Research Progress on Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe under Grazing

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.003

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 3587-3596.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.003

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress on Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe under Grazing

KANG Saruul¹, HAN Guo-dong¹, ZHAO Meng-li¹, ZHANG Xia¹, ZHANG Can-hao¹, LIU Yang-qiao¹

1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010020, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Botany, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010020, China

Received:2023-05-29 Revised:2023-08-02 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-01-03

放牧背景下短花针茅荒漠草原研究进展

康萨如拉¹, 韩国栋¹, 赵萌莉¹, 张霞¹, 张灿浩¹, 刘仰乔¹

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 草地资源教育部重点实验室, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010020;
2. 内蒙古农业大学植物学国家级实验教学示范中心, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

通讯作者: 韩国栋,E-mail:nmghanguodong@imau.edu.cn
作者简介:康萨如拉(1986-)，女，蒙古族，内蒙古兴安盟人，博士，讲师，主要从事草地生态学研究，E-mail:srlkang@imau.edu.cn
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2021MS03043)；国家自然基金重大项目(32192463)；国家自然基金(31760129)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Desert steppe is a fragile ecosystem. Exploring the response of desert steppe to long-term climate change and human interference provides a more reliable theoretical reference for the research on the adaptability of fragile ecosystems. We reviewed key findings of research related to the desert steppe dominated by Stipa breviflora over the past 20 years. We summarized the response and adaptation characteristics of the desert steppe of Stipa breviflora to different grazing utilization and different grazing intensities from the perspectives of plant individuals,populations,communities,ecosystems and soil physicochemical properties. These results would effectively save time for subsequent researchers to consult and identify areas of weak knowledge. Several important topics and key scientific issues,which urgently need to be addressed in the following future,have proposed.

Key words: Desert steppe, Stipa breviflora, Grazing utilization, Grazing intensity

摘要： 荒漠草原是脆弱生态系统，探讨荒漠草原对长期放牧等人为干扰的响应，为深入开展脆弱生态系统适应性研究提供更加可靠的理论依据。本文总结了近20年涉及短花针茅(Stipa breviflora)荒漠草原相关研究中的关键发现，从植物个体、种群、群落、生态系统以及土壤理化性质等方面归纳、总结并探讨了短花针茅荒漠草原对不同放牧利用方式和不同放牧强度的响应和适应特征，为有效节省后续研究人员查阅时间的同时，确定了知识薄弱的地方，提出了放牧利用下荒漠草原将来的几个重要研究方向和亟待解决的关键科学问题。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 短花针茅, 放牧利用方式, 放牧强度

CLC Number:

Q948.1

KANG Saruul, HAN Guo-dong, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Xia, ZHANG Can-hao, LIU Yang-qiao. Research Progress on Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe under Grazing[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3587-3596.

康萨如拉, 韩国栋, 赵萌莉, 张霞, 张灿浩, 刘仰乔. 放牧背景下短花针茅荒漠草原研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3587-3596.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2023/V31/I12/3587

