对台湾红藜青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 764-770.
[15]	王小燕, 张彩军, 蒲强胜, 安康, 张倩, 杨晶, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 人工草地建植对甘南高寒草甸草地生产力及土壤理化特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 288-296.