miR396-MsGRFs参与调控紫花苜蓿愈伤组织再生

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.005

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 2884-2891.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.005

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

miR396-MsGRFs参与调控紫花苜蓿愈伤组织再生

陈筱冉, 严建萍, 仇如梦, 刘燕蓉, 张万军

中国农业大学草业科学与技术学院, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2022-08-08 修回日期:2022-09-02 发布日期:2022-12-02
通讯作者: 张万军,E-mail:wjzhang@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:陈筱冉(2001-)，女，汉族，黑龙江哈尔滨人，本科生，主要从事牧草基因工程育种研究，E-mail：2019324010111@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
海南省崖州湾种子实验室揭榜挂帅项目(B21HJ0507)；国家自然科学基金项目(31971755)资助

MiR396-MsGRFs Regulate the Regeneration of Alfalfa Callus

CHEN Xiao-ran, YAN Jian-ping, QIU Ru-meng, LIU Yan-rong, ZHANG Wan-jun

Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2022-08-08 Revised:2022-09-02 Published:2022-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)愈伤组织再生率受基因型限制，是影响苜蓿遗传转化效率的主要因素之一。研究发现，GRF转录因子家族基因在提高多种植物愈伤再生中起着重要促进作用。本试验以拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)AtGRF序列为模板，在紫花苜蓿基因组序列中查找，获得了含有miR396靶点的9个MsGRFs基因。除MsGRF3a和MsGRF4a外，其余7个MsGRFs在紫花苜蓿胚性愈伤组织中的表达量均显著高于非胚性愈伤。为了进一步研究MsGRFs对紫花苜蓿愈伤再生效率的影响，我们在紫花苜蓿中转入MIM396基因，降低miR396的表达。结果显示：MIM396植株叶片愈伤组织再生时间显著缩短，再生率显著提高；与野生型愈伤组织相比，在MIM396植株叶片诱导的愈伤组织中，除MsGRF3a外，其余MsGRFs显著高表达。以上研究表明，miR396-MsGRF通路对苜蓿愈伤组织再生起着重要调控作用，这为提高苜蓿再生效率，并打破基因型对不同苜蓿品种再生的限制提供候选基因。

关键词: miR396, MsGRFs, 紫花苜蓿, 愈伤组织, 再生

Abstract: The low regeneration rate of alfalfa callus is one of the main factors limiting the genetic transformation efficiency of alfalfa. It has been found that GRF transcription factor family genes play an important role in promoting callus regeneration in a variety of plants. In this study,we used the AtGRF protein sequences as template to search in alfalfa genome database and obtained 9 MsGRFs genes containing miR396 target sites. Excepting MsGRF3a and MsGRF4a,the expression levels of the other 7 MsGRFs in embryonic callus of alfalfa were significantly higher than those in non-embryonic callus. To further investigate the effects of MsGRFs on callus regeneration efficiency of alfalfa,we transferred MIM396 gene into alfalfa and reduced the expression of miR396 in transgenic plants. The results showed that the regeneration time was significantly shortened,while the regeneration rate of callus of MIM396 transgenic plants was significantly increased. Compared to wild-type callus,the leaf inducing callus of MIM396 plants showed significantly higher expression of MsGRFs except MsGRF3a. The results indicated that miR396-MsGRF pathway played an important regulatory role in alfalfa callus regeneration,which provided candidate genes for improving the regeneration efficiency of alfalfa and breaking the restriction of genotype on regeneration of different alfalfa varieties.

Key words: miR396, MsGRFs, Medicago sativa, Callus, Regeneration

中图分类号:

S963.22+3.3

陈筱冉, 严建萍, 仇如梦, 刘燕蓉, 张万军. miR396-MsGRFs参与调控紫花苜蓿愈伤组织再生[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 2884-2891.