References

[1] HAN F,KANG S,ALEXANDER B,et al. Effects of climate change on primary production in the Inner Mongolia Plateau,China[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2016,37(23-24):5551-5564
[2] 牛得草,SHARON H J,傅华,等. 围封对阿拉善荒漠草原碳库的影响[C]//畜牧兽医编写组. 第八届博士生学术年会,2010:10-89
[3] WANG Z W,JIAO S Y,HAN G D,et al. Impact of Stocking Rate and Rainfall on Sheep Performance in a Desert Steppe[J]. Rangeland ecology & management,2011,64(3):249-256
[4] FISCHER F M,BONNET O J F,CEZIMBRA I M,et al. Long-term effects of grazing intensity on strategies and spatial components of functional diversity in subtropical grassland[J]. Applied Vegetation Science,2019(22):39-47
[5] JÄSCHKE Y,HEBERLING G,WESCHE K. Environmental controls override grazing effects on plant functional traits in Tibetan rangelands[J]. Functional Ecology,2020(4):747-760
[6] LV X M,HE Q J,ZHOU G S. Contrasting responses of steppe Stipa ssp. to warming and precipitation variability[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2019,9(16):9061-9075
[7] 康萨如拉,牛建明,张庆,等. 短花针茅叶片解剖结构及与气候因子的关系[J]. 草业学报,2013(1):77-86
[8] 刘文亭. 荒漠草原短花针茅种群对放牧强度的响应机制[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:27-63
[9] 萨其拉,张霞,朱琳,等. 长期不同放牧强度下荒漠草原建群种短花针茅(Stipa breviflora)叶片解剖结构变化[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(14):1-10
[10] 石红霄. 过度放牧下高原早熟禾矮小化及其形成机理[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016:22-36
[11] 姜晓红,宝力道,阿拉腾布力格,等. 不同放牧强度对荒漠草原牧草微量元素和营养成分的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2021,42(2):91-96
[12] 刘芳,韩国栋,王忠武,等. 载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原不同季节植物营养成分的影响[J]. 草原与草业,2015(2):40-44
[13] 王亚婷,赵天启,王玺,等. 短花针茅(Stipa breviflora)叶片δ13C对载畜率的响应[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(4):613-619
[14] 李江文. 长期不同载畜率下短花针茅荒漠草原植物功能性状与功能多样性的关系[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:30-81
[15] 王亚婷. 载畜率对短花针茅草原主要植物稳定性碳同位素的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:24-50
[16] YERUHAN,LIU G,CHANG H,et al. Response of plant traits of Stipa breviflora to grazing intensity and fluctuation in annual precipitation in a desert steppe,northern China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation,2020(24):e01237
[17] 贾丽欣,杨阳,张峰,等. 不同载畜率下短花针茅分蘖数量对内源激素浓度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(7):2391-2397
[18] 木兰,张璞进,单玉梅,等. 短期氮、水添加对放牧背景下荒漠草原短花针茅叶片属性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(2):522-534
[19] 贾丽欣,张峰,乔荠蓉,等. 放牧强度对荒漠草原无芒隐子草斑块碳氮化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(1):9-16,93
[20] 安钰,安慧,李生兵. 放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(12):94-102
[21] 迟延艳. 草原群落演替过程中植物内源激素对植物个体大小调控作用的研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2006:11-29
[22] 贾丽欣. 放牧对短花针茅分蘖特征的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019:10-25
[23] 丁钰. 短花针茅响应放牧的转录组学及遗传多样性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2018:11-30
[24] 李江文,王忠武,任海燕,等. 荒漠草原建群种短花针茅功能性状对长期放牧的可塑性响应[J]. 西北植物学报,2017,37(9):1854-1863
[25] 古琛,赵天启,王亚婷,等. 短花针茅生长和繁殖策略对载畜率的响应[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(1):36-42
[26] 贾丽欣,杨阳,乔荠瑢,等. 荒漠草原短花针茅表型特征可塑性对放牧的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(5):64-69
[27] 王亚婷,王玺,赵天启,等. 不同放牧强度上内蒙古短花针茅草原植物功能群水分和氮素利用效率相关分析[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(6):964-970
[28] 单玉梅,温超,陈海军,等. 不同放牧强度下植物种群密度的季节性变化[J]. 生态科学,2017,36(6):125-129
[29] 古琛,陈万杰,杜宇凡,等. 载畜率对内蒙古荒漠草原冷蒿种群资源分配格局的影响[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(7):2237-2243
[30] 王玺,古琛,王亚婷,等. 荒漠草原短花针茅茎叶功能性状对不同载畜率的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2017,39(6):40-46
[31] 孙熙麟. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤种子库对不同强度放牧的响应[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010:6-23
[32] LIU W T. Individual reproductive strategy of Stipa breviflora under different grazing pressures[J]. Grassland Science,2020,66(3):1-9
[33] 张文霞,王春光,殷晓飞,等. 无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构对荒漠草原不同退化梯度的响应[J]. 生态环境学报,2018(27):1809-1817
[34] 李志强,王明玖,陈海军,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤种子库对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2010(6):184-188
[35] 鱼小军,王彦荣,曾彦军,等. 温度和水分对无芒隐子草和条叶车前种子萌发的影响[J]. 生态学报,2004(24):884-887
[36] 杜宇凡,古琛,乌力吉,等. 不同载畜率下短花针茅荒漠草原物种多度格局[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(3):675-683
[37] 杜宇凡. 放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原群落特征及空间分布的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2017:11-22
