旅游干扰对芦芽山亚高山草甸植物生物量分配的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.028

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3492-3502.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.028

旅游干扰对芦芽山亚高山草甸植物生物量分配的影响

李佳成¹, 陈炜昊¹, 侯钢¹, 张亚慧¹, 孙小涵¹, 李帅², 杨美红³, 严师节⁴, 赵祥¹, 许驭丹¹

1. 山西农业大学草业学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 山西农业大学资源环境学院, 山西太谷, 0300801;
3. 山西农业大学基础部, 山西太谷 030801;
4. 高平市畜牧兽医服务中心, 山西高平 048400

收稿日期:2023-05-15 修回日期:2023-07-28 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-12-01
通讯作者: 赵祥,E-mail:sxndzhaox@126.com;许驭丹,E-mail:xyd124680@163.com
作者简介:李佳成(1999-),男,汉族,山西大同人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态系统退化与恢复研究,E-mail:18035279695@163.com
基金资助:
山西省基础研究计划青年科学研究项目(202103021223172)；山西农业大学博士科研启动项目(2021BQ61)；山西省博士毕业生、博士后研究人员来晋工作奖励经费科研项目(SXBYKY2022030)；山西农业大学科技创新基金项目(2004022)资助

Effect of Tourism Disturbance on Plant Biomass Allocation of Subalpine Meadows in Luya Mountain,China

LI Jia-cheng¹, CHEN Wei-hao¹, HOU Gang¹, ZHANG Ya-hui¹, SUN Xiao-han¹, LI Shuai², YANG Mei-hong³, YAN Shi-jie⁴, ZHAO Xiang¹, XU Yu-dan¹

1. College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. College of Resource and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. Department of Basic Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
4. Gaoping County Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Service Center, Gaoping, Shanxi Province 048400, China

Received:2023-05-15 Revised:2023-07-28 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 芦芽山作为华北地区亚高山草甸的典型分布区，在日益加剧的旅游压力下面临着巨大的退化风险，明晰旅游干扰背景下亚高山草甸植物生物量的分配策略、平衡当地经济发展和生态保护成为当前亟待解决的问题。本研究以芦芽山亚高山草甸为研究对象，关注不同旅游干扰强度和海拔梯度对植物群落整体和各功能群地上、地下生物量及分配策略的影响机制和关键调控因子。结果表明：芦芽山亚高山草甸的植物群落生物量与旅游干扰强度呈负相关，且生物量分配支持最优分配效应；植物地上生物量主要受到植物丰富度、旅游干扰强度、海拔、土壤容重以及土壤速效钾的调控，地下生物量和根冠比受到旅游干扰强度和土壤全磷的调控。本研究表明规范游客行为和提高土壤肥力是亚高山草甸恢复和管理的关键要素。

关键词: 植物生物量分配, 亚高山草甸, 旅游干扰, 功能群, 生物因子, 土壤因子

Abstract: As a typical tourism distribution area in subalpine meadow in North China,Luya Mountain is facing a huge degradation risk under the increasing pressure from tourism. It is currently urgent to clarify plant biomass allocation of subalpine meadow under the pressure of tourism interference and balance economic development and ecological protection. Based on the subalpine meadow of Luya Mountain,this study aims to explore the regulation mechanism and important impacting factors of different tourism disturbance degrees and altitude gradients on the aboveground and belowground biomass and allocation strategy of plant community and functional groups. The results of this study revealed that:plant community biomass of subalpine meadow in Luya Mountain was negatively correlated with the degree of tourism disturbance,and plant allocation strategy of this area was closer to optimal partitioning theory. The aboveground biomass of plants was mainly regulated by plant richness,tourism disturbance degree,altitude,soil bulk density and soil available potassium. The underground biomass and root-shoot ratio were regulated by tourism disturbance degree and soil total phosphorus. This study highlighted that regulating tourist behavior and improving soil fertility were critical to the restoration and management of subalpine meadows.

Key words: Plant biomass allocation, Subalpine meadow, Tourism disturbance, Functional groups, Biological factors, Soil factors

中图分类号:

X171.1

李佳成, 陈炜昊, 侯钢, 张亚慧, 孙小涵, 李帅, 杨美红, 严师节, 赵祥, 许驭丹. 旅游干扰对芦芽山亚高山草甸植物生物量分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3492-3502.

