化学添加剂对有氧胁迫下湿贮玉米发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.033

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 3455-3463.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.033

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

化学添加剂对有氧胁迫下湿贮玉米发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

刘宇洋^1,3, 高文韩¹, 孔令芝^1,3, 郑杨晨^1,3, 刘畅¹, 何涛^1,3, 薛艳林², 李井春^1,3, 李雁冰^1,3

1. 黑龙江八一农垦大学动物科技学院, 黑龙江省寒区饲料资源高效利用与营养调控重点实验室, 黑龙江大庆 163319;
2. 内蒙古自治区农牧科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010031;
3. 农业农村部东北平原农业绿色低碳重点实验室, 黑龙江大庆 163319

收稿日期:2022-07-25 修回日期:2022-09-27 发布日期:2023-01-04
通讯作者: 李雁冰,E-mail:liyanbing929@163.com
作者简介:刘宇洋(1995-),男,汉族,黑龙江鸡西人,硕士研究生,主要从事青贮饲料加工与调制的研究,E-mail:liuyuyang0016@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31402136);黑龙江省自然科学基金青年项目(QC2018022)资助

Effects of Chemical Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of High Moisture Corn under the air stress

LIU Yu-yang^1,3, GAO Wen-han¹, KONG Ling-zhi^1,3, ZHENG Yang-chen^1,3, LIU Chang¹, HE Tao^1,3, XUE Yan-lin², LI Jing-chun^1,3, LI Yan-bing^1,3

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University;Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Feed Resources and Nutrition manipulation in Cold Region of Heilongjiang Province, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, 163319, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural&Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010031, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Low-carbon Green Agriculture in Northeastern China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs P. R. China, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, China

Received:2022-07-25 Revised:2022-09-27 Published:2023-01-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究苯甲酸钠、山梨酸钾和亚硝酸钠组成的化学添加剂对有氧胁迫处理的湿贮玉米发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响。以35%和50%含水量的湿贮玉米为原料，设置对照组(无添加)、添加组1(2mL·kg^-1)、添加组2(4mL·kg^-1)在湿贮期设置不同时期有氧胁迫处理分别为:前期有氧胁迫处理(1~7d，Early air stress，EAS)、后期有氧胁迫处理(22~28 d，Later air stress，LAS)、全程有氧胁迫处理(1~28d，Full air stress，FAS)，28d后分析发酵品质、有氧稳定性以及有氧暴露7d后的发酵品质。结果表明：与对照组相比，添加组2的有机酸浓度最高，干物质损失最少，而且有氧稳定性最高。4mL·kg^-1的化学添加剂还显著抑制了酵母菌和大肠杆菌的生长。因此，化学添加剂明显消除了氧气的负面影响，并延长了有氧胁迫条件下的有氧稳定时间。

关键词: 湿贮玉米, 化学添加剂, 有氧胁迫, 发酵品质, 有氧稳定性

Abstract: To investigate the effects of chemical addition consisting of sodium benzoate,potassium sorbate,and sodium nitrite on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of high moisture corn processed with air stress treatments of different stages. The control group (no addition),addition group 1 (2 mL·kg^-1),and addition group 2 (4 mL·kg^-1) were treated with air stress of different stages of wet storage as early air stress treatment (1-7 d,EAS),later air stress treatment (22-28 d,LAS),and full air stress treatment (1-28 d,FAS),respectively. The fermentation quality,aerobic stability,and fermentation quality after 7 days of aerobic exposure were analyzed after 28 days. The results showed that,Compared to the control group,The addition group 2 had significantly the highest concentrations of organic acid,the greatest recoveries of DM,and the highest aerobic stability. The chemical additive of 4 mL·kg^-1 groups inhibited the growth of yeast and E. coli. In summary,Chemical additives significantly eliminated the negative effects of oxygen and prolonged aerobic stabilization under air stress conditions.

Key words: High moisture corn, Chemical addition, Air stress, Fermentation quality, Aerobic stability

中图分类号:

S816.5+3

刘宇洋, 高文韩, 孔令芝, 郑杨晨, 刘畅, 何涛, 薛艳林, 李井春, 李雁冰. 化学添加剂对有氧胁迫下湿贮玉米发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3455-3463.

