Comparative experiment of forage sorghum varieties in the Ningxia irrigation area

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.035

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 1751-1758.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.035

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative experiment of forage sorghum varieties in the Ningxia irrigation area

FU Bing-zhe^1,3, CHANG Wei¹, LI Ze-ya¹, GAO Xue-qin^1,2

1. Agronomy College, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
2. Breading Base of State Key Laboratory for Preventing Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Modern Molecular Breeding for Dominant and Special Crops in Ningxia, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China

Received:2019-08-11 Revised:2019-09-08 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-31

宁夏引黄灌区饲用高粱品种比较研究

伏兵哲^1,3, 常巍¹, 李泽亚¹, 高雪芹^1,2

1. 宁夏大学农学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
2. 宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室, 宁夏银川 750021;
3. 宁夏优势特色作物现代分子育种重点实验室, 宁夏银川 750021

通讯作者: 高雪芹,E-mail:306098639@qq.com
作者简介:伏兵哲(1982-),男,陕西扶风人,博士,副教授,主要从事牧草育种与栽培利用研究,E-mail:fbzhe19@163.com
基金资助:
宁夏自然科学基金项目（2019AAC03061）资助；草学-一流学科建设项目（NXYLXK2017A01）资助；宁夏青年科技人才托举工程项目（TJGC2018083）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to screen sorghum varieties suitable for spreading and application in ningxia.The seven growth indexes and six nutrition indexes of six sorghum varieties were comprehensively evaluated by using the grey relational degree.The results showed that dajiang 2180 have strong lodging resistance in growth characteristics.Hainiu and fengtian were superior to other varieties in plant height,stem diameter,fresh weight and dry. The crude protein and fat content of dajiang 2180,the acid washing fiber and lignin content of fengtian and dajiang 2180,and the crude ash content of hainiu are better than other breeds in terms of nutritional indicators.Comprehensive evaluation of six sorghum varieties using grey relational degree can reveal,Fengtian,Dajiang 2180 and Hainiu are more suitable for promotion and application in ningxia irrigation area.

Key words: Ningxia yellow irrigation area, Sorghum, Grey relational degree

摘要： 为筛选出适合在宁夏引黄灌区推广应用的饲用高粱（Sorghum bicolor（L.）Moench）品种，本试验利用灰色关联理论对6个高粱品种的7个生长指标和6个营养指标进行综合评价。结果表明：生长特性上大奖2180抗倒伏能力较强，海牛和丰甜在株高、茎粗、鲜重和干重要优于其他品种；营养成分上大奖2180的粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量、丰甜和大奖2180的酸性洗涤纤维和木质素含量、海牛的粗灰分含量要优于其他品种。应用灰色关联度理论对6个高梁品种进行综合评价得出，丰甜、大奖2180和海牛较其他品种更适宜在宁夏引黄灌区推广应用。

关键词: 宁夏引黄灌区, 高粱, 灰色关联度

CLC Number:

S514

FU Bing-zhe, CHANG Wei, LI Ze-ya, GAO Xue-qin. Comparative experiment of forage sorghum varieties in the Ningxia irrigation area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1751-1758.

伏兵哲, 常巍, 李泽亚, 高雪芹. 宁夏引黄灌区饲用高粱品种比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1751-1758.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.035

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2019/V27/I6/1751

References

[1] 张国琴,葛玉彬,张正英. 10个饲用高粱品种(系)在甘肃的区试结果初报[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2019(06):8-11
[2] 高春华,朱金英,张华文,等. 38个粒用高粱品种芽期耐盐性的综合鉴定及评价[J]. 核农学报,2019(09):1841-1855
[3] 景海春,刘智全,张丽敏,等. 饲草甜高粱分子育种与产业化[J]. 科学通报,2018,63(17):1664-1676
[4] 王晓龙,王晓燕,米福贵. 浅谈畜牧业饲草料发展存在的问题及建议[J]. 草原与草业,2018,30(02):4-7
[5] 王国文. 9个甜高粱品种比较试验初报[J]. 中国糖料,2018,40(04):29-31
[6] 李春喜,冯海生. 甜高粱在青海高原不同海拔生态区的适应性研究[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(03):51-59
[7] 何敏. 不同品种高粱饲用价值的研究[D]. 广州:华南农业大学,2016:15-32
[8] 刘艳梅. 吉林省西部不同类型高梁品种(系)主要农艺性状及相关能源性状研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2013:23
[9] 马建华,赵满飞,张蓉,等. 宁夏牧草产业科技创新体系建设启示[J]. 宁夏农林科技,2014,55(07):33-34
[10] Peng D,Chen X,Yin Y,et al. Lodging resistance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.):Lignin accumulation and its related enzymes activities due to the application of paclobutrazol or gibberellin acid[J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH,2014,157:1-7
[11] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2016:370
[12] 郭瑞林. 作物灰色育种学[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1995:434
[13] 张光雨,马和平,邵小明,等. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(05):121-131
[14] 王晓龙,李红,杨曌,等. 饲用高粱不同品种比较试验[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017(13):147-150
[15] 来强,李青丰,莫日根敖其尔,等. 影响牧草含水量测定以及牧草干鲜比的主要因素[J]. 中国草地学报,2008(04):73-77
[16] 高亚敏,萨日娜,孙琳丽,等. 内蒙古通辽地区燕麦引种试验初步研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2017,38(05):32-35
[17] 腾峰. 玉米株高主效QTL,qPH3.1的克隆及其功能验证[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2013:9-20
[18] 张振刚,张福耀,赵威军,等. 甜高粱抗倒伏性研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学,2012,40(08):907-910
[19] 李英双,胡丹,聂蛟,等. 甜荞株高和茎粗的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报,2018,44(08):1185-1195
[20] 李金梅,赵威军,张福耀,等. 甜高粱抗倒伏性相关性状的配合力和遗传参数分析[J]. 作物杂志,2014(02):56-60
[21] 穆艳芳. 不同栽培措施对高粱品质性状的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2016,22(02):106-108
[22] 张光雨,王江伟,张豪睿,等. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(04):1117-1125
[23] 王红梅,梁潇. 宁夏引黄灌区褐色中脉(BMR)高粱饲用性状评定研究[J]. 农业科学研究,2016,37(04):6-10
[24] 曾根滨,曹庆云. 饲料中粗灰分含量测定方法的优化探索[J]. 饲料研究,2017(04):48-53
[25] 程竟竟. 饲料常规分析测定方法的改进研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2016:4-6
[26] 潘春方,郑付华,任延铭,等. 真菌降解木质素在反刍动物饲料中的应用[J]. 饲料博览,2017(10):1-4
[27] 麦麦提敏·乃依木. 四种甜高粱干草品质比较研究[J]. 草食家畜,2018(02):47-51
[28] 昝凯,周青,张志民,等. 灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现[J]. 大豆科学,2018,37(05):664-671
[29] 娜日苏,梁庆伟,杨秀芳,等. 阿鲁科尔沁旗燕麦新品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 饲料研究,2019,42(03):83-86
[30] 孙万斌,冯刚刚,马晖玲,等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种在甘肃荒漠绿洲灌区和半干旱灌区的灰色关联度综合评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2017,52(05):73-82
[31] 梁丹妮,靳巧红,李明雨,等. 10个高粱属品种在宁夏引黄灌区的适应性[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(02):490-501

