转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.002

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 597-605.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.002

转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析

贾会丽^1,2, 王学敏³, 高涛², 石永红², 王运琦², 吴欣明², 刘建宁², 方志红², 董宽虎¹

1. 山西农业大学, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 山西省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 山西太原 030032;
3. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2020-01-16 修回日期:2020-02-16 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-05-30
通讯作者: 董宽虎
作者简介:贾会丽(1980-),女,山西临猗人,副研究员,博士研究生,主要从事牧草种质资源与育种研究,E-mail:jiahuili333@126.com;
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-34）；山西省重点研发计划重点项目（201703D211002-9-2）；山西省农业科学院雁门关农牧交错带专项（YCX2017D2107，YCX2018102）共同资助

Characterization of the Salt Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis Thaliana Overexpression of MsLEA4-4 from Medicago Sativa

JIA Hui-li^1,2, WANG Xue-min³, GAO Tao², SHI Yong-hong², WANG Yun-qi², WU Xin-ming², LIU Jian-ning², FANG Zhi-hong², DONG Kuan-hu¹

1. Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030032, China;
3. Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2020-01-16 Revised:2020-02-16 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了深入研究紫花苜蓿（Medicago sativa）MsLEA4-4基因的抗逆性，本试验对前期获得的转MsLEA4-4基因的拟南芥（Arabidopsis thaliana）株系进行不同浓度盐胁迫处理，以验证MsLEA4-4基因在拟南芥植株体内的耐盐性。试验结果表明：盐胁迫后转基因株系的发芽率达到55%，比对照植株（Control plant，CK）高81%；转基因株系的鲜重、叶绿素含量均高于CK（P<0.05）；盐胁迫后转基因株系的存活率比CK提高75.0%~81.3%；盐胁迫明显抑制根系生长，但转基因植株的侧根数量比CK多4~5根（P<0.05）；盐胁迫后转基因株系体内的可溶性糖含量（P<0.05）和超氧化物歧化酶（P<0.01），过氧化氢酶（P<0.01），过氧化物酶（P<0.05）活性均高于CK，脯氨酸（P<0.01）和丙二醛（P<0.05）含量均低于CK。综上可得，MsLEA4-4基因参与了拟南芥体内的耐盐性调控，提高了转基因拟南芥对盐胁迫的耐受性。本研究为进一步探索MsLEA4-4在转基因紫花苜蓿盐胁迫中的功能及培育耐盐性紫花苜蓿品种提供依据。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 盐胁迫, 胚胎晚期富集蛋白, 拟南芥

Abstract: In order to further analyze the function of MsLEA4-4 in stress resistance,different level of salt stress was applied on Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic lines to verify its salt tolerance function. MsLEA4-4 overexpression transgenic lines were used in this study. The results showed that under salt stress the germination rate of transgenic lines was reached to 55%,which was 81% higher than that of control plant (CK). The fresh weight and chlorophyll content of transgenic lines were higher than CK (P<0.05). The survival rate of transgenic lines were increased by 75.0%~81.3% compared to CK. Salt stress significantly inhibited root growth,but the number of lateral roots of transgenic plants was 4~5 more than that of CK (P<0.05);the content of soluble sugar (P<0.05),SOD (P<0.01),CAT (P<0.01) and POD (P<0.05) activity in transgenic lines was higher than that of CK under salt stress. However,the content of proline (P<0.01) and malondialdehyde (P<0.05) was lower than that of CK. We speculated that MsLEA4-4 was involved in the regulation of salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana,which improved the tolerance of transgenic lines to salt stress. The study provides a basis for further exploring the function of MsLEA4-4 in transgenic alfalfa under salt stress,and provides a basis for the cultivation of salt-tolerant alfalfa.

Key words: Medicago sativa, Late embryogenesis abundant proteins, Salt stresses, Arabidopsis thaliana

中图分类号:

S551+7
Q78

贾会丽, 王学敏, 高涛, 石永红, 王运琦, 吴欣明, 刘建宁, 方志红, 董宽虎. 转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 597-605.

JIA Hui-li, WANG Xue-min, GAO Tao, SHI Yong-hong, WANG Yun-qi, WU Xin-ming, LIU Jian-ning, FANG Zhi-hong, DONG Kuan-hu. Characterization of the Salt Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis Thaliana Overexpression of MsLEA4-4 from Medicago Sativa[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 597-605.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I3/597

