高寒半湿润地区不同苜蓿品种越冬期根系生理及构型特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.017

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 919-930.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.017

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

高寒半湿润地区不同苜蓿品种越冬期根系生理及构型特征

孙万斌¹, 马晖玲¹, 周青平², 陈有军², 张伟², 张俊超², 刘文辉³

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/甘肃省草业工程实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 西南民族大学青藏高原研究院/四川若尔盖高寒湿地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站/四川省发改委工程实验室, 四川成都 610041;
3. 青海省青藏高原优良牧草种质资源利用重点实验室青海大学畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2021-09-01 修回日期:2021-11-18 发布日期:2022-04-25
通讯作者: 马晖玲,E-mail:mahl@gsau.edu.cn;周青平,E-mail:qpingzh@aliyun.com
作者简介:孙万斌(1989-),男,汉族,甘肃临夏人,博士研究生,主要从事于草种质资源及育种方向的研究,E-mail:1205517373@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点专项(2017YFC0504806);国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)资助

Root Physiology and Characteristics of Different Alfalfa Varieties During Overwintering in Alpine Sub-humid Area

SUN Wan-bin¹, MA Hui-ling¹, ZHOU Qing-ping², CHEN You-jun², ZHANG Wei², ZHANG Jun-chao², LIU Wen-hui³

1. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem Ministry of Education/Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province/Sino-U. S. Center for Grassland Ecosystem Sustainability, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Institute of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Southwest Minzu University/Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/Engineering Laboratory of Sichuan Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Superior Forage Germplasm in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2021-09-01 Revised:2021-11-18 Published:2022-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确在青藏高原海拔3 500 m半湿润地区不同苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)品种越冬期根系生理及构型特征与越冬率的关系,选取10个不同苜蓿品种,在越冬不同时期,测定根及根颈中超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶、过氧化氢酶活性和丙二醛、脯氨酸、可溶性糖含量,并在越冬前挖取根系以获取根系形态特征。结果表明:返青前根颈中可溶性糖含量变化比根部剧烈;越冬率较高的苜蓿品种根系分支模式更接近于叉状分支;返青前根部脯氨酸含量、越冬初根颈可溶性糖含量、总根长、总根表面积、主根平均直径与越冬率呈极显著正相关关系(P<0.01),返青前根颈脯氨酸含量、总根体积、根尖数、分叉数与越冬率呈显著正相关关系(P<0.05);主成分分析显示分叉数、总根表面积、总根长对苜蓿越冬率影响较大。参试苜蓿在该地自然越冬过程中,根颈生理活动比根部敏感,根系发达、扩展性强的'WL319HQ'、'皇后'、'太阳神'、'驯鹿'等品种具有较好的越冬适应性。

关键词: 苜蓿, 越冬率, 根系特征, 抗氧化酶, 渗透调节物质

Abstract: To clarify the relationship between root physiological and root configuration and overwintering rate of different alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties in the semi-humid region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau at an altitude of 3 500 m.10 different alfalfa varieties were planted in this area.The activity of superoxide dismutase,peroxidase,catalase,and the content of malondialdehyde,proline,soluble sugars in roots and crown were determined at different stages of overwintering.The root system was picked before overwintering to obtain root morphological characteristics.The results showed that before turning green,the content of soluble sugar in the crown changed more drastically than that in roots.Alfalfa varieties with a higher overwintering rate were closer to dichotomous branches and had better cold resistance.The proline content in the roots before turning green,the soluble sugar content in the crown at the beginning of overwintering,total root length,root surface area,average taproot diameter were significantly positively correlated with the overwintering rate (P<0.01).Proline content in the crown before turning green,root volume,root tips,root forks were significantly positively associated with the overwintering rate (P<0.05).Principal component analysis showed that the root forks,root surface area,and total root length had a greater influence.During the natural overwintering process at this area,the root crown physiological activities was more sensitive than the roots of alfalfa.The varieties'WL319HQ','Alfaqueen','Sun-god'and'AC Caribou'had well-developed root systems and strong expansion with better overwintering adaptability.

Key words: Alfalfa, Overwintering rate, Root characteristics, Antioxidant enzymes, Osmotic adjustment substances

中图分类号:

S963.22+3.3

孙万斌, 马晖玲, 周青平, 陈有军, 张伟, 张俊超, 刘文辉. 高寒半湿润地区不同苜蓿品种越冬期根系生理及构型特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 919-930.

