添加剂对麻叶荨麻青贮发酵品质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.028

›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 291-296.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.028

添加剂对麻叶荨麻青贮发酵品质的影响

张晓庆¹, 金艳梅², 孙启忠¹, 王林³, 张慧杰³

1. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古, 呼和浩特, 010010;
2. 山东大学威海分校海洋学院, 山东, 威海, 264209;
3. 中国农业科学院研究生院, 北京, 100081

收稿日期:2009-09-04 修回日期:2009-11-02 出版日期:2010-04-15 发布日期:2010-04-15
通讯作者: 孙启忠,E-mail:sunqz@126.com
作者简介:张晓庆(1978- ),女,甘肃永昌人,助理研究员,主要从事反刍动物营养和饲料加工利用方面的研究,E-mail:zhangxq137@sina.com
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(中国农业科学院草原研究所)

Effect of Additives on Fermentation Quality of Hempleaf Nettle(Urtica cannabina L.) Silage

ZHANG Xiao-qing¹, JIN Yan-mei², SUN Qi-zhong¹, WANG Lin³, ZHANG Hui-jie³

1. Grassland Research Institute, CAAS, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010010, China;
2. Faculty of Marine Studies, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai, Shandong Province 264209, China;
3. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2009-09-04 Revised:2009-11-02 Online:2010-04-15 Published:2010-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 麻叶荨麻(Urtica cannabina L.)资源丰富,具有较高的营养价值。由于水分、灰分、蛋白质含量和缓冲能值较高,可溶性碳水化合物含量低,难以单独成功青贮。为探讨添加剂对其青贮发酵品质的影响,以MicromanagerH/M(MH)、Lalsil Fresh(LF)、青宝Ⅱ号(FS)、Lalsil Dry(LD)4种添加剂,每种设3个添加梯度,以不使用添加剂处理作为对照(Control),共13个处理,每个处理3次重复,室温袋贮60d后取样分析。结果表明:添加MH、LF和FS不能快速降低pH,没有改善发酵品质;添加LD极显著降低了pH,能够明显促进乳酸发酵(P<0.01);所使用的添加剂均不能抑制蛋白质分解;添加不同剂量MH、LF和FS的青贮品质分别为5级、4级和4级,发酵品质较差;添加不同剂量的LD能够改善发酵品质,其中添加0.5 g/kgLD的效果最好。故乳酸菌制剂与纤维素酶或糖联合使用,可改善麻叶荨麻的青贮品质。

关键词: 麻叶荨麻, 青贮, 添加剂, 乳酸菌

Abstract: Hempleaf nettle(Urtica cannabina L.) is a kind of plant with high nutritive value and wide resources.It can be the supplement to the protein deficiency in gramineous forages and a good alternative in winter and spring.But hempleaf nettle is hard to ensile ? essfully due to relatively high contents of water,ash,and crude protein and high buffering capacity as well as low water soluble carbohydrate content.So,this trail was conducted to improve the silage quality using different additives including Micromanager H/M(MH),Lalsil Fresh(LF),QingbaoⅡ(FS),and Lalsil Dry(LD).Each additive was divided into 3 adding levels,and without additive as the control;total 13 treatments and 3 replications of each treatment incubated at room temperature for 60 days in the plastic bag.The results show that:(1) pH value was not declined rapidly using MH,LF or FS,indicating no improvement of the fermentation.But pH value with LD was significantly lower(P<0.01) and fermentation was obviously promoted.(2) The protein degradation was not kept down by all additives used.(3) The silage quality was poor with different addition levels of MH,LF and FS and the silage grades were 5,4,and 4,respectively.The fermentation quality was improved by LD,especially with the addition level at 0.5 gLD·kg^-1.In conclusion,lactic acid bacteria combined with cellulase or sugars could efficiently improve the silage quality of hempleaf nettle.

Key words: Hempleaf nettle(Urtica cannabina L.), Silage, Additive, Lactic acid bacteria

中图分类号:

S379.9

张晓庆, 金艳梅, 孙启忠, 王林, 张慧杰. 添加剂对麻叶荨麻青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. , 2010, 18(2): 291-296.