LI Jia-cheng, CHEN Wei-hao, HOU Gang, ZHANG Ya-hui, SUN Xiao-han, LI Shuai, YANG Mei-hong, YAN Shi-jie, ZHAO Xiang, XU Yu-dan. Effect of Tourism Disturbance on Plant Biomass Allocation of Subalpine Meadows in Luya Mountain,China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(11): 3492-3502.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I11/3492

参考文献

[1] 马子清.山西植被[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001:41-47
[2] GRABHERR G,GOTTFRIED M,GRUBER A,et al. Patterns and current changes in alpine plant diversity[J]. Arctic and alpine biodiversity:patterns,causes and ecosystem consequences,1995:167-181
[3] SUN J,MA B,LU X. Grazing enhances soil nutrient effects:Trade-offs between aboveground and belowground biomass in alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(2):337-348
[4] NIKLAS K J. Modelling below- and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants[J]. Annals of Botany,2005,95(2):315-321
[5] GEDROC J J,K D M MCCONNAUGHAY,J S COLEMAN. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning:optimal,ontogenetic,or both[J]. Functional Ecology,1996,10(1):44-50
[6] SUN J,WANG X,CHENG G,et al. Effects of grazing regimes on plant traits and soil nutrients in an alpine steppe,northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plos One,2014,9(9):e108821
[7] GAO X X,DONG S K,XU Y D,et al. Plant biomass allocation and driving factors of grassland revegetation in a Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau chronosequence[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2021,32(4):1732-1741
[8] 杨昊天,李新荣,刘立超,等.荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1340-1348
[9] 孟欢欢,张媛媛,周晓兵,等.古尔班通古特沙漠草本植物生物量分配特征[J].中国沙漠,2022,42(1):96-107
[10] CHENG D L,NIKLAS K J. Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities[J]. Annals of Botany,2007,99(1):95-102
[11] KOU D,YANG G,LI F,et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation across the Tibetan alpine permafrost region[J]. Nature communications,2020,11(1):3331
[12] 王敏,苏永中,杨荣,等.黑河中游荒漠草地地上和地下生物量的分配格局[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(3):209-219
[13] 李永康,刘金龙,许冬梅,等.宁夏荒漠草原蒙古冰草资源分配特征[J].草地学报,2023,31(4):1125-1133
[14] 武帅楷,郝杰,刁华杰,等.晋北农牧交错带草地生物量对短期放牧强度的响应[J].草地学报,2023,29(7):1-9
[15] 韩小雨,郭宁,李冬冬,等.氮添加对内蒙古不同草原生物量及土壤碳氮变化特征的影响[J].草业学报,2022,31(1):13-25
[16] 庞晓瑜.增温对岷江冷杉及亚高山草甸生长和营养分配的影响[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2017:3-4
[17] 杨春勐,谢勇,初晓辉,等.不同干扰方式对滇西北亚高山草甸生物量和碳储量的影响[J].中国草地学报,2018,40(3):62-67
[18] 高本强,袁自强,王斌先,等.施肥和刈割对亚高山草甸物种多样性与生产力及其关系的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(5):417-424
[19] 杨阳,刘秉儒.宁夏荒漠草原不同群落生物多样性与生物量关系及影响因子分析[J].草业学报,2015,24(10):48-57
[20] 马丽,徐满厚,周华坤,等.山西亚高山草甸植被生物量的地理空间分布[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(8):2244-2253
[21] JOHNSON N C. Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales[J]. New Phytologist,2010,185(3):631-647
[22] HECTOR A,SCHMID B,BEIERKUHNLEIN C,et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands[J]. Science,1999,286:1123-1127
[23] JING X,SANDERS N J,SHI Y,et al. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above- and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate[J]. Nature Communications,2015,6:8159
[24] HUSTON M A. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments:Re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity[J]. Oecologia,1997,110:449-460
[25] HOOPER D U,CHAPIN III F S,EWEL J J,et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning:A consensus of current knowledge[J]. Ecological Monographs,2005,75(1):3-35
