五个草地早熟禾品种蒸散量及节水性

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2001.03.009

›› 2001, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 207-212.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2001.03.009

五个草地早熟禾品种蒸散量及节水性

潘全山, 韩建国, 王培

中国农业大学草地研究所, 北京, 100094

收稿日期:2000-11-09 修回日期:2001-06-07 出版日期:2001-08-15 发布日期:2001-08-15
作者简介:潘全山(1974- ),男,1997年毕业于甘肃农业大学草地学院,2000年研究生毕业于中国农业大学草地研究所.现在丹麦丹农种子公司中国工表处工作
基金资助:
北京市自然科学基金重点项目(6001001)资助

Study on the Evapotranspiration and Water Saving Ability of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars

PAN Quan-shan, HAN Jian-guo, WANG Pei

Grassland Institute, China Agriculture University, Beijing, 100094, China

Received:2000-11-09 Revised:2001-06-07 Online:2001-08-15 Published:2001-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究5个草地早熟禾品种的蒸散量及节水性。结果表明,在土壤水分充足,其它条件相同的情况下,Dawn和Nuglade品种的蒸散量大于S-21、Midnignt和Nassau。在水分胁迫下,S-21和Nassau的节水性好,耗水量低,较高的相对含水量和叶片水势,同时土壤含水量变幅小,土壤水吸值小,而Dawn与Nuglade恰好相反,Midnight的节水性介于前两者及后两者之间。

关键词: 草地早熟禾, 蒸散量, 节水性

Abstract: Among the cultivars of Ken tucky bluegrass,the ET of Dawn and Nuglade was higher than that of S-21,Midnight and Nassau,respectively.The ET difference between Dawn and Nuglade was not significantly,so was the ET difference among S-21,Midnight and Nassau.Under the condition of limited water supply,S-21 and Nassau had the highest water saving ability,which has lower ET,higher relative water content and water potential,higher soil water content and lower soil water tension than the other three cultivars.Dawn and Nuglade had lowest water saving ability.Midnight had medium water saving ability.Deficient soil water content can greatly influence ET of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars,every treatment's ET was less than that of CK.

Key words: Kentucky bluegrass, Evapotranspiration, Water saving ability

中图分类号:

潘全山, 韩建国, 王培. 五个草地早熟禾品种蒸散量及节水性[J]. , 2001, 9(3): 207-212.

PAN Quan-shan, HAN Jian-guo, WANG Pei. Study on the Evapotranspiration and Water Saving Ability of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars[J]. , 2001, 9(3): 207-212.

参考文献

[1] Biran l,Bravdo B,Bushkin-Harav l,Rawitz E.Water consumption and growth rate of 11 turfgrasses as affected by mowing height,irrigation frequency,and soil moisture[J]. Agron.J.1981,73:85-90
[2] Kopec D M,Shearman R C,Riordan T P.Evapotranspiration of tall fescue turf[J]. Hort Science,1988,23:300-301
[3] Carrow R N.Influence of soil compaction on three turfgrass species[J]. Agron.J,1980,72:1038-1042
[4] Carrow R N,Shearman R C,Watson J R.Turfgrass.1990.889-919.In Stewart B A, Nielsen D R.(ed.)lrrigation of agriculture crops.Agron.Monogr.30,ASA,CSSA,and SSSA,Madisin,WI.
[5] Carrow R N.Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast:Evapotransporation and crop coefficients[J]. Crop Sci,1995,35:1685-1690
[6] Carrow R N.Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast:Root-shoot respinses[J]. Crop Sci.1996b,36:687-694
[7] Beard J B.Turfgrass water stress:Drought resistance components,physiological mechanisms,and species-genotype diversity.1989.23-28.In Takatoh H.(ed.) Proc,Int.Turf.Sci,6th,Tokyo,Japan,August 1989,Japan.Soc,Turf Sci,Tokyo.
[8] Huang B R,Duncan R,Carrow R N.Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying: 1.shoot response[J]. Crop Sci.1997,37:1858-1863
[9] Steward B.A.et al,Yield and water use efficiency of grain sorghum in a limited irrigation-dryland farming system[J] ,Agron.J,1983,(75):629-634
[10] 汤章城,王育启,吴亚华,王洪春.高粱苗对高渗培养液的生长、生理反应及其抗逆性[J]. 植物生理学报,1984,10(1):37-46
[11] 马宗仁.短芒披碱草和老芒麦在水分胁迫下游离脯氨酸积累的研究[J]. 中国草地,1991,4:12-16
[12] Bowman D C,Macaulay L.Comparative evapotranspiration rates of tall fescue cultivars[J]. Hort Science 1991,26:122-123
[13] Danielson R E,Feldhake C M,Hart W E.Urban lawn irrigation and management practices for water saving with minimum effect on lawn quality.Completion Report to OWRT Project No.H-043-Colo.1981.120
[14] Feldhake C M,Danielson R E,Butler J D.Turfgrass evapotranspiration.I.Factors influencing rates in urban environments[J]. Agron J.1983,75:824-830
[15] O'Neil K J,Carrow R N.Kentucky bluegrass growth and water use under different soil compaction and irrigation regimes[J]. Agron.J,1982,74:933-936

