新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.02.024

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 553-561.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.02.024

新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价

岳丽¹, 山其米克¹, 王卉¹, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班¹, 毛红艳¹, 刘敏²

1. 新疆农业科学院粮食作物研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830091;
2. 新疆农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2023-07-10 修回日期:2023-08-24 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-03-06
通讯作者: 刘敏,E-mail:523337046@qq.com
作者简介:岳丽(1990-),女,汉族,新疆吉木萨尔人,硕士,主要从事作物抗逆研究,E-mail:Yueli4467@163.com
基金资助:
新疆农业科学院青年基金（xjnkq-2022012）；新疆维吾尔自治区公益性科研院所基本业务费专项（KY2022008）；新疆少数民族科技人才特殊培养计划科研项目（2022D03008）资助

Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Sorghum Germplasm Resources during Germination in Xinjiang

YUE Li¹, SHAN Qi-mike¹, WANG Hui¹, Zaituniguli·Kuerban¹, MAO Hong-yan¹, LIU Min²

1. Research Institute of Grain Crops, Xingjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830091, China;
2. Institute of Quality Standards & Testing Technology for Agri-products, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830091, China

Received:2023-07-10 Revised:2023-08-24 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究新疆本土高粱（Sorghum）种质资源的抗旱性并筛选萌发期有效抗旱指标，以来源于不同地区的207份高粱种质资源为研究对象，采用PEG-6000溶液模拟干旱胁迫条件，对高粱萌发相关的10个指标进行分析，在主成分分析基础上采用隶属函数法对各高粱品种的抗旱性进行综合评价。结果表明：在干旱胁迫下，高粱的各萌发指标均受到影响。其中，相对发芽势与萌发抗旱指数相关性最强，前3个主成分累计贡献率为78.328%，分别反映高粱在干旱胁迫下的生长、萌发及发育情况。根据综合得分将207份种质划分为5类，即高度抗旱种质12份、抗旱种质28份、中等抗旱种质87份、干旱敏感种质64份和高度敏感种质16份。筛选出高粱萌发期抗旱性鉴定的重要指标为相对芽鲜重、萌发抗旱指数、相对干物质转运率，建立了可准确评估高粱萌发期抗旱性的回归方程，为高粱萌发期抗旱性种质筛选提供理论依据。

关键词: 高粱种质, 干旱胁迫, 主成分分析, 萌发期, 综合评价

Abstract: In order to study the drought resistance of sorghum germplasm resources in Xinjiang and screen effective drought indicators during the germination period,207 sorghum germplasm resources originating from different regions were used to evaluate under drought stress conditions using PEG-6000 solution simulation. 10 indicators related to sorghum germination were analyzed and comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance of sorghum varieties was done on the basis of principal component analysis using the affiliation function approach. The results showed that all germination indexes of sorghum were affected under drought stress. Among them,the relative germination potential was most strongly correlated with the germination drought tolerance index,and the cumulative contribution of the first three principal components was 78.328 %,reflecting the growth,germination and development of sorghum under drought stress,respectively. Based on the differences in drought tolerance scores among germplasm,the 207 germplasms were classified into five categories by cluster analysis:12 highly drought-tolerant germplasms,28 drought-tolerant germplasms,87 moderately drought-tolerant germplasms,64 drought-sensitive germplasms,and 16 highly sensitive germplasms. The important indicators for the identification of drought resistance in sorghum germination were screened as relative shoot fresh weight,germination drought resistance index,and relative dry matter transfer rate,and a regression equation was established to accurately assess the drought resistance of sorghum germination,which provided a theoretical basis for the screening of drought-resistant germplasm during the germination period of sorghum.

Key words: Sorghum germplasm, Drought stress, Principal component analysis, Germination, Comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

Q945.78

岳丽, 山其米克, 王卉, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 毛红艳, 刘敏. 新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.