[26] POORTER H,NIKLAS K J,REICH P B,et al. Biomass allocation to leaves,stems and roots:Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control[J]. New Phytologist,2012,193(1):30-50
[27] LAMBERS H,RAVEN J A,SHAVER G R,et al. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2008,23(2):95-103
[28] MOMMER L,VAN RUIJVEN J,DE CALUWE H,et al. Unveiling below-ground species abundance in a biodiversity experiment:A test of vertical niche differentiation among grassland species[J]. Journal of Ecology,2010,98(5):1117-1127
[29] 雷隆举,赵锦梅,张雪,等.祁连山东段不同植物群落的特征及生物量分配[J].草业科学,2020,37(5):853-863
[30] 宋清华.高寒退化草地西北针茅生物量分配和根系功能性状的环境适应性[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2016:12-13
[31] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:40-60
[32] THE R CORE TEAM. R:a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna,Austria[EB/OL]. http://www.R-project.org/,2023-01-01/2023-07-28
[33] KISSLING M,HEGETSCHWEILER K T,RUSTERHOLZ H P,et al. Short-term and long-term effects of human trampling on above-ground vegetation,soil density,soil organic matter and soil microbial processes in suburban beech forests[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2009,42(3):303-314
[34] 刘光荣.旅游干扰对庐山风景区微生物多样性的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(2):274-279
[35] 王雪超,刘艳萍,高永,等.旅游扰动对草原植被及土壤的影响[J].草原与草坪,2021,41(6):127-138
[36] 王钰.旅游干扰对长白山苔原带植物多样性和土壤微生物的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2022:3-4
[37] 万里强,陈玮玮,李向林,等.放牧对草地土壤含水量与容重及地下生物量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(26):25-29
[38] KIER L P,WEISBACH A N,WEINER J. Root and shoot competition:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology,2013,101(5):1298-1312
[39] LONG S P,HUTCHIN P R. Primary production in grasslands and coniferous forests with climate change:An overview[J]. Ecological Applications,1991,1(2):139-156
[40] 王长庭,王启基,龙瑞军,等.高寒草甸群落植物多样性和初级生产力沿海拔梯度变化的研究[J].植物生态学报,2004(2):240-245
[41] 赵彩红.基于植被及土壤生化特性分析旅游对草原生态的影响[J].分子植物育种,2022,20(17):5904-5908
[42] 张金屯.芦芽山亚高山草甸优势种群和群落的二维格局分析[J].生态学报,2005(6):1264-1268
[43] 李素清,张金屯,上官铁梁.芦芽山亚高山草甸的数量分类与排序研究[J].西北植物学报,2005(10):2062-2067
[44] 李巧峡,赵庆芳,马世荣,等.嵩草属植物研究进展[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006(6):78-82
[45] 武胜男,张曦,高晓霞,等.三江源区“黑土滩”型退化草地人工恢复植物群落的演替动态[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2444-2453
[46] 宋昕旖,聂瑾璐,杨梦涵,等.祁连山不同海拔珠芽蓼光合特性和繁殖策略[J].应用与环境生物学报,2022,28(6):1527-1533
[47] 张芊妤,曾奕丰,李文洁,等.季节放牧下青藏高原高寒草甸牧草生物量空间分布特征[J].草业科学,2022,39(2):318-327
[48] 武俊智,上官铁梁,张婕,等.旅游干扰对马仑亚高山草甸植物物种多样性的影响[J].山地学报,2007(5):534-540
[49] MOU X M,LI X G,ZHAO N N,et al. Tibetan sedges sequester more carbon belowground than grasses:A¹³C labeling study[J]. Plant and Soil,2018,426:287-298
[50] 邢云飞,王晓丽,刘永琦,等.不同建植年限人工草地植物群落和土壤有机碳氮特征[J].草地学报,2020,28(2):521-528
[51] 鲁庆彬,游卫云,赵昌杰,等.旅游干扰对青山湖风景区植物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(2):295-302
[52] 褚双双.国产电影票房影响因素研究与预测[D].大连:东北财经大学,2020:19-20
[53] 刘兴良,史作民,杨冬生,等.山地植物群落生物多样性与生物生产力海拔梯度变化研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2005(4):27-34
[54] 李凯辉,王万林,胡玉昆,等.不同海拔梯度高寒草地地下生物量与环境因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2008(11):2364-2368
[55] 管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999(6):6-9
[56] 秦远好,谢德体,魏朝富,等.土壤生态环境对游憩活动冲击的响应研究[J].水土保持学报,2006(3):61-65
[57] 邓娜.冻融作用对松嫩草地土壤氮、磷矿化的影响[D].长春:东北师范大学,2016:35-36
[58] LI Y,NIU S,YU G. Aggravated phosphorus limitation on biomass production under increasing nitrogen loading:A meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology,2016,22(2):934-943