[38] 韩梦琪,王忠武,靳宇曦,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原物种多样性及生产力对长期不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 西北植物学报,2017,37(11):2273-2281
[39] 张睿洋. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原生物多样性和生态系统功能的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:26-83
[40] 张睿洋,王忠武,韩国栋,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原α多样性对绵羊载畜率的响应[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(3):906-914
[41] 刘菊红. 放牧与降水对短花针茅荒漠草原植物群落稳定性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019:25-86
[42] 刘文亭,卫智军,吕世杰,等. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(10):3394-3402
[43] 马少薇,郭建英,李锦荣,等. 放牧强度对短花针茅群落特征及冠层截留的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2016,38(5):66-70
[44] BADGERY W B,KEMP D R,ZHANG Y J,et al. Optimising grazing for livestock production and environmental benefits in Chinese grasslands[J]. The Rangeland Journal,2020,42(5):347-358
[45] ZHANG R Y,WANG Z W,HAN G D,et al. Grazing induced changes in plant diversity is a critical factor controlling grassland productivity in the Desert Steppe,Northern China[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2018(265):1-11
[46] 王兴. 荒漠草原局域短花针茅群落构建机制[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2018:25-81
[47] BILIGETU,SUO P F,ZHANG J X,et al. Influence of stocking rates on plant community in Stipa breviflora desert steppe[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2004,25(4):30-33
[48] 宋晓辉,王悦骅,王占文,等. 不同放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原地上生物量和枯落物量的影响[J]. 草原与草业,2019,31(2):52-58
[49] 孙熙麟,王明玖,陈海军,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原地下生物量对不同强度放牧的响应[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010(4):101-104
[50] 王天乐. 荒漠草原优势种群特征和短花针茅性状特征对放牧强度的响应[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:10-31
[51] WANG Z W,JIAO S Y,HAN G D,et al. Effects of stocking rate on the variability of ecosystem productivity in desert steppe[C]//Compilation group of grass anthology. International Grassland Congress,2013
[52] 李永强,李治国,董智,等. 内蒙古荒漠草原放牧强度对风沙通量和沉积物粒径的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2016,40(10):1003-1014
[53] 宝力道,徐文芳,王忠武,等. 不同放牧强度短花针茅荒漠草原碳截存研究[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,(3):94-99
[54] 靳宇曦,刘芳,张军,等. 不同载畜率处理下短花针茅荒漠草原生态系统净碳交换特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(3):361-371
[55] 张彬,李邵宇,古琛,等. 内蒙古荒漠草原4种优势植物生物量分配对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(12):3355-3363
[56] 王悦骅,宋晓辉,王占文,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原植物地上地下生物量对载畜率和降水的响应[J]. 西北植物学报,2018,38(8):1526-1533
[57] 李永强. 不同载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤风蚀的影响及作用机制[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016:29-78
[58] 王天乐,卫智军,刘文亭,等. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤养分和植被特征变化研究[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(4):711-716
[59] 王天乐,卫智军,吕世杰,等. 荒漠草原优势种群特征对放牧强度季节调控的响应[J]. 草原与草业,2017,29(1):30-37
[60] 张峰,孙嘉伟,孙宇,等. 不同尺度下荒漠草原建群种短花针茅的空间分布对载畜率的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1735-1743
[61] 殷国梅,吕世杰,刘红梅,等. 放牧强度对荒漠草原建群种短花针茅空间分布异向性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2016,38(5):71-77
[62] 韩朝炜,宝音贺希格. 放牧强度对无芒隐子草空间分布的多重分形结构影响[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(7):1231-1239
[63] 王萨仁娜,韩国栋,张圣微,等. 基于3S技术的绵羊牧食行为与草地环境相互作用研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2015,10(7):860-867
[64] 卻国萍,张爽,吕世杰,等. 放牧强度对荒漠草原建群种短花针茅空间异质性的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2021,42(3):74-80
[65] 李治国,吕世杰,闫宝龙,等. 放牧强度对短花针茅植物种群空间分布的影响[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(6):1060-1068
[66] 黄琛,张宇,王静,等. 不同放牧强度下短花针茅荒漠草原植被的空间异质性[J]. 植物生态学,2014,38(11):1184-1193
[67] 吴艳玲,吕世杰,刘红梅,等. 不同放牧强度对短花针茅草原植物种群种间关系的影响[J]. 生态科学,2016,35(6):34-40
[68] 吴艳玲,吕世杰,刘红梅,等. 不同放牧强度季节调控对短花针茅草原植物种间关系的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(7):25-33,38
[69] 张峰,孙嘉伟,孙宇,等. 不同载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原优势物种间关系及其空间分布特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(8):1-11
[70] 希吉日塔娜,吕世杰,卫智军,等. 不同放牧制度下短花针茅荒漠草原植物种群作用和种间关系分析[J]. 生态环境学报,2013(6):976-982
[71] 吕世杰,吴艳玲,刘红梅,等. 春季休牧后放牧强度变化对短花针茅草原植物种群种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(2):302-308
[72] 王琪,张峰,赵萌莉,等. 放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原植物群落组成及种间关系的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2021,30(10):1961-1967
[73] 王琪,郑佳华,张峰,等. 放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(10):1-9
