不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.007

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 350-357.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.007

不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征

陆永祥^1,2, 成启明¹, 陈良寅¹, 孙林², 肖冰雪¹, 苟文龙¹, 游明鸿¹, 白史且¹, 李平¹

1. 四川省草原科学研究院, 四川成都 611731;
2. 西南民族大学, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2019-11-13 修回日期:2019-12-03 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-04-11
通讯作者: 李平
作者简介:陆永祥(1996-),男,辽宁丹东人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草生产与加工利用研究,E-mail:2489362105@qq.com
基金资助:
科技部十三五重大科研专项-高寒特色畜牧业及区域产业技术体系构建与示范（编号：2017YFC0504806）资助

Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Characteristics of Oat Silage at Different Altitudes

LU Yong-xiang^1,2, CHENG Qi-ming¹, CHEN Liang-yin¹, SUN Lin², XIAO Bing-xue¹, GOU Wen-long¹, YOU Ming-hong¹, BAI Shi-qie¹, LI Ping¹

1. Sichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, Sichuan province 611731, China;
2. Southwest University for Minzu, Chengdu, Sichuan province 610041, China

Received:2019-11-13 Revised:2019-12-03 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究海拔高度对燕麦（Avena sativa L.）青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征的影响，本研究以不同海拔地区种植的燕麦为原料，制作青贮饲料，分别贮存在低海拔地区（成都）和高海拔地区（红原），测定发酵指标和细菌群落特征。结果表明，随着海拔升高，燕麦青贮饲料中细菌群落组成和结构均发生变化（P<0.01）：乳酸菌属相对丰富度呈上升趋势，而不良菌（如梭状芽孢杆菌）属相对丰富度呈下降趋势。不同海拔地区种植的燕麦在同一地区青贮后可溶性碳水化合物、粗蛋白、丁酸和氨态氮含量以及微生物数量均存在差异（P<0.05）。综上，海拔高度影响燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征。

关键词: 燕麦, 贮存地点, 青贮, 发酵品质, 细菌群落

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of altitude on the fermentation quality and bacterial community characteristics of oat silage，In this study, oats grown in different elevations were used as raw materials to produce silage,which was stored in low elevations (Chengdu) and high elevations (Hongyuan) respectively,and the silage fermentation indicators and bacterial community characteristics were analyzed. The results showed that the composition and structure of bacterial community in oat silage changed as the elevation increased (P<0.01)：The relative abundance of lactic acid bacteria increased,while the relative abundance of undesirable bacteria (such as Clostridium) decreased. In terms of the same storage elevation,the contents of carbohydrate (WSC),crude protein (CP),butyric acid (BA) and ammonia nitrogen (AN) and microbial counts in silages of oats grown at different altitudes were significantly different (P<0.05). Therefore,the off-site storage affects the bacterial community characteristics and fermentation quality of oat silage.

Key words: Oats, Storage location, Silage, Fermentation quality, Bacterial community

中图分类号:

S512.6

陆永祥, 成启明, 陈良寅, 孙林, 肖冰雪, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 白史且, 李平. 不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 350-357.

LU Yong-xiang, CHENG Qi-ming, CHEN Liang-yin, SUN Lin, XIAO Bing-xue, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, BAI Shi-qie, LI Ping. Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Characteristics of Oat Silage at Different Altitudes[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 350-357.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I2/350