CHEN Xiao-ran, YAN Jian-ping, QIU Ru-meng, LIU Yan-rong, ZHANG Wan-jun. MiR396-MsGRFs Regulate the Regeneration of Alfalfa Callus[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 2884-2891.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I11/2884

参考文献

[1] 余如刚,王雪茄,王国良,等. 紫花苜蓿品种苗期耐盐性分析及评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(7):1781-1789
[2] 武蓓,师尚礼,张辉辉,等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种光合生理特性差异及香豆素含量的变化[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(10):2674-2683
[3] 边佳辉,刘自扬,李宗英,等. 紫花苜蓿基因工程改良研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(1):139-155
[4] 刘志鹏,周强,刘文献,等. 中国牧草育种中的若干科学问题[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(12):184-193
[5] 金京波,王台,程佑发,等. 我国牧草育种现状与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2021,36(6):660-665
[6] GORDON-KAMM B,SARDESAI N,ARLING M,et al. Using Morphogenic Genes to Improve Recovery and Regeneration of Transgenic Plants[J]. Plants,2019(8):38
[7] 邓百万,张兆清,刘世贵. 几种豆科牧草植物组织培养体细胞胚诱导研究[J]. 汉中师范学院学报(自然科学),2000(3):72-78
[8] CHEN T,MAROWITCH J,THOMPSON B G. Genotypic Effects on Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Callus Cultures of Alfalfa[J]. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture,1987(8):73-81
[9] 靳慧卿. 豆科牧草体细胞胚再生体系构建及其差异性比较研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015:31
[10] KIM J H,CHOI D,KENDE H. The AtGRF Family of Putative Transcription Factors is Involved in Leaf and Cotyledon Growth in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Journal,2003,36(1):94-104
[11] KIM J H,KENDE H. A Transcriptional Coactivator,Atgif1,is Involved in Regulating Leaf Growth and Morphology an Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Aacademy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(36):13374-13379
[12] HORIGUCHI G,KIM G T,TSUKAYA H. The Transcription Factor Atgrf5 and the Transcription Coactivator AN3 Regulate Cell Proliferation in Leaf Primordia of Arabidopsis Thaliana[J]. Plant Journal,2005,43(1):68-78
[13] DEBERNARDI J M,RODRIGUEZ R E,MECCHIA M A,et al. Functional Specialization of the Plant mir396 Regulatory Network Through Distinct Microrna-Target Interactions[J]. PLoS Genetics,2012,8(1):e1002419
[14] KIM J H. Biological Roles and an Evolutionary Sketch of the Grf-Gif Transcriptional Complex in Plants[J]. BMB Reports,2019,52(4):227-238
[15] LIU Y,YAN J,WANG K,et al. mir396-GRF Module Associates with Switchgrass Biomass Yield and Feedstock Quality[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal,2021(19):1523-1536
[16] DEBERNARDI J M,MECCHIA M A,VERCRUYSSEN L,et al. Post-Transcriptional Control of GRF Transcription Factors by Microrna mir396 and GIF Co-Activator Affects Leaf Size and Longevity[J]. Plant Journal,2014,79(3):413-426
[17] VERCRUYSSEN L,VERKEST A,GONZALEZ N,et al. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 Binds to SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complexes to Regulate Transcription during Arabidopsis Leaf Development[J]. Plant Cell,2014,26(1):210-229
[18] DEBERNARDI J M,TRICOLI D M,ERCOLI M F,et al. A GRF-GIF Chimeric Protein Improves the Regeneration Efficiency of Transgenic Plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology,2020,38(11):1274-1279
[19] KONG J,MARTIN-ORTIGOSA S,FINER J,et al. Overexpression of the Transcription Factor GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR5 Improves Transformation of Dicot and Monocot Species[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,12(11):572319
[20] LIVAK K J,SCHMITTGEN T D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative Pcr and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method[J]. Methods,2001,25(4):402-408
[21] GAO F,WANG K,LIU Y,et al. Blocking mir396 Increases Rice Yield by Shaping Inflorescence Architecture[J]. Nature Plants 2015(21):15196
[22] SUGIYAMA M. Historical Review of Research on Plant Cell Dedifferentiation[J]. Journal of Plant Research,2015,128(3):349-359
[23] 仪登霞,仝宗永. 紫花苜蓿遗传转化体系的优化[J]. 分子植物育种,2021,19(2):504-511
[24] NAGLE M,DÉJARDIN A,PILATE G,et al. Opportunities for Innovation in Genetic Transformation of Forest Trees[J]. Front Plant Science,2018,2(9):1443
[25] FENG Q,XIAO L,HE Y,et al. Highly Efficient,Genotype-Independent Transformation and Gene Editing in Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus) Using a Chimeric Clgrf4-GIF1 Gene[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2021,63(12):2038-2042
[26] RODRIGUEZ R E,MECCHIA M A,DEBERNARDI J M,et al. Control of Cell Proliferation in Arabidopsis Thaliana by Microrna mir396[J]. Development,2010,137(1):103-112
[27] BOUCHABKÉ-COUSSA O,OBELLIANNE M,LINDERME D,et al. Wuschel Overexpression Promotes Somatic Embryogenesis and Induces Organogenesis in Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Tissues Cultured in Vitro[J]. Plant Cell Reports,2013(32):675-686
[28] BOUTILIER K,OFFRINGA R,SHARMA V K,KIEFT,et al. Ectopic Expression of BABY BOOM Triggers a Conversion from Vegetative to Embryonic Growth[J]. Plant Cell,2002(14):1737-1749
[29] MASTERS A,KANG M,MCCAW M,et al. Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes[J]. Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments,2020(14):156
[30] LUTZ K A,MARTIN C,KHAIRZADA S,et al. Steroid-Inducible BABY BOOM System for Development of Fertile Arabidopsis Thaliana Plants after Prolonged Tissue Culture[J]. Plant Cell Report,2015,34(10):1849-1856