[74] 卫智军,牛富宝,刘红梅,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原植物种群生态位对放牧的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2015,37(5):24-32
[75] 吕世杰,张爽,刘红梅,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原建群种空间分布的多重分形研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(4):106-112
[76] LV S J,YAN B L,WANG Z W,et al. Dominant species' dominant role and spatial stability are enhanced with increasing stocking rate[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2020,730:138900
[77] 潘嘉琛,董智,李红丽,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤颗粒多重分形及理化性质对放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(8):93-99
[78] 白高娃. 不同放牧利用强度影响下短花针茅荒漠草原土壤特性变化研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013:10-32
[79] 丁海君,韩国栋,王忠武,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同载畜率对土壤的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2016,(4):524-531
[80] 郭振宁,孙世贤,擅建国,等. 放牧强度对荒漠草原土壤含水量及群落特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(6):27-35
[81] 阿木日吉日嘎拉,红梅,韩国栋,等. 不同放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2013,44(2):321-327
[82] 赵巴音那木拉,红梅,梁存柱,等. 施肥对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2014,25(3):687-694
[83] WANG Z W,JIAO S Y,HAN G D,et al. Soil respiration response to different stocking rates on stipa breviflora griseb.desert steppe[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University,2009,40(2):186-193
[84] 殷国梅,赵逸雯,韩阳,等. 短花针茅草原建群植物根部土壤含水量对放牧强度的响应[J]. 草学,2019(2):12-16
[85] 张彬,赵天启,贺启珅,等. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(12):3263-3270
[86] 王舒新. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原生态系统服务价值评估[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:15-28
[87] 王合云. 不同放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原植物群落及土壤的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2016:12-42
[88] 杜宇凡,古琛,王亚婷,等. 放牧率对短花针茅根际和非根际土壤氮素的影响[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(6):1021-1027
[89] 丁莉君. 放牧强度对荒漠草原群落特征及土壤化学计量学特征的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019:9-31
[90] 余娜. 放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤碳氮空间格局的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010:10-35
[91] 米智勇. 不同放牧强度和管理方式下短花针茅荒漠草原土壤的氮矿化作用[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011:9-30
[92] 李永强,李治国,董智,等. 基于风洞模拟的荒漠草原不同放牧强度抗蚀特征比较[J]. 水土保持学报,2016,30(3):103-108
[93] 孙世贤,丁勇,李夏子,等. 放牧强度季节调控对荒漠草原土壤风蚀的影响[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(7):23-29
[94] 常虹,晔薷罕,刘亚红,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同放牧强度土壤线虫群落研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2020,41(3):28-34,41
[95] 德海山.放牧强度对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤动物群落的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016:10-38
[96] 黄维,贾美清,许帅,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤可培养真菌种群结构及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(1):51-56
[97] 格根宝乐尔. 放牧制度与放牧强度对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原AM真菌多样性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2013:20-63
[98] 靳宇曦. 载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原生态系统碳交换的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018:9-22
[99] 王合云,董智,郭建英,等. 不同放牧强度下短花针茅荒漠草原植被-土壤系统有机碳组分储量特征[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(15):4617-4625
[100] 赵坤,朱毅,哈洁,等. 放牧强度和地形对荒漠草原碳交换量的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2021,43(12):40-46,65
[101] 晔薷罕,单玉梅,张璞进,等. 荒漠草原不同放牧强度背景下添加氮水对凋落物分解的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(8):2775-2783
[102] 刘菊红,郝敦元,韩国栋,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原植物的群落组织力及其对重牧的响应[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(7):1093-1099
[103] 刘菊红,王忠武,郝敦元,等. 重牧对荒漠草原主要植物种和功能群组织力的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(5):85-92
[104] WANG Z W,HAN G D,ZHAO M L. Bodyweight gain of grazing sheep responses to stocking rate in Stipa breviflora steppe[C]//Compilation group of grass anthology. Ⅺ International Grassland Congress and the Ⅷ International Rangeland Congress,2008
[105] LI Z G,HAN G D,ZHAO M L,et al. Identifying management strategies to improve sustainability and household income for herders on the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Agricultural Systems,2015(132):62-72
[106] 武倩,韩国栋,王成杰,等. 短期内混合放牧对荒漠草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草原与草业,2015,27(1):40-45
[107] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2000:10-45

