达乌里胡枝子抗氧化防御系统对干旱及增强UV-B辐射的动态响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.015

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 308-315.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.015

达乌里胡枝子抗氧化防御系统对干旱及增强UV-B辐射的动态响应

赵洁, 杜润峰, 王龙飞, 王钰莹, 郝文芳

西北农林科技大学生命科学学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2012-09-27 修回日期:2012-12-13 出版日期:2013-04-15 发布日期:2013-04-23
通讯作者: 郝文芳,haowenfang2002@tom.com
作者简介:赵洁(1988-),女,陕西子长人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物逆境生理,E-mail:zhao19880515jie@163.com
基金资助:
林业公益性行业科研专项(201304312);中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养项目(2008DF02)资助

Dynamic Responses of Antioxidative Defense System of Lespedeza davurica to Drought and Enhanced UV-B Radiation

ZHAO Jie, DU Run-feng, WANG Long-fei, WANG Yu-ying, HAO Wen-fang

Department of Life Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Pronvince 712100, China

Received:2012-09-27 Revised:2012-12-13 Online:2013-04-15 Published:2013-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以达乌里胡枝子(Lespedeza davurica)为研究对象,通过对照、中度干旱以及干旱与增强UV-B辐射复合处理,对其超氧阴离子(O₂^-)、丙二醛(MDA)和抗氧化剂含量及抗氧化酶活性的动态变化进行研究,探讨其抗氧化能力及膜脂过氧化的动态响应。结果表明:与单因子干旱胁迫相比,复合胁迫使超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性降低,抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)及过氧化物酶(POD)活性升高,其中低强度UV-B辐射与干旱复合胁迫使 SOD活性极显著低于单因子干旱胁迫下的(P<0.01),POD活性随UV-B辐射强度增加而降低,APX和CAT活性随UV-B辐射强度增加而增加。与单因子干旱胁迫相比,复合胁迫使抗坏血酸(AsA)含量增加,且随UV-B辐射强度的增加先增加后降低;使叶绿素(Chl)和类胡萝卜素(Car)含量降低,随UV-B辐射强度增加而降低。低强度UV-B辐射与干旱复合胁迫前6 d花青素含量极显著高于对照(P<0.01)。复合胁迫前期,MDA和O₂^-含量均比单因子干旱胁迫的低,后期则不同。隶属函数综合评价得出,中度干旱以及复合胁迫均能提高达乌里胡枝子的抗氧化能力,且与干旱胁迫相比,低强度UV-B辐射与干旱复合胁迫下其抗氧化能力较高,而高强度UV-B辐射与干旱复合胁迫下则较低。

关键词: 干旱胁迫, 增强UV-B辐射, 复合胁迫, 达乌里胡枝子, 抗氧化防御系统

Abstract: The effects of drought and enhanced UV-B radiation on the antioxidant defense system and membrane lipid peroxidation in Lespedeza davurica were investigated. Compared with the single-stress of drought, the co-stresses of drought and enhanced UV-B radiation decreased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), and increased the activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POD). SOD activity under the co-stresses of drought and low UV-B radiation intensity was significantly lower than that under the single-stress of drought. With the increase of UV-B radiation intensity under co-stresses, POD activity decreased while activities of APX and CAT increased. Compared with the single-stress of drought, the co-stresses of drought and different UV-B radiation intensities increased ascorbic acid (AsA) content and decreased the contents of chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid (Car). With the increase of UV-B intensity under co-stresses, AsA content initially increased then decreased while the contents of Chl and Car decreased. During the first six days of the co-stresses of drought and low UV-B radiation intensity, anthocyanin content significantly increased compared with control. During the early stage of the co-stresses of drought and enhanced UV-B radiation, the contents of malonaldehyde (MDA) and O₂^- decreased compared with the single-stress of drought. Comprehensive evaluation according to subordinate function indicated that both single-stress of drought and co-stresses could increase the antioxidant ability of Lespedeza davurica, and the co-stresses of drought and low UV-B intensity improved antioxidant ability more.

