黄土高原果园不同覆盖模式对土壤酶活性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.007

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2581-2589.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.007

• • 上一篇

黄土高原果园不同覆盖模式对土壤酶活性的影响

田玉莉¹, 吴小苹¹, 陈欣佛², 郭亚茹¹, 李泽林¹, 倪新华¹, 张嘉涛¹, 李会科¹

1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 青海省水文水资源测报中心, 青海西宁 810009

收稿日期:2022-02-20 修回日期:2022-04-27 发布日期:2022-11-05
通讯作者: 李会科,E-mail:lihuike@nwafu.edu.cn
作者简介:田玉莉(1997-),女,汉族,四川德阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态环境工程研究,E-mail:1849664657@qq.com
基金资助:
果园地力提升及有机替代化肥减肥增效关键技术研究与示范(K3300220205)资助

Effect of Diversity Mulching Model on Soil Enzyme Activities in the Loess Plateau Orchard

TIAN Yu-li¹, WU Xiao-ping¹, CHEN Xin-Fo², GUO Ya-ru¹, LI Ze-lin¹, NI Xin-hua¹, ZHANG Jia-tao¹, LI Hui-ke¹

1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shannxi Province 712100, China;
2. Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau of Qinghai Province, Xining, Qinghai Province 810009, China

Received:2022-02-20 Revised:2022-04-27 Published:2022-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究土壤绝对酶活性和相对酶活性在果园不同覆盖模式下的变化特征及相关影响因素，为果园土壤质量评价提供理论依据，本试验以传统清耕(Conventional tillage,CT)为对照，研究秸秆(Corn stalk,CS)、黑麦草(Lolium perenne L. Ryrgrass,RE)和白三叶(Trifolium repens L. White clover，WC)处理下α-葡萄糖苷酶(α-glucosidase，AG)、β-葡萄糖苷酶(β-glucosidase，BG)、β-木糖苷酶(β-xylosidase，BXYL)、纤维二糖苷酶(Cellobiosidase,CBH)、乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(Acetylglucosaminidase,NAG)、亮氨酸氨基肽酶(L-leucine aminopeptidase,LAP)和碱性磷酸酶(Alkaline phosphatase,ALP)变化特征及影响因素。结果表明，覆盖措施不同程度提高了0~40 cm各土层土壤绝对酶活性。AG，BG，BXYL，CBH，NAG和ALP活性表现为CS>RE>WC>CT，LAP表现为WC>CS>RE>CT。不同覆盖下土壤相对酶活性变化与绝对酶活性基本一致。冗余分析表明，土壤酶活性与有机碳、全氮、全磷等土壤理化因子含量正相关，而与pH值和容重负相关，有机碳、硝态氮和铵态氮含量是影响土壤酶活性的关键环境因素。

关键词: 土壤绝对酶活性, 土壤相对酶活性, 覆盖模式, 黄土高原, 苹果园

Abstract: To provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation of soil quality and the extension of mulching technology in the orchard,this study investigated the change characteristics of soil absolute enzyme activity and specific enzyme activity and related influencing factors under different mulching models. Compared with conventional tillage (CT),characteristics and influencing factors of seven soil enzyme activities including α-glucosidase,β-glucosidase,β-xylosidase,cellobiohydrolase,acetylglucosaminidase,leucine aminopeptidase and alkaline phosphatase under corn straw (CS),ryegrass (RE) and white clover (WC) were analyzed. The results showed that the orchard mulching increased the absolute enzyme activity of 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm soil in different degrees. The activity of AG,BG,BXYL,CBH,NAG and ALP showed CS>RE>WC>CT,while LAP showed WC>CS>RE>CT. The change of soil-specific enzyme activities per unit of organic carbon under different mulching treatments was consistent with the soil absolute enzyme activity. Redundancy analysis showed that soil enzyme activity was positively correlated with soil nutrient factors such as organic carbon,total nitrogen,total phosphorus,while negatively correlated with soil pH ralue and bulk density. Organic carbon,nitrate nitrogen,and ammonium nitrogen are the key environmental factors affecting soil absolute and specific enzyme activities.

Key words: Soil absolute enzyme activity, Soil specific enzyme activity, Mulching model, Loess Plateau, Apple orchard

中图分类号:

S154.1

田玉莉, 吴小苹, 陈欣佛, 郭亚茹, 李泽林, 倪新华, 张嘉涛, 李会科. 黄土高原果园不同覆盖模式对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2581-2589.

