燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.002

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 2582-2589.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.002

燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展

南铭¹, 柴继宽², 景芳², 张丽娟¹, 闵庚梅¹, 刘亚锋², 刘彦明³, 李晶³, 赵桂琴²

1. 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
3. 定西市农业科学研究院, 甘肃定西 743000

收稿日期:2023-02-17 修回日期:2023-03-17 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-10-07
通讯作者: 赵桂琴,E-mail:zhaogq@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:南铭(1983-),男,汉族,甘肃通渭人,博士,副研究员,主要从事燕麦种质资源创新利用研究,E-mail:cedar_nanming@126.com
基金资助:
甘肃省农业科学院人才引进项目(2023GAAS44)；国家农业科技专项(NK2022140202-2);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-07-C-1)资助

Research Advances on Lodging Resistance of Oat (Avena stiva.L)

NAN Ming¹, CHAI Ji-kuan², JING Fang², ZHANG Li-juan¹, MIN Geng-mei¹, LIU Ya-feng², LIU Yan-ming³, LI Jing³, ZHAO Gui-qin²

1. Crop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
3. Dingxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dingxi, Gansu Province 743000, China

Received:2023-02-17 Revised:2023-03-17 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-10-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 倒伏是影响燕麦产量和品质的重要因素之一,也是目前燕麦育种和生产中亟需解决的突出问题。加强燕麦抗倒伏生理和分子机制的系统研究,对促进燕麦抗倒伏种质创新和丰产高效栽培具有重要意义。基于此,本文对燕麦倒伏方面的研究进行了系统总结,梳理了燕麦倒伏发生的影响因素和抗倒伏性鉴定评价现状,综述了燕麦抗倒伏形态学、生理学及解剖学等方面的研究进展,归纳了植株形态、理化物质、栽培措施等与燕麦倒伏的关系。并针对燕麦茎秆力学性能与内源物质合成,抗倒伏相关性状全基因组关联分析(Genome wide association study,GWAS)分析及数量性状位点(Quantitative trait locus,QTL)定位,功能基因挖掘与分子机制解析等研究进行了展望,旨在为我国燕麦遗传改良和抗倒品种选育提供参考,进而推动燕麦抗逆性研究的发展。

关键词: 燕麦, 抗倒伏, 影响因素, 鉴定评价

Abstract: Lodging is one of the important factors affecting the yield and quality of oat. It is a prominent problem to be solved urgently in the breeding and production of oat. Strengthening the systematic research on the physiological and molecular mechanisms of oat lodging resistance is of great significance for promoting the germplasm innovation of oat lodging resistance and cultivation with high yield and high efficiency. Based on that objective,the study on lodging of oats is summarized systematically up in this paper,the influencing factors of lodging occurrence and the status quo of lodging resistance evaluation of oat were combed,the research progress in the morphology,physiology and anatomy of lodging resistance of oat was reviewed,the relationship of plant morphology,physical and chemical substances and cultivation measures with the lodging of oat was summarized up as well. In this paper,we prospected the researches on the characteristics of stem mechanics,endogenous material synthesis,genome wide association study (GWAS) of lodging resistance traits and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping.,functional gene mining and molecular mechanism analysis of oat,in order to provide references for the genetic improvement and breeding of the inverted resistance varieties of oat,and promote the development of researches on stress resistance of oat.

Key words: Oat, Lodging resistance, Influencing factor, Identification evaluation

中图分类号:

S153

南铭, 柴继宽, 景芳, 张丽娟, 闵庚梅, 刘亚锋, 刘彦明, 李晶, 赵桂琴. 燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2582-2589.

NAN Ming, CHAI Ji-kuan, JING Fang, ZHANG Li-juan, MIN Geng-mei, LIU Ya-feng, LIU Yan-ming, LI Jing, ZHAO Gui-qin. Research Advances on Lodging Resistance of Oat (Avena stiva.L)[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2582-2589.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I9/2582