YUE Li, SHAN Qi-mike, WANG Hui, Zaituniguli·Kuerban, MAO Hong-yan, LIU Min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Sorghum Germplasm Resources during Germination in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.02.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I2/553

参考文献

[1] DHANKHER O P,FOYER C H. Climate resilient crops for improving global food security and safety[J]. Plant,cell & environment,2018,41(5):877-884
[2] ALESSANDRA F,LUISA T,STEFANO A. Drought tolerance strategies highlighted by two Sorghum bicolor races in a dry-down experiment[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2016,190:1-14
[3] SEHGAL A,SITA K,SIDDIQUE KHM,et al. Drought or/and Heat-Stress Effects on Seed Filling in Food Crops:Impacts on Functional Biochemistry,Seed Yields,and Nutritional Quality[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018,9:1705
[4] BOBADE P N,AMARSHETTIWAR S B,RATHOD T H,et al. Effect of polyethylene glycol induced water stress on germination and seedling development of rabi sorghum genotypes[J]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry,2019,8(5):852-856
[5] QUEIROZ M S,OLIVEIRA C E S,STEINER F,et al. Drought stresses on seed germination and early growth of maize and sorghum[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,2019,11(2):310
[6] 赵晓倩. 高粱苗期抗旱种质资源鉴选和全基因组关联分析[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2022:7
[7] 吕鑫,平俊爱,牛皓,等. 山西高粱品种(系)的花后抗旱性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(2):11-20
[8] 周福平,史红梅,张海燕,等. 不同高粱品系灌浆期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 山西农业科学,2019,47(11):1907-1912
[9] NDLOVU E,VAN S J,MAPHOSA M. Morpho-physiological effects of moisture,heat and combined stresses on Sorghum bicolor [Moench (L.)] and its acclimation mechanisms[J]. Plant Stress,2021(2):100018
[10] CHANIAGO I,SYARIF A,RIVIONA P. Sorghum seedling drought response:In search of tolerant genotypes[J]. International Journal on Advanced Science,Engineering and Information Technology,2017,7(3):892-897
[11] RAJ S M N,ASHOK P A M,et al. The effect of water stress on germination and seedling growth of sorghum genotypes[J]. The Pharma Innovation Journal,2023,12(4):849-851
[12] ABDEL-GHANY S E,ULLAH F,BEN-HUR A,et al. Transcriptome analysis of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genotypes in response to PEG-induced drought stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2020,21(3):772
[13] RAKKAMMAL K,MAHARAJAN T,SHRIRAM R N,et al. Physiological,biochemical and molecular responses of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) genotypes exposed to short-term drought stress induced by PEG-6000[J]. South African Journal of Botany,2023(155):45-59
[14] 高志昊,李雪颖,兰剑,等. 干旱胁迫条件下不同饲用燕麦品种种子萌发指标比较与评价[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1210-1218
[15] BASAL O,SZABÓ A,VERES S. Physiology of soybean as affected by PEG-induced drought stress[J]. Current Plant Biology,2020,(22):100135
[16] HELLAL F A,EL-SHABRAWI H M,Abd EL-HADY M,et al. Influence of PEG induced drought stress on molecular and biochemical constituents and seedling growth of Egyptian barley cultivars[J]. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology,2018,16(1):203-212
[17] 梁佳,马依努·吾斯曼,方志刚.外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(3):610-617
[18] 吴奇,周宇飞,高悦,等. 不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报,2016,42(8):1233-1246
[19] 王平,王春语,丛玲,等. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫下高粱种子萌发期抗旱、敏感材料筛选、鉴定[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,40(3):30-36
[20] 陈冰嬬,徐宁,李淑杰,等. 高粱亲本系萌发期抗旱性鉴定[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2018,23(8):17-29
[21] 张丽霞,王春语,王平,等. 种子萌发期高粱抗旱材料的筛选与鉴定[J]. 分子植物育种,2018,16(17):5796-5803
[22] 李云,杨梦涵,王健,等. PEG胁迫下谷子品种(系)萌发期耐旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 种子,2022,41(4):29-35
[23] 孙楠楠,周全,职蕾,等. 240份小麦苗期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标与重要农艺性状的相关性分析[J]. 西北农业学报,2022,31(2):147-156
[24] 陈新,宋高原,张宗文,等. PEG-6000胁迫下裸燕麦萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(6):1188-1195
[25] 吴凯铭. 337份小麦品种(系)萌发期抗旱性鉴定及生理响应[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2022:14
[26] 李波,李祥莉.60Co-γ辐射诱变处理对无芒雀麦种子萌发及幼苗期抗旱性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(2):118-123
[27] 江佰阳,白文斌,张建华,等. 高粱抗旱性鉴定方法及分子生物学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2021,37(4):260-272
[28] 王鹏,侯思宇,温宏伟,等. 干旱胁迫对滞绿大豆种子萌发的影响及芽期抗旱性评价[J]. 大豆科学,2021,40(1):68-74
[29] 李亚莉,马瑞,马彦军,等. 盐旱胁迫对盐爪爪种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(12):3715-3723
[30] FADOUL H E,SIDDIG M A E,ABDALLA A W H,et al. Physiological and proteomic analysis of two contrasting Sorghum bicolor genotypes in response to drought stress[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science,2018,12(9):1543-1551
[31] 高志昊. 饲用型燕麦种质材料抗旱性评价与耐旱型品种筛选[D].银川:宁夏大学,2022:47
[32] 何丽,杜彦斌,王娜,等. 胡麻抗旱综合性评价及种质资源分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(21):7270-7280
[33] 谢芳,郭栋良,葛优,等. 亚麻全生育期耐旱性评价及耐旱种质筛选[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2023,40(4):467-475,485
[34] 张学风. 高粱脂质组对干旱胁迫的响应机制研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2022:6
[35] 徐银萍,潘永东,刘强德,等. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报,2020,46(3):448-461
[36] 樊瑀,董淑琦,原向阳,等. 谷子种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2022,27(6):42-54
[37] 罗兴明,聂刚,刘秋旭,等. 73份多花黑麦草种质资源萌发期耐铅性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(8):2377-2386