参考文献

[1] 董彦红. 高寒地区的优质饲草—燕麦[J]. 草业与畜牧,2010(6):61-62
[2] 杨云贵,程天亮,杨雪娇,等. 3个燕麦品种不同收获期对青贮饲草营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(4):683-688
[3] 王成章,陈桂荣. 饲草生产学[M]. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1998:285
[4] 阿依古丽·达嘎尔别克,古丽努尔·阿曼别克,海米提·亚库甫江,等. 昭苏马场燕麦草地适时刈割及青贮调制研究[J]. 饲料研究,2015(5):66-68
[5] Weinberg Z G,Szakacs G,Ashbell G,et al. The effect of temperature on the ensiling process of corn and wheat[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2001,90(4):561-566
[6] 冯亚杰,王二耀,施巧婷,等. 中草药添加剂对热应激奶牛产奶性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国饲料,2018(8):66-69
[7] 李志强,冯富. 燕麦青贮研究进展[J]. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2018,44(1):1-5
[8] 常明华. 燕麦青贮技术在高海拔地区的试验[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2014,10(5):33-34
[9] 郭刚,原现军,林园园,等. 添加糖蜜与乳酸菌对燕麦秸杆和黑麦草混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(2):409-413
[10] Murphy R P. A method for the extraction of plant samples and the determination of total soluble carbohydrates[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1958,9:714-717
[11] 辛鹏程,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加丙酸对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(3):594-600
[12] Broderick G A,Kang J H. Automated Simultaneous Determination of Ammonia and Total Amino Acids in Ruminal Fluid and In Vitro Media 1[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[13] 孙肖慧,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(6):1353-1359
[14] Li P,Zhang Y,Gou W,et al. Silage fermentation and bacterial community of bur clover,annual ryegrass and their mixtures prepared with microbial inoculant and chemical additive[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2019,247,285-293
[15] Ni K,Wang F,Zhu B,et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage[J]. Bioresource Technology,2017:S096085241730545X
[16] Bolger A M,Usadel B. Trimmomatic:a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data[J]. Bioinformatics,2014,30(15):2114-2120
[17] Magoc T,Salzberg S L. FLASH:fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies[J]. Bioinformatics,2011,27(21):2957-2963
[18] Edgar R C. UPARSE:highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nature Methods,2013,10(10):996
[19] 程晓月. 甘肃天祝几种高寒草甸植物营养成分含量和生理生化指标与海拔的关系研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2012:6-7
[20] 张娟,王丽娜,曹蕾,等. 青藏高原不同海拔区垂穗披碱草的发酵性能[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(7):1550-1556
[21] İbrahim,Ertekin,Mustafa,et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation in pre-harvesting period on fermentation and feed quality properties of alfalfa silage[J]. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences,2019,15:245-253
[22] Borreani G,Tabacco E,Schmidt R J,et al. Silage review:Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):3952-3979
[23] 黄峰,张露,周波,等. 青贮微生物及其对青贮饲料有氧稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报,2019,31(1):82-89
[24] Guo X S,Ding W R,Han J G,et al. Characterization of protein fractions and amino acids in ensiled alfalfa treated with different chemical additives[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,142(1-2):89-98
[25] 许冬梅,张萍,柯文灿,等. 青贮微生物及其对青贮饲料发酵品质影响的研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3):460-465
[26] Ranjit N K,Kung L J. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri,Lactobacillus plantarum,or a chemical preservative on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(3):526-535
[27] Kung L,Shaver R D,Grant R J, et al. Silage review:Interpretation of chemical,microbial,and organoleptic components of silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):4020-4033
[28] 孙安琪. 白酒糟与菊芋渣混合青贮发酵品质及微生物多样性研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学,2019:21-22
[29] Mills J A,Jr L K. The effect of delayed ensiling and application of a propionic acid-based additive on the fermentation of barley silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(8):1969-1975
[30] 高雪峰,樊星,赵鹏,等. 苜蓿青贮过程汇总蛋白质分解调控机制研究现状[J]. 江西农业,2017(15):45-54
[31] Ghalfi H,Allaoui A,Destain J,et al. Bacteriocin Activity by Lactobacillus curvatus CWBI-B28 To Inactivate Listeria monocytogenes in Cold-Smoked Salmon during 4℃ Storage[J]. Journal of Food Protection,2006,69(5):1066-1071
[32] Vescovo M,Scolari G,Zacconi C. Inhibition of Listeria innocua growth byantimicrobial-producing lactic acid cultures in vacuum-packed cold-smoked salmon[J]. Food Microbiol,2006,23(7):689-693
[33] Wang Y,He L,Xing Y,et al. Bacterial diversity and fermentation quality of Moringa oleifera leaves silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and stored at different temperatures[J].Bioresource Technology,2019,284:349-358
[34] 保安安. 青藏高原不同地区垂穗披碱草青贮饲料中乳酸菌多样性及优势菌种的发酵特性研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2016:16-17
[35] Ren F,He R,Zhou X,et al. Dynamic changes in fermentation profiles and bacterial community composition during sugarcane top silage fermentation:A preliminary study[J]. Bioresource technology,2019,85:121315
[36] Xue Y,Bai C,Sun J,et al. Effects of locations and growth stages on nutritive value and silage fermentation quality of\\\,Leymus chinensis\\\,in Eurasian steppe of northern China[J]. Grassland Science,2018,64(1):40-50
[37] 张大伟,陈林海,朱海霞,等. 青贮饲料中主要微生物对青贮品质的影响研究[J]. 饲料研究,2007,(3):65-68

不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征

Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Characteristics of Oat Silage at Different Altitudes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋词, 黄小涛, 石国玺, 周华坤, 王芳萍, 姚步青. 播期对青藏高原燕麦生长和饲草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 121-127.
[2]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[3]	吴海艳, 曲珍, 刘昭明, 拉巴顿珠, 同桑措姆, 曲尼, 尼玛卓嘎, 马玉寿. 基于主成分分析的燕麦品种生产性能的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[4]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[5]	朱海霞. 多孢木霉HZ-31菌株胁迫下野燕麦内参基因的选择[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1666-1674.
[6]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[7]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[8]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[9]	郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 韩志顺, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮. 不同改良措施对盐碱土土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1200-1209.
[10]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[11]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[12]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[13]	李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 佘智慧, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[14]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[15]	童永尚, 鱼小军, 徐长林, 汪鹏斌, 宋建超, 李珍, 李颖. 天祝高寒区播期对7个燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.