苜蓿青贮接种菌系Li6、Al2、Ru2的筛选及其发酵特性

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2004.02.010

›› 2004, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 124-128.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2004.02.010

苜蓿青贮接种菌系Li6、Al2、Ru2的筛选及其发酵特性

王小芬, 崔宗均, 胡跃高, 陈晓燕, 高丽娟, 张涛

中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京, 100094

收稿日期:2003-03-27 修回日期:2004-04-02 出版日期:2004-05-15 发布日期:2004-05-15
通讯作者: 崔宗均
作者简介:王小芬(1976- ),女,博士研究生,主要从事微生物群体功能及有机物资源再利用研究
基金资助:
农业部跨越计划项目"青刈黑麦、苜蓿产业化生产技术集成试验示范"(2000-24)

Selection of Inoculants of Li6、Al2、Ru2 for Alfalfa Silage and Analysis of Their Fermented Characteristics

WANG Xiao-fen, CUI Zong-jun, HU Yao-gao, CHEN Xiao-yan, GAO Li-juan, ZHANG Tao

College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2003-03-27 Revised:2004-04-02 Online:2004-05-15 Published:2004-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以pH值的降低迅速、稳定,L(+)乳酸积累量多为指标,通过连续的限制性培养,从发酵饲料、青贮苜蓿及乳酸菌制剂中分别筛选出Li6、Al2和Ru2三组菌系,以期作为苜蓿青贮用菌剂。该三组菌系均pH下降迅速,发出香甜气味,在玉米粉培养基、苜蓿汁培养基、MRS培养基中将pH稳定到3.8～4.0之间,所需时间分别为10h、16h和20h。气质联机分析结果表明,发酵液中含有较高的乙酸、乳酸,还有少量甲酸、丙酸等挥发性脂肪酸及丁二醇、乙酸乙酯、异丁醛、乙醛和乙酰胺等风味物质;在代谢产物中乙酸和乳酸占总代谢物的98%以上,其中L(+)乳酸的比率高达60%～70%。

关键词: 草原学, 苜蓿, 青贮, 菌系, 筛选, 发酵特性

Abstract: Aiming at a silage inoculant that could quickly debase and stabilize the pH value of fresh grass, and add to it more L(+) lactic acid, a continuous restricted cultivation of the material was carried on until three groupsof microbial community-Li6, A12-, Ru2-have been selected from fermented forage, a lfalfa silage and a lactic bacteria agent. The three groups of microbial community alignith the target: debasing the pH value quickly and inducing the silage to emit a sugary fragrance. Uultured in corn medium, alfalfa medium, and MRS,the three groups of microbial community cause the mediums’pH value to debase to 3.8~4.0 within 10 hours, 16 hours, and 20 hours respectively. Through GC-MS analysis, large amount of metabolic products such as lactic acid and acetic acid, and some formic acid and propionic acid are obtained. Other materials like butanediol, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde, glycerol are also produced. Among the metabolic products,lactic acid and acetic acid take 98% of the total, in which 60%~70% is L(+) lactic acid.

Key words: Grassland science, Alfalfa, Silage, Microbial community, Selection, Fermenting characteristic

中图分类号:

Q815
S816.53

王小芬, 崔宗均, 胡跃高, 陈晓燕, 高丽娟, 张涛. 苜蓿青贮接种菌系Li6、Al2、Ru2的筛选及其发酵特性[J]. , 2004, 12(2): 124-128.

WANG Xiao-fen, CUI Zong-jun, HU Yao-gao, CHEN Xiao-yan, GAO Li-juan, ZHANG Tao. Selection of Inoculants of Li6、Al2、Ru2 for Alfalfa Silage and Analysis of Their Fermented Characteristics[J]. , 2004, 12(2): 124-128.

