放牧对藏北高寒草地优势种和伴生种生物量分配的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.005

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1313-1321.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.005

放牧对藏北高寒草地优势种和伴生种生物量分配的影响

乌仁¹, 秦小静^2,3, 孙健⁴

1. 海西州科学技术协会科普服务中心, 青海海西 817099;
2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川成都 610041;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2018-06-05 修回日期:2018-09-18 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2019-01-28
通讯作者: 秦小静
作者简介:乌仁(1980-),女,青海人,研究生,助理研究员,主要从事科普工作研究,E-mail:446318204@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0502002）资助

Effect of Grazing on Biomass Allocation of Dominant Species and Associated Species in the Alpine Grassland,Northern Tibet

WU Ren¹, QIN Xiao-jing^2,3, SUN Jian⁴

1. Haixi association for science and technology scientific research team, Haixi, Qinghai Province 817099, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Institute of geographic sciences and natural resources, CAS Beijing 100101, China

Received:2018-06-05 Revised:2018-09-18 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2019-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以藏北高寒草地优势种紫花针茅（Stipa purpurea）和伴生种小叶棘豆（Oxytropis microphylla）为研究对象，探讨围封和放牧草地中两种植物在叶、茎、根间生物量分配的差异性。结果表明：放牧对紫花针茅和小叶棘豆的叶、茎的质量比影响显著，两者叶-茎和叶-根的异速生长指数均升高，根-冠的异速生长指数均降低，植株叶-茎和叶-根的异速生长关系出现趋同化。种间根、茎和叶生物量分配存在显著差异性，小叶棘豆叶-茎、叶-根和茎-根的异速生长指数均大于紫花针茅。放牧改变了植物各器官间的权衡策略，紫花针茅在叶-茎权衡关系中更益于茎的生长，小叶棘豆更益于叶的生长；在叶-根和茎-根权衡关系中，小叶棘豆更倾向于叶，紫花针茅则更倾向于茎；相对于根系，两者均在放牧后分配更多资源到地上部分。放牧环境和种间差异导致的植物各器官间生物量分配的变化对群落组成演替有着重要意义。

关键词: 高寒草地, 围栏, 放牧, 生物量分配, 异速生长

Abstract: The difference in biomass allocation relationships among roots,stems and leaves of dominant species Stipa purpurea and associated species Oxytropis microphylla between fencing and grazing grasslands was investigated in the alpine steppe of northern Tibet. The results showed that the fraction of leaf,stem of Stipa purpurea and Oxytropis microphylla were influenced significantly by grazing. The allometric scaling exponents of leaf-stem and leaf-root of both species increased,while the scaling exponents of root-shoot reduced. The allometric relationship of leaf-stem and leaf-root performed convergent assimilation in grazing grassland. It showed significant difference between species on the fraction of organs. And the allometric scaling exponents of leaf-stem,leaf-root and stem-root of Oxytropis microphylla were greater than those of Stipa purpurea. The trade-off strategy among organs was changed by grazing. The trade-off between leaf-stem of Oxytropis microphylla was higher than Stipa purpurea under grazing conditions. Similarly,as for the trade-off leaf-root and stem-root,the benefit of Oxytropis microphylla was more inclined to leaf,while this of Stipa purpurea benefitted stem. Compared with the root,more resources were allocated to the aboveground parts of two species. The variation of biomass allocation among plant organs caused by grazing environments and species means a lot to the community composition succession.

Key words: Alpine grassland, Fencing, Grazing, Biomass allocation, Allometry

中图分类号:

S812

乌仁, 秦小静, 孙健. 放牧对藏北高寒草地优势种和伴生种生物量分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1313-1321.