参考文献

[1] 谷洪彪,迟宝明,姜纪沂. 灾害学定义之下的土壤盐碱化风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(5):1623-1629
[2] Shahid S A,Zaman M,Heng L. Soil salinity:historical perspectives and a world overview of the problem guideline for salinity assessment,mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques[M]. Springer International Publishing,2018:43-53
[3] 缑倩倩,韩致文,王国华. 中国西北干旱区灌区土壤盐渍化问题研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(29):246-250
[4] Yang Y,Guo Y. Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2018,60(9):796-804
[5] 蔡晓锋,胡体旭,叶杰,等. 植物盐胁迫抗性的分子机制研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2015,4(3):134-141
[6] 胡涛,张鸽香,郑福超,等. 植物盐胁迫响应的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种,2018,16(9):3006-3015
[7] 焦德志,赵泽龙. 盐碱胁迫对植物形态和生理生化影响及植物响应的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(20):1-4
[8] 温延臣,孔少华,赵同凯,等. 黄河三角洲盐碱地区耐盐牧草与经济作物筛选[J]. 山东农业科学,2019,51(5):42-46
[9] Dure L,Galau G A. Developmental biochemistry of cottonseed embryogenesis and germination XIII. Regulation of biosynthesis of principal storage proteins[J]. Plant Physiology,1981,68:187-194
[10] Zeng X,Ling H,Yang J W,et al. LEA proteins from Gastrodia elata enhance tolerance to low temperature stress in Escherichia coli[J]. Gene,2018,646:136-142
[11] Wu Y C,Liu C L,Kuang J,et al. Overexpression of SmLEA enhances salt and drought tolerance in Escherichia coli and Salvia miltiorrhiza[J]. Protoplasma,2014,215(5):1191-1199
[12] Cheng Z Q,Targolli J,Huang X Q,et al. Wheat LEA genes,PMA80 and PMA1959,enhance dehydration tolerance of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Molecular Breeding,2002,10(1-2):71-82
[13] Goyal K,Walton L J,Tunnacliffe A. LEA proteins prevent protein aggregation due to water stress[J]. Biochemical Journal,2005,388(1):151-157
[14] Qu G Z,Zang L N,Hu X L,et al. Co-transfer of LEA and bZip genes from Tamarix confers additive salt and osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,2012,30:512-518
[15] Romo S,Labrador E,Dopico B. Water stress-regulated gene expression in Cicer arietinum seedlings and plants[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2001,39(11):1017-1026
[16] 贾会丽,石永红,王学敏,等. 紫花苜蓿MsLEA4启动子的克隆及表达分析[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(4):789-796
[17] 刘峰,汪小东,赵彦鹏,等. 棉花种子特异表达的LEA启动子克隆及功能验证[J]. 棉花学报,2014,26(4):310-317
[18] Min D H,Zhang X H,Xu Z S,et al. Induction Kinetics of a Novel Stress-related LEA Gene in Wheat[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,2012,30:1313-1321
[19] Rodríguez-Valentín R,Campos F,Battaglia M,et al. Group 6 Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins in monocotyledonous plants:genomic organization and transcript accumulation patterns in response to stress in Oryza sativa[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,2014,32(1):198-208
[20] Li X,Cao J. Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) gene family in Maize:identification,evolution,and expression profiles[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,2016,34(1):15-28
[21] 李乐,许红亮,杨兴露,等. 大豆LEA基因家族全基因组鉴定、分类和表达[J]. 中国农业科学,2011,44(19):3945-3954
[22] Altunoglu Y C,Baloglu P,Yer E N,et al. Identification and expression analysis of LEA gene family members in cucumber genome[J]. Plant Growth Regulation,2016,80:225-241
[23] Hundertmark M,Hincha D K. LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. BMC Genomics,2008(9):118
[24] 刘志敏,刘文献,贾喜涛,等. 蒺藜苜蓿LEA基因家族全基因组分析[J]. 草业科学,2015,32(3):382-391
[25] Dang N X,Popova A V,Hundertmark M,et al. Functional characterization of selected LEA proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana in yeast and in vitro[J]. Planta,2014,240(2):325-336
[26] 贾会丽,王学敏,郭继承,等. 紫花苜蓿MsLEA4-4基因的克隆、表达分析及遗传转化[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(12):108-116
[27] Zamora-Briseno J A,Jimenez E S. A LEA 4 protein up-regulated by ABA is involved in drought response in maize roots[J]. Molecular Biology Reports,2016,43(4):221-228
[28] 刘国宝. 两种大豆LEA4蛋白的金属离子结合特性及对生物大分子的保护作用[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2006:1-12
[29] 贾会丽,王学敏,高洪文,等. 紫花苜蓿γ-生育酚甲基转移酶(γ-TMT)基因的克隆与逆境下的表达分析[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(6):198-206
[30] 陈小芳,徐化凌,毕云霞. 苜蓿种质资源概况及耐盐性研究进展[J]. 中国种业,2018(09):16-18
[31] 张新全,马啸,郭志慧,等. 国外禾本科草育种研究进展[J]. 草业与畜牧,2015(01):1-7
[32] 张权. 牧草生物技术及发展趋向分析[J]. 畜禽业,2018(4):44-46
[33] 麻冬梅,张喜斌,黄婷,等. 利用SSR标记对不同耐盐紫花苜蓿遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(06):1477-1485
[34] 贾会丽,郭继承,吴欣明,等. 柠条锦鸡儿CkCDPK基因的克隆、表达分析及载体构建[J]. 华北农学报,2019,34(3):43-51
[35] 冯光燕,王学敏,付媛媛,等. 紫花苜蓿MsWRKY33转录因子的分离及遗传转化研究[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(11):48-57
