不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质及化学计量特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.022

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 957-965.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质及化学计量特征

昝看卓¹, 阿山江·伊米尼江¹, 刘丛¹, 谭凯¹, 白婕¹, 何树斌¹, 王可珍², 屈洋², 龙明秀¹

1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 宝鸡市农业科学研究院, 陕西岐山 722400

收稿日期:2021-09-14 修回日期:2021-10-29 发布日期:2022-04-25
通讯作者: 龙明秀,E-mail:longmingxiu@nwsuaf.edu.cn
作者简介:昝看卓(1997-),女,蒙古族,青海门源人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草生理生态研究,E-mail:zkz1128@nwafu.edu.com
基金资助:
优质紫花苜蓿栽培关键技术研究与集成示范(2019ZDLNY05-03);紫花苜蓿与糜子保护播种中公共菌根网络(CMNs)碳氮转运机制研究(32071878)资助

Physicochemical Properties and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Bulk Soils of Alfalfa of Different Fall Dormancy Types

ZAN Kan-zhuo¹, Ashanjiang·Yiminijiang¹, LIU Cong¹, TAN Kai¹, BAI Jie¹, HE Shu-bin¹, WANG Ke-zhen², QU Yang², LONG Ming-xiu¹

1. College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Baoji Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Qishan, Shaanxi Province 722400, China

Received:2021-09-14 Revised:2021-10-29 Published:2022-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质,本研究调查了关中地区种植5年不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿再生期和休眠期根际与非根际土壤有机碳(Soil organic carbon,SOC)、全氮(Total nitrogen,TN)、全磷(Total phosphorus,TP)及土壤酶活性。结果表明:根际SOC、TN、土壤酶活性及化学计量比显著高于非根际土壤(P<0.05);TP在根际与非根际土壤中无显著差异(P>0.05);休眠期土壤SOC、TN、TP含量整体变化趋势表现为随着秋眠级数递增,养分含量逐渐升高,即强秋眠(D)<半秋眠(SD)<非秋眠(ND),而再生期的表现趋势正好相反。根际与非根际SOC与TN、蔗糖酶活性呈正相关;根际土壤TN与蔗糖酶、蛋白酶活性呈正相关,与脲酶活性呈负相关;非根际土壤TN与蔗糖酶活性呈正相关,与蛋白酶活性呈负相关。本研究结果将有助于进一步探究不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿土壤营养物质循环与生产力之间的关系及根际土壤的微生态。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 秋眠类型, 根际与非根际土壤

Abstract: To investigate the physicochemical properties and stoichiometric characteristics of rhizosphere and bulk soils of different fall dormant types of alfalfa,this study investigated the organic carbon (SOC),total nitrogen (TN),total phosphorus (TP) and soil enzyme activities of rhizosphere and bulk soil of different fall dormant alfalfa grown in Guanzhong area for five years during spring regrowth and winter dormancy.The results showed that rhizosphere SOC,TN,soil enzyme activities and stoichiometric ratios were significantly higher than those of bulk soil (P<0.05);TP was not significantly different between rhizosphere and bulk soils (P>0.05).During the winter dormancy period,the overall trend of SOC,TN and TP contents showed a gradual increase in nutrient contents with increasing fall dormancy levels (fall dormancy < semi-fall dormancy < non-fall dormancy),while the regrowth period showed the opposite trend.The SOC of rhizosphere and bulk soli was positively correlated with TN and sucrase activity;TN in rhizosphere soil was positively correlated with sucrase and protease activity,and negatively correlated with urease activity.TN in bulk soil was positively correlated with sucrase activity and negatively correlated with protease activity.The results of this study will help to further investigate the relationship between nutrient cycling and productivity of soils and the microecology of rhizosphere soils grown different fall dormancy alfalfa varieties.

Key words: Alfalfa, Fall dormancy types, Rhizosphere and bulk soil

中图分类号:

S153

昝看卓, 阿山江·伊米尼江, 刘丛, 谭凯, 白婕, 何树斌, 王可珍, 屈洋, 龙明秀. 不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质及化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 957-965.

ZAN Kan-zhuo, Ashanjiang·Yiminijiang, LIU Cong, TAN Kai, BAI Jie, HE Shu-bin, WANG Ke-zhen, QU Yang, LONG Ming-xiu. Physicochemical Properties and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Bulk Soils of Alfalfa of Different Fall Dormancy Types[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 957-965.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I4/957

