极干旱胁迫对雀麦、多年生黑麦草生长和体内水分的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.016

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3807-3818.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.016

极干旱胁迫对雀麦、多年生黑麦草生长和体内水分的影响

张咏梅¹, 胡海英², 白小明³, Matthew Cory⁴, García-Favre Javier⁴, Ordóñez Iván P^4,5

1. 甘肃农业大学干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 宁夏大学林业与草业学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
3. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
4. 农业与环境学院梅西大学, 北帕默斯顿 4442;
5. 坎佩奈克农艺研究所, 麦哲伦蓬塔阿雷纳斯 6212707

收稿日期:2024-01-30 修回日期:2024-05-10 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-12-14
通讯作者: 白小明,E-mail:baixm@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:张咏梅(1974-),女,汉族,甘肃武威人,博士,副研究员,主要从事草业科学与植物生理学研究,E-mail:zhangyongm@gsau.edu.cn;
基金资助:
甘肃省科技计划项目(20 JR10RA564)；甘肃省林草局草原生态修复治理科技支撑项目(GSLC-2020-3)资助

The Effects of Extreme Drought Stress on Growth and Water Content in Pasture Brome and Perennial Ryegrass

ZHANG Yong-mei¹, HU Hai-ying², BAI Xiao-ming³, MATTHEW Cory⁴, GARCÍA-FAVRE Javier⁴, ORDÓÑEZ Iván P.^4,5

1. State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. College of Forestry and Grassland, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
3. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
4. School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand;
5. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA, Kampenaike, Punta Arenas 6212707, Chile

Received:2024-01-30 Revised:2024-05-10 Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究极端干旱对牧草生长的影响，选择多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne，Lp)和雀麦(Bromus valdivianus，Bv)给予80%~85%植物有效水(Plant available water,PAW)和20%~25% PAW 2种水分处理，分析两种牧草生长及体内水分状况对干旱胁迫的响应。研究表明：80%~85% PAW充足水分下，两种牧草生物量积累、水势(Water potential,WP)、相对含水量(Relative water content,RWC)和净光合速率(Net photosynthetic rate,Pn)无明显种间差异。Bv叶片宽而重,蒸腾速率(Transpiration rate,Tr)、CO₂总导度(Total conductance to CO₂,CndCO₂)和气孔导度(Conductance to H₂O,Gs)显著高于Lp。而Lp分蘗多、叶多汁,瞬时水分利用效率是Bv的1.63倍。20%~25% PAW对两种牧草生长影响不完全一致，叶饱和重、干重和叶面积有相反变化趋势，但与充足水分相比差异不显著；Pn，Tr，CndCO₂，Gs和RWC则极显著降低，WP极显著降低了1.60 MPa，致使枯叶占比和叶温差显著升高。总之，雀麦和多年生黑麦草生长相近，水分利用模式不同；遭受极端干旱，不同种的两种牧草耐旱机制具有一定的共性，通过增强叶片持水力、降低水分循环、减少蒸腾失水以提高牧草抗旱性。

关键词: 干旱胁迫, 光合作用, 蒸腾作用, 生物量积累, 瞬时水分利用效率, 水势

Abstract: In order to study the effects of extreme drought on growth of forage grasses, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne，Lp) and pasture brome (Bromus valdivianus，Bv) were used as materials in pot experiment. 80%-85% plant available water (PAW) (well watered) and 20%-25% PAW (extreme drought) were applied to analyze adaptive changes of growth and responses to water status in forage grasses to drought stress. The results indicated that:1) Under 80%-85% PAW, there were no dramatic differences between Bv and Lp in biomass accumulation, water potential (WP), relative water content (RWC) and net photosynthesis rate (Pn). However, Bv had larger and heavier blade than Lp and its transpiration rate (Tr), total conductance to CO₂ (CndCO₂) and conductance to H₂O(Gs) were markedly higher than those in Lp. While Lp had slender, juicy blades and more tillers, instantaneous water use efficiency (iWUE) of Lp was 1.63 times of Bv. 2) Under 20%-25% PAW extreme drought, the growth of two forage grasses were not completely consistent, leaf turgid weight, dry weight and blade area showed opposite trend, but were not significant difference compared to that of the well watered condition. Pn, Tr, CndCO₂, Gs and RWC in Bv and Lp observably decreased, especially WP reduced by 1.60 MPa, which resulted in dead blade ratio and blade temperature difference increasing. In conclusion, Bv and Lp had similar growth characteristic in biomass accumulation and different water use models. When suffering extreme drought, two forage grasses from different species, their drought tolerance mechanism having some commonalities, improved their drought resistance by enhancing blade water retention, reducing water recycle and cutting down transpiration water loss.