miR396-MsGRFs参与调控紫花苜蓿愈伤组织再生

MiR396-MsGRFs Regulate the Regeneration of Alfalfa Callus

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐小博, 王鑫尧, 郁伟杰, 苗一凡, 徐博. 紫花苜蓿MsJMT基因的克隆及其与育性的关联分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2306-2314.
[2]	孟翔, 孙伶俐, 谢开云, 刘伟, 褚皓清, 赵越. 灌溉、施磷量及AM真菌对紫花苜蓿产量和水磷利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2356-2364.
[3]	王瑜, 代先林, 马晓颖, 韦宝, 何峰, 李向林, 仝宗永. 划区轮牧对放牧型紫花苜蓿人工草地产量与品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2477-2482.
[4]	郝俊峰, 于浩然, 贾玉山, 王志军, 格根图, 李宇宇, 孙林. 青贮密度和青贮时间对紫花苜蓿发酵品质及营养成分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2492-2496.
[5]	王勃, 王聪聪, 夏方山, 陈奕霖, 赵萍, 朱慧森. 硒引发对不同品种紫花苜蓿种子抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2037-2044.
[6]	位明君, 王萌, 范希峰, 滕文军, 滕珂, 温海峰, 武菊英, 刘艳芬, 岳跃森. 青绿苔草(Care breviculmis)愈伤组织诱导与再生体系的建立[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2053-2057.
[7]	张辉辉, 师尚礼, 武蓓, 李自立, 李小龙, 吴芳, 康文娟, 陈新栋. 紫花苜蓿与不同生活型多年生禾本科牧草混播生长生理特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2144-2157.
[8]	李军, 杜俊颖, 杨莉, 宋连昭, 李鑫洋, 薛祝林, 刘贵河. 冀西北地区错期交叉混播对第3年草地生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2167-2172.
[9]	徐洪雨, 李钰莹. 基于KEGG通路分析紫花苜蓿的冷适应过程[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1721-1730.
[10]	余如刚, 王雪茄, 王国良, 徐智明, 高晴晴, 杜雪玲, 张宇龙. 紫花苜蓿品种苗期耐盐性分析及评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1781-1789.
[11]	阚海明, 庞卓, 陈超, 邹俊亮, 张国芳, 武菊英. 北京西北浅山区退化草地植被恢复对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1350-1358.
[12]	李莉萍, 李旭漉, 张晓捷, 谷丽丽, 张博. 紫花苜蓿atpA基因的克隆及表达模式分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1413-1421.
[13]	杨帆, 韦宝, 王瑜, 何峰. 紫花苜蓿产量、品质和根系对刈割高度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1597-1602.
[14]	毛培, 申书恒, 蒲军, 娄可可, 周强, 王增裕, 孙娟, 刘志鹏. 基于SCoT标记分析紫花苜蓿遗传多样性的取样数量[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1110-1121.
[15]	魏江文, 刘磊, 王森山, 陈丽霞, 蒋明君, 王庚浩, 徐亨昊. “抗”“感”苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜适应性及体内酶活的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1171-1177.