SUN Wan-bin, MA Hui-ling, ZHOU Qing-ping, CHEN You-jun, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Jun-chao, LIU Wen-hui. Root Physiology and Characteristics of Different Alfalfa Varieties During Overwintering in Alpine Sub-humid Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 919-930.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.017

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I4/919

参考文献

[1] 晏和飘,李文龙,梁天刚,等.青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J].草地学报,2021,29(S1):190-198
[2] 张文浩,侯龙鱼,杨杰,等.高寒地区苜蓿人工草地建植技术[J].科学通报,2018,63(17):1651-1663
[3] SHEN X H,LI J D,FENG P,et al. Root Physiological Traits and Cold Hardiness of Alfalfa Grown Alone or Mix-sowed with Meadow Fescue[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,2017,67(3):235-244
[4] 畅喜云,范月君,邹华,等.青藏高原高海拔地区极抗寒苜蓿选育问题探讨及栽培技术要点[J].草业与畜牧,2013(4):19-21
[5] 朱鹏锦,尚艳霞,杨莉,等.青藏高原几种高山植物的光合生理特性[J].草业科学,2013,30(6):886-892
[6] 徐呈祥.提高植物抗寒性的机理研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(24):7966-7980
[7] 李美如,刘鸿先,王以柔.细胞氧化应激机制与植物抗冷性机理的研究[J].生命科学,1996,8(4):30-34
[8] 徐洪雨,甄莉丽,李钰莹,等.低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(4):724-733
[9] 陶雅,孙启忠.不同紫花苜蓿品种可溶性糖、全氮、丙二醛含量动态变化及其与抗寒性关系研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2008,10(S1):56-60
[10] 南丽丽,师尚礼,陈建纲,等.不同根型苜蓿根系对低温胁迫的响应及其抗寒性评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(3):619-625
[11] CASTONGUAY Y,BERTRAND A,MICHAUD R,et al. Cold-Induced Biochemical and Molecular Changes in Alfalfa Populations Selectively Improved for Freezing Tolerance[J]. Crop Science,2011,51(5):2132-2144
[12] 刘志英,李西良,李峰,等.越冬紫花苜蓿根系性状与秋眠性的关系及其抗寒效应[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1689-1701
[13] 刘香萍.苜蓿品种间抗寒性能评价及其相关形态学与生理学研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2004:25-31
[14] 洪绂曾.苜蓿根系的类型和根蘖型苜蓿的选育[J].牧草与饲料,1987(1):10-15
[15] 朱爱民,韩国栋,张玉霞,等.不同播种时期对紫花苜蓿越冬率影响及分析[J].草地学报,2020,28(2):446-453
[16] 邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:163-169
[17] FITTER A H,STICKLAND T R,HARVEY M L. Architectural Analysis of Plant Root Systems 1. Architectural Correlates of Exploitation Efficiency[J]. New Phytologist,1991,118(3):375-382
[18] BOUMA T J,NIELSEN K L,VAN HAL J,et al. Root System Topology and Diameter Distribution of Species from Habitats Differing in Inundation Frequency[J]. Functional Ecology,2001,15(3):360-369
[19] BERNTSON G M. Topological Scaling and Plant Root System Architecture:Developmental and Functional Hierarchies[J]. New Phytologist,1997,135(4):621-634
[20] LYNCH J. Root Architecture and Plant Productivity[J]. Plant Physiology,1995,109(1):7-13
[21] APEL K,HIRT H. Reactive Oxygen Species:Metabolism,Oxidative Stress,and Signal Transduction[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2004,55(1):373-399
[22] 洪剑明,邱泽生.植物抗性生理(一)[J].生物学通报,1997(5):13-15
[23] 方强恩.紫花苜蓿根颈芽发育成枝及越冬休眠特性研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016:7-8
[24] WANG S Y,FAUST M,JIAO H J. Changes in Superoxide Dismutase Activity during Thidiazuron-induced Lateral Budbreak of Apple[J]. HortScience,1991,26(9):1202-1204
[25] 贾祥,多吉格桑,赵爱民,等. 4种禾本科牧草苗期抗寒性综合评价[J].草地学报,2020,28(5):1372-1378
[26] 尹永强,胡建斌,邓明军.植物叶片抗氧化系统及其对逆境胁迫的响应研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(1):105-110
[27] 田国忠,李怀方,裘维蕃.植物过氧化物酶研究进展[J].植物科学学报,2001,19(4):332-344
[28] 申晓慧.苜蓿与无芒雀麦单混播后越冬期根系生理指标的变化及其与抗寒性的关系[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(26):13-15,19
[29] STRANDÅ,FOYER C H,GUSTAFSSON P,et al. Altering Flux through the Sucrose Biosynthesis Pathway in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana Modifies Photosynthetic Acclimation at Low Temperatures and the Development of Freezing Tolerance[J]. Plant,Cell and Environment,2003,26(4):523-535
[30] 魏双霞,师尚礼,康文娟,等.三个抗寒紫花苜蓿品系的寒境生理适应性研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2016,51(6):95-101,109
[31] REYES-DÍAZ M,ULLOA N,ZU'IGA-FEEST A,et al. Arabidopsis thaliana Avoids Freezing by Supercooling[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2006,57(14):3687-3696
[32] RUELLAND E,VAULTIER M N,ZACHOWSKI A,et al. Advances in Botanical Chapter 2:Cold Signalling and Cold Acclimation in Plants[M]. Oxford:Elsevier Ltd,2009:35-150
[33] 崔国文.紫花苜蓿田间越冬期抗寒生理研究[J].草地学报,2009,17(2):145-150
[34] 李晶,阎秀峰,祖元刚.低温胁迫下红松幼苗活性氧的产生及保护酶的变化[J].植物学报,2000,42(2):148-152
[35] 吴新卫,韩清芳,贾志宽.不同苜蓿品种根颈和根系形态学特性比较及根系发育能力[J].西北农业学报,2007,16(2):80-86
[36] 唐子钦,陈有军,胡健,等.川西北沙化草地7种牧草根系构型及根鞘特征分析[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(2):22-31
[37] 周洋洋.种植方式对高寒区苜蓿促生及提高越冬的生理生态研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2019:37-39
[38] 李思诗,司晓静,蒋芳市,等.长汀县崩岗区8种禾本科植物根系构型特征[J].草业学报,2018,27(10):215-222
[39] 单立山.西北典型荒漠植物根系形态结构和功能及抗旱生理研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013:39-45