Key words: Drought stress, Photosynthesis, Transpiration, Biomass accumulation, Instantaneous water use efficiency (iWUE), Water potential

中图分类号:

S543

张咏梅, 胡海英, 白小明, Matthew Cory, García-Favre Javier, Ordóñez Iván P. 极干旱胁迫对雀麦、多年生黑麦草生长和体内水分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3807-3818.

ZHANG Yong-mei, HU Hai-ying, BAI Xiao-ming, MATTHEW Cory, GARCÍA-FAVRE Javier, ORDÓÑEZ Iván P.. The Effects of Extreme Drought Stress on Growth and Water Content in Pasture Brome and Perennial Ryegrass[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3807-3818.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I12/3807

参考文献

[1] VOLAIRE F. A unified framework of plant adaptive strategies to drought:crossing scales and disciplines[J]. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(7):2929-2938
[2] MISHRA A K, SINGH V P. A review of drought concepts[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 391(1-2):202-216
[3] IPCC. Climate change:The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[R]. Cambridge and New York:Cambdridge University Press, 2013:1031-1106
[4] BEN OTHMAN D, ABIDA H. Monitoring and mapping of drought in a semi-arid region:case of the Merguellil watershed, central Tunisia[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194(4):287
[5] ANANDHARUBAN P, ELANGO L. Spatio-temporal analysis of rainfall, meteorological drought and response from a water supply reservoir in the megacity of Chennai, India[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2021, 130(1):17
[6] NOORISAMELEH Z, GOUGH W A, MIRZA M Q. Persistence and spatial-temporal variability of drought severity in Iran[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research international, 2021, 28(35):48808-48822
[7] MATTHEW C, VAN DER, LINDEN A, HUSSAIN S, et al. Which way forward in the quest for drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass?[J]. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 2012, 74:195-200
[8] 马思煜. 云南省农业干旱事件时空动态变化与驱动机制研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2021:1-10
[9] 赵兰兰, 闻童, 赵兵, 等. 西南地区近50年干旱趋势及特征分析[J]. 水文, 2021, 41(6):91-95, 59
[10] KASIM W A, OSMAN M E, OMAR M N, et al. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2013, 32(1):122-130
[11] 于贵瑞, 王秋凤. 植物光合、蒸腾与水分利用的生理生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2010:38-43
[12] DANGWAL N, PATEL N R, KUMARI M, et al. Monitoring of water stress in wheat using multispectral indices derived from Landsat-TM[J]. Geocarto International, 2016, 31(6):682-693
[13] TERÁN-CHAVES C A, GARCÍA-PRATS A, POLO-MURCIA S M. Water stress thresholds and evaluation of coefficient ks for perennial ryegrass in tropical conditions[J]. Water, 2022, 14(11):1696
[14] ZUFFO A M, STEINER F, AGUILERA J G, et al. Selected indices to identify water-stress-tolerant tropical forage grasses[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(18):2444
[15] DOMINGUEZ D L E, CAVAGNARO J B, ROS J P, et al. Genetic diversity for drought tolerance in the native forage grass Trichloris crinita and possible Morpho-physiological mechanisms involved[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14:1235923
[16] TALEB M H, MAJIDI M M, PIRNAJMEDIN F, et al. Plant functional trait responses to cope with drought in seven cool-season grasses[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1):5285
[17] SALSINHA Y C F, INDRADEWA D, PURWESTRI Y A, et al. Selection of drought-tolerant local rice cultivars from East Nusa Tenggara Indonesia during vegetative stage[J]. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 2019, 21(1):170-178
[18] SALSINHA Y C F, Maryani, INDRADEWA D, et al. Leaf physiological and anatomical characters contribute to drought tolerance of Nusa Tenggara Timur local rice cultivars[J]. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2021, 24(3):337-348
[19] HEIN J A, SHERRARD M E, MANFREDI K P, et al. The fifth leaf and spike organs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) display different physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16(1):248
[20] OLSZEWSKA M. Effects of cultivar, nitrogen rate and biostimulant application on the chemical composition of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) biomass[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(4):826
[21] NEAL J S, MURPHY S R, HARDEN S, et al. Differences in soil water content between perennial and annual forages and crops grown under deficit irrigation and used by the dairy industry[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 137:148-162
[22] ORDÓÑEZ I, LÓPEZ I F, KEMP P D, et al. Effect of pasture improvement managements on physical properties and water content dynamics of a volcanic ash soil in southern Chile[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 178:55-64
[23] LÓPEZ I F, KEMP P D, DÖRNER J, et al. Competitive strategies and growth of neighbouring Bromus valdivianus phil. and Lolium perenne L. plants under water restriction[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2013, 199(6):449-459
[24] ORDÓÑEZ I P, LÓPEZ I F, KEMP P D, et al. Response of Bromus valdivianus (pasture brome) growth and physiology to defoliation frequency based on leaf stage development[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(10):2058