参考文献

[1] 洪绂曾.苜蓿科学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2009
[2] 李平,孙杰,邢建军.论苜蓿的起源与传播[J].内蒙古草业,2012,24(1):5-8
[3] 中华人民共和国农业部.农业部关于印发《全国种植业结构调整规划(2016-2020年)》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2016/diwuqi/201711/t20171127_5920851.htm.2016-4-11/2017-11-27
[4] LI Y,HUANG M. Pasture yield and soil water depletion of continuous growing alfalfa in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2008,124(1):24-32
[5] DENG L,WANG K B,LI J P,et al. Carbon storage dynamics in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) fields in the Hilly-Gully region of the loess plateau,China[J]. CLEAN-Soil,Air,Water,2014,42(9):1253-1262
[6] 刘志英.不同苜蓿品种秋眠级评定及其对越冬率的影响机理[D].呼和浩特:中国农业科学研究院草原研究所,2016:1-2
[7] 赵海明,游永亮,李源,等.不同秋眠级苜蓿品种在海河平原区的适应性评价[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(01):48-57
[8] 严秀将.温度对不同秋眠等级苜蓿(Medicago sativa)生长的动态影响[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009:2
[9] MONTES-BORREGO M,JA NAVAS-CORTÉS,LANDA B B. Linking microbial functional diversity of olive rhizosphere soil to management systems in commercial orchards in southern Spain[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2013,181:169-178
[10] QIU M,LI S,ZHOU X,et a1. De-coupling of root-microbiome associations followed by antagonist inoculation improves rhizosphere soil suppressiveness[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2014,50(2):217-224
[11] 肖列,刘国彬,李鹏,等.短期CO₂浓度升高和干旱胁迫对白羊草土壤碳氮和微生物根际效应的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(10):3251-3259
[12] 马志良,赵文强,刘美,等.增温对高寒灌丛根际和非根际土壤微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(6):1893-1900
[13] 马源,李林芝,张德罡,等.退化高寒草甸优势植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量的分布特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(4):797-804
[14] ASADISHAD B,et al. Amendment of agricultural soil with metal nanoparticles:effects on soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2018,52(4):1908-1918
[15] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008(8):3937-3947
[16] PAZ JIMENEZ M D,HORRA A M,PEUZZO L. Soil quality:a new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2002,35(4):302-306
[17] 王晓龙,李红,米福贵,等.不同秋眠级苜蓿生产性能及越冬率评价[J].草业学报,2019,28(6):82-92
[18] 屈洋,宋慧,刘洋,等.谷子新品种(系)主要农艺性状及茎杆特性的遗传多样性分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(3):51-58
[19] 冉卓.低温胁迫紫花苜蓿生理生化特性和解剖结构的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017:9
[20] 杨秀芳,梁庆伟,娜日苏,等.年刈割次数对科尔沁沙地不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿品种产量、品质和越冬率的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(3):637-643
[21] 马力,周鹏,高小叶,等.非秋眠和半秋眠紫花苜蓿品种在华东冬闲田的生长规律和营养动态[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(5):38-45
[22] CHAUDHARY D R,GAUTAM R K,YOUSUF B,et al. Nutrients,microbial community structure and functional gene abundance of rhizosphere and bulk soils of halophytes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2015,91:16-26
[23] 黄文,陈颍卓,庄远红.油茶根际与非根际土壤养分含量和微生物数量的季节变化[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(19):265-270
[24] 全国农业技术推广服务中心.土壤分析技术规范[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006
[25] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.3版[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000
[26] RUAN J,MAL F,SHI Y Z,ZHANG F S. Effects of litter incorporation and nitrogen fertilization on the contents of extractable aluminium in the rhizosphere soil of tea plant (Camallia sinensis (L.) O.Kuntze)[J]. Plant and Soil,2004,263(1):283-296
[27] 杨阳,刘秉儒.荒漠草原不同植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量分布特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(22):7562-7570
[28] 陈高起,傅瓦利,张婷,等.石灰土地区几种作物根际与非根际土壤养分特征对比研究——以重庆市中梁山为例[J].水土保持研究,2014(1):104-109
[29] 李从娟,李彦,马健,范连连,王吉利.干旱区植物根际土壤养分状况的对比研究[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(2):222-228
[30] 王卫霞,罗明,潘存德.塔里木河下游几种荒漠植物根际土壤微生物及其活性[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):571-576
[31] SIERR A J,DAUDIN D,et al. Nitrogen transfer from a legume tree to the associated grass esti-mated by the isotopic signature of tree root exudates:A comp-arison of the ¹⁵N leaf feeding and natural¹⁵N abundance methods[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2007,27(2):178-186
[32] WANG X Y,GAO Y Z. Advances in the mechanism of cereal/legume intercropping promotion of symbiotic nitrogen fixation[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2019,65(2-3):142-149
[33] 吴林坤,林向民,林文雄.根系分泌物介导下植物-土壤-微生物互作关系研究进展与展望[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(3):298-310
[34] 李栎,王光军,周国新,等.会同桢楠人工幼林土壤C:N:P生态化学计量的时空特征[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(2):6
[35] HU W,JIAO Z,WU F,et al. Long-term effects of fertilizer on soil enzymatic activity of wheat field soil in Loess Plateau,China[J]. Ecotoxicology,2014,23(10):2069-2080
[37] 张华亮.玉米/紫花苜蓿间作氮素高效吸收利用的根系-土壤互作机理[D].长春:东北师范大学,2020:8
[37] 万忠梅,吴景贵.土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(6):87-92
[38] 王玉琴,尹亚丽,李世雄.不同退化程度高寒草甸土壤理化性质及酶活性分析[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(6):1108-1116
[39] KAMLMURA Y,HAYANO K. Properties of protease extracted from tea-field soil[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,30(4):351-355
[40] WANG L,PANG X,LI N,et al. Effects of vegetation type,fine and coarse roots on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in eastern Tibetan plateau[J]. Catena,2020(194):104694
[41] 许亚东,王涛,李慧,等.黄土丘陵区人工柠条林土壤酶活性与养分变化特征[J].草地学报,2018,26(2):363-370
[42] 周媛媛,杜明新,周向睿,等.毛乌素沙漠南缘紫穗槐根际与非根际氮素含量特征[J].草业科学,2013,30(4):515-520
[43] 卢维宏,张乃明,张丽,等.增效肥料对设施栽培小白菜生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J].南方农业学报,2019,50(9):2022-2028
[44] 易艳灵,吴丽英,杨倩,等.柏木根系分泌物对盆栽香椿土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(7):2080-2086
[45] 邱莉萍,刘俊,王益权,等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力关系的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(2):277-280
[46] 安韶山,黄懿梅,李璧成,等.用典型相关分析研究宁南宽谷丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤酶活性与土壤因子的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(5):704-709
[47] 杨凯,刘颖川,张发莲,等.青海东部地区地膜覆盖对玉米地土壤无机氮含量和酶活性的影响[J].青海大学学报,2021,39(1):6
[48] 杜威,王紫泉,和文祥,等.豆科绿肥对渭北旱塬土壤养分及生态化学计量学特征影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(4):999-1008
[49] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:36-37,196-198
[50] TIAN H Q,CHEN G S,ZHANG C,et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils:A synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry,2010,98(1-3):139-151
[51] 甘华阳,张顺之,梁开,等.北部湾北部滨海湿地水体和表层沉积物中营养元素分布与污染评价[J].湿地科学,2012,10(3):285-298
[52] 吴晓生.不同林龄杉木根际和非根际土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].林业勘察设计,2020,40(4):8-12
[53] 彭学义,贾亚男,蒋勇军,等.中梁山岩溶槽谷区不同土地类型土壤生态化学计量学特征[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(5):84-92
[54] 程亮.季节性栽培紫花苜蓿根系生长与地上部生长关系的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2013:37
[55] 刘志英,李西良,李峰,等.越冬紫花苜蓿根系性状与秋眠性的关系及其抗寒效应[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1689-1701