参考文献

[1] 王堃,陈默君.苜蓿产业化生产技术[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2001.114～131
[2] McAllister T A, Feniuk R, Mir Z. et al. Inoculants for alfalfa silage: effects on aerobic stability, digestibility and the growth performance of feedlot steers[J]. Livestock Production Science,1998, (53):171～181
[3] Fredeen A H, McQueen R E, Browning D A. Effects of enzymes and nutrients in a bacterial inoculant on quality of timothy or alfalfa silage and dairy cow performance[J]. Can. J. Anim. sci,1991, (71): 781～791
[4] Sheperd A C, Maslanka M, Quinn D, King L Jr. Additives containing bacteria and enzymes for alfalfa silage[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 1995, (78): 565～672
[5] 康玉凡,陈树兴,徐延生.苜蓿草青贮方法与效果的实验研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,1999,(9):15～16
[6] Weinberg Z G, Muck R E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 1996, (19): 53～68
[7] 曹维平.食品调味技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.134～148
[8] McDonald P. The biochemistry of silage[M]. Chalcombe Publications. New York:Cambrian Printers, 1991. 81～136
[9] 冯树,张忠泽.混和菌一类值得重视的微生物资源[J].世界科技研究与发展,2001,22(3):44～47
[10] 纪亚君.青贮接种剂的应用研究概况[I].青海畜牧兽医杂志,1996,26(2):41～43
[11] Whittenbury R. An investigation of the lactic acid bacteria[D].PhD. Thesis, Edinburgh University,UK. 1961
[12] Mayne C S. An evaluation of an inoculant of Lactobacillus plantarum as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle[J].Anim. Prod, 1990, (51): 1～13
[13] 崔宗均,李美丹,朴哲.一组高效稳定纤维素分解菌复合系MC1的筛选及功能.环境科学,2002,23(3):36～39
[14] Kung L Jr, Tung S, Maciorowski K G, et al. Effect of plant cellwall-degrading enzymes and lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation and composition[J]. J. Dairy. Sci, 1991, (74):4284～4296
[15] Dunlop R H. Pathologenesis of ruminant lactic acidosis[A]. In:Advances in veterinary science and comparative medicine[C].New York. Academic Press,1972. 259～294

苜蓿青贮接种菌系Li6、Al2、Ru2的筛选及其发酵特性

Selection of Inoculants of Li6、Al2、Ru2 for Alfalfa Silage and Analysis of Their Fermented Characteristics

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈崎, 张岩, 霍晓伟, 伊风艳, 石凤翎, 高翠萍, 栗振义, 张志强. 紫花苜蓿MsTIFY10a基因对植物抗寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2786-2795.
[2]	王雪丽, 王云玲, 齐开源, 严海军, 王显国, 孟根其格木, 周立业. 水分调控对不同品种紫花苜蓿生产性能及土壤酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2808-2819.
[3]	刘茜, 陈薇薇, 高卉, 万伟帆, 赵坤, 胡海娜, 李海港. 紫花苜蓿幼苗氮磷养分吸收和根系特征对土壤磷和钼添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2820-2831.
[4]	石菁, 刘晓静, 李佳奇, 韩颜隆, 汪雪, 王静. 15个紫花苜蓿品种在民勤地区的适应性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2843-2853.
[5]	徐欣欣, 王莉娜, 丁雪妍, 刘庭玉, 孙志强, 马西青. 通辽地区不同类型玉米品种生产性能和青贮品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3068-3076.
[6]	王伟, 奇明嘎, 王志军, 赵牧其尔, 格根图. 不同添加剂及混合比例对全株玉米与饲用小黑麦混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3077-3087.
[7]	袁玉涛, 吴莉, 魏小星, 刘文辉, 陈有军, 何克燕, 周青平. 河西走廊半干旱区12个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能及品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3088-3098.
[8]	王恕平, 齐帅, 陈彦龙, 张蓓, 曹文侠, 焦婷. 河西灌区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能与发酵品质的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3099-3107.
[9]	刘钟歌, 常建萍, 祁鹤兴. 青贮玉米链格孢叶斑病菌全基因组解析及不同菌株中毒素合成基因的分布[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2433-2442.
[10]	安雯, 张新宇, 麻冬梅, 马巧利, 郎思睿, 刘晓霞. 紫花苜蓿MsNF-YB8基因的克隆及耐盐性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2456-2466.
[11]	张航, 刘艳君, 刘耀猛, 胡桂馨. 不同施钾处理苜蓿对豌豆蚜生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2467-2473.
[12]	邹雨琪, 王志军, 刘丽英, 原野, 潘泽宇, 孟和高勒, 宝乐尔, 格根图. 螺旋藻多肽对苜蓿发酵品质和微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2685-2693.
[13]	徐双鹏, 赵永琦, 董晓慧, 梁文斌, 尹国丽, 鱼小军. 乳酸菌添加剂对高寒牧区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混合青贮品质及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2694-2702.
[14]	陈浩, 高万顺, 王旭哲, 马春晖. 不同品种田菁与青贮玉米混贮的养分及发酵品质[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2713-2720.
[15]	吉凌鹤, 何傲蕾, 何峰, 李昌宁, 姚拓. 紫花苜蓿种子包衣材料筛选及其对种子萌发影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2728-2736.