五个草地早熟禾品种蒸散量及节水性

Study on the Evapotranspiration and Water Saving Ability of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	左郎, 王树森, 马迎梅, 温苏雅勒图, 白刚, 郁鑫明. 火炬树浸提液对两种草坪草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1927-1933.
[2]	金一锋, 陈阳, 齐欣, 高岩松, 金忠民, 赵清峰, 王琦. 草地早熟禾NRT1/PTR FAMILY 8.3基因的克隆及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1397-1405.
[3]	朱琨, 郑桂华, 刘丽杰, 周璐, 李珊珊, 范震宇, 钟玥, 尼尼. 草地早熟禾叶片表皮解剖结构与抗白粉病性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1430-1435.
[4]	张韦钰, 王春勇, 杜红梅. 富氢水对草地早熟禾耐盐性的影响以及与抗氧化酶活性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1436-1445.
[5]	朱琨, 刘丽杰, 周璐, 李珊珊, 范震宇, 吴纪一, 尼尼. 外源激素对染白粉菌草地早熟禾叶片膜透性及表面结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1210-1216.
[6]	朱瑞婷, 牛奎举, 张娣君, 杨阳, 宋云, 马晖玲. 外源2,4-表油菜素内酯对镉胁迫下草地早熟禾叶绿素代谢的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 635-643.
[7]	高娅楠, 韩烈保, 许立新. 乙烯利对干旱胁迫下草地早熟禾抗氧化酶基因表达的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2200-2213.
[8]	张然, 马祥, 朱瑞婷, 牛奎举, 赵春旭, 马晖玲. 青海野生草地早熟禾响应干旱胁迫的代谢通路及转录调控分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1508-1518.
[9]	赵春旭, 张然, 牛奎举, 朱瑞婷, 王勇, 马祥, 马晖玲. 青海野生草地早熟禾响应低温胁迫的代谢组学研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 904-914.
[10]	周彤, 师尚礼, 陈建纲, 吴芳, 宫文龙, 来幸樑, 阿芸, 张成君. 紫花苜蓿与草地早熟禾轮作模式对其农艺性状和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 720-726.
[11]	赵春旭, 马祥, 董文科, 牛奎举, 张然, 马晖玲. 低温胁迫下不同青海野生草地早熟禾的转录组比较分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 305-318.
[12]	张金青, 陈金龙, 李凡, 赵炳森, 贾新凤, 马晖玲. 草地早熟禾种子萌发和幼苗生长对铅胁迫的适应性[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 130-140.
[13]	鲜靖苹, 王勇, 马晖玲. 外源NO缓解草地早熟禾镉胁迫的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1467-1476.
[14]	鲜靖苹, 王勇, 马晖玲. 一氧化氮信号途径参与草地早熟禾耐镉机制的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1577-1586.
[15]	陈润娟, 白小明, 郑文博, 郭宵, 黄琪, 李昌宁, 卢妮. 甘肃地区11个野生草地早熟禾材料根茎扩展性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1250-1258.