新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Sorghum Germplasm Resources during Germination in Xinjiang

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯瑞虹, 杜柯, 黄伟业, 高佳荷, 刘亚玲, 石凤翎, 张志强, 唐芳. 10份不同种源野生花苜蓿材料种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 489-494.
[2]	王玲秀, 邵帅, 娄亚桦. 异时萌发对旱麦草属4种牧草生长与品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 495-502.
[3]	高山, 闫程铭, 万畅, 任伟, 郭兴玉, 于洪柱, 王志锋. 基于灰色关联度法和DTOPSIS法对羊草种质资源综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 599-609.
[4]	宋雪, 付楚涵, 李家红, 孙雪铜, 韦银珠, 肖汇川, 李韦瑶, 秦立刚. 内生菌提高植物抗旱性和耐盐性分子机制研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 13-24.
[5]	韩喆, 张永强, 张浩浩, 罗文浩, 陈爱萍. 干旱胁迫对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 105-112.
[6]	张景龙, 沈益新, 刘信宝, 迟英俊. 高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 179-187.
[7]	武玲玲, 谢永丽, 杨杰, 杨雪, 李俊熹, 王添, 高英, 常斐斐. 萎缩芽孢杆菌WL520生物活性及干旱胁迫下促紫花苜蓿生长效应[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 322-330.
[8]	蒋宇佳, 于元平, 孙向一, 周敏, 吴春妍, 李玉华, 刘明稀. 假俭草R2R3-MYB基因家族的鉴定及其在干旱胁迫下的表达模式分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2628-2641.
[9]	孙艳楠, 路耿新, 唐超, 李冠义, 王欣欣, 时梓涵, 张明飞. 134份皮燕麦种质资源生物学性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2684-2692.
[10]	王佳敏, 柴润东, 陈璐云, 冯渝茜, 朱梦杳, 马宏忠, 孙盛楠, 严学兵. 29个紫花苜蓿品种种子萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2722-2729.
[11]	周涛, 卢蕊, 刘宁芳, 徐倩, 胡龙兴. 不同来源老鸦谷种质牧草产量与品质性状的分析与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2369-2376.
[12]	罗兴明, 聂刚, 刘秋旭, 汪霞, 陈菲, 余帅, 黄琳凯, 张新全. 73份多花黑麦草种质资源萌发期耐铅性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2377-2386.
[13]	冯树林, 周婷, 王军利. 胡枝子幼苗不同生长阶段叶水势对干旱-复水的响应特征[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2077-2085.
[14]	于思敏, 罗永忠, 康芳明, 邱应德, 李转桃. 干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1762-1771.
[15]	王一博, 陈奕彤, 刘馨迪, 郭勇震, 孙娟, 张慧, 李圆圆, 郭善利. 饲用藜麦在黄河三角洲盐碱地的适应性研究与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1810-1817.