TIAN Yu-li, WU Xiao-ping, CHEN Xin-Fo, GUO Ya-ru, LI Ze-lin, NI Xin-hua, ZHANG Jia-tao, LI Hui-ke. Effect of Diversity Mulching Model on Soil Enzyme Activities in the Loess Plateau Orchard[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2581-2589.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I10/2581

参考文献

[1] 李会科,赵政阳,张广军.果园生草的理论与实践——以黄土高原南部苹果园生草实践为例[J].草业科学,2005,22(8):32-37
[2] 李会科,张广军,赵政阳,等.渭北黄土高原旱地果园生草对土壤物理性质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(7):2070-2076
[3] 张道勇,李会科,郭宏,等.间作白三叶对苹果/白三叶复合系统土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(5):39-45
[4] WANG Y J,HUANG Q Q,LIU C,et al. Mulching Practices Alter Soil Microbial Functional Diversity and Benefit to Soil Quality in Orchards on the Loess Plateau[J]. Environtmenal Management,2020,271:110985
[5] YANG J F,DUAN Y M,ZHANG R Q,et al. Connecting Soil Dissolved Organic Matter to Soil Bacterial Community Structure in a Long-term Grass-mulching Apple Orchard[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2020,149:112344
[6] 宋霄君,吴会军,梁国鹏,等.长期保护性耕作可提高表层土壤碳氮含量和根际土壤酶活性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(6):1588-1597
[7] 周玮,王应飞,李玲.黔中岩溶区不同土层厚度土壤碳、氮、磷含量及其转化酶的活性[J].贵州农业科学,2017,45(3):76-79
[8] XU H W,QU Q,LU B B,et al. Response of Soil Specific Enzyme Activity to Vegetation Restoration in the Loess Hilly Region of China[J]. Catena,2020,191:104564
[9] DE O S,DE M E,DUDA G P,et al. Seasonal Effect of Land Use Type on Soil Absolute and Specific Enzyme Activities in a Brazilian semi-arid Region[J]. Catena,2019,172:397-407
[10] STONE M M,PLANTE A F. Changes in Phosphatase Kinetics With Soil Depth Across a Variable Tropical Landscape[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,71:61-67
[11] GUAN H L,FAN J W,LU X. Soil Specific Enzyme Stoichiometry Reflects Nitrogen Limitation of Microorganisms under Different Types of Vegetation Restoration in the Karst Areas[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2022,169:104253
[12] YU P J,TANG X G,ZHANG A C,et al. Responses of Soil Specific Enzyme Activities to Short-term Land Use Conversions in a Salt-affected Region,Northeastern China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2019,687:939-945
[13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第三版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-112
[14] ZHANG R Q,HUANG Q Q,YAN T Y,et al. Effects of Intercropping Mulch on the Content and Composition of Soil Dissolved Organic Matter in Apple Orchard on the Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Management,2019,250:109531
[15] DEFOREST J L. The Influence of Time,Storage Temperature,and Substrate Age on Potential Soil Enzyme Activity in Acidic Forest Soils Using MUB-linked Substrates and l-DOPA[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2009,41(6):1180-1186
[16] QI R,LI J,LIN Z,et al. TemperaTure Effects on Soil Organic Carbon,Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions,and Soil Enzyme Activities under Long-term Fertilization Regimes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2016,102:36-45
[17] 温晓霞,殷瑞敬,高茂盛,等.不同覆盖模式下旱作苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物数量时空动态研究[J].西北农业学报,2011,20(11):82-88
[18] 侯婷,闫鹏科,庞群虎,等.行内覆盖对果园土壤特性及酿酒葡萄产量和品质的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2019,53(6):869-875
[19] 寇建村,杨文权,韩明玉,等.行间种植豆科牧草对苹果园土壤微生物区系及土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2013,21(4):676-682
[20] CENINI V L,FORNARA D A,MCMULLAN G,et al. Linkages between Extracellular Enzyme Activities and the Carbon and Nitrogen Content of Grassland Soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,96:198-206
[21] ZHAO S,LI K,ZHOU W,et al. Changes in Soil Microbial Community Enzyme Activitiesand Organic Matter Fractions under Long-term Straw Return in North-central China[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2016,216:82-88
[22] ZHENG W,GONG Q L,ZHAO Z Y,et al. Changes in the Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Enzyme Activities after Intercrop Mulch with Cover Crop for Eight Years in an Orchard[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2018,86:34-41
[23] SONG YY,SONG CC,SHI F X,et al. Linking Plant Community Composition with the soil C pool,N Availability and Enzyme Activity in Boreal Peatlands of Northeast China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2019,140:144-154
[24] 肖力婷,杨慧林,黄文新,等.生草栽培对南丰蜜橘园土壤酶活性及氮循环功能微生物的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(6):1476-1484
[25] WANG Y J,HUANG Q Q,GAO H,et al. Long-term Cover Crops Improved Soil Phosphorus Availability in a Rain-fed Apple Orchard[J]. Chemosphere,2021,275:130093
[26] KATSALIROU E,DENG S,GERAKIS A,et al. Long-term Management Effects on Soil P,Microbial Biomass P,and Phosphatase Activities in Prairie soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2016,76:61-69
[27] RAIESI F,BEHESHTI A. Soil Specific Enzyme Activity Shows More Clearly Soil Responses to Paddy Rice Cultivation than Absolute Enzyme Activity in Primary Forests of Northwest Iran[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2014,75:63-70
[28] QIAN X,GU J,PAN H J,et al. Effects of Living Mulches on the Soil Nutrient Contents,Enzyme Activities,and Bacterial Community Diversities of Apple Orchard Soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2015,70:23-30
[29] ZHENG W,GONG Q L,LV F L,et al. Tree-scale Spatial Responses of Extracellular Enzyme Activities and Stoichiometry to Different Types of Fertilization and Cover Crop in an Apple Orchard[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2020,99:103207
[30] LAGOMARSINO A,BENEDETTI A,MARINARI S,et al. Soil Organic C Variability and Microbial Functions in a Mediterranean Agro-forest Ecosystem[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2011,47(3):283-291
[31] DING W B,WANG F,DONG Y Y,et al. Effects of RainwaterHarvesting System on Soil Moisture in Rain-fed Orchards on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2021,243:106496
[32] FANSLER S J,SMITH J L,BOLTON H,et al. Distribution of Two C Cycle Enzymes in Soil Aggregates of a Prairie Chronosequence[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2005,42(1):17-23
[33] BASTIDA F,ZSOLNAY A,HERNANDEZ T,et al. Past,Present and Future of Soil Quality Indices:A Biological Perspective[J]. Geoderma,2008,147(3):159-171
[34] 魏倩倩,寇建村,李尚玮,等.苹果园覆盖白三叶对土壤微生物和营养特性的影响[J].草地学报,2016,24(3):544-552
[35] 赵思腾,师尚礼,陈建纲,等.陇中旱作区不同轮作方式对土壤碳、氮含量及酶活性的影响特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(4):817-824
[36] 方凯凯,贾曼莉,杜毅飞,等.生草栽培下果园土壤酶活性与肥力因子的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(8):461-466
[37] BANERJEE S,BORA S,THRALL P H,et al. Soil C and N as Causal Factors of Spatial Variation in Extracellular Enzyme Activity Across Grassland-woodland Ecotones[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2016,105:1-8
[38] DEFOREST J L,MOORHEAD D L. Effects of Elevated pH and Phosphorus Fertilizer on soil C,N and P Enzyme Stoichiometry in an Acidic MixeD mesophytic Deciduous Forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2020,150:107996
[39] ALLISON S D,VITOUSEK P M. Responses of Extracellular Enzymes to Simple and Complex Nutrient Inputs[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2005,37(5):937-944
[40] RAIESI F,SALEK-GILANI S. The Potential Activity of Soil Extracellular Enzymes as an Indicator for Ecological Restoration of Rangeland Soils after Agricultural Abandonment[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2018,126:140-147
[41] HOU E Q,CHEN C R,WEN D Z,et al. Phosphatase Activity in Relation to Key Litter and Soil Properties in Mature Subtropical Forests in China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2015,515-516:83-91
[42] YU P,TANG X,ZHANG A,et al. Responses of Soil Specific Enzyme Activities to Short-term Land Use Conversions in a Salt-affected Region,Northeastern China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2019,687(3):939-945