Research Progress on Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe under Grazing

放牧背景下短花针茅荒漠草原研究进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WU Shuai-kai, HAO Jie, DIAO Hua-jie, JU Xin, NING Ya-nan, SU Yuan, DONG Kuan-hu, WANG Chang-hui. Response of Grassland Biomass to Short-term Grazing Intensities in the Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northern Shanxi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2446-2454.
[2]	WANG Xin, WANG Yun-ying, PEI Wei-wei, DU Yan-gong. Meta-Analysis of Effects of Grazing on Soil nitrogen Mineralization and Nitrification in Grassland in China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2490-2495.
[3]	LIU Zhuo-tong, CUI Yuan-yuan, BAI Liu, WANG Yue-hua, SONG Xiao-hui, LI Zhi-guo, HAN Guo-dong, WANG Zhong-wu. Effects of Simulated Precipitation on Aboveground and Belowground Biomass and Their Allocation Proportion of Plant Community in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1632-1639.
[4]	PAN Sen, BU Jia-wei, GAN An-qi, SHANG Zhen-yan, GUO Ding, YANG Xiao-xia, DONG Quan-min, NIU De-cao. Effect of Grazing Intensities on Extracellular Enzyme Stoichiometry of Soil Microorganisms in Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1780-1787.
[5]	CHAI Zhi-hui, TIAN Ming-jun, YAO Feng-tong. Digital Technology,Grassland Transfer and Grazing Intensity —An Empirical Analysis Based on Pure Herdsmen in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1842-1852.
[6]	HOU Dong-jie, HAN Bei-lei, LIU Lu, WANG Zhong-wu. Effects of Grazing on Plant Diversity Based on Species Turnover in a Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 952-962.
[7]	LI Yong-kang, LIU Jin-long, XU Dong-mei, SA Chun-ning, LIU Meng-ge, MA Yuan. Resource Allocation Characteristics of Agropyron mongolicum in the Desert Steppe in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1125-1133.
[8]	ZHAO Kun, HAN Guo-dong. Responses of the Functional Traits of Dominant Species to Different Grazing Intensities in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 649-656.
[9]	LI Yan-long, SHI Chun-jun, WANG Hao, WU Lin, WANG Ya-dong, LENG Shuang, ZHANG Jia-lu, LI Ke-xin, LI Yong-hong. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Community Structure and Livestock Productivity in A Typical Steppe of Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 844-851.
[10]	LIU Xin-rui, CUI Yuan-yuan, WANG Zhong-wu, SUN Hai-lian, HAN Guo-dong, HOU Dong-jie, WANG Jing, LI Zhi-guo, LIU Zhuo-tong. Effects of Grazing and Simulated Precipitation on Plant Functional Group Diversity in Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 868-875.
[11]	SHEN Ting-ting, TAN Yao, WANG Yue-hua, HAN Guo-dong. Responses of Plant and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Nutrient Contents to Different Stocking Rates in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 441-447.
[12]	WANG Zi-han, LV Shi-jie, LI Zhi-guo, HAN Guo-dong, HOU Dong-jie, CUI Yuan-yuan, SUN Hai-lian, WANG Zhong-wu. Effect of Stocking Rates on the Content of Available Nutrients in Adjacent Soil of Caragana microphylla Plants in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 464-470.
[13]	ZHANG Bin, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, WANG Qi, LI Ya-nan, QIAO Ji-rong, ZHAO Tian-qi, YU Yue, ZHAO Meng-li. Responses of Abundance-asymmetric of Interspecific Interaction to Stocking Rates in the Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 510-517.
[14]	FAN Bo, WANG Zhan-yi, LIU Peng-bo, ZHAO Xiang-lin, LI Hai-jing, WANG Cheng-jie. Effects of Biochar-based Fertilizer Application and Reseeding on Plant Community and Soil Nutrients in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3775-3784.
[15]	XIAO Qing, LIN Zhen-rong, JIANG Feng-yan, SHI Li-na, ZHAO Hong-xin, LI Yong-yuan, QI Jin-xian, DANG Zhi-ying, DONG Quan-min, ZHOU Hua-kun, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Grazing Intensities on the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Plants in an Alpine Meadow in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3018-3025.