水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.002

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 206-211.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.002

水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响

李文娆^1,3,4, 张岁岐^1,2, 山仑^1,2,4

1. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室;
2. 西北农林科技大学, 陕西, 杨凌, 712100;
3. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100039;
4. 河南大学牛命科学学院, 河南, 开封, 475001

收稿日期:2006-11-06 修回日期:2007-03-12 出版日期:2007-06-15 发布日期:2007-06-15
通讯作者: 张岁岐,E-mail:sqzh ang@m s.isw c.ac.cn
作者简介:李文娆(1980- ),女,博士研究生,主要从事植物水分生理生态研究,E-mail:wrli2004@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX3-SW-444);中国科学院水土保持研究所领域前沿科研专项经费资助项目(SW05101)

Effect of Water Stress on Characteristics of Root Water Uptake and Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Seedlings

LI Wen-rao^1,3,4, ZHANG Sui-qi^1,2, SHAN Lun^1,2,4

1. State Key Lab.of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resource;
2. Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling Shaanxi 712100 P. R. China;
3. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039 P. R. China;
4. College of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng Henan 475001

Received:2006-11-06 Revised:2007-03-12 Online:2007-06-15 Published:2007-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 变水条件下(利用PEG-6000模拟水分胁迫48 h,ψs=-0.2 MPa,之后复水48 h),测定紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L,品种阿尔冈金和陇东苜蓿)幼苗根系水力学导度与光合参数变化规律,旨在研究变水条件下紫花苜蓿光合作用的响应机制、植株水分吸收能力的变化规律及地上与地下部可能的相关关系。结果表明:干旱胁迫使得紫花苜蓿根系水力学导度(Lp_r)受到显著影响。随着水分胁迫时间的延长,根系吸水能力呈现快速——缓慢下降趋势,即根系水力学导度逐渐下降,气孔导度(Gs)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、净光合速率(Pn)和叶片水势亦随之而显著降低,胞间二氧化碳浓度(Ci)先随之降低但最终上升而累积。复水后,根系水导呈现缓慢——慢速的恢复趋势,Pn、Gs、Tr、叶片水势随着根系水导速率的增加而逐渐恢复;Ci则随复水时间的延长而逐渐下降。但各参数除Ci外,均没有恢复到胁迫前水平。紫花苜蓿根系水导与光合参数在复水后的恢复程度说明,紫花苜蓿对干旱逆境的抵御与适应能力相对较弱,但陇东苜蓿对水分胁迫的忍耐能力强于阿尔冈金。

关键词: 干旱胁迫及复水, 根系水导, 光合参数, 紫花苜蓿

Abstract: The change of the root system hydraulic conductivity and photosynthetic parameters in alfalfa(Medicago sativa L var.Longdong and Algonquin) seedlings were measured under water stress(mimicked by PEG-6000 solution,ψ_s=-0.2 MPa,stress time:48 h) and subsequent rehydration(time:48 h).These measurements were used to investigate photosynthetic response mechanism,change regulation on ability of root water uptake and relationship of above-and underground under variable water conditions in alfalfa.The results showed that the ability of root water uptake declined rapidly in the initial phase and slowly in the later phase,indicating that the root system hydraulic conductivity(Lp_r) was affected obviously by water stress and rehydration.The Lp_r declined with prolonged water stress.Simultaneously,the stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr),net phorosynthetic rate(Pn) and leaf water potential declined gradually with the reduction of Lp_r and intercellular CO₂ concentration(Ci) decreased at first and accumulated at the end.After rehydration,Lp_r recovered slowly.Pn,Gs,Tr and leaf water potential increased and Ci decreased gradually with the recovery of Lp_r.All the parameters except Ci did not recover to the level of control.The extent of Lp_r recovery and the photosynthetic parameters suggested that the tolerance of water stress in alfalfa was weak,while that of Longdong was stronger than Algonquin.

Key words: Water stress, Rehydration, Root system hydraulic conductivity, Photosynthetic parameters, Alfalfa

中图分类号:

Q945
Q948.1

李文娆, 张岁岐, 山仑. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响[J]. , 2007, 15(3): 206-211.

