不同杀菌剂对饲用燕麦炭疽病和叶斑病复合病害的田间防效评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.031

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3619-3627.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.031

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

不同杀菌剂对饲用燕麦炭疽病和叶斑病复合病害的田间防效评价

张婷¹, 张金凤², 赵弋锐², 孙小涵², 杨子森¹, 王研³, 韩伟⁴, 赵祥², 高鹏²

1. 山西省畜牧技术推广服务中心, 山西太原 030031;
2. 山西农业大学草业学院/农业农村部饲草高效生产模式创新重点实验室, 山西太谷 030801;
3. 朔州市骏宝宸农业科技股份有限公司, 山西山阴 036900;
4. 大同千叶牧草科技有限公司, 山西天镇 038200

收稿日期:2024-05-09 修回日期:2024-06-27 发布日期:2024-11-29
通讯作者: 高鹏,E-mail:zyjt_721@163.com
作者简介:张婷(1984-),女,汉族,山西宁武人,硕士,畜牧师,主要从事饲草栽培管理研究,E-mail:zhangtingsxvet@163.com
基金资助:
山西农业大学科技创新基金项目(2018YJ37)资助

Evaluation of Field Control Efficacies against Anthracnose and Leaf Spot on Oat

ZHANG Ting¹, ZHANG Jin-feng², ZHAO Yi-rui², SUN Xiao-han², YANG Zi-seng¹, WANG Yan³, HAN Wei⁴, ZHAO Xiang², GAO Peng²

1. Center of Animal Husbandry Technology extension Service on Shanxi Province, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030001, China;
2. College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. Junbaocheng of Shuozhou City Agricultural Science and Technology Limited-liability Company, Shanyin, Shanxi Province 036900, China;
4. Datong Qianye Pasture Science and Technology Limited Company, Tianzhen, Shanxi Province 038200, China

Received:2024-05-09 Revised:2024-06-27 Published:2024-11-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 炭疽病(Colletotrichum cereale)和叶斑病(Drechslera avenace)是饲用燕麦(Avena sativa)上的主要病害，常复合发生，严重影响草产品的经济收益。为筛选能同时防治两种病害的杀菌剂，选择不同靶标位点的3种新型杀菌剂，设置单独喷施和复配喷施处理，评价对炭疽病和叶斑病的田间防效和对干草产量、品质的影响。结果表明，单独喷施0.95 L·ha^-1用药量的25%吡唑醚菌酯悬浮剂和20%氟唑菌酰羟胺悬浮剂，分别对炭疽病和叶斑病的相对防效达90.4%和83.8%，复配喷施对两种病害的相对防效均达到90%以上，而中生菌素对这两种病害的防效不佳。25%吡唑醚菌酯悬浮剂和20%氟唑菌酰羟胺悬浮剂复配喷施后，干草产量和主要营养品质指标均较对照有显著提升，其中干草产量增幅达41.2%，可溶性碳水化合物、粗蛋白和相对饲喂价值的增幅分别为31.1%，16.9%和26.7%。同时，感官颜色由焦黄色转变为青绿色，满足了商品干草的基本要求。推荐25%吡唑醚菌酯悬浮剂和20%氟唑菌酰羟胺悬浮剂分别作为炭疽病和叶斑病的防治药剂，如病害复合发生，可按推荐剂量复配喷施防治。

关键词: 燕麦, 炭疽病, 内脐蠕孢, 叶斑病, 复合病害, 化学防治

Abstract: Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum cereale and leaf spot disease caused by Drechslera avenace are the main diseases on feed oats. Anthracnose and leaf spot often occur in combination,seriously affecting the economic benefits of oat products. In order to screen the fungicides that can control both diseases at the same time,three new fungicides with different target sites were selected,and the spraying treatment was set up to evaluate the field control efficiency of anthrax and leaf spot disease and the influence on the yield and quality of hay. The results showed that the recommended doses of 25% pyrazoxystrobin suspension and 20% fluconazole hydroxylamine suspension were sprayed separately,with relative control effects on anthracnose and leaf spot disease reaching 90.4% and 83.8%,respectively. The relative control effect of compound spraying on the two diseases reached over 90%. After the combination and spraying of two pesticides,the hay yield and main nutritional quality indicators were significantly improved compared to the control group with water,with a 41.2% increase in hay yield and 31.1%,16.9%,and 26.7% increase in soluble carbohydrates,crude protein,and relative feeding value,respectively. In addition,after compound spraying,the sensory color changed from burnt yellow to turquoise,meeting the basic requirements of commercial hay. Therefore,using 25% pyrazoxystrobin suspension and 20% fluconazole hydroxylamine suspension as control agents for anthracnose and leaf spot disease were recommended. If the disease occurred in combination,the recommended dosage could be sprayed for prevention and control.