[25] DESCALZI C, BALOCCHI O, LÓPEZ I, et al. Different soil structure and water conditions affect the growing response of Lolium perenne L. and Bromus valdivianus Phil. growing alone or in mixture[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2018, 18(3):617-635
[26] ORDÓN'EZ I P, LÓPEZ I F, KEMP P D, et al. Pasture brome (Bromus valdivianus) leaf growth physiology:a six leaf grass species[C]// 47th Agronomy Society Conference. Whanganui:New Zealand, 2017:13-22
[27] GARCÍA-FAVRE J, ZHANG Y M, LÓPEZ I F, et al. Decreasing defoliation frequency enhances Bromus valdivianus phil. growth under low soil water levels and interspecific competition[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(17):1333
[28] FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33:317-345
[29] 张熙, 张晋昕. 多个样本均数间的两两比较[J]. 循证医学, 2008, 8(3):167-171, 176
[30] 岳喜元, 左小安, 庾强, 等. 降水量和短期极端干旱对典型草原植物群落及优势种羊草(Leymus chinensis) 叶性状的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5):1009-1016
[31] 张一龙, 喻启坤, 李雯, 等. 不同抗旱性狗牙根地上地下表型特征及内源激素对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3):163-178
[32] 赵小强, 陆晏天, 白明兴, 等. 不同株型玉米基因型对干旱胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2):149-162
[33] 彭云玲, 赵小强, 任续伟, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同株型玉米大喇叭口期生长的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(4):1064-1070
[34] 张咏梅, 胡海英, 白小明, 等. 多年生黑麦草、雀麦根系形态和生长对土壤干旱的适应性[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(11):1784-1794
[35] 葛体达, 隋方功, 李金政, 等. 干旱对夏玉米根冠生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(1):103-109
[36] BRADBURY M. The effect of water stress on growth and dry matter distribution in juvenile Sesbania sesban and Acacia nilotica[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1990, 18(3):325-333
[37] WAN J X, GRIFFITHS R, YING J F, et al. Development of drought-tolerant canola (Brassica napus L.) through genetic modulation of ABA-mediated stomatal responses[J]. Crop Science, 2009, 49(5):1539-1554
[38] ROBERTSON B C, HE T H, LI C D. The genetic control of stomatal development in barley:new solutions for enhanced water use efficiency in drought-prone environments[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(8):1670
[39] MASTALERCZUK G, BORAWSKA-JARMUŁOWICZ B, DARKALT A. Changes in the physiological and morphometric characteristics and biomass distribution of forage grasses growing under conditions of drought and silicon application[J]. Plants, 2022, 12(1):16
[40] COWAN I R. Stomatal behaviour and environment[J]. Advances in Botanical Research, 1978, 4:117-228
[41] COWAN I R, FARQUHAR G D. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment[J]. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 1977, 31:471-505
[42] RODRIGUEZ-ITURBE I, PORPORATE D E A. Modeling photosynthesis, transpiration, and soil water balance:hourly dynamics during interstorm periods[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2004, 5:546-558
[43] 李彦彬, 朱亚南, 李道西, 等. 阶段干旱及复水对小麦生长发育、光合和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(8):76-82
[44] FARIASZEWSKA A, APER J, VAN HUYLENBROECK J, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of forage grass varieties to mild drought stress under field conditions[J]. International Journal of Plant Production, 2020, 14(2):335-353
[45] NEAL J S, FULKERSON W J, SUTTON B G. Differences in water-use efficiency among perennial forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation[J]. Irrigation Science, 2011, 29(3):213-232
[46] SMEAL D, GREGORY E J, ARNOLD R N. Interseasonal variability in the water use-production function of alfalfa[J]. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1992, 5(4):576-580
[47] 胡海英. 荒漠草原优势植物水分利用策略与干旱适应机制[M]. 银川:宁夏人民出版社, 2021:8
[48] MASTALERCZUK G, BORAWSKA-JARMUŁOWICZ B. Physiological and morphometric response of forage grass species and their biomass distribution depending on the term and frequency of water deficiency[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(12):2471
[49] BOZKURT ÇOLAK Y, YAZAR A, ALGHORY A, et al. Evaluation of crop water stress index and leaf water potential for differentially irrigated quinoa with surface and subsurface drip systems[J]. Irrigation Science, 2021, 39(1):81-100
[50] ALGHORY A, YAZAR A. Evaluation of crop water stress index and leaf water potential for deficit irrigation management of sprinkler-irrigated wheat[J]. Irrigation Science, 2019, 37(1):61-77
[51] WIDIYONO W, NUGROHO S, RACHMAT A, et al. Drought tolerant screening of 20 Indonesian Sorghum genotypes through leaf water potential measurements under water stress[J]. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 439(1):012033
[52] TARDIEU F, DAVIES W J. Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status[J]. Plant Physiology, 1992, 98(2):540-545
[53] POCKMAN W T, SPERRY J S. Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran Desert vegetation[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2000, 87(9):1287-1299
[54] HÖLTTÄ T, MENCUCCINI M, NIKINMAA E. Linking phloem function to structure:analysis with a coupled xylem-phloem transport model[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 259(2):325-337
[55] SPERRY J S, HACKE U G, OREN R, et al. Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2002, 25(2):251-263
[56] GUO J S, OGLE K. Antecedent soil water content and vapor pressure deficit interactively control water potential in Larrea tridentata[J]. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(1):218-232