LI Wen-rao, ZHANG Sui-qi, SHAN Lun. Effect of Water Stress on Characteristics of Root Water Uptake and Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Seedlings[J]. , 2007, 15(3): 206-211.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.03.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2007/V15/I3/206

参考文献

[1] Lawlor D W,Cornic G.Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2002,25:275-294
[2] Marques da Silva J,Arrabac M C.Photosynthesis in the water-stressed C₄ grass Setaria sphacelata is mainly limited by stomata with both rapidly and slowly imposed water deficits[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2004,2:409-420
[3] Brodribb J T,Holbrook N M.Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration correlation with other leaf physiological traits[J].Plant Physiology,2003,132:2166-2173
[4] Volker B,Wolfgang B.Differential inhibition of photosynthesis during pre-flowering drought stress in Sorghum bicolor genotypes with different senescence traits[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2005,124:249-259
[5] Steudle E.Water uptake by roots:effects of water deficit[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,61:1531-1542
[6] Lee S H,Chung G C,Steudle Er.Gating of aquaporins by low temperature in roots of chilling-sensitive cucumber and chilling-tolerant gleaf gourd[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2005,56(413):985-995
[7] 张岁岐,山仑.根系吸水机理研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(4):396-402
[8] Miyamoto Na,Steudle E,Hirasawa T,Lafitte R.Hydraulic conductivity of rice roots[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2001,52(362):183-184
[9] Mu Z X,Zhang S Q,Zhang L S,Liang A H,Liang Z S.Hydraulic conductivity of whole root system is better than hydraulic conductivity of single root in correlation with the leaf water status of maize EJ].Botanical Studies,2006,47:145-151
[10] Meinzer F C,Grantz D A.Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane:stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity[J].Plant,Cell and Experiment,1990,13:383-388
[11] Cochard H,Coll L,Roux Le X,Ameglio T.Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut[J].Plant Physiology,2002,128:282-290
[12] 姚爱兴,王槐三,梁祖锋.紫花苜蓿根系生物学特性的研究[J].牧草与饲料,1989,(2):23-26
[13] 白文明,左强,黄元仿,李保国.乌兰布和沙区紫花苜蓿根系生长及吸水规律的研究[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(1):35-41
[14] 郭彦军,徐恢仲,张家骅.紫花苜蓿根系形态学研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2002,24(6):484-486
[15] Maria C R,Esther M G,Frank R M,Webbc K J,Arrese Igorb C,Javier R,Manuel B.Effects of water stress on antioxidant enzymes of leaves and nodules of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutases[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2002,115:531-540
[16] 刘建新,王鑫,王凤琴.水分胁迫对苜蓿幼苗渗透调节物质积累和保护酶活性的影响[J].草业科学,2005,22(3):18-21
[17] 赵金梅,周禾,王秀艳.水分胁迫下苜蓿品种抗旱生理生化指标变化及其相互关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):184-189
[18] 李文娆,张岁歧,山仓.水分胁迫和复水对紫花苜蓿幼苗叶绿素、荧光特性的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(1):129-136
[19] Irigoyen J J,Emerich D W,Sanchez-Diaz M.Alfalfa leaf senescence induce by drought stress:photosynthesis,hydro gen peroxide metabolism,lipid peroxidation and ethylene evolution[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1992,84:67-72
[20] 杨启国,张旭东,杨兴国.甘肃中部半干旱区紫花苜蓿耗水规律及土壤水分变化特征研究[J].中国农业气象,2003,24(1):37-40
[21] 桑玉强,吴文良,张劲松.毛乌素沙地杨树防护林内紫花苜蓿蒸散耗水规律的研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(5):44-49
[22] 孙洪仁,刘国荣,张英俊,高飞,逯涛林,韩建国.紫花苜蓿的需水量、耗水量、需水强度、耗水强度和水分利用效率研究[J].草业科学,2005,22(12):24-30
[23] 王生毅,邓西平,薛崧,薛思林.干旱胁迫对西红柿根系水导的影响研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(2):105-108
[24] Bota J,Medrano H,Flexas J.Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress[J].New Phytologist,2004,162:671-681
[25] Parry M A,Andralojic P J,Rhan S.Rubisco activity:effects of drought stress[J].Annals of Botany,2002,89(S):833-901
[26] Gullo M I,Nardini A,Salleo S,Tyree M.Changes in root hydraulic conductance(KR) of Olea oleaster seedlings following drought stress and irrigation[J].New physiology,1998,140:25-31

水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响

Effect of Water Stress on Characteristics of Root Water Uptake and Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[2]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[3]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[5]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[6]	张旭辉, 马绍英, 马蕾, 杨宁, 王娜, 张维霞, 连荣芳, 李胜, 柴强. 接种根瘤菌对重茬豌豆植株生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1234-1241.
[7]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[8]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[9]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[10]	黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 贾倩英, 李向阳, 张宏, 张振粉. 成团泛菌CQ10脂多糖对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及苗期生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[11]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.
[12]	李满有, 马忠仁, 王斌, 杨雨琦, 沈笑天, 曹立娟, 李小云, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区2个苜蓿品种不同行比混播模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[13]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[14]	陈德奎, 郭香, 郑明扬, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 砂仁精油对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[15]	夏方山, 王聪聪, 李红玉, 刘曼, 郑川, 张耀丹, 范华芳. 硒引发对紫花苜蓿种子抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 472-477.