Key words: Oat, Anthracnose, Drechslera avenace, Leaf spot, Multiple disease, Chemical control

中图分类号:

S435.4

张婷, 张金凤, 赵弋锐, 孙小涵, 杨子森, 王研, 韩伟, 赵祥, 高鹏. 不同杀菌剂对饲用燕麦炭疽病和叶斑病复合病害的田间防效评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3619-3627.

ZHANG Ting, ZHANG Jin-feng, ZHAO Yi-rui, SUN Xiao-han, YANG Zi-seng, WANG Yan, HAN Wei, ZHAO Xiang, GAO Peng. Evaluation of Field Control Efficacies against Anthracnose and Leaf Spot on Oat[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3619-3627.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I11/3619

参考文献

[1] GORASH A,ARMONIENE R,FE·TCH J M,et al. Aspects in oat breeding:nutrition quality,nakedness and disease resistance,challenges and perspectives[J]. Annals of Applied Biology,2017,171(3):281-302
[2] 张琦,魏臻武,闫天芳,等. 燕麦种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性的鉴定评价[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(2):309-316
[3] 赵桂琴,慕平,魏黎明. 饲用燕麦研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(4):116-125
[4] 王加亭,陈志宏. 中国草业统计(2020)[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2020:82
[5] 李春杰,陈泰祥,赵桂琴,等. 燕麦病害研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(12):203-222
[6] 高鹏,魏江铭,李瑶,等. 山西省大同市早播饲用燕麦叶部真菌病害病原鉴定及影响因素分析[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(6):82-93
[7] 石永红,高鹏,方志红,等. 15个进口饲用燕麦品种炭疽病的抗病性评价及损失分析[J]. 草业学报,2023,32(9):130-142
[8] 南志标. 建立中国的牧草病害可持续管理体系[J]. 草业学报,2000,9(2):1-9
[9] 袁军海,曹丽霞,石碧红,等. 冀西北地区燕麦主栽品种(系)对叶斑病抗性鉴定[J]. 中国植保导刊,2014,34(2):31-33
[10] 李霜,杜桂林,尹晓飞,等. 我国饲草重大病虫鼠害研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报,2020,36(1):9-16
[11] UMETSU N,SHIRAI Y. Development of novel pesticides in the 21^st century[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science,2020,45(2):54-74
[12] MAY W E,AMES N,IRVINE R B,et al. Are fungicide applications to control crown rust of oat beneficial? [J] Canadian Journal of Plant Science,2014,94(5):911-922
[13] BANYAL D K,SOOD V K,SINGH A,et al. Integrated management of oat diseases in north-western Himalaya[J]. Range Management and Agroforestry,2016,37(1):84-87
[14] 张睿芳,赵桂琴,曾亮,等. 不同生防药剂对燕麦叶斑病的防治效果[J]. 草业科学,2022,39(11):2393-2402
[15] 高鹏,刘琳,刘昀鑫,等. 不同作用机制杀菌剂对燕麦炭疽病病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(9):1737-1744
[16] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,1993:19-61
[17] PLAYNE M J,MCDONALD P. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1966,17(6):264-268
[18] VAN SOEST V P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiber，neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597
[19] SELBY A D,MANNS T F. Studies in diseases of cereals and grasses[J]. Ohio of Agricultural Experiment Station,1909(203):195-203
[20] LIU F,MA Z Y,HOU L W,et al. Updating species diversity of Colletotrichum,with a phylogenomic overview[J]. Studies in Mycology,2022,101(1):1-56
[21] CROUCH J A,BEIRN L A. Anthracnose of cereals and grasses[J]. Fungal Diversity,2009,39(12):19-44
[22] 何苏琴,荆卓琼,赵桂琴,等. 内蒙古自治区乌兰察布市燕麦炭疽病病原鉴定[J]. 植物保护,2015,41(3):68-72
[23] 李瑶. 山西省朔州市饲用燕麦炭疽病的病原鉴定、发生特征及影响因素分析[D]. 太谷:山西农业大学,2021:22-24
[24] CHEN H,XUE L H,WHITE J F,et al. Identification and characterization of Pyrenophora species causing leaf spot on oat (Avena sativa) in western China[J]. Plant Pathology,2021,71(3):566-577
[25] 何苏琴,文朝慧,白滨,等. 燕麦紫斑病的病原[J]. 菌物学报,2021,40(7):1-13
[26] ZHANG J G,NI X M,ZHAO G Q. First report of leaf spot caused by Alternaria brassicae on Avena sativa in China[J]. Plant Disease,2021,105(11):3750
[27] 张笑宇,孙雪梅,周洪友,等. 燕麦叶斑病病原菌鉴定及其生物学特性[J]. 植物保护学报,2017,44(3):473-480
[28] 刘万友,吕世杰,孙雪梅,等. 内蒙古燕麦叶斑病的发生及其影响因素[J]. 植物保护学报,2022,49(2):553-558
[29] 冶福春,马文林,杨晓龙. 枯草芽胞杆菌Qh-618对燕麦叶斑病防治效果研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报,2021,37(4):785-795
[30] TOLLENAERE C,SUSI H,LAINE A L. Evolutionary and epidemiological implications of multiple infection in plants[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2016,21(1):80-90
[31] FITT B D,HUANG Y J,BOSCH F V D,et al. Coexistence of related pathogen species on arable crops in space and time[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology,2006(44):163-182
[32] CLARK R V,WALLEN V R,GALWAY D A,et al. Effects of maneb fungicide on seed yield and protein content of oat cultivars[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,1986,8(3):323-327
[33] 赵国康,李焰,张树武,等. 5种植物源农药对苹果斑点落叶病的防效评价[J]. 中国南方果树,2020,5(3):46-49
[34] 刘振兴,周桂梅,陈健,等. 几种生物农药对绿豆叶斑病的防治效果[J]. 作物杂质,2018,33(6):154-157
[35] 王文桥,马平,张小风,等. 生物源杀菌剂与化学药剂协调防控番茄病害[J]. 植物保护学报,2011,38(1):75-80
[36] 张玉霞,王国基,姚拓,等. 燕麦散黑穗病防治药剂筛选及其对燕麦幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(3):616-622
[37] GRUBER B R,KRUGER E L,MCMANUS P S. Effects of cherry leaf spot on photosynthesis in tart cherry ‘Montmorency’ foliage[J]. Phytopathology,2012,102(7):656-661
[38] 红敏,高民,卢德勋,等. 粗饲料品质评定指数新一代分级指数的建立及与分级指数(GI2001)和饲料相对值(RFV)的比较研究[J]. 动物营养学报,2011,23(8):1296-1302