不同秋眠类型紫花苜蓿根际与非根际土壤理化性质及化学计量特征

Physicochemical Properties and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Bulk Soils of Alfalfa of Different Fall Dormancy Types

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同紫花苜蓿品种的氮效率比较及差异机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 889-900.
[2]	刘东霞, 杨莉, 宋连昭, 杨志敏, 王芳, 刘贵河. 三种镰孢菌对不同苜蓿品种致病性的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 909-918.
[3]	王芳, 李伟, 刘鑫, 李文辰, 赵金波, 张智慧, 杨曌. 紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.
[4]	杨迎月, 毛桂莲, 麻冬梅, 张峰举, 许兴. 四种牧草种子在不同浓度NaCl或NaHCO₃胁迫下的萌发特性[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 637-645.
[5]	杨习江, 杨昌福, 蒋学乾, 张帆, 何飞, 杨青川, 康俊梅. 紫花苜蓿粗灰分与矿质元素含量QTL定位分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 312-319.
[6]	孙志轩, 敖平星, 毕玉芬, 赵雁. 德钦’紫花苜蓿叶绿体基因组序列及特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 320-328.
[7]	赵阳安, 芦光新, 邓晔, 王英成, 马坤, 颜珲璘, 张海娟, 周学丽, 窦声云. 根瘤菌拌种对两种苜蓿生长及根际微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 370-378.
[8]	韩颜隆, 刘晓静, 王静, 汪雪, 李佳奇. 施氮对不同品种紫花苜蓿根系特性和生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 379-384.
[9]	何玉娟, 李东琴, 邓波, 杨军, 对山艾力·卡布吐拉, 杨超. 外源赤霉素GA₃施加对紫花苜蓿-根瘤菌共生体系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 385-393.
[10]	李彦飞, 初晓辉, 李嘉懿, 马祖艳, 牛琼梅, 单贵莲. 大狼毒对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 394-402.
[11]	苏旺苍, 冯长松, 李慧龙, 孙兰兰, 徐洪乐, 吴仁海. 甲咪唑烟酸与烯草酮混配对紫花苜蓿生长影响及除草效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 479-486.
[12]	申晓慧. 两种诱变处理下紫花苜蓿全基因组DNA甲基化图谱分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 46-54.
[13]	汪雪, 刘晓静, 赵雅姣, 王静. 不同根系交互强度下紫花苜蓿/甜高粱体内氮营养动态特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 76-83.
[14]	赵文静, 张浩阳, 徐燕妮, 罗蛟, 刘美君. 不同温度下AOX和COX途径对苜蓿种子萌发和幼根生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 84-92.
[15]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.