Key words: Drought stress, Enhanced UV-B radiation, Co-stresses, Lespedeza davurica, Antioxidant defense system

中图分类号:

Q945.79

赵洁, 杜润峰, 王龙飞, 王钰莹, 郝文芳. 达乌里胡枝子抗氧化防御系统对干旱及增强UV-B辐射的动态响应[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 308-315.

ZHAO Jie, DU Run-feng, WANG Long-fei, WANG Yu-ying, HAO Wen-fang. Dynamic Responses of Antioxidative Defense System of Lespedeza davurica to Drought and Enhanced UV-B Radiation[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 308-315.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I2/308

参考文献

[1] Caldwell M, Teramura A, Tevini M. The changing solar ultraviolet climate and the ecological consequences for higher plants[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1989,4(12):363-367
[2] Herman J R, Bhartia P K, Ziemke J, et al. UV-B increases (1979-1992) from decreases in total ozone[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,1996,23(16):2117-2120
[3] Rozema J, Van De Staaij J, Bjrn L O, et al. UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: Stress and regulation[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1997,12(1):22-28
[4] 李方民,陈怡平,王勋陵,等. UV-B辐射增强和CO₂浓度倍增的复合作用对番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2006,17(1):71-74
[5] 刘芸,钟章成,Marinus J A,等. α-NAA 和UV-B辐射对栝楼幼苗光合色素及保护酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(1):8-13
[6] Alexieva V, Sergiev I, Mapelli S, et al. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment,2001,24(12):1337-1344
[7] Petropoulou Y, Kyparissis A, Nikolopoulos D, et al. Enhanced UV-B radiation alleviates the adverse effects of summer drought in two Mediterranean pines under field conditions[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2006,94(1):37-44
[8] Turtola S, Rousi M, Pusenius J, et al. Genotypic variation in drought response of willows grown under ambient and enhanced UV-B radiation[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2006,56(1):80-86
[9] Yang Y, Yao Y, Xu G, et al. Growth and physiological responses to drought and elevated ultraviolet-B in two contrasting populations of Hippophae rhamnoides[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2005,124(4):431-440
[10] Sullivan J, Teramura A. Field study of the interaction between solar ultraviolet-B radiation and drought on photosynthesis and growth in soybean[J]. Plant Physiology,1990,92(1):141-146
[11] Teramura A H, Sullivan J H, Ziska L H. Interaction of elevated ultraviolet-B radiation and CO₂ on productivity and photosynthetic characteristics in wheat, rice, and soybean[J]. Plant Physiology,1990,94(2):470-475
[12] 王芳,姬茜茹,邱宗波,等. 不同玉米品种对增强 UV-B 辐射与干旱复合胁迫的生理响应[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(3):438-442
[13] 苏加楷. 优良牧草及栽培技术[M]. 北京:金盾出版社,2001:40-41
[14] 孙启忠,韩建国. 达乌里胡枝子群落生物量初步研究[J]. 中国草地,2001,23(4):21-26
[15] 刑毅,赵祥,董宽虎,等. 不同居群达乌里胡枝子形态变异研究[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(4):26-31
[16] 侯志兵,赵祥,白志明,等. 不同浸种时间对达乌里胡枝子种子发芽力的影响[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(5):11-14
[17] 慕自新,张岁岐,郝文芳,等. 玉米根系形态性状和空间分布对水分利用效率的调控[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(11):2895-2900
[18] Caldwell M. Solar UV irradiation and the growth and development of higher plants[J]. Photophysiology,1971,6:131-177
[19] Rashmi R, Ram P M, Shachi S S, et al. UV-B and UV-C pre-treatments induce physiological changes and Artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. -An antimalarial plant [J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology,2011,105(3):216-225
[20] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版社. 2000
[21] 王爱国,罗广华. 植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系[J]. 植物生理学通讯,1990(6):55-57
[22] Ithal N,Reddy A. Rice flavonoid pathway genes, OsDfr and OsAns, are induced by dehydration, high salt and ABA, and contain stress responsive promoter elements that interact with the transcription activator, OsC1-MYB[J]. Plant Science,2004,166(6):1505-1513
[23] Monk L, Fagerstedt K, Crawford R. Oxygen toxicity and superoxide dismutase as an antioxidant in physiological stress[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,1989,76(3):456-459
[24] Bakalova S, Nikolova A, Nedeva D. Isoenzyme profiles of peroxidase catalase and superoxide dismutase as affected by dehydration stress and ABA during germination of wheat seeds[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,30(1):64-77
[25] Pan Y, Wu L, Yu Z. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.)[J]. Plant Growth Regulation,2006,49(2):157-165
[26] Manivannan P, Abdul Jaleel C, Kishorekumar A, et al. Changes in antioxidant metabolism of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. by propiconazole under water deficit stress[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces,2007,57(1):69-74
[27] Halliwell B, Gutteridge J. Free radicals in biology and medicine[M]. New York: Clarendon Press,1985
[28] Rao M, Paliyath G, Ormrod D. Ultraviolet-B-and ozone-induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Physiology,1996,110(1):125-136
[29] 尹永强,胡建斌,邓明军. 植物叶片抗氧化系统及其对逆境胁迫的响应研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(1):105-115
[30] Sharma P, Dubey R. Drought induces oxidative stress and enhances the activities of antixidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings [J]. Plant Growth Regulation,2005,46(3):209-221
[31] Munné-Bosch S, Alegre L. Changes in carotenoids, tocopherols and diterpenes during drought and recovery, and the biological significance of chlorophyll loss in Rosmarinus officinalis plants[J]. Planta,2000,210(6):925-931
[32] Ehling-Schulz M, Bilger W, Scherer S. UV-B-induced synthesis of photoprotective pigments and extracellular polysaccharides in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc commune[J]. Journal of Bacteriology,1997,179(6):1940-1945
[33] 李元,祖艳群,高召华,等. UV-B辐射对报春花的生理生化效应[J]. 西北植物学报,2006,26(1):179-182
[34] Balakumar T, Vincent V, Paliwal K. On the interaction of UV-B radiation (280-315 nm) with water stress in crop plants[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,1993,87(2):217-222
[35] Shen X F, Zhou Y Y, Duan L S, et al. Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2010,167(15):1248-1252
[36] Pei Z, Murata Y, Benning G, et al. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells[J]. Nature,2000,406(6797):731-734
[37] 冯虎元,安黎哲. 增强UV-B辐射与干旱复合处理对小麦幼苗生理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1564-1568
[38] Teramura A, Sullivan J. Effects of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis and growth of terrestrial plants[J]. Photosynthesis Research,1994,39(3):463-473
[39] Tevini M, Teramura A H. UV-B effects on terrestrial plants[J]. Photochemistry and Photobiology,1989,50(4):479-487

