华北农牧交错带农田-草地景观土壤速效氮界面研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.011

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 1222-1226.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.011

华北农牧交错带农田-草地景观土壤速效氮界面研究

傅尧^1,2, 刘利², 林长存¹

1. 北京林业大学林学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2014-05-08 修回日期:2014-08-30 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-01
通讯作者: 林长存
作者简介:傅尧(1973-),男,吉林长春人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事草地恢复生态及景观生态学研究,E-mail: fuyao73@sohu.com
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(BLX2012037)资助

Study on Soil Available Nitrogen Boundaries of Farmland-grassland Mosaic in Agro-pastoral Transition of North China

FU Yao^1,2, LIU Li², LIN Chang-cun¹

1. The College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2014-05-08 Revised:2014-08-30 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用非线性回归的生态界面测试分析法(BEDA),对华北农牧交错带农田-草地景观土壤的速效氮界面在生长季(5-9月)的时空动态进行分析,为干旱、半干旱地区以植被恢复为主的大规模生态环境建设提供参考.结果表明:农田-草地边界的土壤速效氮生态界面位于草地内.在少雨的5月,农田-草地的边界影响域最小,仅为37.5 m;而在雨水较为丰沛的8月,边界影响域最大,为57.5 m.相对于少雨期,丰雨期的速效氮生态界面会更靠近草地内部.速效氮素在农田-草地界面上表现出地表生态流季节动态性.

关键词: 农牧交错带, 农田-草地界面, 界面影响域, 速效氮

Abstract:

In order to provide reference to the vegetation restoration of large scale ecological construction in the arid and semi-arid area, the spatial and temporal variability of soil available nitrogen border at the grassland-farmland ecotone were analyzed by the method of a border-and-ecotone detection analysis (BEDA) based on non-linear regression analysis. The study was located in a mosaic of anthropogenic deciduous grasslands and farmland in the agro-pastoral transition of North China from the dry period (May) to rainy period (September) of 2012. The results showed that the minimum DEI towards the grassland interior was 37.5 m in the dry period (May). The maximum DEI of 57.5 m occurred in the rainy period (August). The amount of precipitation affected the simple diffusion process of available nitrogen, which represented the seasonal dynamics of ecological flows between grassland and farmland.

Key words: Agro-pastoral transition, Boundary between grassland and farmland, Depth-of-edge influence, Available nitrogen

中图分类号:

S812-05

傅尧, 刘利, 林长存. 华北农牧交错带农田-草地景观土壤速效氮界面研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1222-1226.

FU Yao, LIU Li, LIN Chang-cun. Study on Soil Available Nitrogen Boundaries of Farmland-grassland Mosaic in Agro-pastoral Transition of North China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1222-1226.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.011

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I6/1222

参考文献

[1] 王堃. 华北农牧交错带草原-农田群落空间演变机制的研究[J]. 草地学报,2000,8(4):267-273
[2] 李博,杨持. 草地生物多样性研究[M]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社,1995:10-29
[3] 高洪文. 生态交错带(Ecotone)理论研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,1994,14(1):22-26
[4] Cadenasso M L, Pickett S T A, Weathers K C, et al. An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries [J]. BioScience,2003,53(8):717-722
[5] 林长存,王德利,曹勇宏,等. 农林交错带界面的小气候边界影响域季节动态[J]. 生态学杂志,2008,27(11):1932-1936
[6] 刘洪来,张卫华,王堃,等. 华北农牧交错带农田-草地界面土壤水分影响域分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(3):659-664
[7] Hofmeister J, Hosek J, Brabec M, et al. Strong influence of long-distance edge effect on herb-layer Vegetation in forest fragments in an agricultural landscape [J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics,2013,15(6):293-303
[8] Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity [J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics,2003,34(1):487-515
[9] Honnay O, Verheyen K, Hermy M. Permeability of ancient forest edges for weedy plant species invasion [J]. Forest Ecology And Management,2002,161(1/3):109-122
[10] Rheault H, Drapeau P, Bergeron Y, et al. Edge effects on epiphytic lichens in managed black spruce forests of eastern North America [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2003,33(1):23-32
[11] Cancino J. Modelling the edge effect in even-aged Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) stands [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2005,210(1/3):159-172
[12] Toms J D, Lesperance M L. Piecewise regression: A tool for identifying ecological thresholds [J]. Ecology,2003,84(8):2034-2041
[13] Brand L A, George T L. Response of passerine birds to forest edge in coast redwood forest fragments [J]. The Auk,2001,118(3):678-686
[14] Ewers R M, Didham R K. Continuous response functions for quantifying the strength of edge effects [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,43(3):527-536
[15] Hennenberg K J, Goetze D, Szarzynski J, et al. Detection of seasonal variability in microclimatic borders and ecotones between forest and savanna [J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2008,9(3):275-285
[16] Orlova M A, Lukina N V, Tutubalina O V, et al. Soil nutrient's spatial variability in forest-tundra ecotones on the Kola Peninsula, Russia [J]. Biogeochemistry,2013,113(1/3):283-305
[17] Saccone P, Girel J, Pages J P, et al. Ecological resistance to Acer negundo invasion in a European riparian forest: Relative importance of environmental and biotic drivers [J]. Applied Vegetation Science,2013,16(2):184-192
[18] 时项锋,许冬梅,邱开阳,等. 游动分割窗技术在景观界面影响域判定中的应用:以牛枝子-黑沙蒿群落界面为例[J]. 草业科学,2010,27(4):30-33
[19] 李丽光,何兴元,李秀珍,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷农林边界影响域的研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1804-1808
[20] Ries L, Fletcher R J J, Battin J, et al. Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained [J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics,2004,35(1):491-522
[21] Piessens K, Honnay O, Devlaeminck R, et al. Biotic and abiotic edge effects in highly fragmented heathlands adjacent to cropland and forest [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2006,114(2/4):335-342
[22] Cadenasso M, Pickett S, Weathers K, et al. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries [J]. BioScience,2003,53(8):750-758
[23] Wiens J, Crawford C, Gosz J. Boundary dynamics: A conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems [J]. Oikos,1985,45(3):421-427
[24] Strayer D L, Power M E, Fagan W F. A classification of ecological boundaries [J]. BioScience,2003,53(8):723-729
[25] Desrochers A, Fortin M J. Understanding avian responses to forest boundaries: A case study with chickadee winter flocks [J]. Oikos,2000,91(2):376-384
[26] De S A, Nachtergale L, Roskams P, et al. Soil acidification along an ammonium deposition gradient in a Corsican Pine stand in northern Belgium [J]. Environmental Pollution,1998,102(1):427-431

