添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.032

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 1353-1359.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.032

添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

孙肖慧¹, 原现军¹, 郭刚¹, 闻爱友³, 王坚¹, 余成群², 邵涛¹

1. 南京农业大学动物科学技术学院饲草调制加工与贮藏研究所, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
3. 安徽科学技术学院动物科技学院, 安徽凤阳 233100

收稿日期:2014-02-18 修回日期:2014-04-23 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-01
通讯作者: 邵涛
作者简介:孙肖慧(1989-),女,山西吕梁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为饲草调制加工与贮藏,E-mail: sunxiaohui1016@163.com
基金资助:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2011BAC09B03); 中国科学院西藏区域创新平台建设项目“促进农牧民增收的西藏农牧结合技术体系构建与示范”;西藏主要农作物秸秆与栽培牧草混合青贮关键技术研究(XZ20093ZD)资助

Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Mixed Silages in Tibet

SUN Xiao-hui¹, YUAN Xian-jun¹, GUO Gang¹, WEN Ai-you³, WANG Jian¹, YU Cheng-qun², SHAO Tao¹

1. Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210095, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
3. College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, Anhui Province 233100, China

Received:2014-02-18 Revised:2014-04-23 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评价添加糖蜜、山梨酸钾和山梨酸钾+糖蜜对西藏地区燕麦(Avena sativa)和紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)(7:3)混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响,设对照组(C),4%糖蜜组(M),0.15%山梨酸钾组(S)和山梨酸钾+糖蜜(S+M)4个处理,青贮后第30,45,60 d开窖取样,测定青贮饲料的发酵品质,其他青贮窖在发酵60 d后全部打开,暴露于空气中5,10,15 d后取样分析其有氧稳定性.结果表明:与对照组相比,M组及S+M组pH显著降低,乳酸含量显著升高(P<0.05),有效地改善了混合青贮发酵品质,S组改善效果不显著.有氧暴露过程中,对照组和M组pH值迅速升高,乳酸含量显著减少(P<0.05),S组和S+M组的pH值、乳酸、水溶性碳水化合物等含量相对稳定.表明S+M组既能提高燕麦和紫花苜蓿混合青贮发酵品质,又能改善有氧稳定性.

关键词: 添加剂, 混合青贮, 发酵品质, 有氧稳定性

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the effects of adding molasses, potassium sorbate and their combinations on the fermentation qualities and aerobic stability of mixed silages of 70% oat (Avena sativa)and 30% alfalfa(Medicago sativa), 4 treatments were prepared as follows: control (C), 4% molasses (M), 0.15% potassium sorbate (S), potassium sorbate+ molasses (S+M). Silos were opened on the 30, 45, 60^th day of ensiling, respectively, and the fermentation quality was analyzed. The rest silos were opened to expose to the air after ensiling 60 days. Chemical analyses were carried out on the 5, 10, 15^th days after exposing to air. M and S+M treatments had significantly lower pH values and higher lactic acid contents(P<0.05)compared to control, indicating that the addition of M and S+M improved the fermentation quality of mixed silages efficiently. However, S was unavailable to improve fermentation quality. During aerobic exposure, the pH values of the control and M treatment increased rapidly, the contents of lactic acid reduced significantly(P<0.05). The pH values and the contents of lactic acid and water soluble carbohydrate of the S and the S+M treatments were relatively stable. Based on results, the S+M was practicable to improve fermentation quality with better aerobic stability.

Key words: Additives, Mixed silage, Fermentation quality, Aerobic stability

中图分类号:

S324
S543.6

孙肖慧, 原现军, 郭刚, 闻爱友, 王坚, 余成群, 邵涛. 添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1353-1359.

SUN Xiao-hui, YUAN Xian-jun, GUO Gang, WEN Ai-you, WANG Jian, YU Cheng-qun, SHAO Tao. Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Mixed Silages in Tibet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1353-1359.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.032