不同杀菌剂对饲用燕麦炭疽病和叶斑病复合病害的田间防效评价

Evaluation of Field Control Efficacies against Anthracnose and Leaf Spot on Oat

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	白瑞, 关皓, 李海萍, 王笑寒, 汪辉, 陈仕勇. 初次刈割时间和乳酸菌剂对再生燕麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2982-2989.
[2]	朱昊, 张荟荟, 张学洲, 梁维维, 阿斯娅·曼力克, 管廷贤, 王学敏. 新疆昌吉15个引进饲用燕麦品种的生产性能综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2151-2157.
[3]	张乐, 李欢, 李祥, 朱海霞. 燕麦镰刀菌HY-041可湿性粉剂的制备及除草研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1650-1656.
[4]	包文龙, 任家辉, 张腾薇, 赵金梅, 王照兰, 王凤梧, 唐加高, 殷国梅, 韩云鹏, 孙娟娟. 12个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布生产力的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176.
[5]	铁晓龙, 张英, 马林雄, 道日娜, 汪焱, 雷生妍. 三江源区燕麦根际PGPR菌株功能多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 693-702.
[6]	米春娇, 洪流, 马馼, 毛培胜. 谷胱甘肽引发对老化燕麦种子发芽与幼苗生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 928-934.
[7]	吴瑞, 刘文辉, 梁国玲, 刘凯强, 琚泽亮. 燕麦AsGRAS36基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3371-3382.
[8]	常建萍, 倪如原, 贺晨帮, 芦光新, 刘钟歌, 来有鹏, 祁鹤兴. 青贮玉米近壳多胞叶斑病菌的分离鉴定及其致病性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3400-3407.
[9]	马小龙, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 崔文静, 贾志锋. 氮肥减施与施氮时期对高寒区燕麦光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3215-3224.
[10]	王凤宇, 梁国玲, 刘文辉. 590份燕麦种质资源营养器官表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 158-167.
[11]	南铭, 柴继宽, 景芳, 张丽娟, 闵庚梅, 刘亚锋, 刘彦明, 李晶, 赵桂琴. 燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2582-2589.
[12]	孙艳楠, 路耿新, 唐超, 李冠义, 王欣欣, 时梓涵, 张明飞. 134份皮燕麦种质资源生物学性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2684-2692.
[13]	李红玉, 王聪聪, 夏方山, 杨轩, 李尹琳, 张杰敏. 抗坏血酸引发对燕麦老化种子胚细胞抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2392-2398.
[14]	何纪桐, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 刘勇, 刘凯强, 马小龙, 贾志锋. 高寒区燕麦蚕豆间作比例对光合特性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2399-2408.
[15]	彭靖涵, 程明军, 董志晓, 雷雄, 苟文龙, 刘岳华, 陈书明, 田科, 刘伟, 马啸. 12个饲用燕麦品种在四川的适应性评价分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2128-2136.