不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿叶片响应渍水胁迫的代谢组学分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.014

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3355-3363.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.014

不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿叶片响应渍水胁迫的代谢组学分析

宋佳阳, 胡瑜, 徐倩, 卢蕊, 胡龙兴

湖南农业大学农学院草业科学系, 湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2023-08-17 修回日期:2023-09-22 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-12-01
通讯作者: 卢蕊,E-mail:grass@hunau.edu.cn;胡龙兴,E-mail:704561850@qq.com
作者简介:宋佳阳(1999-),女,汉族,辽宁朝阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草抗逆分子机制研究,E-mail:2302481572@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上(32071877)；国家自然科学青年基金(32201456)；湖南省自然科学青年基金(2022JJ40174)资助

Metabolomic Analysis on the Response of Leaves of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy Levels to Waterlogging Stress

SONG Jia-yang, HU Yu, XU Qian, LU Rui, HU Long-xing

Department of Pratacultural Science, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410128, China

Received:2023-08-17 Revised:2023-09-22 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)叶片代谢的影响，本研究以两个不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿品种'SK 3010'(秋眠级2.5)和'WL 525HQ'(秋眠级8.0)为材料，通过液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)技术的代谢组学方法测定分析了渍水胁迫下叶片代谢产物的变化。结果表明：渍水胁迫下，'SK 3010'的代谢途径主要富集在苯丙氨酸代谢，酪氨酸代谢以及生物碱合成等；'WL 525HQ'主要富集在丙氨酸、天冬氨酸和谷氨酸代谢，D-氨基酸代谢，氨酰生物合成等代谢路径，其中谷氨酸、丝氨酸、谷氨酰胺和天冬酰胺等代谢产物含量显著上调。因此，丙氨酸、天冬氨酸和谷氨酸代谢，D-氨基酸代谢，氨酰生物合成等代谢路径提高了紫花苜蓿的耐渍性，为不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿耐渍性差异机制研究提供重要理论依据。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 秋眠级, 渍水胁迫, 代谢组学

Abstract: To determine the effects of waterlogging stress on leaf metabolism of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.),metabolomics method based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology was used to investigate the changes of leaf metabolites in two alfalfa varieties with different fall dormancy levels as:variety 'SK 3010’ (fall dormancy level 2.5) and 'WL 525HQ’ (fall dormancy level 8.0) under waterlogging stress. The results showed that the metabolic pathways of 'SK 3010’ were mainly concentrated in phenylalanine metabolism,tyrosine metabolism and alkaloid synthesis under waterlogging stress;while 'WL 525HQ’ was mainly concentrated in metabolism of alanine,aspartic acid and glutamate,D-amino acid metabolism,aminoacyl biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways,in which the content of metabolites such as glutamic acid,serine,glutamine and asparagine was significantly up-regulated. In conclusion,the metabolism of alanine,aspartic acid and glutamate,D-amino acid metabolism,aminoacyl biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways improved the stain resistance of alfalfa to waterlogging stress. This study could provide an important theoretical basis for the research on the different mechanisms for waterlogging tolerance of alfalfa varieties with different fall dormancy levels.

Key words: Alfalfa, Fall dormancy, Waterlogging stress, Metabolomics

中图分类号:

S963.22+3.3

宋佳阳, 胡瑜, 徐倩, 卢蕊, 胡龙兴. 不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿叶片响应渍水胁迫的代谢组学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3355-3363.

SONG Jia-yang, HU Yu, XU Qian, LU Rui, HU Long-xing. Metabolomic Analysis on the Response of Leaves of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy Levels to Waterlogging Stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(11): 3355-3363.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.11.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I11/3355