WU Ren, QIN Xiao-jing, SUN Jian. Effect of Grazing on Biomass Allocation of Dominant Species and Associated Species in the Alpine Grassland,Northern Tibet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1313-1321.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I6/1313

参考文献

[1] 张林,罗天祥. 植物叶寿命及其相关叶性状的生态学研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2004,28(6):844-852
[2] Zobel M,Zobel K. Studying plant competition:from root biomass to general aims[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(3):578-580
[3] 武高林,陈敏,杜国祯. 三种高寒植物幼苗生物量分配及性状特征对光照和养分的响应[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(1):60-66
[4] Weiner J. Allocation,plasticity and allometry in plants[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution & Systematics,2004,6(4):207-215
[5] 石福孙,吴宁,吴彦. 川西北高寒草地3种主要植物的生长及物质分配对温度升高的响应[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(5):488-497
[6] Shipley B,Meziane D. The Balanced-Growth Hypothesis and the Allometry of Leaf and Root Biomass Allocation[J]. Functional Ecology,2002,16(3):326-331
[7] Poorter H,Niklas K J,Reich P B,et al. Biomass allocation to leaves,stems and roots:meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control[M]. New Phytologist,2012:30-50
[8] Hermans C,Hammond J P,White P J,et al. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation?[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2006,11(12):610-617
[9] Adler A,Karacic A,Weih M. Biomass allocation and nutrient use in fast-growing woody and herbaceous perennials used for phytoremediation[J]. Plant & Soil,2008,305(1-2):189-206
[10] Mcconnaughay K D M,Coleman J S. Biomass allocation in plants:ontogeny or optimality? a test along three resource gradients[J]. Ecology,1999,80(8):2581-2593
[11] Müller I,Schmid B,Weiner J. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution & Systematics,2000,3(2):115-127
[12] 黎磊,周道玮,盛连喜. 密度制约决定的植物生物量分配格局[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(8):1579-1589
[13] Hendrik P,Jagodzinski A M,Ricardo R P,et al.How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents[J]. New Phytologist,2015,208(3):736-749
[14] Thornley J H M,Parsons A J. Allocation of new growth between shoot,root and mycorrhiza in relation to carbon,nitrogen and phosphate supply:Teleonomy with maximum growth rate[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology,2014,342(5):1-14
[15] 谢然,陶冶,常顺利. 四种一年生荒漠植物构件形态与生物量间的异速生长关系[J]. 生态学杂志,2015,34(3):648-655
[16] Enquist B J,Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants[J]. Science,2002,295(5559):1517-1520
[17] Enquist B J,Allen A P,Brown J H,et al.Biological scaling:does the exception prove the rule?[J]. Nature,2007,445(7127):E10-1
[18] 郑伟,董全民,李世雄,等. 放牧强度对环青海湖高寒草原群落物种多样性和生产力的影响[J]草地学报,2012,20(06):1033-1038
[19] 王炜,梁存柱. 草原群退化与恢复演替中的植物个体行为分析[J].植物生态学报,2000,4(3):268-274
[20] Ejb M,Hik D S. Grazing history versus current grazing:leaf demography and compensatory growth of three alpine plants in response to a native herbivore (Ochotona collaris)[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(2):348-359
[21] Kooijman A M,Smit A. Grazing as a measure to reduce nutrient availability and plant productivity in acid dune grasslands and pine forests in The Netherlands[J]. Ecological Engineering,2001,17(1):63-77
[22] Niu K,Choler P,Zhao B,et al. The allometry of reproductive biomass in response to land use in Tibetan alpine grasslands[J]. Functional Ecology,2009,23(2):274-283
[23] 陈海军. 荒漠草原主要植物种群繁殖性状及化学计量特征对载畜率的响应[D]. 内蒙古:内蒙古农业大学,2011:14-17
[24] Sun J,Wang X D,Cheng G W,et al. Effects of Grazing Regimes on Plant Traits and Soil Nutrients in an Alpine Steppe,Northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plos One,2014,9(9):9
[25] Wang J,Gao J,Wu Y,et al. Biomass allocation and tradeoffs of pedicularis longiflora rudolph. At two slope aspect in an alpine meadow of the eastern tibetan plateau[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research,2017,15(3):51-65
[26] Bradford J B,D'Amato A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management[J]. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment,2012,10(4):210-216
[27] Sun J,Wang H. Soil nitrogen and carbon determine the trade-off of the above-and below-ground biomass across alpine grasslands,Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,60:1070-1076
[28] 王丽华,高景,王金牛,等. 高山草地长花马先蒿的性状和生物量分配对坡向的适应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(4):648-657
[29] Patty L,Halloy S R P,Hiltbrunner E,et al. Biomass allocation in herbaceous plants under grazing impact in the high semi-arid Andes[J]. Flora,2010,205(10):695-703
[30] 赵彬彬,牛克昌,杜国祯. 放牧对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸群落27种植物地上生物量分配的影响[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(3):1596-1606
[31] Pi?eiro G,Paruelo J M,Jobbágy E G,et al. Grazing effects on belowground C and N stocks along a network of cattle exclosures in temperate and subtropical grasslands of South America[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2009,23(2):1-14
[32] 洪江涛,吴建波,王小丹. 放牧和围封对藏北高寒草原紫花针茅群落生物量分配及碳、氮、磷储量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2015,32(11):1878-1886
[33] 梁金华. 内蒙古荒漠化草原四种植物的根系构型特点及其生态适应性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012:12-34
[34] Louault F,Garnier E. Plant Traits and Functional Types in Response to Reduced Disturbance in a Semi-Natural Grassland[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2005,16(2):151-160
[35] 安慧,李国旗. 放牧对荒漠草原植物生物量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(3):705-712
[36] 许岳飞,益西措姆,付娟娟,等. 青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(06):1026-1032
[37] Sun J,Ma B,Lu X. Grazing enhances soil nutrient effects:Trade-offs between aboveground and belowground biomass in alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2018,29(2):337-348
[38] Laliberté E,Scott D. Which traits determine abundance under long-term shifts in soil resource availability and grazing in tensity?[J]. Journal of Ecology,2012,100(3):662-677
[39] Evju M,Mysterud A. Interactions between local climate and grazing determine the population dynamics of the small herb Viola biflora[J]. Oecologia,2010,163(4):921
[40] 李西良,刘志英,侯向阳,等. 放牧对草原植物功能性状及其权衡关系的调控[J]. 植物学报,2015,50(02):159-170
[41] Niu K,Choler P,Zhao B,et al. The Allometry of Reproductive Biomass in Response to Land Use in Tibetan Alpine Grasslands[J]. Functional Ecology,2010,23(2):274-283
[42] Müller I,Schmid B,Weiner J. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2000,3(2):115-127
[43] 鲜骏仁,胡庭兴,张远彬,等. 林窗对川西亚高山岷江冷杉幼苗生物量及其分配格局的影响[J]应用生态学报,2007,18(04):721-727
[44] Niklas K J,Enquist B J. Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2001,98(5):2922-2927
[45] Mccarthy M C,Enquist B J. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation[J]. Functional Ecology,2007,21(4):713-720
[46] 范国艳,张静妮,张永生,等. 放牧对贝加尔针茅草原植被根系分布和土壤理化特征的影响[J]生态学杂志,2010,29(9):1715-1721