ZHANG Xiao-qing, JIN Yan-mei, SUN Qi-zhong, WANG Lin, ZHANG Hui-jie. Effect of Additives on Fermentation Quality of Hempleaf Nettle(Urtica cannabina L.) Silage[J]. , 2010, 18(2): 291-296.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.02.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2010/V18/I2/291

参考文献

[1] Playne M J,McDonald P.The buffering constituents of herbage and silage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1966,17:264-26.
[2] 张治安,张美善,蔚荣海.植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004:111-113.
[3] 玉柱,白春生,孙启忠.不同添加剂对无芒雀麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2008,10(4):76-81.
[4] Broderica G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,33:64-75.
[5] Kaiser E,Wei K.A new system for the evaluation of the fermentation quality of silages[A]. In:Park R S,Stronge M D.eds.Proceedings of the XIV International Silage Conference,a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress[C]. Bellast,Northern Ireland,2005.275.
[6] Smith L H.Theoretical carbohydrate requirement for alfalfa silage production[J]. Agronomy Journal,1962,54:291-293.
[7] Phillip L E,Underhill L,Garino H.Effects of treating Lucerne with an inoculum of lactic acid bacteria or formic acid upon chemical changes during fermentation,and upon the nutritive value of the silage for lambs[J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45:337-344.
[8] Kung L Jr,Taylor C C,Lynch M P,et al.The effect of treating alfalfa with Lactobacillus bunchneri 40788 on silage fermentation,aerobic stability,and nutritive value for lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(1):336-343.
[9] Jones B A,Satter L D,Muck R E.Influence of bacterial inoculant and substrate addition to lucerne ensiled at different dry matter contents[J]. Grass and Forage Science,1992,47:19-27.
[10] 刘晗璐,桂荣,塔娜.乳酸菌添加剂对禾本科混合牧草青贮发酵特性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2008,39(6):739-745.
[11] Zhang J G,Cai Y M,Kobayashir R,et al.Characteristic of lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops and their effects on silage fermentation[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2000,80:1455-1460.
[12] Drieehuis F,Van Wikselaar P G.The occurrenee and prevention of ethanol fermentation in high dry matter grass silage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2000,8:711-718.
[13] Vaitiekunas W,Abel H.Impact of lactic acid bacteria as a silage additive on the feeding value of grass silage for dairy cows[J]. Agribiol Research,1993,46:4588-4601.
[14] Cai Y M,Benni Y,Ogawa M,et al.Effect of applying lactic bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation and characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82:520-526.
[15] Cai Y M,Kumai S.The proportion of lactate isomers in farm silage and the influence of inculation with lactic acid bacteria on the proportion of L-lactate in silage[J]. Japanese Journal of Zootechny Science,1994,65:788-795.
[16] 范传广,刘秦华,张建国.六个水稻品种饲用价值及青贮特性研究[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(4):495-499.
[17] 荣辉,徐安凯,下条雅敬,等.初次刈割象草青贮发酵品质动态[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(4):537-539.
[18] Lindgren,S E,Axelsson L T,Mcfeeters R F.Anaerobic L-lactate degradation by Lactobacillus Plantarum[J]. FEMS Microbiol Letters,1990,66:209-214.
[19] McDonald P,Henderson A R,Herson S J E.The biochemistry of silage.2nd edition[M]. Marlow:Chalcombe Publ.,1991.
[20] Fairbairn R,Alli I,Baker B E.Proteolysis associated with the ensiling of chopped alfalfa[J]. Journal of Diary Science,1998,71(1):152-158.
[21] Weinters A L,Cockburn J E,Dhanoa M S.Effects of lactic acid bacteria in inoculants on changes in amino acid composition during ensilage of sterile and nonsterile ryegrass[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2000,89:442-451.
[22] Davies D R,Merry R J,Williams A P,et al.Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81:444-453.
[23] Evaluating Silage Quality.http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/for4909

添加剂对麻叶荨麻青贮发酵品质的影响

Effect of Additives on Fermentation Quality of Hempleaf Nettle(Urtica cannabina L.) Silage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[5]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[6]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[8]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[9]	李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 佘智慧, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[11]	郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[12]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[13]	王斌, 董秀, 李满有, 杨雨琦, 兰剑. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[14]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[15]	陈德奎, 郭香, 郑明扬, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 砂仁精油对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.