LIU Yu-yang, GAO Wen-han, KONG Ling-zhi, ZHENG Yang-chen, LIU Chang, HE Tao, XUE Yan-lin, LI Jing-chun, LI Yan-bing. Effects of Chemical Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of High Moisture Corn under the air stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3455-3463.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.033

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I12/3455

参考文献

[1] 韩吉雨,宋丽华,张彩霞,等. 饲喂高水分湿贮玉米对奶牛生产性能及饲养成本的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2018,39(17):19-22
[2] FERRARETTO L F,CRUMP P M,SHAVER R D. Effect of Cereal Grain Type and Corn Grain Harvesting and Processing Methods on Intake,Digestion,and Milk Production by Dairy Cows Through a Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2013,96(1):533-550
[3] WANG X,TAN W,ZHOU S,et al. Converting Maize Production with Low Emergy Cost and High Economic Return for Sustainable Development[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2021,136:110443
[4] 张帆,韩淑敏,李井春,等. 不同添加剂对玉米籽实发酵品质的影响[J]. 草学,2018(S1):37-38
[5] CHAVES A A M,MARTINS C F,VASCONCELOS M,et al. In Vitro Digestibility of Four High Moisture Grains used in Liquid Pig Feeding[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production,2022,54(2):136
[6] ARCHIBEQUE S L,MILLER D N,FREETLY H C,et al. Feeding High-Moisture Corn Instead of Dry-Rolled Corn Reduces Odorous Compound Production in Manure of Finishing Beef Cattle without Decreasing Performance[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(7):1767-1777
[7] SALVO P A R,GRITTI V C,DANIEL J L P,et al. Fibrolytic Enzymes Improve the Nutritive Value of High-Moisture Corn for Finishing Bulls[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2020,98(2):1-11
[8] KUNG JR L,MYERS C L,NEYLON J M,et al. The Effects of Buffered Propionic Acid-Based Additives Alone or Combined with Microbial Inoculation on the Fermentation of High Moisture Corn and Whole-Crop Barley[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2004,87(5):1310-1316
[9] PITT R E. Dry Matter Losses Due to Oxygen Infiltration in Silos[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1986,35(3):193-205
[10] WOOLFORD M K. The Detrimental Effects of Air on Silage[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,1990,68(2):101-116
[11] GERLACH K,ROB F,WEIB K,et al. Changes in Maize Silage Fermentation Products During Aerobic Deterioration and Effects on Dry Matter Intake by Goats[J]. Agricultural and Food Science,2013,22(1):168-181
[12] BORREANI G,TABACCO E,SCHMIDT R J,et al. Silage Review:Factors Affecting Dry Matter and Quality Losses in Silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):3952-3979
[13] DA SILVA É B,COSTA D M,SANTOS E M,et al. The Effects of Lactobacillus Hilgardii 4785 and Lactobacillus Buchneri 40788 on the Microbiome,Fermentation,and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage Ensiled for Various Times[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2021,104(10):10678-10698
[14] KUNG JR L,SMITH M L,DA SILVA E B,et al. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive Based on Sodium Benzoate,Potassium Sorbate,and Sodium Nitrite on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(7):5949-5960
[15] WILKINSON J M,DAVIES D R. The Aerobic Stability of Silage:Key Findings and Recent Developments[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2013,68(1):1-19
[16] LI Y,DA SILVA E B,NOVINSKI C O,et al. Effect of Microbial and Chemical Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Alfalfa Silage Ensiled at 2 Dry Matters and Subjected to Air Stress During Storage[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2021,99(7):1-8
[17] KNICKY M,SPÖRNDLY R. Use of a Mixture of Sodium Nitrite,Sodium Benzoate,and Potassium Sorbate in Aerobically Challenged Silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(8):5729-5734
[18] DA SILVA T C,SMITH M L,BARNARD A M,et al. The Effect of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of High-Moisture Corn[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(12):8904-8912
[19] KUNG JR L,SAVAGE R M,DA SILVA E B,et al. The Effects of Air Stress During Storage and Low Packing Density on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage Inoculated with Lactobacillus Buchneri 40788[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2021,104(4):4206-4222
[20] 李金库,王雪洋,赵峻祥,等. 不同添加剂对豆浆型和豆渣型发酵饲料发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2020,32(3):1424-1433
[21] KUNG JR L,RANJIT N K. The Effect of Lactobacillus Buchneri and other Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(5):1149-1155
[22] 田吉鹏,韦青,刘蓓一,等. 复合添加剂对花生秧青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(2):464-470
[23] KIM S C,ADESOGAN A T. Influence of Ensiling Temperature,Simulated Rainfall,and Delayed Sealing on Fermentation Characteristics and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2006,89(8):3122-3132
[24] 辛亚芬,陈晨,曾泰儒,等. 青贮添加剂对微生物多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2021,37(9):24-30
[25] 赵小雪,郭凤根,罗富成. 添加纤维素酶与藜麦麸皮及小麦麸皮对台湾红藜青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(3):764-770
[26] 陈梦言,白洁,柯文灿,等. 青贮饲料微生物群落组成与功能研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2021,37(9):11-23
[27] DA SILVA N C,DOS SANTOS J P,áVILA C L S,et al. Evaluation of the Effects of Two L Actobacillus Buchneri Strains and Sodium Benzoate on the Characteristics of Corn Silage in a Hot-Climate Environment[J]. Grassland Science,2014,60(3):169-177
[28] TELLER R S,SCHMIDT R J,WHITLOW L W,et al. Effect of Physical Damage to Ears of Corn before Harvest and Treatment with Various Additives on the Concentration of Mycotoxins,Silage Fermentation,and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(3):1428-1436
[29] MORASSI L L P,SILVA B S,FURTADO M M,et al. Growth/No-Growth Modeling to Control the Spoilage of Chocolate Cake by Penicillium Citrinum LMQA_053:Impact of pH,Water Activity,Temperature,and Different Concentrations of Calcium Propionate and Potassium Sorbate[J]. Food Control,2022,139:109064
[30] ØSTERGAARD E. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effects of Sodium Benzoate and Dichlorobenzyl Alcohol Against Dental Plaque Microorganisms:An in Vitro Study[J]. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,1994,52(6):335-345
[31] 陈瑶,刘成国,罗扬,等. 亚硝酸盐在腊肉加工中的作用及其替代物的研究进展[J]. 肉类研究,2010(5):32-36

