TOPSIS法评价南方大豆品种在黄土高原地区的饲用潜力

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.030

草地学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 1710-1717.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.030

TOPSIS法评价南方大豆品种在黄土高原地区的饲用潜力

安东¹, 来兴发¹, 邓建强¹, 韩天富², 沈禹颖¹

1. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院/草地农业系统国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730020;
2. 中国农业科学院作物研究所, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2019-10-10 修回日期:2019-11-11 出版日期:2019-12-15 发布日期:2019-12-31
通讯作者: 沈禹颖,E-mail:yy.shen@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:安东(1995-),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草生产研究,E-mail:and17@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系（CARS-34）；甘肃省重点人才项目资助

Evaluation of Feeding Potential of Soybean Varieties Origin from Southern China by the Method of TOPSIS

AN Dong¹, LAI Xing-fa¹, DENG Jian-qiang¹, HAN Tian-fu², SHEN Yu-ying¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
2. National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2019-10-10 Revised:2019-11-11 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究大豆（Glycine max（L.）Merrill）南种北引的饲用潜力，丰富黄土高原地区一年生豆科饲草资源，本研究将33个原产于我国东南、华南和西南地区的籽粒型晚熟大豆品种引种到陇东旱塬，测定其初花期干物质产量、粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、粗脂肪和粗灰分含量，进一步用基于主成分和熵权法的综合多指标决策分析方法（technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution，TOPSIS）对饲用品质进行综合评价。结果表明，33个品种中具有干物质产量优势的有桂夏1号、桂夏5号、华夏3号、桂夏7号和桂夏4号。饲用品质较好的有南黑豆20、兰溪大黄豆、桂夏6号、桂夏7号和华夏3号。来自华南地区的华夏3号和桂夏7号是所有供试材料中产量和品质综合表现兼优的2个品种，可作为培育优质饲草大豆专用品种的候选材料。

关键词: 饲用大豆, 综合评价, 干物质产量, 品质, TOPSIS

Abstract: This study was aimed to explore the feeding potential of soybean(Glycine max (L.) Merrill) introduced from the south to the north,and enrich the annual legume forage resources in the Longdong Loess Plateau. Thirty-three soybean varieties origin from southeast China,south China and southwest China were introduced to the Longdong Loess Plateau. Dry matter yield and forage quality traits including crude protein,neutral detergent fiber,acid detergent fiber,crude fat and ash were measured. PCA-based TOPSIS with EW was used to evaluate forage quality. Among the varieties,Guixia 1,Guixia 5,Huaxia 3,Guixia7 and Guixia 4 had high yield. Nanhei 20,Lanxidahuangdou,Guixia 6,Guixia 7,Huaxia 3 had good forage quality. Huaxia 3 and Guixia 7 from the South China are two varieties with excellent comprehensive performance in both yield and quality,and can be used as candidate materials for cultivating high-quality forage soybean varieties in the Longdong Loess Plateau.

Key words: Forage soybean, Comprehensive evaluation, Dry matter yield, Nutritional quality, TOPSIS

中图分类号:

S565.1

安东, 来兴发, 邓建强, 韩天富, 沈禹颖. TOPSIS法评价南方大豆品种在黄土高原地区的饲用潜力[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1710-1717.

AN Dong, LAI Xing-fa, DENG Jian-qiang, HAN Tian-fu, SHEN Yu-ying. Evaluation of Feeding Potential of Soybean Varieties Origin from Southern China by the Method of TOPSIS[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1710-1717.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.030

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2019/V27/I6/1710

参考文献

[1] Willard C J. The time of harvesting soybeans for hayand seed[J]. Agronomy Journal. 1925,(17):157-168
[2] Boerma H R,Specht J E. Soybeans:improvement,production and uses[J]. Agricultural Systems,1987,83(1):110-111
[3] 乔玉梅. 禾本科牧草与大豆秸秆饲用产量和营养品质的研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2008:28-30
[4] 费志宏,贾贞,冷建田,等. 不同生态类型大豆品种光周期反应的鉴定[J]. 作物杂志,2009,b(04):52-55
[5] 刘汉中. 大豆引种中发育"延"、"促"效应之再论证[J]. 中国农业大学学报. 1988,7(1):89-96
[6] Craig C. Sheaffer,James H. Orf,Thomas E. DevineJ,et al. Yield and Quality of Forage Soybean[J]. Agronomy Journal,2001,93:99-106
[7] 龙会英,张德. 提那罗爪哇大豆引种及生产试验研究[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(2):420-423
[8] Chemey J H,Chemey D J R. Legume Forage Quality[J]. Journal of Crop Production,2002,5(1):261-284
[9] 郑敏娜,李荫藩,梁秀芝,等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 草地学报. 2014,22(3):631-637
[10] 郭克婷,龙腾芳,杨付新. 利用DTOPSIS法综合评价黄河流域棉花区试新品种[J]. 中国农学通报,2004,20(2):226-226
[11] 王郝为,侯振平,杨焕胜,等. 几种非常规粗饲料养分及其饲用价值的比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(1):189-194
[12] Van Soest P J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant,second edition[M]. Ithaca,New York:Cornell Univerity Press,1994:28-50
[13] Zhang J,Iwaasa A D,Han G,et al. Utilizing a multi-index decision analysis method to overall assess forage yield and quality of C3 grasses in the western Canadian prairies[J]. Field Crops Research,2018,222:12-25
[14] 费志宏,吴存祥,孙洪波,等. 以光周期处理与分期播种试验综合鉴定大豆品种的光温反应[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(8):1525-1531
[15] 宋雯雯. 中国大豆品种生育期组的精细划分与应用[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所),2016:31-35
[16] 邱楚婵,年海,赵祯丽,等. 华南三省区大豆生育期组划分的评价与研究[J]. 大豆科学,2015,34(04):555-564
[17] Devine T E,Hatley E O,Starner D E. Registration of ‘Tyrone’ Forage Soybean[J]. Crop Science,1998(6):17-20
[18] 韩路,贾志宽,韩清芳,等. 旱作条件下紫花苜蓿主要性状对产草量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(3):61-64
[19] Zhang Q,Bell L,Shen Y,et al. Indices of forage nutritional yield and water use efficiency amongst spring-sown annual forage crops in north-west China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2018,93(1):1-10
[20] Hintz R W,Albrecht K A,Oplinger E S. Yield and Quality of Soybean Forage as Affected by Cultivar and Management Practices[J]. Agronomy Journal,1992,84(5):795-798
[21] Hintz R W,Albrecht K A. Dry Matter Partitioning and Forage Nutritive Value of Soybean Plant Components[J]. Agronomy Journal,1994,86(1):59-62
[22] Seiter S,Altemose C E,Davis M H. Forage Soybean Yield and Quality Responses to Plant Density and Row Distance[J]. Agronomy Journal,2004,96(4):966-970
[23] Norman H C,Freind C,Masters D G,et al. Variation within and between two saltbush species in plant composition and subsequent selection by sheep[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2004,55(9):999-1007

TOPSIS法评价南方大豆品种在黄土高原地区的饲用潜力

Evaluation of Feeding Potential of Soybean Varieties Origin from Southern China by the Method of TOPSIS

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[5]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[6]	姚喜喜, 才华, 刘皓栋, 李长慧. 不同季节高寒草甸牧草瘤胃发酵特性和体外消化率分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[7]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[8]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[9]	宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 汪鹏斌, 童永尚, 李珍, 贺有龙, 汪海波. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[10]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[11]	董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 聂聪, 杨建, 张建波, 苟文龙, 马啸. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[12]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[13]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[14]	李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 佘智慧, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[15]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.