不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 1096-1102.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响

王保平, 董晓燕, 董宽虎

山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西太谷 030801

收稿日期:2013-03-30 修回日期:2013-07-03 出版日期:2014-10-15 发布日期:2014-09-30
通讯作者: 董宽虎
作者简介:王保平（1984-），男，山西偏关人，博士研究生，研究方向为饲料作物生产与营养体农业，E-mail：wangbp8409@163.com；
基金资助:
山西省林业厅科技项目；山西省科技攻关项目（20120311011-1）；山西省科技基础条件平台建设项目（2012091004-0101）；山西省研究生优秀创新项目（20123053）资助

Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage

WANG Bao-ping, DONG Xiao-yan, DONG Kuan-hu

College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

Received:2013-03-30 Revised:2013-07-03 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2014-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨不同添加剂及添加量对柠条（Caragana korshinskii）嫩枝叶青贮饲料品质的影响，采用完全随机设计，设对照组（CK）、玉米粉（CM1：10%；CM2：12%；CM3：14%；CM4：16%；CM5：18%）、糖蜜（M1：2%；M2：4%；M3：6%）、纤维素酶（CE1：0.05%；CE2：0.10%；CE3：0.20%）、甲酸（FA1：0.25%；FA2：0.50%；FA3：0.75%）和丙酸（PA1：0.30%；PA2：0.60%；PA3：0.90%），60 d后测定青贮发酵品质和养分含量。结果表明：各添加剂处理组pH值、氨态氮（NH₃-N）、丙酸（PA）和丁酸（BA）含量极显著低于对照（P<0.01）；玉米粉处理组乳酸（LA）含量显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；CM3和CE3组LA含量与PA1组之间无显著性差异，但极显著高于其他处理组（P<0.01）。添加剂、添加量及交互作用极显著影响柠条嫩枝叶青贮饲料各营养成分含量（P<0.01）。玉米粉处理组干物质（DM）和粗蛋白（CP）含量极显著高于其他处理组（P<0.01），酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）含量显著低于其他处理组（P<0.05）。不同添加剂可以改善柠条嫩枝叶青贮饲料的品质，其中添加14%玉米粉的青贮效果最佳。

关键词: 柠条嫩枝叶, 添加剂, 添加量, 青贮, 品质

Abstract:

The effects of different additives and addition amounts on the quality of Caragana korshinskii silage were studied. According to random design, there were 17 treatments including control (CK), corn meal (CM1: 10%; CM2: 12%; CM3: 14%; CM4: 16%; CM5: 18%), molasses (M1: 2%; M2: 4%; M3: 6%), cellulases (CE1: 0.05%; CE2: 0.10%; CE3: 0.20%), formic acid (FA1: 0.25%; FA2: 0.50%; FA3: 0.75%) and propionic acid (PA1: 0.30%; PA2: 0.60%; PA3: 0.90%). The fermentation quality and nutrient contents of treatments were determined after ensiling for 60 days. Results showed that the pH, ammonia-N (NH₃-N), propionic acid (PA) and butyric acid (BA) contents of treatments decreased significantly compared with control (P<0.01). Lactic acid (LA) contents of corn meal were significantly higher than control (P<0.05). The contents of LA had no significant difference between CE3, CM3 and PA1, but significantly higher than control and other treatments (P<0.01). All the nutrient contents of treatments were significantly affected by additives, addition amounts and their interaction (P<0.01). The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) contents of corn meal were significantly higher than control and other treatments (P<0.01), whereas the contents of acid detergent fiber (ADF) were significantly lower (P<0.05). Additives improved the quality of Caragana korshinskii silage, and 14% corn meal was the best additive.

Key words: Caragana korshinskii, Additives, Addition amounts, Silage, Quality

中图分类号:

S816.53

王保平, 董晓燕, 董宽虎. 不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1096-1102.

WANG Bao-ping, DONG Xiao-yan, DONG Kuan-hu. Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 1096-1102.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I5/1096

