渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期根系形态的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.016

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 420-428.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.016

渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期根系形态的影响

李丹竹, 张强, 徐倩, 张志飞, 刘宁芳, 曾宁波, 胡龙兴

湖南农业大学农学院草业科学系, 湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2019-11-11 修回日期:2020-01-03 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-04-11
通讯作者: 胡龙兴
作者简介:李丹竹(1997-),女,湖南永州人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草逆境分子生理研究,E-mail:934913765@qq.com
基金资助:
长沙市重点研发计划（kq1801019）；湖南省自然科学基金（2018JJ3223，2019JJ40135）资助

Effects of Waterlogging on Root Phenotype in Seedling Stage of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy

LI Dan-zhu, ZHANG Qiang, XU Qian, ZHANG Zhi-fei, LIU Ning-fang, ZENG Ningbo, HU Long-xing

Department of Pratacultural Science, College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410128, China

Received:2019-11-11 Revised:2020-01-03 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿（Medicago sativa）根系形态的影响，本研究以30个秋眠级为2~10.2的紫花苜蓿品种为材料，分析了渍水胁迫下苜蓿总根长、根系表面积和体积、根平均直径和根尖数的变化以及秋眠级与根系形态及耐渍性的相关性。结果表明：渍水胁迫下不同秋眠级苜蓿根系生长均受到抑制，总根长、根系体积和表面积以及根尖数呈下降趋势，而根平均直径呈上升趋势；苜蓿品种的秋眠级与总根长和根系表面积呈显著负相关；总根长与根系表面积、根系体积和根尖数呈极显著正相关，而根系平均直径与总根长、根系表面积和体积均呈极显著负相关。聚类分析表明耐渍性较强品种其秋眠级中等和较低，根的数量、表面积和体积均相对较高，而秋眠级较大的品种耐渍性较弱，其根系形态各参数较低，表明在渍水胁迫下，侧根生长旺盛，根数较多，有利于提高紫花苜蓿的耐渍性。

关键词: 渍水胁迫, 秋眠级, 紫花苜蓿, 根系形态

Abstract: In order to elucidate the effect of waterlogging stress on the root phenotype of alfalfa with different fall dormancy,the variations of total root length,root surface area,root volume,root average diameter,number of root tips,and the correlation of fall dormancy level with root phenotypic traits 30 alfalfal varieties with the fall dormancy scale of 2 to 10.2 were investigated. The results showed that the root growth were inhibited by waterlogging stress for all the varieties with different fall dormancy. There were a decreasing trend for total root length,root surface area,root volume and number of root tips,and an increasing trend for the root average diameter. Under waterlogging stress,fall dormancy level was negatively correlatedwith total root length and root surface area. Total root length was significantly positively correlated with root surface area,root volume and number of root tips,whereas average root diameter was significantly negatively correlated with total root length,root surface area and root volume. Cluster analysis revealed that the fall dormancy level of waterlogging tolerant varieties were intermediate and had a relatively high level of root number,root surface area and root volume,whereas the varieties with higher level of fall dormancy were mostly waterlogging sensitive and had a relatively lower root parameters. Those results indicated that the increased lateral roots and absorption area could contribute to the waterlogging tolerance of alfalfa.

Key words: Waterlogging stress, Fall dormancy, Alfalfa, Root phenotype

中图分类号:

S963.22+3.3

李丹竹, 张强, 徐倩, 张志飞, 刘宁芳, 曾宁波, 胡龙兴. 渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期根系形态的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 420-428.

LI Dan-zhu, ZHANG Qiang, XU Qian, ZHANG Zhi-fei, LIU Ning-fang, ZENG Ningbo, HU Long-xing. Effects of Waterlogging on Root Phenotype in Seedling Stage of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 420-428.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I2/420