放牧对藏北高寒草地优势种和伴生种生物量分配的影响

Effect of Grazing on Biomass Allocation of Dominant Species and Associated Species in the Alpine Grassland,Northern Tibet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨冲, 王文颖, 刘攀, 周华坤, 索南吉, 刘艳方, 关晋宏. 三江源区不同高寒草地植物矿物元素含量特征及分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 52-61.
[2]	秦海蓉, 陈长成, 胡月明, 王立亚, 肖武, 赵之重, 胡永强, 赵理, 马秉云, 霍俊领, 王福成. 青海省高寒草地土壤侵蚀强度及其空间分布特点[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 104-112.
[3]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[4]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[5]	赵树栋, 李建宏. 高原早熟禾根际促生菌分离筛选及特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1885-1891.
[6]	侯路路, 王旭, 张翔, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞, 程利, 辛晓平. 放牧强度对肉牛行为的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1974-1982.
[7]	张博, 程杰, 王淑红, 刘晶, 杨雪, 晏昕辉, 李伟. 氮添加和放牧对云雾山草原优势种异速生长模式的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1983-1991.
[8]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[9]	高宏元, 侯蒙京, 葛静, 包旭莹, 李元春, 刘洁, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚, 贺金生, 钱大文. 基于随机森林的高寒草地地上生物量高光谱估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[10]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[11]	裴雯, 陈清, 张洛梓, 贾丽英. 放牧、水分和氮素对内蒙古草原土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[12]	钱前, 张秀娟, 王军邦, 叶辉, 李英年, 张志军. 2005-2017年青海三江源区草地家畜承载力时空格局研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1311-1317.
[13]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[14]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[15]	孙一梅, 田青, 郭爱霞, 张森溪, 吕朋, 左小安. 放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.