黄土高原果园不同覆盖模式对土壤酶活性的影响

Effect of Diversity Mulching Model on Soil Enzyme Activities in the Loess Plateau Orchard

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李渊, 张清平, 王涛, 沈禹颖. 施肥对黄土高原紫花苜蓿草地N₂O通量及生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1584-1589.
[2]	尉剑飞, 王誉陶, 张翼, 张昊, 李建平. 黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 532-543.
[3]	李兴龙, 师尚礼, 黄宗昌, 李革革, 吴芳, 张辉辉. 黄土丘陵区不同饲草混播模式对种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326.
[4]	陈利云, 汪之波, 呼丽萍. 6种豆科绿肥植物与苹果树套种对果园土壤碳氮特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 671-676.
[5]	白岗栓, 郭江平, 杜建会. 自然生草对渭北旱塬苹果园小气候及果实灼伤和早期落叶病的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 324-332.
[6]	郭建鑫, 李金升, 唐士明, 李佳欢, 王堃. 黄土高原与内蒙古高原草原种子植物区系比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 298-305.
[7]	韩炳宏, 牛得草, 袁晓波, 任运涛, 石明明, 吴让, 傅华. 围封与放牧措施下生物土壤结皮发育及其微生境土壤养分特征[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1218-1225.
[8]	李尚玮, 杨文权, 赵冉, 韩明玉, 寇建村. 果树行间生草对苹果园土壤肥力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 895-900.
[9]	魏倩倩, 寇建村, 李尚玮, 方国文, 慕小倩, 韩明玉. 苹果园覆盖白三叶对土壤微生物和营养特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 544-552.
[10]	寇建村, 魏倩倩, 杨文权, 李鹏举, 谢道雷, 韩明玉. 垄上覆盖牧草对苹果园垄沟中土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 337-343.
[11]	王亚飞, 樊军, 贾沐霖. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区植被恢复中土壤水分变化[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 344-350.
[12]	易彩琼, 王胜, 樊军. 黄土高原坡地退耕恢复草地的土壤水分动态[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1182-1189.
[13]	贾沐霖, 樊军, 王亚飞. 水蚀风蚀交错区复合植被与单一植被土壤水分特征及其地上生物量差异[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1197-1205.
[14]	杨文权, 褚继鹏, 寇建村, 赵娇, 韩明玉. 遮阴对白三叶叶片解剖结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 653-656.
[15]	董扬红, 曾全超, 李娅芸, 李鑫, 张宏, 安韶山. 黄土高原不同植被类型土壤活性有机碳组分分布特征[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 277-284.