旅游干扰对芦芽山亚高山草甸植物生物量分配的影响

Effect of Tourism Disturbance on Plant Biomass Allocation of Subalpine Meadows in Luya Mountain,China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于泽航, 董全民, 曹铨, 俞旸, 张春平, 刘文亭, 杨晓霞, 刘玉祯, 张振祥, 冯斌, 吕卫东, 杨增增. 不同放牧模式对祁连山高寒草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2621-2627.
[2]	汤靖磊, 任治国, 张学渊, 张依尧, 王忠武, 王珍, 索明春, 任海燕. 典型草原不同功能群物种多样性与生产力关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 1939-1949.
[3]	依里帆·艾克拜尔江, 李进, 李慧, 庄伟伟. 两种黄芪属植物的根瘤特性比较及与土壤因子关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2177-2185.
[4]	侯东杰, 韩蓓蕾, 刘璐, 王忠武. 基于物种周转揭示放牧对荒漠草原植物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 952-962.
[5]	刘欣蕊, 崔媛媛, 王忠武, 孙海莲, 韩国栋, 侯东杰, 王静, 李治国, 刘倬彤. 放牧和模拟降水对短花针茅荒漠草原植物功能群多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 868-875.
[6]	胡雪, 魏晶晶, 马丽, 张中华, 秦瑞敏, 常涛, 苏洪烨, 阿的哈则, 袁访, 李珊, 周华坤. 西藏嵩草草甸植物功能群去除影响群落生物量及土壤理化性质[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3240-3250.
[7]	郭童童, 刘艳, 陈梦娇, 崔靖, 李兰平, 梁德飞, 任飞. 蚁丘形成对高寒草甸植物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3384-3393.
[8]	费璇, 锁才序, 向双, 孙书存. 青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 1954-1963.
[9]	毛芮, 郭碧花, 刘金平, 游明鸿, 张雪梅, 羊勇. 寒区公路不同坡度护坡土壤性状和群落特征及功能群差异[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1550-1557.
[10]	冯斌, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 董全民, 张春平, 刘玉祯, 孙彩彩, 李彩弟, 时光, 杨增增, 张小芳, 魏琳娜. 不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070.
[11]	魏晶晶, 秦瑞敏, 张中华, 李永良, 邓艳芳, 马丽, 苏洪烨, 佘延娣, 常涛, 周宸宇, 杨旭芹, 邵新庆, 孙建, 周华坤. 不同退化程度高寒草地植物群落与土壤性质变化及相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3035-3045.
[12]	刘玉玲, 王德平, 张泓博, 王国富, 李鹏珍, 戎郁萍. 补播时间和补播草种对退化草甸草原植物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3098-3105.
[13]	王淼, 张宇, 张楚, 陈思思, 王旭, 陈金强, 李瑞强, 曹娟, 辛晓平, 周忠义, 闫瑞瑞. 放牧强度对草甸草原植物群落主要功能群碳氮磷贮量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 125-133.
[14]	李强, 何国兴, 刘志刚, 关文昊, 乔欢欢, 张德罡, 韩天虎, 孙斌, 潘冬荣, 柳小妮. 东祁连山高寒草甸植被特征和生物多样性对生境的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 169-177.
[15]	郭丽珠, 吕进英, 王堃, 范希峰, 黄顶, 武菊英. 不同草地利用方式对河北坝上天然草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 245-252.