极干旱胁迫对雀麦、多年生黑麦草生长和体内水分的影响

The Effects of Extreme Drought Stress on Growth and Water Content in Pasture Brome and Perennial Ryegrass

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高志强, 乌汉夫, 徐文, 袁玉莹, 李冰, 木扎帕尔·吐鲁洪, 崔国文. 不同耐旱性肥披碱草干旱胁迫下生理响应和转录组学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2718-2727.
[2]	韩玲娟, 范乐, 马峥, 李懿璇, 胡乐乐, 韩佳校, 高鹏, 梁银萍, 赵祥. 干旱胁迫下土壤微生物对白羊草生长及生理生化特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2816-2823.
[3]	黄洁琼, 翟佳兴, 王颖, 岑慧芳, 朱慧森, 许涛, 夏方山. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2575-2583.
[4]	刘雪婷, 石凤翎, 叶文兴. 喷施外源肌醇对草地早熟禾响应干旱胁迫的抗氧化特性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2584-2591.
[5]	孙天国, 衣兰, 谷新颖, 王思琪, 张爽. 外源亚精胺对苜蓿幼苗干旱缓解生理机制分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2099-2105.
[6]	罗鑫, 闫利军, 李达旭, 游明鸿, 张建波, 季晓菲, 雷雄, 白史且, 常丹. 野生垂穗披碱草种质资源抗旱性筛选与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2158-2168.
[7]	于元平, 蒋宇佳, 孙向一, 吴春妍, 周敏, 刘明稀. 假俭草WRKY家族基因鉴定及其响应干旱胁迫表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1378-1391.
[8]	李铭怡, 王冉, 贾濠基, 耿启明, 郭士维, 王福豪, 刘黎明, 董文豪, 许文年. 土壤化学计量特征及内稳性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1068-1077.
[9]	赵尧尧, 刘美君, 张政, 王婕, 王玉祥, 安长奇, 王跳霞. 低温和干旱双重胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶片光系统II的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1120-1130.
[10]	翟永青, 马艳红, 范菠菠, 房永雨, 张学峰, 于卓, 李坤, 吴婧, 闫秀秀, 赵彦. 蒙古冰草脱水素基因生物信息学识别及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 684-692.
[11]	李霜, 黄娟娟, 裴向军, 周立宏, 陈正峰, 胡友邦, 赵春章. 双聚材料对干旱条件下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 793-803.
[12]	岳丽, 山其米克, 王卉, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 毛红艳, 刘敏. 新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.
[13]	赵婷婷, 胡雨彤, 张少民, 仇春辰, 周小国, 郭亮, 廖雨, 王永斌. 减磷配施腐植酸对羊草生长及磷素吸收的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3539-3546.
[14]	宋雪, 付楚涵, 李家红, 孙雪铜, 韦银珠, 肖汇川, 李韦瑶, 秦立刚. 内生菌提高植物抗旱性和耐盐性分子机制研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 13-24.
[15]	韩喆, 张永强, 张浩浩, 罗文浩, 陈爱萍. 干旱胁迫对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 105-112.