化学添加剂对有氧胁迫下湿贮玉米发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响

Effects of Chemical Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of High Moisture Corn under the air stress

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张佳伟, 贾玉山, 格根图, 王志军, 包健, 李宇宇, 彭冬, 王宇, 孙鹏波, 岳晓明. 不同丙酸浓度对天然牧草青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2522-2528.
[2]	龙仕和, 李雪枫, 潘俊歆, 常晔, 史孟丽, 黄乃馨, 崔智海, 王坚. 不同生长天数‘热研4号’王草青贮品质和微生物群落多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1900-1908.
[3]	马淑敏, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 秦伟娜, 王正文, 赵生国, 祁娟. 混合型乳酸菌制剂对不同品种青饲玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1558-1568.
[4]	贾宏定, 黄丽娟, 刘蕾, 孙镕基, 张志飞, 陈桂华. 不同品种水稻秸秆青贮品质的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1310-1318.
[5]	赵牧其尔, 王志军, 包健, 孙林, 张永虎, 温蕊, 王伟, 贾玉山, 格根图. 不同青贮添加剂对饲用谷子青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 1021-1026.
[6]	付东青, 贾春英, 张力, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 石河子地区青贮玉米农艺性状和发酵品质动态分析及评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 682-691.
[7]	付薇, 陈伟, 周丽, 蔡璐, 王小利, 韩永芬, 孟军江. 植物乳杆菌和短乳杆菌复合添加对高丹草青贮效果的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 758-763.
[8]	李彦飞, 杨双双, 初晓辉, 马向丽, 段新慧, 韩博, 段佳鑫, 单贵莲. 昆明优质本土乳酸菌的筛选及其对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3215-3224.
[9]	曹欣, 吴康乐, 文乐元, 黄丽娟, 肖润林, 张志飞. 水稻秸秆、麦麸、葡萄糖添加对绿狐尾藻青贮质量影响研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3447-3454.
[10]	赵小雪, 王仕玉, 郭凤根, 罗富成. 乳酸菌及纤维素酶对不同藜麦秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2827-2833.
[11]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[12]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[13]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[14]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[15]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.