参考文献

[1] 俞雪. 紫花苜蓿生长相关基因的筛选及验证[D].石河子:石河子大学,2021:1
[2] 岑慧芳,黄洁琼,申王晖，等. 紫花苜蓿MsUGT87A1基因克隆及其对非生物胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1682-1692
[3] 孙延亮,赵宇哲,魏孔钦,等. 不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿茎和叶的碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(5):9-19
[4] KOFFI D,CURTIS O,KOMLAN K,et al. Evaluation of different fall dormancy-rating alfalfa cultivars for forage yield in a semiarid environment[J]. Agronomy,2020,10(1):146
[5] 李丹竹,曾宁波,张志飞,等. 渍水胁迫对不同磷水平下紫花苜蓿根系生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(6):1563-1571
[6] ZENG N,YANG Z,ZHANG Z,et al. Comparative transcriptome combined with proteome analyses revealed key factors involved in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) response to waterlogging stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2019,20(6):1359
[7] 张浩阳,刘美君,卫丹丹,等. 不同秋眠级苜蓿越冬前后叶片光合作用的比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(4):983-991
[8] DU H,SHI Y,LI D,et al. Screening and identification of key genes regulating fall dormancy in alfalfa leaves[J]. Plos One,2017,12(12):e0188964
[9] LIU Z,LI X,WANG Z,et al. Contrasting strategies of alfalfa stem elongation in response to fall dormancy in early growth stage:the tradeoff between internode length and internode number[J]. Plos One,2015,10(8):e0135934
[10] 张卫红,吴亚,刘大林,等. 水淹对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期生物学特性的影响[J]. 草学,2019(2):17-23
[11] 安渊,陈凡毅,王俊,等. 半秋眠和非秋眠紫花苜蓿品种耐涝性能研究[J]. 中国草地,2004(4):31-36
[12] BAILEY-SERRES J,VOESENEK L. Flooding stress:acclimations and genetic diversity[J].Annual Review of Plant Biology,2008,59:313-339
[13] LIMAMI A M,DIAB H,LOTHIER J. Nitrogen metabolism in plants under low oxygen stress[J]. Planta,2014,239(3):531-541
[14] GIBBS J,GREENWAY H. Review:Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth,survival and anaerobic catabolism[J]. Functional Plant Biology,2003,30(1):1-47
[15] BAXTER-BURRELL A,YANG Z,SPRINGER P S,et al. RopGAP4-dependent Rop GTPase rheostat control of Arabidopsis oxygen deprivation tolerance[J]. Science,2002,296(5575):2026-2028
[16] TAMANG B G,MAGLIOZZI J O,MAROOF M A S,et al. Physiological and transcriptomic characterization of submergence and reoxygenation responses in soybean seedlings[J]. Plant,Cell and Environment,2014,37(10):2350-2365
[17] KATSUHIRO S. Revision of biochemical pH-Stat:Involvement of alternative pathway metabolisms[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology,1998,39(5):467-473
[18] 姜威. 水稻耐淹基因Sub1A的克隆及在玉米中转化的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2012:2-3
[19] 李丹竹. 渍水胁迫对不同磷水平下紫花苜蓿生长和生理代谢的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2021:8
[20] 郭家鑫,鲁晓宇,陶一凡,等. 硫酸盐胁迫对棉花生理和代谢的影响[J]. 棉花学报,2022,34(6):479-493
[21] 柴华,杨曌,李红,等. 干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿抗旱性评价及代谢组学分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2023(7):94-105，135-137
[22] 杨杰,唐志璇,杜雅雯,等. 园林植物对淹水胁迫的生理及分子响应机理研究进展[J]. 南通大学学报(自然科学版),2023,22(1):34-43
[23] EDAS K,EROYCHOUDHURY A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science,2014,2:00053
[24] 赵雪瑶,韩丽霞,张鸽香. 淹水胁迫对美国流苏幼苗生理特性和叶片结构的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2023,43(3):410-420
[25] 李玲,张春雷,张树杰,等. 渍水对冬油菜苗期生长及生理的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2011,33(3):247-252
[26] 董慧. 淹水胁迫对不同苜蓿品种生长及生理生化变化的影响[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学,2015:7
[27] 于明倩. 基于代谢组与转录组的黄花苜蓿耐盐碱机制研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学,2021:20
[28] 杨艳婷. 扁蓿豆的碳氮代谢规律及其对低温胁迫的响应[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2022:7-8
[29] 邢芳芳,高明夫,周传志,等. 氨基酸与植物抗逆性关系的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2018(3):150-155
[30] SANCHEZ H D,LIPPOLD F,REDESTIG H,et al. Integrative functional genomics of salt acclimatization in the model legume Lotus japonicus[J]. Plant Journal,2008,53(6):973-987
[31] SANCHEZ H D,PIECKENSTAIN L F,SZYMANSKI J,et al. Comparative functional genomics of salt stress in related model and cultivated plants identifies and overcomes limitations to translational genomics[J]. Plos One,2011,6(2):e17094
[32] TOSHIHIRO O R A F. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses[J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences,2012,69(19):3225-3243
[33] QUAN J,ZHENG W W,TAN J R,et al. Glutamic acid and Poly-γ-glutamic acid enhanced the heat resistance of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) by improving carotenoid biosynthesis,photosynthesis,and ROS signaling[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2022,23(19):11671
[34] FRANZONI G,COCETTA G,FERRANTE A. Effect of glutamic acid foliar applications on lettuce under water stress[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants,2021,27(5):1059-1072
[35] 邢羽桐,滕永康,吴天凡,等. 高温干旱下缩节胺通过调节碳和氨基酸代谢提高Bt棉杀虫蛋白含量的生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学,2023,56(8):1471-1483
[36] WANG X C,YAN L C,W B,et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of grapevine rootstock in response to waterlogging stress [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:749184
[37] LESS H,GALILI G. Principal transcriptional programs regulating plant amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses[J]. Plant Physiology,2008,147(1):316-330
[38] KAVI B P K,RENUKA S,GUDDIMALLI R,et al. Lysine,lysine-rich,serine,and serine-rich proteins:link between metabolism,development,and abiotic stress tolerance and the role of ncRNAs in their regulation[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,11:546213
[39] 杨雄榜. 不同胁迫对不同生长期苦荞黄酮积累及其合成相关酶基因表达的影响[D]. 成都:四川农业大学,2014:5,24-27
[40] 龚意辉,李丽梅,黄华,等. 基于非靶向代谢组学分析黄桃果肉褐变过程中代谢产物的差异[J]. 中国食品学报,2023,23(2):265-275