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I6/1353

参考文献

[1] Yuan X J, Yu C Q, Li Z H, et al. Effect of inclusion of grasses and wet hulless-barley distillers' grains on the fermentation and nutritive quality of oat straw-and straw-grass silages in Tibet [J]. Animal Production Science,2013,53(5):419-426
[2] McDonald P, Henderson A R, Heron S. The biochemistry of silage[M]. 2th ed. Aberystwyth: Cambrian Printers Ltd, 1991:126-130
[3] Sibanda S, Jingura R M, Topps J H. The effect of level of inclusion of the legume Desmodium uncinatum and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass-and maize-legume silages [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1997,68(3):295-305
[4] Shao T, Ohba N, Shimojo M, et al. Fermentation quality of forage oat (Avena sativa L.) silages treated with pre-fermented juices, sorbic acid, glucose and encapsulated-glucose [J]. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture,2003,47(2):341-349
[5] Cai Y, Kumai S, Ogawa M, et al. Characterization and identification of pediococcus species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1999,65(7):2901-2906
[6] 王奇,余成群,辛鹏程,等. 苇状羊茅和箭筈豌豆混合青贮发酵品质的研究[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):952-956
[7] Henderson N. Silage additives [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1993,45(1):35-56
[8] Rezaei J, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H. Nutritive value of fresh and ensiled amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) treated with different levels of molasses [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,151(1):153-160
[9] Lima R, Lourenco M, Diaz R F, et al. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,155(2):122-131
[10] Shao T, Ohba N, Shimojo M, et al. Effects of adding glucose, sorbic acid and pre-fermented juices on the fermentation quality of guineagrass silages [J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2004,17(6):808-813
[11] Kung Jr L Ranjit N K. The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Other Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(5):1149-1155
[12] Ridla M, Uchida S. Effects of combined treatment of lactic acid bacteria and cell wall degrading enzymes on fermentation and composition of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Kunth.) silage [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1998,11(5):522-529
[13] Driehuis F, Oude E S, Van W P G. Fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of grass silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without homofermentative lactic acid bacteria [J]. Grass and Forage Science,2001,56(4):330-343
[14] 许庆方,玉柱,李志强,等. 苜蓿、玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性研究[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(6):519-524
[15] Weinberg Z G, Ashbell G, Azrieli A, et al. Ensiling peas, ryegrass and wheat with additives of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and cell wall degrading enzymes [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1993,48(1):70-78
[16] Buxton D R, Muck R E, Harrison J H. Silage science and technology [M]. Madison: American Society of Agronomy,2003:305-360
[17] Alli I, Pabari S, Fairbairn R, et al. The effects of sorbates on the ensilage of chopped whole-plant maize and lucerne [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1985,36(2):63-70
[18] Kleinschmit D H, Schmidt R J, Kung J L. The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(6):2130-2139

添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Mixed Silages in Tibet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[2]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[3]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[4]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[5]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[6]	路平乐, 魏玉明, 杨发荣, 江小帆, 李倩, 赵生国, 蔡原, 焦婷. 体外产气法评价全株藜麦与全株玉米混合青贮饲料饲用价值[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2391-2398.
[7]	丁浩, 吴永杰, 邵涛, 赵杰, 代童童, 董东, 尹雪敬, 贾玉山, 李君风. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2600-2608.
[8]	陆永祥, 赵嫚, 陈良寅, 成启明, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 白史且, 李平. 布氏乳杆菌和甲酸对青藏高原不同物候期燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[9]	朱九刚, 张健, 邵涛, 董志浩, 李君风, 唐露, 冉启凡, 刘秦华. 添加剂对全株燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1756-1761.
[10]	高雪梅, 焦婷, 雷赵民, 冉福, 赵生国. 添加剂对汽爆玉米秸秆养分和发酵特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1129-1135.
[11]	梁龙飞, 王飞, 董祥, 郝俊. ‘热研4号’王草替代紫花苜蓿对TMR发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 703-711.
[12]	陆永祥, 成启明, 陈良寅, 孙林, 肖冰雪, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 白史且, 李平. 不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 350-357.
[13]	李龙兴, 汪依妮, 杨学东, 黎俊, 龚正发, 弗雷泽·乔治·哈里森, 陈秀华, 黄文琥, 梁显义. 凋萎和添加乳酸菌对大黑山薏苡青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1102-1106.
[14]	穆麟, 李顺, 曾宁波, 陈桂华, 张志飞, 叶志刚. 添加糖蜜、乳酸菌制剂对籽粒苋与稻秸混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 482-487.
[15]	商振达, 谭占坤, 李家奎, 卓嘎, 王宏辉, 谢国平, 刘锁珠. 种植时间对西藏地区青贮玉米发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 488-496.