2种秸秆与全株构树混贮发酵品质及瘤胃体外产气特性

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.031

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 3297-3304.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.031

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

2种秸秆与全株构树混贮发酵品质及瘤胃体外产气特性

孙颖超¹, 柴雨昕¹, 侯国庆², 陈永成¹, 郑晓凯¹, 杨鉴琦^1,3, 张凡凡¹

1. 石河子大学动物科技学院, 新疆石河子 833000;
2. 新疆生产建设兵团第七师农业科学研究所, 新疆奎屯 833200;
3. 四川农业大学动物科技学院, 四川成都 610000

收稿日期:2024-04-03 修回日期:2024-05-16 发布日期:2024-11-04
通讯作者: 张凡凡,E-mail:zhangfanfan@shzu.edu.cn
作者简介:孙颖超(1999-)，男，汉族，河南驻马店人，硕士研究生，主要从事饲草生产与加工研究，E-mail：321470946@qq.com
基金资助:
南疆重点产业创新发展支撑计划项目(2022DB017);财政部和农业农村部-国家牧草体系项目(CARS-34)资助

Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Rumen Gas Production of Corn Straw Wheat Straw Mixed with Whole Conformation Tree

SUN Ying-chao¹, CHAI Yu-xin¹, HOU Guo-qing², CHEN Yong-cheng¹, ZHENG Xiao-kai¹, YANG Jian-qi^1,3, ZHANG Fan-fan¹

1. College of Animal Science & Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 833000, China;
2. Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Seventh Division Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Kuiton, Xinjiang 833200, China;
3. College of Animal Science & Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610000, China

Received:2024-04-03 Revised:2024-05-16 Published:2024-11-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在探索新疆地区主要作物秸秆与全株构树(Broussonetia papyrifera L.)的混合青贮发酵特性，为提高秸秆资源利用效率、改善构树发酵品质提供理论依据。试验共设7个处理，分别为CK组(100%全株构树青贮)，C₁组[90%全株构树+10%玉米(Zea mays L.)秸秆],C₂组(70%全株构树+30%玉米秸秆),C₃组(50%全株构树+50%玉米秸秆)，W₁组[90%全株构树+10%小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)秸秆]，W₂组(70%全株构树+30%小麦秸秆)，W₃组(50%全株构树+50%小麦秸秆)。测定自然发酵90天发酵前后各处理组的营养成分、发酵品质、微生物数量，并进行瘤胃体外产气试验。结果表明：与CK组相比，混合发酵中的粗蛋白含量、pH值、氨态氮含量和霉菌数量均显著降低(P＜0.05)，乳酸菌数量、乳酸含量均显著升高(P＜0.05)；混合青贮的有机物消化率、代谢能均显著低于CK组(P＜0.05)。综上，全株构树与玉米、小麦秸秆混合青贮(1∶1)可显著改善青贮发酵品质。

关键词: 玉米秸秆, 小麦秸秆, 全株构树, 发酵品质, 瘤胃体外产气

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore the fermentation characteristics of dominant straw and whole-plant Broussonetia papyrifera in Xinjiang province,and to provide a theoretical basis for improving the utilization efficiency of straw resources and the fermentation quality of B. papyrifera. A total of 7 treatments were set up in the experiment,and each treatment had 7 replicates,including CK group (whole-plant B. papyrifera silage),C₁ group (90% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 10% corn straw),C₂ group (70% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 30% corn straw),C₃group (50% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 50% corn straw),W₁ group (90% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 10% wheat straw),W₂ group (70% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 30% wheat straw),W₃ group (50% whole-plant B. papyrifera and 50% wheat straw). After 90 days of fermentation,the nutritive value,fermentation quality,microbial number and in vitro gas production of rumen were measured. The results showed as follows：1) compared with CK group,the dry matter loss rate,pH value,ammonia nitrogen content and mold number of mixed silage fermentation system decreased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase of the addition ratio of the two straws. The number of lactic acid bacteria and lactic acid content significantly increased ( P<0.05). 2) The organic matter digestibility and metabolic energy of mixed silage of whole plant Broussonetia papyrifera and straw were significantly lower than those of CK group (P<0.05).The mixed silage (1∶1) of whole-plant B. papyrifera with corn straw and wheat straw could significantly improve the fermentation quality of silage.

Key words: Corn straw, Wheat straw, Whole-plant Broussonetia papyrifera, Fermentation quality, In vitro rumen gas production

中图分类号:

S816.53

孙颖超, 柴雨昕, 侯国庆, 陈永成, 郑晓凯, 杨鉴琦, 张凡凡. 2种秸秆与全株构树混贮发酵品质及瘤胃体外产气特性[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3297-3304.

