白刺叶片解剖结构性状异速生长与生态适应性研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.015

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1150-1158.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.015

白刺叶片解剖结构性状异速生长与生态适应性研究

任尚福^1,2

1. 喀什大学生命与地理科学学院, 新疆喀什 844000;
2. 新疆帕米尔高原生物资源与生态重点实验室, 新疆喀什 844000

收稿日期:2021-10-19 修回日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-06-06
作者简介:任尚福(1973-),男,汉族,山东泰安人,博士,副教授,主要从事逆境植物生理学研究,E-mail:renshangfu@163.com

Allometric Growth and Ecological Adaptability of the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Nitrariaspp.

REN Shang-fu^1,2

1. College of Life and Geographic Sciences, Kashi University, Kashi, Xinjiang 844000, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecology of Pamirs Plateau in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Kashi, Xinjiang 844000, China

Received:2021-10-19 Revised:2021-11-10 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本实验以不同生境下3种白刺(西伯利亚白刺、大果白刺、唐古特白刺)叶片为研究对象，测量3种白刺的叶片解剖结构中叶片厚度、上角质层厚度、上表皮厚度、栅栏组织厚度、海绵组织厚度、下表皮厚度和下角质层厚度等性状指标，用经典异速方程(Y=βX^α)描述叶片解剖性状之间的关系。结果表明：不同生境的白刺叶片解剖性状均有显著性差异(P＜0.05)，均呈显著性幂指数异速生长关系，其异速系数表现显著性差异(P＜0.05)，其异速指数表现出两类完全不同的规律，一类是≈1，另一类是＜1，存在着资源分配的权衡。不同生境白刺叶片解剖性状的变异系数在0.10～0.45之间，属于相对稳定的系统演替性状。植物生境中的海拔高度、年降水量与年蒸发量是影响叶片性状的主要因素，3种白刺通过长期的外界异质性的环境因子驱动改变叶片结构性状，可以使其在不同的生境下朝着最适的异速生长曲线进化。

关键词: 白刺叶片, 解剖结构, 异速生长, 生态适应性

Abstract: In this experiment,the leaves of three species of Nitraria (Nitraria sibirica Pall.,N. roborowskii Kom.,N. tangutorum Bobr.) in different habitats were taken as the research objects. The leaf thickness,upper cuticle thickness,upper epidermis thickness,palisade tissue thickness,spongy tissue thickness,lower epidermis thickness and lower cuticle thickness in the leaf anatomical structure of three species of Nitrariain different habitats were measured. The relationship between leaf anatomical traits was described by the classical allometry equation (Y=βX^α). The results showed that there were significant differences in anatomical traits of leaves in different habitats (P<0.05),and they all showed a significant exponential allometric growth relationship. The allometric coefficient lgβ showed significant differences (P<0.05). The allometric index showed two completely different patterns,one was ≈1,and the other was <1. There was a trade-off between resource allocation. The coefficient of variation of leaf anatomical traits in different habitats ranged from 0.10 to 0.45,belonging to relatively stable systematic succession traits. Altitude,annual precipitation and annual evaporation are the main factors affecting leaf traits in plant habitats. Three Nitraria change leaf structural traits through long-term external heterogeneity of environmental factors,which can make them evolve towards the optimal allometric growth curve in different habitats.

Key words: Nitraria spp. leaf, Anatomical structure, Allometry growth, Ecological adaptability

中图分类号:

Q948.12

任尚福. 白刺叶片解剖结构性状异速生长与生态适应性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1150-1158.

REN Shang-fu. Allometric Growth and Ecological Adaptability of the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Nitrariaspp.[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1150-1158.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.05.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I5/1150