华北农牧交错带农田-草地景观土壤速效氮界面研究

Study on Soil Available Nitrogen Boundaries of Farmland-grassland Mosaic in Agro-pastoral Transition of North China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	任亮, 孙芳, 丁玎. 机会成本视角下北方农牧交错带生态优先兼顾农业产业发展策略[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1294-1300.
[2]	逯玉兰, 李广, 闫丽娟, 董莉霞, 李杰, 聂志刚, 王钧. 甘肃农牧交错带1971—2019年降水量变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2556-2565.
[3]	陆燕花, 李广, 马维伟, 王钧, 刘强, 张尚文. 农牧交错带复合生态经济系统的能值分析—以甘肃省定西市为例[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1673-1681.
[4]	王惠玲, 刁华杰, 崔乐乐, 薄元超, 刘夏琳, 任雨佳, 郝杰, 李扬, 申颜, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 北方农牧交错带典型草地土壤呼吸及其组分对刈割强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1403-1411.
[5]	董斅晓, 薄元超, 张晓琳, 贺婷婷, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 农牧交错带半干旱草地生态系统土壤呼吸对短期不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 53-62.
[6]	刘春阳, 李占台, 刘东霞, 王激清, 刘贵河. 速效氮肥和缓释肥配施对高羊茅草坪质量及土壤硝态氮动态的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5): 1248-1254.
[7]	刘贵河, 葛剑, 李军, 刘春阳, 张英俊, 汪诗平. 华北农牧交错带不同放牧强度绵羊食性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 743-748.
[8]	王建立, 郝俊, 杨丰, 刘洪来, 程巍, 陈超. 贵州人工草地-农田界面土壤水热耦合影响域动态变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 303-309.
[9]	林长存, 王堃, 孙钰茗. 中国北方农牧交错带中段近60年气温序列变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 747-753.
[10]	王建立, 刘洪来, 杨丰, 唐文汉, 程巍. 贵州人工草地-农田景观土壤水分界面研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 697-702.
[11]	陈超, 黄顶, 王堃, 张卫华, 孙增慧, 陈龙. 北方农牧交错带草木犀属外来植物沿公路分布和扩展的影响因素探讨[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 722-727.
[12]	杨丰, 刘洪来, 陈超, 黎琳, 孔德顺, 吴文旋, 赵丽丽, 向俊. 贵州人工草地-农田界面土壤温度影响域研究[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1080-1084.
[13]	郑浩, 邵新庆, 吕进英, 林长存, 何峰, 王堃. 北方农牧交错带生态用水现状及优化配置分析——以河北沽源县为例[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 287-291.
[14]	徐轩, 张英俊. 农牧交错带草-畜-田耦合的IRM模拟分析[J]. , 2010, 18(3): 320-326.
[15]	焦燕, 赵江红, 徐柱. 内蒙古农牧交错带土地利用对土壤性质的影响[J]. , 2009, 17(2): 234-238.