Comparative experiment of forage sorghum varieties in the Ningxia irrigation area

宁夏引黄灌区饲用高粱品种比较研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[2]	LI Hong, LI Bo, FANG Zhi-jian, YANG Zhao, ZHANG Chao, FENG Cheng-long, JIN Shan-shan, WANG Si-qi, SHI Wan-ying. Physiological Response of Alfalfa Seedlings to Freeze-thaw or Freeze-thaw Versus Soda Saline-alkali Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[3]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[4]	YOU Si-Han, DU Shuai, ZHOU Zhong-Yi, Gegentu, WAN Tao, JIA Yu-Shan. Mixed Silage of Sorghum Hybrid Sudan Grass and Perennial Ryegrass with Different Proportions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[5]	LIANG Jia, MAYINU·Wusiman, FANG Zhi-gang. Effects of Exogenous Growth Substances on Seed Germination of Sweet Sorghum under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[6]	WU Guo-fang, YU zhuo, YU Xiao-xia, YANG Dong-sheng, LU Qian-qian, LI Jing-wei, LI Jia-qi. Fine mapping of main QTL PA7-2 for low hydrocyanic acid content in sorghum-sudangrass hybrid [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2149-2157.
[7]	Zaituniguli KUERBAN, Tuerxun TUERHONG, SHAN QIMIKE, WANG Hui, TU Zhen-dong, Aikebaier YILAHONG. Study on The Change of Soil Nutrient Content in The Growth Period of Sweet Sorghum under Different Fertilization [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 103-113.
[8]	SUN Yu-qin, CHEN Cai-jin, WU Juan, ZENG Yan-xia, ZHANG Xiao-juan, CHEN Zhi-long, SHANG Ji-hong, GAO Ting, ZHANG Rong, MA Jian-hua. Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1615-1625.
[9]	LI Yuan, ZHAO Hai-ming, YOU Yong-liang, WU Rui-xin, ZHANG Sui-lin, LIU Gui-bo. Analysis of the Relationship between Stem Traits and Lodging Resistance of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1798-1804.
[10]	LI Yuan, YOU Yong-liang, ZHAO Hai-ming, WU Rui-xin, SONG Feng-ge, LIU Gui-bo. Effects of Adjusting Plant Spacing and Film Mulching on Production Performance of Sorghum bicolor×S.sudanense [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1379-1385.
[11]	BAI Chun-sheng, TONG Ming-hao, ZHAO Meng-meng, SUN Juan-juan, XUE Yan-lin, YU Zhu. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cutting Height on Silage Fermentation Quality and Forage Value of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1421-1426.
[12]	LI Zheng-yan, XU Zhi-ming, SHI Shang-li, HE Chun-gui. Effects of Four Cultivars of Photosensitive Sorghum Sudangrass Hybrid on Soil Micro-ecological Environment in Jiang-huai Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 326-335.
[13]	MA Yin-shan, ZHU Yong, LI Guang-wen, JIANG Peng, CHE Ju-zhu, MA Ting-ting, ZHANG Qiang. Effects of Fertilization and Clipping on Compensatory Growth of Sorghum Sudanense [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 377-382.
[14]	ZHANG Yan-yi, LI Xia, WANG Ji, LI Xiao-kang, AN Tao. Effects of Wrapping Layers on the Quality of Baled Sweet Sorghum Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(3): 670-674.
[15]	WEI Ying-ying, YU Zhu. Effects of Different Additives on the Silage Quality of Sorghum-sudangrass Hybrid [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(3): 658-662.