[36] Livak K J,Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2^-△△CT method[J]. Methods,2001,25(4):402-408
[37] Jiang J S,Jia H L,Feng G Y,et al. Overexpression of Medicago sativa TMT elevates the α-tocopherol content in Arabidopsis seeds,alfalfa leaves,and delays dark-induced leaf senescence[J]. Plant Science,2016,249:93-104
[38] 张以顺,黄霞,陈云凤. 植物生理学实验课程[M]. 高等教育出版社,2009:79-82
[39] Petridis A,Therios I,Samouris G,et al. Salinity-induced changes in phenolic compounds in leaves and roots of four olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) and their relationship to antioxidant activity[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2012,79:37-43
[40] 王志春,杨福,齐春艳,等. 盐碱胁迫下水稻渗透调节的生理响应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):153-157
[41] Hossain M A,Bhattacharjee S,Armin S M,et al. Hydrogen peroxide priming modulates abiotic oxidative stress tolerance:insights from ROS detoxification and scavenging[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2015,6:420
[42] Jain G,Gould K S. Are betalain pigments the functional homologues of anthocyanins in plants?[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2015,119:48-53
[43] 萧凤回. 大麦、水稻干旱可诱导LEA基因启动子的克隆及功能分析[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2008:16-26
[44] 王艳蓉,张治国,吴金霞.LEA蛋白及其在植物抗逆改良中的应用[J]. 生物技术通报,2015,31(3):1-9
[45] 杨东雷,董伟欣,张迎迎,等. 赤霉素调节植物对非生物逆境的耐性[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2013,43(12):1119-1126
[46] 刘军,齐广平,康燕霞,等. 土壤水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿光合特性及其生物量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2019,36(4):893-900
[47] 李海波,陈温福,李全英. 盐胁迫下水稻叶片光合参数对光强的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2006,17(9):1588-1592
[48] 赵海新. 碱胁迫对水稻叶绿素及叶片脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2020(01):1-5
[49] 李格,孟小庆,蔡敬,等. 活性氧在植物非生物胁迫响应中功能的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报,2018,54(6):951-959
[50] Apel K,Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species:metabolism,oxidative stress,and signal transduction[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2004,55:373-399
[51] Wang X,Fang G,Yang J,et al. A thioredoxin-dependent glutathione peroxidase (OsGPX5) is required for rice normal development and salt stress tolerance[J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,2017,35(3):333-342
[52] Borghesi E,González-Miret M L,Escudero-Gilete M L,et al. Effects of salinity stress on carotenoids,anthocyanins,and color of diverse tomato genotypes[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2011,59(21):11676-11682
[53] Zhang X,Li C,Nan Z. Effects of salt and drought stress on alkaloid production in endophyte-infected drunken horse grass (Achnatherum inebrians)[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2011,39(4-6):471-476
[54] Wang L,Liu X,Liang M,et al. Proteomic analysis of salt-responsive proteins in the leaves of mangrove Kandelia candel during short-term stress[J]. Plos One,2014,9(1):e83141
[55] Triantaphylidès C,Havaux M. Singlet oxygen in plants:production,detoxification and signaling[J].Trends in Plant Science,2009,14(4):219-228
[56] 薛鑫,张芊,吴金霞. 植物体内活性氧的研究及其在植物抗逆方面的应用[J]. 生物技术通报,2013(10):6-11
[57] Das K,Roychoudhury A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science,2014,2:53

转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析

Characterization of the Salt Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis Thaliana Overexpression of MsLEA4-4 from Medicago Sativa

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[2]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[3]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[5]	张韦钰, 王春勇, 杜红梅. 富氢水对草地早熟禾耐盐性的影响以及与抗氧化酶活性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1436-1445.
[6]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[7]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[8]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[9]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[10]	黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 贾倩英, 李向阳, 张宏, 张振粉. 成团泛菌CQ10脂多糖对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及苗期生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[11]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.
[12]	李满有, 马忠仁, 王斌, 杨雨琦, 沈笑天, 曹立娟, 李小云, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区2个苜蓿品种不同行比混播模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[13]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[14]	陈德奎, 郭香, 郑明扬, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 砂仁精油对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[15]	夏方山, 王聪聪, 李红玉, 刘曼, 郑川, 张耀丹, 范华芳. 硒引发对紫花苜蓿种子抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 472-477.