参考文献

[1] 牛西午. 柠条研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2003:1-45,95-123
[2] 罗惠娣,牛西午,毛杨毅,等. 柠条的营养特点与利用方法研究[J]. 中国草食动物,2005,25(5):36-39
[3] 田树飞,毛可桢. 柠条对草食动物饲用价值的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(25):7836-7837
[4] 方姝骄. 不同水平柠条对奶牛生产性能和消化性能的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2010:13-20
[5] 张国君,李云,付元瑞,等. 刺槐、柠条和紫穗槐青贮品质的比较[J]. 西北林学院学报,2009,24(1):151-156
[6] 田晋梅,谢海军. 几种豆科植物单独青贮及饲喂效果试验[J]. 草原与牧草,2000,2(5):29-30
[7] 王峰,温学飞,张浩. 柠条饲料化技术及应用[J]. 西北农业学报,2004,13(3):143-147
[8] 王峰,吕海军,温学飞,等. 提高柠条饲料利用率的研究[J]. 草业科学,2005,22(3):35-37
[9] 樊莉娟,孙启忠,张德罡,等. 生物添加剂对灌木青贮中有机酸含量和pH值的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报,2008,29(4):68-71
[10] 高文俊,许庆方,玉柱,等. 添加剂对柠条青贮影响的研究[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(2):323-326
[11] 陈亮,张凌青,罗晓瑜,等. 饲喂柠条包膜青贮饲料对肉牛育肥效果的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2013(7):40-42
[12] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993:1-260
[13] Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck R E, et al. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates [J]. Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[14] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage [J]. Crop Science, 2004,44(3):914-919
[15] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(2):63-65,67
[16] Broderica G A, Kang J H. Auto mated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[17] 彭海兰. 不同青贮添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2003:27-31
[18] 黄其芬. 不同添加剂对杂交象草青贮品质的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2012:12-21
[19] 薛艳林,白春生,玉柱,等. 添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(4):339-343
[20] Bial M Q. Effect of molasses and corn as silage additives on cell fractions of Mott grass silage with different fermentation [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2008,18(4):102-106
[21] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and minaation of moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J]. Crop science,2004,44(3):914-919
[22] Bilal M Q. Effect of molasses and corn as silage additives on the characteristics of Mott Dwarf elephant grass silage at different fermentation periods [J]. Pakistan Veterinary Journal,2009,29(1):19-23
[23] 原现军,王奇,李志华,等. 添加糖蜜对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及营养价值的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(3):116-123
[24] 程方方,杨连玉,许雪魁,等. 糖蜜和乳酸菌对光叶紫花苕青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):947-951
[25] Alli I, Fairbairn R, Noroozi E, et al. The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1984,35(3):285-289
[26] Yunus M, Ohba N, Tobisa M, et al. Effect of glucose and formic acid on the quality of Napiergrass silage after treatment with urea [J]. Asian-Australasian Joumal of Animal Science,2001,14(2):211-215
[27] Rezaei J, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H. Nutritive value of fresh and ensiled amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) treated with different levels of molasses [J]. Animal feed Science and Technology,2009,151(1/2):153-160
[28] Dehghani M R, Weisbjerg M R, Hvelplund T, et al. Effect of enzyme addition to forage at ensiling on silage chemical composition and NDF degradation characteristics [J]. Livestock Science,2012,150(1/3):51-58
[29] Selmer-Olsen I, Henderson A R, Robertson S, et al. Cell wall degrading enzymes for silage. 1. The fermentation of enzyme-treated ryegrass in laboratory silos [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1993,48(1):45-54
[30] Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives. 1. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[31] 韩立英,玉柱,周禾. 乳酸菌和纤维素酶对直穗鹅观草青贮的改善效果[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(9):1439-1444
[32] 荣辉,陈杰,余成群,等. 添加甲酸对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):1105-1111
[33] 丁武蓉,干友民,郭旭生,等. 甲酸对二色胡枝子青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(1):81-84
[34] 张晓庆,李鹏,郑琛,等. 添加甲酸对麻叶荨麻青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(3):618-625
[35] Kennedy S J. Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silage fed to beef cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45(1):17-28
[36] Kung L Jr, Myers C L, Neylon J M, et al. The effects of buffered propionic acid-based additives alone or combined with microbial inoculation on the fermentation of high moisture corn and whole-crop barley [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2004,87(5):1310-1316
[37] 郭艳萍,玉柱,顾雪莹,等. 不同添加剂对高粱青贮质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(6):875-879
[38] 李平,白史且,鄢家俊,等. 添加剂及含水量对老芒麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(6):1176-1181
[39] 张增欣,邵涛. 丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(2):102-107

不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响

Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[5]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[6]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[7]	姚喜喜, 才华, 刘皓栋, 李长慧. 不同季节高寒草甸牧草瘤胃发酵特性和体外消化率分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[8]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[9]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[10]	宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 汪鹏斌, 童永尚, 李珍, 贺有龙, 汪海波. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[11]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[12]	董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 聂聪, 杨建, 张建波, 苟文龙, 马啸. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[13]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[14]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[15]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.