不同品种玉米植株3种调制方法效果比较

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.01.013

›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 67-72.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.01.013

不同品种玉米植株3种调制方法效果比较

许庆方¹, 张翔¹, 董宽虎¹, 岳文斌¹, 玉柱², 孙启忠³, 刘建宁⁴

1. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西, 太谷, 030801;
2. 中国农业大学动物科学院, 北京, 100093;
3. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古, 呼和浩特, 010010;
4. 山西省农科院畜牧兽医研究所, 山西, 太原, 030032

收稿日期:2009-07-03 修回日期:2009-12-15 出版日期:2010-02-15 发布日期:2010-02-15
作者简介:许庆方(1972- ),男,山西壶关人,博士,副教授,主要从事牧草栽培与加工利用的研究,E-mail:xqfsx@sohu.com
基金资助:
十一五国家科技支撑计划课题(2006BAD16B03-09);十一五国家科技支撑计划课题(2007BAD56B02);农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项课题(nyhyzx07-022);山西农业大学博士后基金资助

Study on Three Processing Methods of Different Corn Varieties

XU Qing-fang¹, ZHANG Xiang¹, DONG Kuai-hu¹, YUE Wen-bin¹, Yu ZHu², SUN Qi-zhong³, LIU Jian-ning⁴

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China;
3. Grassland Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010010, China;
4. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030032, China

Received:2009-07-03 Revised:2009-12-15 Online:2010-02-15 Published:2010-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨品种和调制方法对玉米(Zea mays L.)植株品质的影响,选用中原单32、农大86、农大95、农大108、农大高油115为研究对象,于蜡熟期取样进行全株青贮、去穗秸秆青贮、秸秆干燥堆放处理。经贮存45d后,取样分析表明,各品种全株玉米青贮饲料的pH显著低于去穗玉米秸秆青贮饲料(P<0.05),而相应乳酸含量则显著较高(除品种农大86以外)(P<0.05),全株玉米青贮饲料的CP含量显著高于去穗玉米秸秆青贮饲料(P<0.05),NDF和ADF含量则相应较低,表明全株玉米青贮饲料的发酵品质和营养价值优于去穗玉米秸秆青贮饲料;干燥堆放玉米秸秆的CP含量因品种而有差异,其NDF和ADF含量都高于相应青贮饲料,表明干燥堆放秸秆的营养价值较低。中原单32全株玉米青贮饲料的CP含量显著高于其他品种(P<0.05),并且含有适度的NDF和ADF。总体而言,玉米植株以全株青贮为宜,而且全株青贮时,中原单32品质优于其它品种。

关键词: 玉米, 品种, 青贮, 秸秆, 品质

Abstract: The effects of variety and processing method on feeding values of corn(Zea mays L.) were studied.The corn varieties of Zhongyuandan32,Nongda86,Nongda95,Nongda108,and NongdaGaoyou115 were harvested at dough stage and then processed for 45 d as whole-crop silage,stover only silage,or stover stack,respectively.The analytic results of samples indicate that the pH of the whole-crop corn silage was significantly lower than that of stover silage(P<0.05),and the lactic acid content was significantly higher(except for Nongda 86)(P<0.05).The CP content of the whole-crop corn silage was significantly higher than that of stover silage(P<0.05),and the NDF and ADF contents were lower.This inferred that the fermentative quality and nutrient contents of whole-crop corn silage were better than those of stover silage.The CP content of stover stack varied among varieties,and the NDF and ADF contents of stover stack were higher than those of silages.This inferred the lower nutrient quality of stover stack.The CP content of whole-crop corn silage of Zhongyuandan32 were significantly higher than that of others(P<0.05),and the fiber content of which was moderate.In general,the whole-crop corn silage had better feeding values and the Zhongyuandan32 performed better than others.

Key words: Corn, Variety, Silage, Stover, Quality

中图分类号:

S325

许庆方, 张翔, 董宽虎, 岳文斌, 玉柱, 孙启忠, 刘建宁. 不同品种玉米植株3种调制方法效果比较[J]. , 2010, 18(1): 67-72.

XU Qing-fang, ZHANG Xiang, DONG Kuai-hu, YUE Wen-bin, Yu ZHu, SUN Qi-zhong, LIU Jian-ning. Study on Three Processing Methods of Different Corn Varieties[J]. , 2010, 18(1): 67-72.

参考文献

[1] 王元东,段民孝.青贮玉米育种研究进展[J].玉米科学.2002,10(2):17-21
[2] 张劲松,代绪民.提倡用去穗玉米秸杆青贮[J].畜牧与兽医,1988,17(4):22
[3] 许庆方,张翔,崔志文,等.不同添加剂对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J].草地学报.2009,17(2):157-161
[4] 高丽娟,王小芬,崔宗均,等.玉米、小麦、水稻秸秆自然发酵的生化变化[J].草地学报.2005,13(1):47-52
[5] Cherney D J R,Cherney J H,Cox W J.Fermentation characteristics of corn forage ensiled in mini-silos[J].Journal of Animal Science,2004,87:4238-4246
[6] Thomas E D,Mandebvu P,Ballard C S,et al.Comparison of corn silage hybrids for yield,nutrient composition,in vitro digestibility,and milk yield by dairy cows[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,84:2217-2226
[7] Andrae J G,Hunt C W,Pritchard G T,et al.Effect of hybrid,maturity,and mechanical processing of corn silage on intake and digestibility by beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79:2268-2275
[8] 王洋.不同品种玉米植株在成熟过程中营养价值变化规律及青贮利用价值的研究[D].中国农业大学硕士学位论文.2005
[9] 王海,张垚,赵祥,等.倒春寒对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿脯氨酸含量与产量的影响[J].草原与草坪.2007,6:12-17
[10] Han K J,Collins M,Vanzant E S,et al.Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J].Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919
[11] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等.高效液相色谱法测定苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J].草原与草坪.2007,2:63-65,67
[12] Broderica G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[13] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社.1993,1-260
[14] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J].Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[15] 崔淘气.全株玉米青贮与去穗秸秆青贮饲喂肉牛的增重效果对比试验[J].黄牛杂志.2002,28(3):19-21
[16] 崔淘气.玉米秸秆青贮与全株玉米青贮饲喂奶牛的效果[J].中国奶牛.2003,1:24-26
[17] Morrison F B,Humphrey G O,Hulce R S.Corn stover silage versus corn cilage for milk production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1921,4(1):29-31
[18] Shinnersa K J,Binversiea B N,Muckb R E,et al.Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2007,31(4):211-221
[19] 余汝华,赵丽华,莫放,等.玉米秸秆青贮饲料国NDF和ADF含量变化规律的研究[J].饲料工业.2003,24(10):19-20
[20] 朱顺国,邢壮,张微,等.玉米秸秆NDF与ADF含量变化规律的研究[J].中国奶牛.2001,1:24-26

不同品种玉米植株3种调制方法效果比较

Study on Three Processing Methods of Different Corn Varieties

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[5]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[6]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[7]	姚喜喜, 才华, 刘皓栋, 李长慧. 不同季节高寒草甸牧草瘤胃发酵特性和体外消化率分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[8]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[9]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[10]	宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 汪鹏斌, 童永尚, 李珍, 贺有龙, 汪海波. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[11]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[12]	付志慧, 格根图, 贾玉山, 王志军, 吕世杰, 侯美玲, 南丁罕, 意如乐, 阿希达, 金国. 茬次与品种对多花黑麦草在北方地区种植的产量及营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1571-1577.
[13]	董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 聂聪, 杨建, 张建波, 苟文龙, 马啸. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[14]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[15]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.