参考文献

[1] 岳彦红,齐晓,王彦荣,等. 35个10龄紫花苜蓿品种的持久性比较[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(1):58-64
[2] 全瑞兰,玉永雄. 淹水对紫花苜蓿南北方品种抗氧化酶和无氧呼吸酶的影响[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(5):84-90
[3] 安渊,陈凡毅,王俊,等.半秋眠和非秋眠紫花苜蓿品种耐涝性能研究[J].中国草地,2004,26(4):31-36
[4] 王运涛,于林清,李景柱,等. 低温胁迫对5份苜蓿品种根系形态特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(1):101-106
[5] Herzog M,Striker G G,Colmer T D,et al. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat-a review of root and shoot physiology [J]. Plant & Cell Environment,2016,39(5):1068-86
[6] Sairam R K,Kumutha D,Ezhilmathi K,et al. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants[J]. Biologia Plantarum,2008,52(3):401-412
[7] Voesenek L A C J,Sasidharan R. Ethylene and oxygen signaling drive plant survival during flooding [J]. Plant Biology,2013,15(3):426-435
[8] 张卫红,吴亚,刘大林,等. 水淹对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期生物学特性的影响[J]. 草学,2019(2):17-23
[9] Yamauchi T,Colmer T D,Pedersen O,et al. Regulation of root traits for internal and tolerance to soil waterlogging-flooding stress [J]. Plant Physiology,2018,176(2):1118-1130
[10] Johnson L D,Marquez J J,Lamb J F S,et al. Root morphology of alfalfa plant introductions and culvars [J]. Crop Science,1998,38(2):497-502
[11] Marquez-Ortiz J J,Lamb F S,Johnson L D,et al. Heritability of crown trait in alfalfa [J]. Crop Science,1999,39(1):38-43
[12] Avice J C,Ourry A,Lemaire G,et al. Root protein and vegetative storage protein are key organic nutrients for alfalfa shoot regrowth [J]. Crop Science,1997,37(4):1187-1193
[13] 丁晓青,樊子菡,沈益新. 紫花苜蓿苗期根系生长的水分胁迫损伤及氮磷的修复生长作用[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(5):92-99
[14] 宋晓慧,张智杰,李春光,等. 淹水时间对不同耐涝性大豆品种苗期根部形态和叶部生理指标的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2014,33(1):70-72
[15] 王琼,张春雷,李光明,等. 渍水胁迫对油菜根系形态与生理活性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2012,34(2):157-162
[16] 严琼琼.南方渍水条件下紫花苜蓿根系结构的研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2013:20-32
[17] 刘法涛,杨志忠,条了汉. 地下水位与紫花苜蓿根深关系及其灌溉方法[J]. 中国草地,1995(3):48-49
[18] 陶茸,师尚礼,张翠梅,等. 外源香豆素和咖啡酸对紫花苜蓿根系形态建成与解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(2):404-412
[19] 李跃,李振松,苗丽宏,等. 不同生育期干旱对紫花苜蓿生长和根系ABA含量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(6):1245-1250
[20] 薛峥,张昆,唐海洋,等.营养水平对紫花苜蓿苗期根系生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(5):951-956
[21] 陈艳. 紫花苜蓿根系生长与地上部生长的相关性分析[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2011:30-42
[22] 吴新卫,韩清芳,贾志宽. 不同苜蓿品种根颈和根系形态学特性比较及根系发育能力[J]. 西北农业学报,2007(2):80-86
[23] 陈积山,李锦华,常根柱,等. 10个紫花苜蓿品种根系形态特征的研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2009(1):33-36
[24] 史纪安,刘玉华,韩清芳,等. 不同秋眠级数的紫花苜蓿品种根系发育能力研究[J]. 西北农业学报,2009,18(4):149-154
[25] 刘志英,李西良,李峰,等. 越冬紫花苜蓿根系性状与秋眠性的关系及其抗寒效应[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1689-1701
[26] Qi X,Li Q,Ma X,et al. Waterlogging-induced adventitious root formation in cucumber is regulated by ethylene and auxin through reactive oxygen species signaling [J]. Plant & Cell Environment,2019,42(5):1458-1470

渍水胁迫对不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿苗期根系形态的影响

Effects of Waterlogging on Root Phenotype in Seedling Stage of Alfalfa with Different Fall Dormancy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[2]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[3]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[5]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[6]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[7]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[8]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[9]	刘允熙, 罗佳佳, 雷健, 刘国道, 刘攀道. 柱花草磷高效种质筛选及根系形态对低磷胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 876-883.
[10]	杨洁, 单立山, 苏铭, 张正中, 解婷婷, 李毅. 降水量和生长方式对红砂和珍珠根系形态特征的影响研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 936-945.
[11]	黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 贾倩英, 李向阳, 张宏, 张振粉. 成团泛菌CQ10脂多糖对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及苗期生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[12]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.
[13]	李满有, 马忠仁, 王斌, 杨雨琦, 沈笑天, 曹立娟, 李小云, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区2个苜蓿品种不同行比混播模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[14]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[15]	陈德奎, 郭香, 郑明扬, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 砂仁精油对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.