SUN Ying-chao, CHAI Yu-xin, HOU Guo-qing, CHEN Yong-cheng, ZHENG Xiao-kai, YANG Jian-qi, ZHANG Fan-fan. Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Rumen Gas Production of Corn Straw Wheat Straw Mixed with Whole Conformation Tree[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3297-3304.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.10.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I10/3297

参考文献

[1] 张红,陈凤鸣,黄兴国,等. 构树叶的营养价值及其在动物生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报,2020,32(9):4086-4092
[2] 张玉琳,杨泽毅,李超程,等. 植物乳杆菌对全株杂交构树青贮品质、有氧稳定性及瘤胃体外产气特性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(11):6320-6329
[3] ZHANG Y L,YANG H J,HUANG R Z,et al. Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lactiplantibacillus brevis on fermentation,aerobic stability,and the bacterial community of paper mulberry silage[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2022,22(13):1063914-1063914
[4] HAO Y Y,HUANG S,SI J F,et al. Effects of paper mulberry silage on the milk production,apparent digestibility,antioxidant capacity,and fecal bacteria composition in holstein dairy cows[J]. Animals (Basel),2020,10(7):1152
[5] CHEN G S,SHUI S Z,CHAI M J,et al. Effects of paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera) leaf extract on growth performance and fecal microflora of weaned piglets[J]. BioMed Research International,2020,11(17):6508494
[6] LIU Y Y,LI Y H,XIAO Y,et al. Mulberry leaf powder regulates antioxidative capacity and lipid metabolism in finishing pigs[J]. Animal Nutrition,2021,7(2):421-429
[7] XU W,SHI S L,QI J,et al. Effect of different processing methods on the quality of alfalfa hay[J]. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,2013,12(6):689-693
[8] 凌一波,薛颖昊,王家平,等. 近20年来新疆农作物秸秆资源量变化、现状分析及综合利用探讨[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(1):130-139
[9] 徐均钊,王琦,胡宗福,等. 不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1894-1901
[10] WANG S R,LI J F，DONG Z H,et al. Inclusion of alfalfa improves nutritive value and in vitro digestibility of various straw-grass mixed silages in Tibet[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2018,73(3):694-704
[11] HUANG R Z,CAI B X,CHEN Y C,et al. Bacterial community structure and metabolites after ensiling paper mulberry mixed with corn or wheat straw[J]. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems,2024,8:1356705
[12] FAN X Y,XIE Z M,CHENG Q M,et al. Fermentation quality,bacterial community,and predicted functional profiles in silage prepared with alfalfa,perennial ryegrass and their mixture in the karst region[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2022,28(13):1062515
[13] 马宇莎,高凤芹,苏亚拉图,等. 全株玉米与紫花苜蓿或向日葵秸秆混贮效果研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(6):85-90
[14] 马宇莎,苏亚拉图,贺俊英,等. 向日葵秸秆与紫花苜蓿混贮动态品质研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2023,45(4):107-114
[15] 程景,张元庆,张丹丹,等. 全株玉米青贮、小麦秸秆、苜蓿干草组合的体外消化特性及组合效应研究[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(5):2982-2992
[16] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2006:45-80
[17] 高诚泽,赵璐洁,陈玮,等不同添加量葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(6):1986-1994
[18] RIBEIRO S S,VASCONCELOS J T,MORAIS M G,et al. Effects of ruminal infusion of a slow-release polymer-coated urea or conventional urea on apparent nutrient digestibility situ degradability,and rumen parameters in cattle fed low-quality hay[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,164(1/2):53-61
[19] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T13092-2006 饲料中霉菌总数的测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2006:1-4
[20] 卢德勋,谢崇文. 现代反刍动物营养研究方法和技术[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1991:102-116
[21] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al. The estimation of the digestility and metabolizable energycontent of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,93(1):217-222
[22] MORAÏS S,MIZRAHI I. The oad not taken:the rumen microbiome,functional groups,and community states[J]. Trends in Microbiology,2019,27(6):538-549
[23] SCHOFIELD P,PITT R E,PELL A N. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1994,72(11):2980-2991
[24] 刘悦,字学娟,陈婷,等. 饲草青贮微生物多样性研究进展及对策[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(11):6084-6092
[25] 李茂,字学娟,吕仁龙,等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对王草青贮品质和瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2020,56(7):161-165
[26] DAI W. Synergy and antagonism in feed additives[J]. Veterinary Durgs and Feed Addititives,2007,12(2):35
[27] 任海伟,刘菲菲,王莉,等. 添加纤维素酶对干玉米秸秆与白菜废弃物混贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(6):158-167
[28] PANDAY A,SOCCOL C R. Preservation of forage crops by solid-state lactic fermentation-ensiling[M]. New York:Springer,2008:443-467
[29] KUNG L J R,SHAVER R D,GRANT R J,et al. Silage review:Interpretation of chemical,microbial,and organoleptic components of silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):4020-4033
[30] NAZAR M. 暖季型牧草表面微生物菌群对青贮发酵品质及微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2020,21-132
[31] ZHANG H X,MA Z F,LUO X Q,et al. Effects of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.) consumption on health outcomes:a mini-review[J]. Antioxidans,2018,7:69
[32] MCKERSIE B D,BUCHANAN-SMITH J. Changes in the levels of proteolytic enzymes in ensiled alfalfa forage[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1982,62:111-116
[33] WANG J,WANG J Q,ZHOU H. Effects of addition of previously fermented juice prepared from alfalfa on fermentation quality and protein degradation of alfalfa silage[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,151(3/4):280-290
[34] OGUNADE I M,JIANG Y,CERVANTES A A P,et al. Bacterial diversity and composition of alfalfa silage as analyzed by Illumina miseq sequencing:Effects of escherichia coli O157:H7 and silage additives[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(3):2048-2059
[35] 夏洪泽,张琳琳,王银梦,等. 体外产气法评价不同分级指数玉米青贮-苜蓿干草组合发酵特性[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(4):1136-1144
[36] 徐均钊,王琦,胡宗福,等. 不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1894-1901(责任编辑闵芝智)第32卷第10期 Vol.32 No. 10草地学报 ACTAAGRESTIASINICA 2024年 10月