参考文献

[1] ZHOU X,JELLE V,MURPH Y,et al. Progenitor germplasm of domesticated hexaploid oat[J]. Crop Science,1999,39(4):1208
[2] 刘欢,赵桂琴. 燕麦抗逆性研究进展[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(6):63-68
[3] 赵桂琴. 饲用燕麦及其栽培加工[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2016:12-15
[4] 任长忠,胡跃高. 中国燕麦学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2013:44-47
[5] 南铭,赵桂琴,柴继宽,等. 黄土高原半干旱区饲用燕麦种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(6):1197-1205
[6] 田保明,杨光圣. 农作物倒伏及其评价方法[J]. 中国农学通报,2005(7):111-114
[7] CLONINGER F D,ZUBER M S,CALVRET O J,et al. Methods of evaluating stalk quality in corn[J]. Phytopathology,1970,60(2):295-300
[8] STERLING M,BAKER C J,BERRY P M,et al. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2003,119(3):149-165
[9] HAMILTON D G. Certain oat culm characters and their relationship to lodging[J]. Science Agriculture,1941,21(10):646-676
[10] 黄文辉,王会,梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志,2018(4):13-19
[11] MURPHY H C,PETR F,FREY K J. Lodging resistance studies in oat[J]. Agriculture Journal,1958,50:609-611
[12] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 不同燕麦品种茎秆形态特征与抗倒伏性的关系[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1383-1391
[13] 南铭. 燕麦抗倒伏生理机制及茎秆木质素合成基因表达研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2021:20-21
[14] 梁国玲,刘文辉,张永超,等. 倒伏发生对燕麦籽粒灌浆进程及非结构性碳水化物的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(4):1024-1033
[15] WELTON F A. Lodging in oats and wheat[J]. Botanical Gazatte,1928,85:111-151
[16] MARSHALL H G,KOLB F L,ROTH G W. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate,seeding rate,and row spacing on semi-dwarf and conventional height spring oat[J]. Crop Science,1986,27:572-575
[17] PENDLETON J W. The effect of lodging on spring oat yields and test weights[J]. Agronomy Journal,1954,46:265-267
[18] 赵孟圆. 缩节胺、矮壮素及氮钾配比对燕麦抗倒伏及产量的影响[D]. 张家口:河北北方学院,2021:52-54
[19] DIOGENES C S,SIMONE S B,LUCIANO A E,et al. Morphological traits of stem to indirect selection of resistance to lodging in Avena sativa L.[J]. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology,2022(50):39-50
[20] 杨晶,刘文辉,梁国玲,等. 高寒地区不同燕麦品系抗倒伏相关性状分析[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(12):50-60
[21] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 半干旱区燕麦品种茎秆理化特性及其与抗倒性的关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(5):1284-1290
[22] 南铭,李晶,赵桂琴,等. 茎秆基部节间特性和木质素合成与燕麦抗倒伏的关系[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(11):172-180
[23] 内蒙古农研所粮作室莜麦专业. 莜麦抗倒伏品种形态特征的初步研究[J]. 内蒙古农业科技,1978(12):19-21
[24] 刘刚,赵桂琴. 灰色系统理论在燕麦抗倒伏综合评价中的应用[J]. 草业科学,2006,10(23):24-27
[25] 陈有军,周青平,孙建,等. 不同燕麦品种田间倒伏性状研究[J]. 作物杂志,2016(5):44-49
[26] 葛军勇,张斌,王霞,等. 不同应用类型裸燕麦品种的茎秆抗倒伏特性评价[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2018,41(5):7-12
[27] 纪明雪,张智勇,齐冰洁,等. 燕麦种质资源抗倒伏及生物学性状的差异评价[J]. 麦类作物学报,2022,42(10):1-10
[28] 郑殿升,王晓鸣,张京.燕麦种质资源描述规范与数据标准[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2006:9-11
[29] 任长忠,杨才. 中国燕麦品种志[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2018:23
[30] 梁国玲,刘文辉,秦燕,等. 不同燕麦资源生物量构成和茎秆特征与倒伏间的相关性研究[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(5):1339-1346
[31] 梁国玲,张永超,贾志锋,等. 高寒区不同燕麦品种(系)表型性状和茎秆力学特征与抗倒伏性的关系研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(4):58-69
[32] 南铭,赵桂琴,柴继宽. 20份饲草型燕麦品种的抗倒伏性研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2019,39(5):62-68
[33] SILVERRA D C,BASSO S M S,EBONEL A,et al. Morphological traits of stem to indirect selection of resistance to lodging in Avena sativa L[J]. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology,2022,25:39-50
[34] NAKHFOROOSH A,KUMAR S,FETCH T,et al. Peduncle breaking resistance:a potential selection criterion to improve lodging tolerance in oat[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,2020,100(6):707-719
[35] MOHAMMADI M,FINNAN J,STERLING M,et al. A calibrated oat lodging model compared with agronomic measurements[J]. Field Crops Research,2020,255(4):107784
[36] PINTHUS M J. Lodging in wheat,barley,and oats:the phenomenon,its causes,and preventive measures[J]. Advances in Agronomy,1974,25:209-263
[37] 龚建军. 播种量和氮肥水平对燕麦倒伏和产量的影响[J]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2007:41-42
[38] WU W,MA B L. Erect-leaf posture promotes lodging resistance in oat plants under high plant population[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2019,103:175-187
[39] KOST B,CHUAN H. The plant cytoskeleton:vacuoles and cell walls make the difference[J]. Cell,2002,108(1):9-12
[40] BAUCHER M,MONTIES B,VAN MONTAGU M,et al. Biosynthesis and genetic engineer in lignin[J]. Critical Review Plant Science,1998,17:125-197