参考文献

[1] 许月,杨晓东,谢一鸣,等.浙江天童木本植物小枝的"大小-数量"权衡[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(12):1268-1276
[2] 刘艳芳.贡嘎山阔叶木本植物叶片解剖结构特征及其环境适应研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2015,26
[3] 孟婷婷,倪健,王国宏.植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):150-165
[4] 王勋陵,王静.植物的形态结构与环境[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,1989,105-138
[5] 徐高峰,申时才,张付斗.异质环境下入侵植物薇甘菊的适应性与繁殖特性[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(8):1258-1264
[7] EVANS J R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants[J]. Oecologia,1989,78:9-19
[8] 潘莎.植物叶代谢生态指数和叶性状随环境梯度变化的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014
[9] 张慧文,马剑英,孙伟,等.不同海拔天山云杉叶功能性状及其与土壤因子的关系[J].生态学报,2010,30(21):5747-5758
[10] 郭志华,王荣,肖文发.不同光环境下喜树与四川大头茶幼苗的表型可塑性[J].林业科学,2009,45(9):6-12
[11] 林华,陈双林,郭子武,等.苦竹叶片性状及其异速生长关系的密度效应[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(4):617-623
[12] BERTALANFY LV. Problems of life:an evaluation of modern biological thought[M]. Beijing:The Commercial Press,1999:141-168
[13] LABARBERA M. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.1989,20:97-117
[14] WHITE J. The allometrie interpretation of the self-thinning rule[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology,1981,8(3):475-503
[15] PETERS R H. The ecological implications of body size[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1986
[16] WEST G B,BROWN J H. The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems:towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology,2005,208:1575-1592
[17] NIINEMETS V,PORTSMUTH A,TENA D,et al. Do we Underestimate the Importance of Leaf Size in Plant Economics. Disproportional Scaling of Support Costs Within the Spectrum of Leaf[J]. Physiognomy.Annals of Botany,2007,100(2):283-303
[18] NIINEMETS V,PORTSMUTH A,TOBIAS M. Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems,petioles and midribs in temperate plants[J]. New Phytologist,2006,171(1):91-104
[19] JOHN G P,SCOFFONI C,SACK L. Allometry of cells and tissues within leaves[J]. American Journal of Botany,2013,100(10):1936-1948
[20] 吴征镒.中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J].云南植物研究(增刊),1991:1-139
[21] 吴征镒,路安民,汤彦承,等.中国被子植物科属综论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.759-764
[22] 刘金环,曾德慧.科尔沁沙地东南部地区主要植物叶片性状及其相互关系[J].生态学杂志.2006,25(8):921-925
[23] 张发起,付鹏程,高庆波,等.蒺藜科及由其分出的两新科四种植物种子形态特征比较研究[J].植物分类与资源学报,2013,35(3):280-284
[24] 李正理.植物制片技术[M].北京:科学出版社.1987:10-15
[25] 孙俊,王满堂,程林,等.不同海拔典型竹种枝叶大小异速生长关系[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):165-172
[26] MARTINS T G,SIMPSON D,LINDGREN F. Bayesian computing with INLA:new features[J]. Computational Statistics&Data Analysis,2013,67(11):68-83
[26] 张海娜,苏培玺,李善家,等.荒漠区植物光合器官解剖结构对水分利用效率的指示作用[J].生态学报,2013,33(16):4909-4918
[27] 黄文娟,焦培培,黄金花,等.塔里木河流域胡杨叶片解剖结构比较研究[J].植物研究,2016,36(5):669-675
[27] JEREMY M,WILLIAM B. Leaf size and inflorescence size may be allometrically related traits[J]. Oecologia,1989,78(3):427-429
[28] 张咏梅,白小明,田彥锋,等. 8种禾本科观赏草叶片解剖学特征的描述及其适应性分析[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1370-1376
[29] 史广东,孟林,毛培春,等.偃麦草属植物叶片表皮形态与结构研究[J].草地学报,2009,17(5):655-664
[30] 蔡永立,王希华.中国东部亚热带青冈种群叶片的生态解剖机[J].生态学报.1999,19(6):844-949
[31] SUN C S,DONG M J,PEI L S. The Leaf Size-Twig Size Spectrum of Temperate Woody Species Along an Altitudinal Gradient:An Invariant Allometric Scaling Relationship[J]. Annals of Botany,2006,97(1):97-107
[32] WESTOBY M,FALSTER D S,MOLES A T,et al. PLANT ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES:Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology&Systematics,2002,33(1):125-159
[33] 严德福,杨允菲,赵明清.松嫩平原异质生境芦苇种群叶片的表型可塑性[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版,2012,44(2):78-83
[34] YANG S D,CHEN G C,ZHANG C L,et al. Some difference of capacity of osmotic regulation between lanceolate and broad-ovate leaves in Populus euphratica[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2004,(9):1583-1586
[35] 徐建英,刘新新,冯琳,等.生态补偿权衡关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(20):6901-6907
[36] PRICE C A,OGLE K,WHITE E P,et al. Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches[J]. Ecology Letters,2009,12(7):641-651
[37] 陈庆诚,孙仰文,张国樑.疏勒河中,下游植物群落优势种生态-形态解剖特性的初步研究[J].兰州大学学报,1961(3):61-96
[38] WWINER J. Allocation,plasticity and allometry in plants[J]. Perspectivesin Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2004,6(4):207-215
[38] JEREMY M,WILLIAM B. Leaf size and inflorescence size may be allometrically related traits[J]. Oecologia,1989,78(3):427-429
[40] 陶冶,张元明.准噶尔荒漠6种类短命植物生物量分配与异速生长关系[J].草业学报,2014,23(2):38-48
[41] 陆霞梅,周长芳,安树青.植物的表型可塑性,异速生长及其入侵能力[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(9):1438-1444
[42] KOZLOWSKI J,KONARZEWSKI M,GAWELCZYK A T. Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolicrate scaling[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003(18):283-289
[43] 白潇,李毅,苏世平,等.不同居群唐古特白刺叶片解剖特征对生境的响应研究[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(10):1986-1993
[44] 李芳兰,包维楷.植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J].植物学通报,2005(S1):118-127
[45] HUANG Y X. Evaluating general allometric models:interspecific and intraspecific data tell different stories due to interspecific variation in stem tissue density and leaf size[J]. Oecologia,2016(180):671-684
[46] SULTAN S E. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation[J]. Acta Botanica Neerlandica,1995,44(4):363-383