2种秸秆与全株构树混贮发酵品质及瘤胃体外产气特性

Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Rumen Gas Production of Corn Straw Wheat Straw Mixed with Whole Conformation Tree

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	麻天丽, 李小梅, 钟怡豪, 罗宏杰, 杜昭昌, 肖启银, 刘卫国, 闫艳红. 川西北高原全株玉米与不同豆科牧草混贮品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2999-3005.
[2]	胥贵, 汪雅婷, 穆麟, 王青兰, 魏岚, 郭阳, 魏仲珊, 张志飞. 尿素添加对青贮品质影响的Meta分析研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2607-2619.
[3]	柴雨昕, 贾舒安, 张天, 李肖, 陈永成, 黄嵘峥, 张凡凡. 植物乳杆菌对麻叶荨麻青贮品质和绵羊瘤胃降解特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2283-2289.
[4]	杨丹, 尹含雪, 张庆. 苯乳酸和温度对玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质及抗性基因的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2290-2296.
[5]	武齐丰, 陈晨, 黄沁骄, 张云飞, 李小梅, 陈远航, 文兴金, 闫艳红. 纤维素酶和乳酸菌对杂交象草青贮结构性碳水化合物影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2314-2322.
[6]	程志泽, 伊斯拉依·达吾提, 万江春, 乃比·阿不来提, 艾比布拉·伊马木. 不同添加剂对辣椒秸秆青贮品质及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2330-2336.
[7]	黑梦琴, 曹正宇, 王志远, 代春辉, 陈程, 张文举. 添加复合乳酸菌和糖蜜对不同水分含量苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1601-1609.
[8]	孔德慧, 靳思玉, 曹阳. 乳酸菌和混合酸对苜蓿青贮品质、叶绿素及其降解酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1610-1618.
[9]	孙蓉, 李茂, 陈桂武, 字学娟, 王凯. 添加裸花紫珠对王草青贮发酵品质和体外产气特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1267-1275.
[10]	黄莉莹, 崔卫东, 田静, 张建国. 大豆秸和稻草对甜玉米秸秆和湿啤酒糟混合青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 945-951.
[11]	金丽娜, 蒋苏苏, 敬淑燕, 何建文, 张慧君. 黄芪药渣与全株玉米混合青贮对饲料感官、发酵品质及营养成分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 630-636.
[12]	徐均钊, 王琦, 胡宗福, 吴白乙拉, 牛化欣. 不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.
[13]	李肖, 陈永成, 黄嵘峥, 齐亚银, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 复合发酵剂对葵花副产物发酵品质及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1564-1570.
[14]	柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮. 添加不同乳酸菌对燕麦低温青贮发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 923-928.
[15]	詹佳琦, 陈丹丹, 郭田心, 郭香, 吴硕, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 不同添加剂对中药渣青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3851-3857.