达乌里胡枝子抗氧化防御系统对干旱及增强UV-B辐射的动态响应

Dynamic Responses of Antioxidative Defense System of Lespedeza davurica to Drought and Enhanced UV-B Radiation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[2]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[3]	佟莉蓉, 王娟, 宋雨, 倪顺刚. 达乌里胡枝子花粉萌发特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 457-464.
[4]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[5]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[6]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[7]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[8]	佟莉蓉, 宋雨, 王朋, 王娟, 车迪. 达乌里胡枝子的繁育系统及传粉生物学[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2454-2460.
[9]	秦立刚, 李雪, 李韦瑶, 胡尧, 李俊, 崔国文. PEG干旱胁迫对3种葱属植物种子萌发期渗透调节物质及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 72-79.
[10]	张然, 马祥, 朱瑞婷, 牛奎举, 赵春旭, 马晖玲. 青海野生草地早熟禾响应干旱胁迫的代谢通路及转录调控分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1508-1518.
[11]	刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 马祥, 梁国玲. 干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[12]	王晓雪, 李越, 张斌, 贾举庆, 冯美臣, 张美俊, 杨武德. 干旱胁迫及复水对燕麦根系生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[13]	李春艳, 王曦, 周胜花, 李希, 钟华, 董宽虎. 白羊草R2R3-MYB转录因子的挖掘及对干旱胁迫反应的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1784-1790.
[14]	陈爱萍, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 靳瑰丽, 王堃, 安沙舟. 干旱胁迫及复水对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225.
[15]	罗小燕, 李欣勇, 张瑜, 王文强, 丁西朋. 8种山蚂蝗种子萌发期耐盐耐旱性差异分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1329-1336.