高寒半湿润地区不同苜蓿品种越冬期根系生理及构型特征

Root Physiology and Characteristics of Different Alfalfa Varieties During Overwintering in Alpine Sub-humid Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同紫花苜蓿品种的氮效率比较及差异机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 889-900.
[2]	刘东霞, 杨莉, 宋连昭, 杨志敏, 王芳, 刘贵河. 三种镰孢菌对不同苜蓿品种致病性的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 909-918.
[3]	王芳, 李伟, 刘鑫, 李文辰, 赵金波, 张智慧, 杨曌. 紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.
[4]	杨迎月, 毛桂莲, 麻冬梅, 张峰举, 许兴. 四种牧草种子在不同浓度NaCl或NaHCO₃胁迫下的萌发特性[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 637-645.
[5]	李红, 李波, 李晨阳, 杨曌. 大孔树脂纯化苜蓿总黄酮及纯化前后抗氧化能力比较[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 750-757.
[6]	杨习江, 杨昌福, 蒋学乾, 张帆, 何飞, 杨青川, 康俊梅. 紫花苜蓿粗灰分与矿质元素含量QTL定位分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 312-319.
[7]	孙志轩, 敖平星, 毕玉芬, 赵雁. 德钦’紫花苜蓿叶绿体基因组序列及特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 320-328.
[8]	赵阳安, 芦光新, 邓晔, 王英成, 马坤, 颜珲璘, 张海娟, 周学丽, 窦声云. 根瘤菌拌种对两种苜蓿生长及根际微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 370-378.
[9]	韩颜隆, 刘晓静, 王静, 汪雪, 李佳奇. 施氮对不同品种紫花苜蓿根系特性和生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 379-384.
[10]	何玉娟, 李东琴, 邓波, 杨军, 对山艾力·卡布吐拉, 杨超. 外源赤霉素GA₃施加对紫花苜蓿-根瘤菌共生体系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 385-393.
[11]	李彦飞, 初晓辉, 李嘉懿, 马祖艳, 牛琼梅, 单贵莲. 大狼毒对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 394-402.
[12]	刘慧, 金富强, 刘亚朋, 黄嵘峥, 韩小强, 马春晖. 8种生物农药对苜蓿叶象甲的室内毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 426-431.
[13]	苏旺苍, 冯长松, 李慧龙, 孙兰兰, 徐洪乐, 吴仁海. 甲咪唑烟酸与烯草酮混配对紫花苜蓿生长影响及除草效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 479-486.
[14]	李生仪, 孙延亮, 刘选帅, 赵俊威, 赵建涛, 马春晖, 张前兵. 磷肥对滴灌苜蓿根际土壤微环境及干草产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 495-502.
[15]	申晓慧. 两种诱变处理下紫花苜蓿全基因组DNA甲基化图谱分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 46-54.