[41] OOKAWA T,ISHIHARA K V. Varietal difference of the cell wall components affecting the bending stress of the culm in relating to the lodging resistance in paddy rice[J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science,1993,62(3):378-384
[42] HAMILTON D G. Certain oat culm characters and their relationship to lodging[J]. Science Agriculture,1941,21(10):646-676
[43] 南铭,李晶,赵桂琴,等. 茎秆基部节间特性和木质素合成与燕麦抗倒伏的关系[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(11):172-180
[44] 高原,陈信波,张志扬. 木质素生物合成途径及其基因调控的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2007(2):47-51
[45] 李金才,尹钧,魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J]. 作物学报,2005,31(5):662-666
[46] 贾志峰. 施氮量和播种密度对高寒区燕麦种子产量及其相关性状的影响研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2021:36-38
[47] 冯学颖,米俊珍,刘景辉,等. 宽幅条播和种植密度对燕麦抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2021,41(7):914-920
[48] 侯倩倩. 施肥和播种密度对燕麦生长及产量的影响[D]. 沈阳:辽宁大学,2017:20-22
[49] 康勇建,赵宝平,武俊英,等. 追氮时期对饲用燕麦茎秆理化特性和抗倒性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(6):1775-1783
[50] 杨钰洁,梁国玲,刘文辉,等. 硅肥对青藏高原高寒地区燕麦抗倒伏性状及种子产量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2022,39(3):551-561
[51] 郝爽楠,秦杰,刘攀锋,等. 外源硒对燕麦茎部特征及其抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(6):1572-1579
[52] PHILIP J W. Selenium accumulation by plants[J]. Annals of Botany,2016,117(2):217-235
[53] HUANG B F,XIN J L,DAI H W,et al. Effects of interaction between cadmium(Cd)and selenium(Se) on grain yield and Cd and Se accumulation in a hybrid rice (Oryza saliva L.) system[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2017 65(43):9537-9546
[54] GAO M,ZHOU J,LIU H,et al. Foliar spraying with silicon and selenium reduces cadmium uptake and mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,631-632:1100-1108
[55] MOHAMMADREZA M,JOHN F,MARK S,et al. A calibrated oat lodging model compared with agronomic measurements[J]. Field Crops Research,2020,255:107784
[56] 孙怀恩,谭旭良,张俊超,等. 施氮量和植物生长调节剂对青引2号燕麦抗倒能力及产量品质的影响[J]. 草学,2022(3):24-30
[57] CASSERLY L M. The effect of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium on lodging in oats[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1957,37(3):245-251
[58] 王在满,郑乐,张明华,等. 不同播种方式对直播水稻倒伏指数和根系生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2016,32(4):725-728
[59] TORRIE J H. Inheritance studies of several qualitative and quantitative characters in spring wheat crosses between varieties relatively susceptible and resistance to drought[J]. Canadian Journal of Research,1936,14:368-385
[60] DE KOEYER D L,TINKER N A,WIGHT C P,et al. A molecular linkage map with associated QTLs from a hulless×covered spring oat population[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2004,108(7):1285-1298
[61] TANHUANPÄÄ P,MANNINEN O,KIVIHARJU E. QTLs for important breeding characteristics in the doubled haploid oat progeny[J]. Genome,2010,53(6):482-493
[62] HERRMANN M H,YU J,BEUCH S,et al. Quantitative trait loci for quality and agronomic traits in two advanced backcross populations in oat (Avena sativa L.)[J]. Plant Breeding,2014,133(5):588-601
[63] TANHUANPAA P,MANNINEN O,BEATTIE A,et al. An updated doubled haploid oat linkage map and QTL mapping of agronomic and grain quality traits from Canadian field trials[J]. Genome,2012,55(4):289-301
[64] HIZBAI B T,GARDNER K M,WIGHT C P,et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting oil content,oil composition,and other agronomically important traits in oat[J]. The Plant Genome,2012,5(3):164-175
[65] YAN H,ZHOU P,PENG Y,et al.Genetic diversity and genome-wide association analysis in Chinese hulless oat germplasm[J].Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2020,133(12):3365-3380
[66] 潘莹,程时锋. 燕麦基因组学研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2021,22(2):304-308
[67] GIORGIO T,ROELAND E,VOORRIPS C M,et al. Genome-wide association analysis for lodging tolerance and plant height in a diverse European hexaploid oat collection[J]. Euphytica,2017,213(8):1-12
[68] YAN H,YU K,XU Y,et al. Position validation of the dwarfing gene Dw6 in oat (Avena sativa L.) and its correlated effects on agronomic traits[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:668-847
[69] 叶雪玲,甘圳,万燕,等. 饲用燕麦育种研究进展与展望[J]. 草业学报,2023,32(2):160-177
[70] MARSHALL H G,MURPHY C F. Inheritance of dwarfness in three oat crosses and relationship of height to panicle and culm length[J]. Crop Science,1980,21:335-338
[71] MILACH S,RINES H,PHILLIPS R. Molecular genetic mapping of dwarfing genes in oat[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1997,95:783-790
[72] MORIKAWA T,SUMIYA M,KURIYAMA S. Transfer of new dwarfing genes from the weed species Avena fatua into cultivated oat A. byzantina[J]. Plant Breeding,2007,126(1):30-35
[73] 张波,任长忠. 燕麦基因组学与分子育种研究进展[J]. 植物学报,2022,57(6):785-791

燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展

Research Advances on Lodging Resistance of Oat (Avena stiva.L)

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙艳楠, 路耿新, 唐超, 李冠义, 王欣欣, 时梓涵, 张明飞. 134份皮燕麦种质资源生物学性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2684-2692.
[2]	李红玉, 王聪聪, 夏方山, 杨轩, 李尹琳, 张杰敏. 抗坏血酸引发对燕麦老化种子胚细胞抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2392-2398.
[3]	何纪桐, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 刘勇, 刘凯强, 马小龙, 贾志锋. 高寒区燕麦蚕豆间作比例对光合特性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2399-2408.
[4]	彭靖涵, 程明军, 董志晓, 雷雄, 苟文龙, 刘岳华, 陈书明, 田科, 刘伟, 马啸. 12个饲用燕麦品种在四川的适应性评价分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2128-2136.
[5]	鲍根生, 张鹏, 马祥, 贾志锋, 刘文辉, 马兴赟. 高寒区氮添加对禾豆间作系统牧草和种子产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2210-2219.
[6]	叶文兴, 孔令琪. 基于氧传感技术测定燕麦种子活力的初步研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1714-1719.
[7]	毛丽萍, 盛兵扬, 张鸿博, 阿依谢木, 沈禹颖. 钾添加对燕麦生长及其钾积累和分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1744-1753.
[8]	胡伟, 梁国玲, 刘凯强, 刘文辉, 李文. 青藏高原9个燕麦品种抗倒伏能力及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1788-1797.
[9]	甘丽, 李海萍, 汪辉, 陈有军, 陈仕勇, 蒋永梅, 张珈敏, 梁骥, 关皓, 周青平. 生育期和混播比例对四川冬闲田燕麦/箭筈豌豆混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1867-1877.
[10]	南铭, 李晶, 王昶, 李永生, 向达兵, 景芳, 刘彦明. 甘肃中部春播燕麦不同刈割期产量和品质比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1878-1885.
[11]	郭常英, 王伟, 蒲小剑, 傅云洁, 王龙然, 魏晓丽, 彭丹, 徐成体. 种植行距对高寒地区饲用燕麦饲用价值及土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1886-1893.
[12]	王振龙, 杜江, 牛勇, 姚拓. 若尔盖高寒补播草地燕麦根际促生菌的筛选及促生特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1406-1413.
[13]	王勃, 夏方山, 董秋丽, 岑慧芳, 李尹琳, 张杰敏. 外源油菜素内酯引发对劣变燕麦种子抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1461-1468.
[14]	武敬也, 马琳, 吴欣明, 石永红, 陈菲儿, 王学敏, 赵威. 180份饲用燕麦种质资源表型遗传多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1501-1510.
[15]	李红玉, 王雅聪, 夏方山, 王勃, 李尹琳, 张杰敏. 燕麦种胚细胞和线粒体AsA-GSH循环对外源H₂O₂引发的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1064-1070.