[1]	张博, 程杰, 王淑红, 刘晶, 杨雪, 晏昕辉, 李伟. 氮添加和放牧对云雾山草原优势种异速生长模式的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1983-1991.
[2]	朱琨, 郑桂华, 刘丽杰, 周璐, 李珊珊, 范震宇, 钟玥, 尼尼. 草地早熟禾叶片表皮解剖结构与抗白粉病性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1430-1435.
[3]	刘梦瑶, 李伟琼, 王铁娟. 差不嘎蒿茎叶解剖特征及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1118-1124.
[4]	潘新雅, 李军保, 陈阳, 王鹏飞, 卫先伟, 李瑞, 刘佳茜, 郑智龙, 徐炳成, 王智. 6个紫花苜蓿品种根系形态结构对低磷胁迫的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2494-2504.
[5]	左晨, 王梦亭, 王礼欣, 陶冶. 不同生境大托叶猪屎豆构件生物量分配的权衡特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 454-460.
[6]	张咏梅, 白小明, 田彥锋, 龚良建. 4种观赏草叶片解剖结构的观察及其对环境的适应性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1377-1383.
[7]	洪雪男, 杨允菲. 松嫩平原赖草无性系构件生长的可塑性及其规律[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 371-376.
[8]	陶茸, 师尚礼, 张翠梅, 陈建纲, 王晓瑛. 外源香豆素和咖啡酸对紫花苜蓿根系形态建成与解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 404-412.
[9]	乌仁, 秦小静, 孙健. 放牧对藏北高寒草地优势种和伴生种生物量分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1313-1321.
[10]	陈阳, 金一锋, 孙华山, 赵春丽, 王琦, 王玉书. 草地早熟禾的石蜡切片制作技术的优化[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1376-1379.
[11]	朱天琦, 刘晓静, 张晓玲. 氮营养调控对紫花苜蓿根系形态及其解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1290-1295.
[12]	黄迎新, 宋彦涛, 范高华, 周道玮. 灰绿藜形态性状与繁殖性状的异速关系[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 905-913.
[13]	郝凤, 刘晓静, 张晓玲. NH₄⁺-N对紫花苜蓿输导组织解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 963-967.
[14]	武瑞鑫, 邵新庆, 胡新振, 钟梦莹, 位晓婷, 潘多, 张德罡. 披针叶黄华茎叶性状对不同草地管理措施的响应及其生长关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 476-482.
[15]	杨文权, 褚继鹏, 寇建村, 赵娇, 韩明玉. 遮阴对白三叶叶片解剖结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 653-656.

白刺叶片解剖结构性状异速生长与生态适应性研究

Allometric Growth and Ecological Adaptability of the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Nitrariaspp.

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价