不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿叶片响应渍水胁迫的代谢组学分析

Metabolomic Analysis on the Response of Leaves of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy Levels to Waterlogging Stress

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	唐芳, 梅亭, 高佳荷, 王佳妮, 石凤翎, 高翠萍. 紫花苜蓿GPAT基因家族鉴定及在盐碱胁迫下的表达模式分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2608-2620.
[2]	李乐, 李丹宁, 杨叶研, 潘新雅, 万懿琦, 张国云, 席杰军, 王亚芳, 杨培志. 干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿叶片代谢组分析及气孔调节物质的筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2671-2683.
[3]	刘嘉伟, 王明玖, 曹克璠, 何丽君, 郝新艳, 张慧敏, 郝璐. 基于代谢组学的‘蒙农三叶草1号’与结瘤相关的根系代谢物研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2703-2711.
[4]	王佳敏, 柴润东, 陈璐云, 冯渝茜, 朱梦杳, 马宏忠, 孙盛楠, 严学兵. 29个紫花苜蓿品种种子萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2722-2729.
[5]	夏方山, 王勃, 阴禹舟, 李尹琳, 岑慧芳, 朱慧森. 硒引发对紫花苜蓿幼苗抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2875-2881.
[6]	阚海明, 徐恒康, 鲁佳男, 孙鑫博, 武菊英. 不同丛枝菌根真菌接种对3种草地植物生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 1922-1930.
[7]	任忠敏, 刘畅, 李珊珊, 李波. 外源激素和⁶⁰Co-γ辐射对苜蓿愈伤组织分化及内源激素水平的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2162-2169.
[8]	岑慧芳, 黄洁琼, 申王晖, 朱慧森, 夏方山, 许涛. 紫花苜蓿MsUGT87A1基因克隆及其对非生物胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1682-1692.
[9]	郁伟杰, 苗一凡, 穆海婷, 贾雪, 闫冬, 徐博. 转录组学解析紫花苜蓿雄性不育系花粉败育机制[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1702-1713.
[10]	于思敏, 罗永忠, 康芳明, 邱应德, 李转桃. 干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1762-1771.
[11]	朱琨, 方志坚, 李帅, 王巍, 李波. 冻融及盐碱双重胁迫对苜蓿幼苗营养器官矿质离子吸收及运输的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1818-1825.
[12]	闫星全, 贾玉山, 格根图, 王志军, 赵牧其尔, 刘静怡, 珠娜, 孙鹏波. 原料含水量及添加剂种类对青贮苜蓿品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1861-1866.
[13]	王欣怡, 王晓倩, 刘亚玲, 晁跃辉. 紫花苜蓿MsMYB33基因克隆、亚细胞定位及转录自激活检测[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1331-1337.
[14]	陈超超, 李贺洋, 闫雨欣, 宋晴, 黄悠, 热孜亚·艾力, 张铁军. 20份紫花苜蓿种质对黄萎病的抗性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1425-1434.
[15]	路文杰, 吴聪, 齐晋云, 景亚泓. 生物炭和接种剂配施对紫花苜蓿生物量和土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1578-1587.